Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

1989 Cannondale 3.0 worth it?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

1989 Cannondale 3.0 worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-04, 03:58 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
1989 Cannondale 3.0 worth it?

I used to be into bicycling long distance and in 1989 I bought a Cannondale 3.0 Aluminum series with Shimano 105 gear train. I haven't ridden it since the early 90's when I moved from Charleston South Carolina. While I lived in Connecticut (US Navy keeps me goin') I got into Mountain biking and haven't ridden the Cannondale since. In November I moved to Northern Virginia and recently bought a Specialized Hardrock Mountain bike. I've found that many of the trails are paved and in very good shape and you can ride 50-60 miles or more on some of them.

Here's my question...while I'm getting a good workout with the mountain bike (25-35 mile rides) the urge to go further and further is setting in and I'm asking for opinions on whether (if it were you) would get the Cannondale tuned up and going again (it's in excellent shape and very clean) or if I should just wait until next year (maybe) and cough up the cash for a new bike. When I bought it it was a $800 bike and even the red paint is clean (except the back forks, from leaning on things). Not sure about flat spots on the Wolber rims. Thanks in advance and...later
thingsbike is offline  
Old 05-21-04, 04:05 PM
  #2  
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity

Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by thingsbike
I used to be into bicycling long distance and in 1989 I bought a Cannondale 3.0 Aluminum series with Shimano 105 gear train. I haven't ridden it since the early 90's when I moved from Charleston South Carolina. While I lived in Connecticut (US Navy keeps me goin') I got into Mountain biking and haven't ridden the Cannondale since. In November I moved to Northern Virginia and recently bought a Specialized Hardrock Mountain bike. I've found that many of the trails are paved and in very good shape and you can ride 50-60 miles or more on some of them.

Here's my question...while I'm getting a good workout with the mountain bike (25-35 mile rides) the urge to go further and further is setting in and I'm asking for opinions on whether (if it were you) would get the Cannondale tuned up and going again (it's in excellent shape and very clean) or if I should just wait until next year (maybe) and cough up the cash for a new bike. When I bought it it was a $800 bike and even the red paint is clean (except the back forks, from leaning on things). Not sure about flat spots on the Wolber rims. Thanks in advance and...later
Maybe $50 for a tuneup so you can save for a new one/ Your'e kidding right. Tune it up and ride. BTW bikes don't have "back forks"
__________________
Raiyn is offline  
Old 05-21-04, 04:12 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I know they're not called forks but I couldn't think of it at the time...oops!
thingsbike is offline  
Old 05-21-04, 06:18 PM
  #4  
Evil Genius
 
capsicum's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sumner, WA
Posts: 1,529

Bikes: '92 novara ponderosa, '74 schwinn le tour, Novara fusion, novara transfer, novara randonee(2), novara careema pro, novara bonita(2).

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
seat stays (upper) or chain stays(lower; either side not just the chain side) as a whole its the rear triangle.
capsicum is offline  
Old 05-21-04, 07:17 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks, I kept thinking downstays but just couldn't get it...
thingsbike is offline  
Old 05-21-04, 07:21 PM
  #6  
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I wouldn't bother getting a new bike, especially if you ride primarily mountain. 105 is pretty decent stuff, and the 3.0 is a pretty decent frame for its time.
seely is offline  
Old 05-21-04, 07:25 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thingsbike - I think it depends on what shape the bike is in, how serious you are, and how much it will cost to get it running smoothly. I assume you have downtube index shifters and will need a fresh set of tires and a tune up. How many miles are on the drive train ? Ride it for awhile and if you get more serious, use it as a beater back-up. I had a 1988 Cannondale 3.0 that I have used as a 2nd back-up beater. I loaned it to my brother-in-law a few years ago and he loaned it to someone else.
marnan is offline  
Old 05-22-04, 03:35 AM
  #8  
Pat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,794

Bikes: litespeed, cannondale

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by thingsbike
I used to be into bicycling long distance and in 1989 I bought a Cannondale 3.0 Aluminum series with Shimano 105 gear train. I haven't ridden it since the early 90's when I moved from Charleston South Carolina. While I lived in Connecticut (US Navy keeps me goin') I got into Mountain biking and haven't ridden the Cannondale since. In November I moved to Northern Virginia and recently bought a Specialized Hardrock Mountain bike. I've found that many of the trails are paved and in very good shape and you can ride 50-60 miles or more on some of them.

Here's my question...while I'm getting a good workout with the mountain bike (25-35 mile rides) the urge to go further and further is setting in and I'm asking for opinions on whether (if it were you) would get the Cannondale tuned up and going again (it's in excellent shape and very clean) or if I should just wait until next year (maybe) and cough up the cash for a new bike. When I bought it it was a $800 bike and even the red paint is clean (except the back forks, from leaning on things). Not sure about flat spots on the Wolber rims. Thanks in advance and...later
The Cannondale CAAD 3 with Shimano 105 is a perfectly functional bike. I would suggest you get it tuned up and checked over for road worthiness and ride it. It is still a good bicycle. I have one that I use as my backup bike and really I do just as well on it as I do on my Cannondale CAAD 5. After a certain point, improving the bike does not make much difference.
Pat is offline  
Old 05-22-04, 06:08 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 3,619
Liked 108 Times in 60 Posts
the CAAD 3 Is not a Cannondale 3.0. Still, cannondale is a good company, and that is a good bike. a 50 dollar tune up is definly worth it. go for it, man.
Phatman is offline  
Old 05-22-04, 06:50 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The flat spot on the rim may be fixed during the tune up.
DieselDan is offline  
Old 05-23-04, 09:14 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Big Bear
Posts: 210

Bikes: Fondriest & Serotta

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IMHO, ride it for now and save for a new one. You won't be able to upgrade the 3.0 due to the axle spacing of 126 mm. Since it is aluminium, you can not bend the chainstay to accept the current standard of 130 mm. Also, your components are a little obsolete so you may have trouble finding replacement parts
MtnMan is offline  
Old 05-23-04, 09:50 AM
  #12  
Crank Crushing Redneck
 
SamDaBikinMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: A van down by the river.
Posts: 2,600

Bikes: Bikes are environmentally damaging

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ride it and save for the new bike. "If it ain't broke then go out and buy a brand new one!" OoooPPSS, I mean "don't fix it"..
SamDaBikinMan is offline  
Old 05-27-04, 12:48 AM
  #13  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the input...I got an estimate of $170.00 for 2 new tires and tubes, 1 new brake cable and adjustment, Handlebar tape, true the back wheel and a couple minor adjustments...I went out and spent $85.00 on parts and did the work myself, the only thing I have left to do is put the tape on the handlebars. I understand they have to make a living but it took me about 45 minutes for the above work.

They said I didn't need a full tune up but what should I take apart and lubricate? 10 years is a long time for a bike to be sitting around (plus 5 years of riding).

Mtnman: Didn't think about parts being obsolete, hopefully they hold up for a year or two.

marnan: The bike really is in good shape. I rode it quite a bit for about 5 years but that was before kids and I had lots of time to tinker and keep it in excellent shape.
thingsbike is offline  
Old 05-27-04, 08:46 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Hubs and bottom bracket may need to be repacked or even have the bearings replaced.
DieselDan is offline  
Old 05-27-04, 09:13 AM
  #15  
auk
Coasting makes you grumpy
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,376

Bikes: Specialized Stumpjumper M2Comp; Habanero Ti-Team; Slingshot Road; 1962 converted Raliegh fixer aka: The Beast

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MtnMan
IMHO, ride it for now and save for a new one. You won't be able to upgrade the 3.0 due to the axle spacing of 126 mm. Since it is aluminium, you can not bend the chainstay to accept the current standard of 130 mm. Also, your components are a little obsolete so you may have trouble finding replacement parts
The 3.0 is not a 126mm spacing that I'm aware of and mine certainly was not. Came with 7spd, upgraded to 8spd STI, then to 9spd STI. I would measure the rear spacing first, but I'm near positive that it is going to be 130mm. It is a great frameset. Remember they (Cannondale) tended to use the same frame for all its Road series line. $400 bike had the same frame as the $2000 bike of it time. Ride it and enjoy. If the urge to continue grabs you, then upgrade either the components or the bike.

Dave
auk is offline  
Old 05-27-04, 12:59 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Big Bear
Posts: 210

Bikes: Fondriest & Serotta

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
7 speed = 126 mm

If you got a nine speed in your chainstays, you forced it in there and lived to tell about it
MtnMan is offline  
Old 05-27-04, 01:20 PM
  #17  
One knee is enough
 
SchreiberBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: East Central Illinois
Posts: 281

Bikes: 1978 Fuji - now fixed and pegged. 1980s Cannondale Touring - pegged with 18 speeds. 2001 Cannondale CADD 3 - not being ridden

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MtnMan
7 speed = 126 mm

If you got a nine speed in your chainstays, you forced it in there and lived to tell about it
During the transition from 126 to 130mm dropouts, at least some Cannondales were made with 130mm seven speed hubs. C-dale generally makes one frame design which they then use on a wide number of different models. The same frame (with different decals) is used on a high-end nine speed, then when they build up 7 speed wheels for the lower-end model, they add a spacer.
SchreiberBike is offline  
Old 05-27-04, 01:28 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Big Bear
Posts: 210

Bikes: Fondriest & Serotta

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I stand corrected. Thanks for the info.
MtnMan is offline  
Old 05-31-04, 12:53 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New tubes, tires, handlebar tape, sprockets cleaned and oiled, brake cable replaced, and a coat of wax...looks a little different than a few days ago. Including a $20 Cateye computer (to replace the ancient one), I have about $100 in it. Took it for a quick spin in between rain and it works like a champ. Needs a little adjusting on the rear derailer and the plastic part of the toe straps are broke on both sides (didn't notice that before) but other than that it's good to go.

Any suggestions on toe straps? I couldn't find the shoes that go with them anyway.
thingsbike is offline  
Old 05-31-04, 04:00 PM
  #20  
Perineal Pressurized
 
dobber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by thingsbike
Any suggestions on toe straps? I couldn't find the shoes that go with them anyway.
Go clipless, its the only way to pedal
dobber is offline  
Old 04-20-05, 10:27 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Humboldt county, CA
Posts: 70

Bikes: Le Tour

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have an 88 cannondale criterium and it has an 8spd cluster in the back. I love the bike, enjoy yours.
whiteshark is offline  
Old 04-21-05, 09:12 AM
  #22  
???What???
 
barleyrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland ish
Posts: 312

Bikes: Cervelo R2.5 - Cervelo P2k - Bianchi Vigorelli - Cannondale 3.0

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My 3.0 is currently being built back up. It has a 9 speed cluster in the back. the frame is as stiff as you'll find. every effort you put into the pedels goes into turing the wheels. I plan on keeping mine untill it won't function any more. When you have the chance to buy a new one, do as well. you can always use more bikes. I'm currently up to 6 myself.
barleyrocket is offline  
Old 04-21-05, 10:07 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
DieselDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beaufort, South Carolina, USA and surrounding islands.
Posts: 8,521

Bikes: Cannondale R500, Motobecane Messenger

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by MtnMan
7 speed = 126 mm

If you got a nine speed in your chainstays, you forced it in there and lived to tell about it
I have an older Cannondale 2.8 frame that will accept a 130mm rear hub. Mine may be spaced at 128mm.
DieselDan is offline  
Old 04-21-05, 12:13 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
marcusbandito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 278

Bikes: Voodoo Wanga, Waterford RS, Gitane SS

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride a 1995 Cannondale frame. I'm not sure what frame version though, anyone know?

Anyways, it came 7speed RSX and I upgraded to 9 speed. The rear measures out at 130mm.
marcusbandito is offline  
Old 04-21-05, 12:34 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Ebbtide's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ohio's Cycling Capital, America's North Coast.
Posts: 4,617
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I used to ride around Mayport and Charleston in the 80's. My friend had a Cannondale and I secretly drolled over (I had a plane jane nishiki). Today, I commute on a 87' Cannondale everyday. Get yours fixed up and start riding. I did put a 20.00 carbon fork off e-bay on it but it only helped the looks.

If you really feel the need to upgrade have at it, but you will not notice much difference between the old and new. I also have a new road bike to make that comparison, but thats just me.

GO NAVY!
Ebbtide is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.