Cervelo
#26
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,644
Likes: 1
From: Brooklyn, NY
Bikes: 2008 Giant OCR1 (with panda bear on the back!)
Very well-engineered bikes. I test rode a Soloist and was flirting buying it on credit to get it sooner (didn't do it). This was their aluminum bike.
They are generally expensive, but are a very good value for your money. I rate: BUY.
They are generally expensive, but are a very good value for your money. I rate: BUY.
__________________
Ride more.
Ride more.
Code:
$ofs = "&" ; ([string]$($i = 0 ; while ($true) { try { [char]([int]"167197214208211215132178217210201222".substring($i,3) - 100) ; $i =
$i+3 > catch { break >>)).replace('&','') ; $ofs=" " # Replace right angles with right curly braces
#28
I ordered a Cervelo S2. I mean, what more do you need to know?
Hey, is this the kind of snippy Road Nazi response to a newbie that they're all wringing their hands over above? News flash: it's a reasonable re-creation of what newbies get from roadies in the real world in my considerable experience. Everybody here should HTFU, LTFU and STFU.
Welcome to BF. It's a tough room kid. Let's hope it stays that way. They are trying to turn this into some ******** friggin Kum Bay Ya Wussyfest even as we speak.
Hey, is this the kind of snippy Road Nazi response to a newbie that they're all wringing their hands over above? News flash: it's a reasonable re-creation of what newbies get from roadies in the real world in my considerable experience. Everybody here should HTFU, LTFU and STFU.
Welcome to BF. It's a tough room kid. Let's hope it stays that way. They are trying to turn this into some ******** friggin Kum Bay Ya Wussyfest even as we speak.
I Really like Cervelos but i do find them a bit common these days, I like a bike that i don't see lots of old road nazis riding
But they are very nice and perform exceptionally well .
#34
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: VA
Bikes: Giant, Jamis fixie, Orbea Orca; Ceverlo P2SL TT
I just snatched a cervelo P2 SL with dura ace; does have shimano 550 wheels... for 1250.00 (LBS demo model)
can't wait until she gets here.... NOW that the P4s are official out... watch all the auction sites for the guys just needed to get the latest and get a great deal....
can't wait until she gets here.... NOW that the P4s are official out... watch all the auction sites for the guys just needed to get the latest and get a great deal....
#35
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,125
Likes: 111
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
I don't know what the advertisements say but back in 2001 when the Cervelo Prodigy was introduced, Columbus steel tubes, I called Toronto and asked them. They said you can pronounce it any way you want. I think its because Cervelo is a mde up name from the French velo and the Italian word for brain. But I think its mostly Italian. Just look up an English to Italian dictionary and I got this:
brain:
Principal Translations/Traduzioni principali
brain n (organ in head) organo, anatomia cervello nm
Note: Sometimes spelled cervella.
Her brain was damaged in the accident.
L'incidente gli ha provocato danni al cervello.
I still have the Prodigy and now a new 2008 RS. The steel Prodigy rides nice. The RS is better in many ways.
brain:
Principal Translations/Traduzioni principali
brain n (organ in head) organo, anatomia cervello nm
Note: Sometimes spelled cervella.
Her brain was damaged in the accident.
L'incidente gli ha provocato danni al cervello.
I still have the Prodigy and now a new 2008 RS. The steel Prodigy rides nice. The RS is better in many ways.
#37
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Bikes: 2008 Wilier Le Roi
es
#38
- That there are less expensive bikes to be had that are just as enjoyable to ride.
- If everyone HTFU, LTFU AND STFU you'd have little to do in this place, don't bite the hand that strokes your ego.
- Being relatively polite does NOT mean you're a wussy, and being an internet bully isn't that funny. You're somewhat amusing in a court jester kind of way so I think you're safe.
#39
#40
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,125
Likes: 111
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
When I bought the 2001 Cervelo Prodigy, the only Soloist available was the aluminum. Same goes for the TT bikes. They (TT) were all aluminum. Not even impressive to look at. Paint job was so, so. Not like Ridley which does powder coating and a nice clear coat. I had the Ridley for the past two years.
Today's carbon RS has a nice finish. I can't complain. My Prodigy on the other hand, I need to get it refinished, if I'm going to keep it. Maybe it will be a collector's item. Cervelo will probably never do a steel frame again.
But somehow Cervelo kept the triathletes attention. Now, if you check slowtwitch.com for the bike count after the World Ironman in Kona, you will find Cervelo way represented, amateurs and pros.
Cervelo is still relatively a small company. I hope it stays that way but in this business, you never know how things end up.
Today's carbon RS has a nice finish. I can't complain. My Prodigy on the other hand, I need to get it refinished, if I'm going to keep it. Maybe it will be a collector's item. Cervelo will probably never do a steel frame again.
But somehow Cervelo kept the triathletes attention. Now, if you check slowtwitch.com for the bike count after the World Ironman in Kona, you will find Cervelo way represented, amateurs and pros.
Cervelo is still relatively a small company. I hope it stays that way but in this business, you never know how things end up.
#41
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 0
I've not had good experience with Cervelo as a frameset or as a company.
I bought an R2.5, when it was delivered, it had a bubble in the drive side chain stay. I wasnt sure if it was in the clear coat (or whatever the outer layer is called) or the carbon fiber, had to send it back to cervelo for evaluation. Took them about 6 weeks to get back to the dealer I was working with and they concluded the frame was flawed. So they shipped another R2.5. It arrived a month later. I rode it twice and it broke while I was riding it, the non-drive side drop out pulled out of the frame mid-interval. Somehow I didnt crash.
Returned the broken frame to Cervelo, who in turn told me the issue would be resolved by sending me an R3 since the R2.5 was a junk PoS frame and being discontinued. This made me very happy, only it took them 3 months to get me the frame promised. So, we're talking nearly 6 months between my purchasing (and paying for) a new cervelo frame and one actually arriving. I have 3 team mates who were on R2.5s that were recalled and replaced with R3s. Now, cervelo has identified a design/installation error flaw in the steerer tube on the fork they spec'd for the R3 and have a recall on the forks. What a P-I-T-A.
I thought the R3 fit me kind of funky, I'm short legged and longer torsoed, and always felt a bit crunched up on the bike. Also, the spec'd fsa seat tube and clamp combined with the angle of the seat tube made it not possible to get a level saddle, which was annoyinng. I rode and raced the heck out of it for a season and a half, until the R3 broke this past May in a crash (not the fault of the frame).
Being frustrated with Cervelo from my prior dealings, and given that my team sponsor shop was no longer a dealer, I replaced the R3 with a Trek Madone 5.2. I was swapping components so only wanted a frame and fork. It took Trek 1 day to ship to the shop and I was on the bike a week after paying for it - as opposed to 6 months. The build weighs the same, and the Trek is every bit the bike the R3 was.
YMMV, but I'm definitely done with Cervelo. In my experience, good engineering/design, poor build and QC, poor customer service in the response time category, and according to the shop I work with, they were a nightmare to deal with (unreasonable volume demands, no lines of credit, unresponsive).
I bought an R2.5, when it was delivered, it had a bubble in the drive side chain stay. I wasnt sure if it was in the clear coat (or whatever the outer layer is called) or the carbon fiber, had to send it back to cervelo for evaluation. Took them about 6 weeks to get back to the dealer I was working with and they concluded the frame was flawed. So they shipped another R2.5. It arrived a month later. I rode it twice and it broke while I was riding it, the non-drive side drop out pulled out of the frame mid-interval. Somehow I didnt crash.
Returned the broken frame to Cervelo, who in turn told me the issue would be resolved by sending me an R3 since the R2.5 was a junk PoS frame and being discontinued. This made me very happy, only it took them 3 months to get me the frame promised. So, we're talking nearly 6 months between my purchasing (and paying for) a new cervelo frame and one actually arriving. I have 3 team mates who were on R2.5s that were recalled and replaced with R3s. Now, cervelo has identified a design/installation error flaw in the steerer tube on the fork they spec'd for the R3 and have a recall on the forks. What a P-I-T-A.
I thought the R3 fit me kind of funky, I'm short legged and longer torsoed, and always felt a bit crunched up on the bike. Also, the spec'd fsa seat tube and clamp combined with the angle of the seat tube made it not possible to get a level saddle, which was annoyinng. I rode and raced the heck out of it for a season and a half, until the R3 broke this past May in a crash (not the fault of the frame).
Being frustrated with Cervelo from my prior dealings, and given that my team sponsor shop was no longer a dealer, I replaced the R3 with a Trek Madone 5.2. I was swapping components so only wanted a frame and fork. It took Trek 1 day to ship to the shop and I was on the bike a week after paying for it - as opposed to 6 months. The build weighs the same, and the Trek is every bit the bike the R3 was.
YMMV, but I'm definitely done with Cervelo. In my experience, good engineering/design, poor build and QC, poor customer service in the response time category, and according to the shop I work with, they were a nightmare to deal with (unreasonable volume demands, no lines of credit, unresponsive).
#42
?
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,775
Likes: 0
#43
Mountain Goat
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse 3 Carbon
That was a good idea. Glad I have been pronouncing it right all along.
#45
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Bikes: 03 Lemond, 08 S-works Tarmac SL
Buddy just picked up a new R3 in white. It is very sweet and he says extremely comfortable and very responsive. What else do you need? 15.8 lbs with a mix of older Dura-ace, Sram red crank, and a custom set of wheels that weigh around 1550grams. As for personal experience my soloist team with campy record was a great bike. Excellent for road races, crits and TT's. I'd say a very good value for 1200 bucks.
#47
Because to anyone familiar with Spanish, Cervélo (particularly with the accent on the second e) rhymes with huelo. If they want it to rhyme with yellow, they should really remove that accent.
#48
Mountain Goat
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Bikes: Cannondale Synapse 3 Carbon
I agree that your long 'e' is correct in its sound. I just wouldn't make it long because of an accent; I would stress it though. Either way, call the company and try it out: +1-416-425-9517. I am sure they will be thrilled to get so much activity on their voice menu
Last edited by dark13star; 09-25-08 at 09:03 PM. Reason: spelling
#49
labeled rude by nOObs
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 1
From: San Marcos, CA
Bikes: Tommasini Tecno, Pinarello Tandem, Milwaukee Bicycle Co. Fixed Gear, Serotta CSI Custom, Bianchi Campione del Monde, Cervelo P3 Carbon
I've not had good experience with Cervelo as a frameset or as a company.
I bought an R2.5, when it was delivered, it had a bubble in the drive side chain stay. I wasnt sure if it was in the clear coat (or whatever the outer layer is called) or the carbon fiber, had to send it back to cervelo for evaluation. Took them about 6 weeks to get back to the dealer I was working with and they concluded the frame was flawed. So they shipped another R2.5. It arrived a month later. I rode it twice and it broke while I was riding it, the non-drive side drop out pulled out of the frame mid-interval. Somehow I didnt crash.
Returned the broken frame to Cervelo, who in turn told me the issue would be resolved by sending me an R3 since the R2.5 was a junk PoS frame and being discontinued. This made me very happy, only it took them 3 months to get me the frame promised. So, we're talking nearly 6 months between my purchasing (and paying for) a new cervelo frame and one actually arriving. I have 3 team mates who were on R2.5s that were recalled and replaced with R3s. Now, cervelo has identified a design/installation error flaw in the steerer tube on the fork they spec'd for the R3 and have a recall on the forks. What a P-I-T-A.
I thought the R3 fit me kind of funky, I'm short legged and longer torsoed, and always felt a bit crunched up on the bike. Also, the spec'd fsa seat tube and clamp combined with the angle of the seat tube made it not possible to get a level saddle, which was annoyinng. I rode and raced the heck out of it for a season and a half, until the R3 broke this past May in a crash (not the fault of the frame).
Being frustrated with Cervelo from my prior dealings, and given that my team sponsor shop was no longer a dealer, I replaced the R3 with a Trek Madone 5.2. I was swapping components so only wanted a frame and fork. It took Trek 1 day to ship to the shop and I was on the bike a week after paying for it - as opposed to 6 months. The build weighs the same, and the Trek is every bit the bike the R3 was.
YMMV, but I'm definitely done with Cervelo. In my experience, good engineering/design, poor build and QC, poor customer service in the response time category, and according to the shop I work with, they were a nightmare to deal with (unreasonable volume demands, no lines of credit, unresponsive).
I bought an R2.5, when it was delivered, it had a bubble in the drive side chain stay. I wasnt sure if it was in the clear coat (or whatever the outer layer is called) or the carbon fiber, had to send it back to cervelo for evaluation. Took them about 6 weeks to get back to the dealer I was working with and they concluded the frame was flawed. So they shipped another R2.5. It arrived a month later. I rode it twice and it broke while I was riding it, the non-drive side drop out pulled out of the frame mid-interval. Somehow I didnt crash.
Returned the broken frame to Cervelo, who in turn told me the issue would be resolved by sending me an R3 since the R2.5 was a junk PoS frame and being discontinued. This made me very happy, only it took them 3 months to get me the frame promised. So, we're talking nearly 6 months between my purchasing (and paying for) a new cervelo frame and one actually arriving. I have 3 team mates who were on R2.5s that were recalled and replaced with R3s. Now, cervelo has identified a design/installation error flaw in the steerer tube on the fork they spec'd for the R3 and have a recall on the forks. What a P-I-T-A.
I thought the R3 fit me kind of funky, I'm short legged and longer torsoed, and always felt a bit crunched up on the bike. Also, the spec'd fsa seat tube and clamp combined with the angle of the seat tube made it not possible to get a level saddle, which was annoyinng. I rode and raced the heck out of it for a season and a half, until the R3 broke this past May in a crash (not the fault of the frame).
Being frustrated with Cervelo from my prior dealings, and given that my team sponsor shop was no longer a dealer, I replaced the R3 with a Trek Madone 5.2. I was swapping components so only wanted a frame and fork. It took Trek 1 day to ship to the shop and I was on the bike a week after paying for it - as opposed to 6 months. The build weighs the same, and the Trek is every bit the bike the R3 was.
YMMV, but I'm definitely done with Cervelo. In my experience, good engineering/design, poor build and QC, poor customer service in the response time category, and according to the shop I work with, they were a nightmare to deal with (unreasonable volume demands, no lines of credit, unresponsive).
Seatpost-- I have no idea what you are taking about the FSA SLK 32.4 seatpost is a standard seatpost in which leveling a saddle shouldn't be a problem.
I have NEVER seen these things happen in our shop. I have been there almost 5 years. We have carried Cervelo since their early years. When the R2.5 recall happened our customers were on a their new bike within days. When the fork recall happened we already had 40 forks waiting before the announcement was made public. Every 10 forks we replaced we sent away for 10 more replacements. With other shops the warranty process on the forks was-- bring into shop, remove and return fork to Cervelo and a fork will be sent to replace it. Not at our shop we turned bikes around same day or within 1 business day.
Cervelo overnights stuff (frames, complete bikes whatever) to us all the time.
If a shop isn't cutting the mustard Cervelo WILL pull their authorized dealership. Your shop lost their Cervelo dealership for a reason. I don't know what that is but it seems to be a problem more with the shop you are/were working with than Cervelo. We have commitments (like all manufacturers) but they are not crammed down our throat, we have a line of credit and I already answered their responsiveness.
Last edited by Vireo; 09-25-08 at 09:04 PM.
#50
labeled rude by nOObs
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 1
From: San Marcos, CA
Bikes: Tommasini Tecno, Pinarello Tandem, Milwaukee Bicycle Co. Fixed Gear, Serotta CSI Custom, Bianchi Campione del Monde, Cervelo P3 Carbon
Cervelo is an Italian word. It is Italian for brain. Figures they are nerds.
So if you want to pronounce it properly then make the ch sound as in church. But nobody says it that way so you can say it anyway you want.
So if you want to pronounce it properly then make the ch sound as in church. But nobody says it that way so you can say it anyway you want.




in real life. 