Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Standard double, or compact

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Standard double, or compact

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-09, 12:46 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hendrick81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sandy Eggo
Posts: 2,129

Bikes: 2006 caad8, 2010 caad9 1, 2011 caad10 4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
Standard double, or compact

Just curious what percentage of you people here use standard double cranks, over compact, and what are the positives, and negatives of each.

Thanks
hendrick81 is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 12:53 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Compact for me. After some knee injuries and finding climbing really painfull on normal cranks I swapped to compact. Did't make me any better on the hills but at least now I can just sit and spin my way up.
sparrowlegs is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 01:01 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
daxr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: K.F., Orygun
Posts: 905

Bikes: 08 Giant Boulder, 08 Scattante XLR

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Compact for me, as I know I will never be a sprinter. With a 12-27 on the back, 50 is plenty on the big ring for the flats and descents, and 34 is small enough for any climb. A triple would just be carting around an extra ring all the time.
daxr is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 01:04 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC (originally from MA)
Posts: 331

Bikes: 2015 Niner RLT9 / 2006 Felt F5C / 2012 Stumpjumper

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm still fairly new to road riding so I still have a compact. I went from a CX front gearing 38/48 to a compact 34/50 and I'm still trying to get used to it.
rob! is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 01:09 PM
  #5  
impressive member
 
badhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: fort collins
Posts: 2,706

Bikes: c'dale supersix, jamis trilogy, spec. tricross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
just went from a triple to a compact with 11-28 in the back. theres a couple of big jumps in the back but i dont really mind and find that the range is worth it to me, and also i can pretty much climb el cap now if i had to.
badhat is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 01:14 PM
  #6  
Farmer tan
 
f4rrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 7,986

Bikes: Allez, SuperSix Evo

Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2870 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 23 Posts
I have a "triple-compact" 34/42/53 with 11-21 on the back. It's like the best of all three.
f4rrest is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 01:58 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 1,371
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Compact
Richard_Rides is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 02:30 PM
  #8  
Pretend Racer
 
dcvelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern Neck
Posts: 1,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hmm...okay. Standard, with 12-25 cassette, on both road bikes.
dcvelo is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 02:43 PM
  #9  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
53/39
umd is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 02:44 PM
  #10  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The positives or negatives of each are to use whichever is necessary to get the appropriate gearing for your fitness and typical riding terrain.
umd is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 03:02 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
hendrick81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sandy Eggo
Posts: 2,129

Bikes: 2006 caad8, 2010 caad9 1, 2011 caad10 4

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
Thanks for the info guys..
hendrick81 is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 03:15 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
MONGO!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Standard 52/39 (Campy), I could never get comfortable with a compact, though I was wishing for one on that 21% climb today...

Last edited by MONGO!; 05-02-09 at 05:01 PM.
MONGO! is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 04:07 PM
  #13  
impressive member
 
badhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: fort collins
Posts: 2,706

Bikes: c'dale supersix, jamis trilogy, spec. tricross

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
yeah i gues it'd be useful to qualify that i spend nearly all my roadie time climbing in the foothills/rockies and dont paceline or sprint.
badhat is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 04:45 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
fbxcore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 315
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
53/39 Standard

Few hills here, to get to the nearest hill worth mentioning it's a 40 mile loop in itself.
fbxcore is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 05:48 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Beverly Hills, MI
Posts: 590

Bikes: '72 Fuji Finest, '80 Austro-Daimler Inter 10, '06 Fuji Team Issue, '06 Salsa Las Cruces, Nashbar Frame single speed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Standard. Few hills here. If I had any hills to worry about I'd definitely want to try out a compact.
dperreno is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 06:13 PM
  #16  
Light-Weight by Design
 
Pi}{ie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 711

Bikes: TCR Carbon Limited

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Compact Double
Pi}{ie is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 06:14 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Standard on a tribike.

I'd caution anyone, especially new riders, that if you may possibly be riding mountain grade-roads at ANY time (even once!), get the compact. My standard gearing 53-39/12-25 is really tough on climbs exceeding 15% (steep). At super-steep climbs of 18-20% (rare, but they are often sought out by local bike clubs), odds are that if you're not a bike racer, you'll have to dismount on the climb.
agarose2000 is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 06:20 PM
  #18  
Live to ride ride to live
 
Carbon Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896

Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I don't have any experience with them, but an FSA compact crankset can accept chain rings larger than a 53 and smaller than a 50. The small chain ring can also accept a variety of chain ring sizes. However, I had heard from some that FSA cranksets do not shift as well as Campy or Shimano but I wouldn't know.

On an FSA you can use these TA 110MM

https://www.peterwhitecycles.com/chainrings.asp

Last edited by Carbon Unit; 05-02-09 at 06:25 PM.
Carbon Unit is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 06:25 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
yogi13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 1,113

Bikes: '06 Specialized Allez Expert

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've got both...compact on one bike, standard on the other. I suck at climbing, and having a 34-26 gear combo helps a lot with some of the climbs around here. I also like that with the compact I pretty much stay in the mid-range cassette cogs on flats and rollers. Main advantage of the standard tends to be on group rides; with the slightly closer gear ratios it's a little easier to match the pace of the group or paceline without under or over pedaling.
yogi13 is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 06:37 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Standard because I can take it...

Actually I would probably go with a compact and a small cassette in the back. Small gear jumps in the back and lighter weight.
ptle is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 07:16 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
JonnyV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bellwood, Pa
Posts: 1,679

Bikes: 2012 Fuji Altamira 1.0. 2017 Lynskey R250

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 5 Posts
Got through my first ride with a compact today. Normally ride a 52/39 but the tri-relay i'm doing is about 85% uphill so I borrowed a crank off one of our floor models. And the stuff said about the FSA Gossamer, unfortunately is all correct. Shifting is horrible. Can't wait for the Red compact crank to show up. Anyway, back on topic, I climbed one of the tougher climbs in the immediate area and though it wasn't a night and day difference there definitely was a difference. I think I'm a believer in the compact crank now.
JonnyV is offline  
Old 05-02-09, 08:30 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cobourg Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,206

Bikes: ParleeZ5/Parlee Chebacco/Trek Farley/Cannondale Slice/Burley Tandem

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 4 Posts
I'm actually going from a compact to a standard. Right now it's a 50-34 with 11-25 I can't remember the last time I was on 34-25 and the LBS group I ride with all pretty much ride standard so I thought I'd join the flock and give the standard a try. 53-39 with 11-26 Sram Force coming with my soon to arrive project one.
youcoming is offline  
Old 05-03-09, 12:02 AM
  #23  
climber has-been
 
terrymorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111

Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times in 1,793 Posts
Compact: 50-34 with a 12-27 cassette.

I'm a climber.
__________________
Ride, Rest, Repeat. ROUVY: terrymorse


terrymorse is offline  
Old 05-03-09, 12:10 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
53/39 and 12-25 or 11-23.

I race in Texas, but I have not had any problems climbing in AR with the 12-25. If you are racing, and you are not incredibly slow, I would say go with a standard.
bikeM3987 is offline  
Old 05-03-09, 12:11 AM
  #25  
crazy bike girl
 
msincredible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CA Central Coast
Posts: 3,325

Bikes: '07 Orbea Onix, '07 Birdy Yellow, '06 Cannondale Bad Boy (stolen)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Compact, I live and ride in the hills.
__________________
Countries I've ridden in: US, Canada, Ireland, UK, Germany, Netherlands, France, China, Singapore, Malaysia
States I've ridden in: Illinois, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, California, Nevada, Missouri, Colorado
msincredible is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.