Standard double, or compact
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Standard double, or compact
Just curious what percentage of you people here use standard double cranks, over compact, and what are the positives, and negatives of each.
Thanks
Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Compact for me. After some knee injuries and finding climbing really painfull on normal cranks I swapped to compact. Did't make me any better on the hills but at least now I can just sit and spin my way up.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: K.F., Orygun
Posts: 905
Bikes: 08 Giant Boulder, 08 Scattante XLR
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Compact for me, as I know I will never be a sprinter. With a 12-27 on the back, 50 is plenty on the big ring for the flats and descents, and 34 is small enough for any climb. A triple would just be carting around an extra ring all the time.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC (originally from MA)
Posts: 331
Bikes: 2015 Niner RLT9 / 2006 Felt F5C / 2012 Stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm still fairly new to road riding so I still have a compact. I went from a CX front gearing 38/48 to a compact 34/50 and I'm still trying to get used to it.
#5
impressive member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: fort collins
Posts: 2,706
Bikes: c'dale supersix, jamis trilogy, spec. tricross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
just went from a triple to a compact with 11-28 in the back. theres a couple of big jumps in the back but i dont really mind and find that the range is worth it to me, and also i can pretty much climb el cap now if i had to.
#6
Farmer tan
I have a "triple-compact" 34/42/53 with 11-21 on the back. It's like the best of all three.
#10
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The positives or negatives of each are to use whichever is necessary to get the appropriate gearing for your fitness and typical riding terrain.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Standard 52/39 (Campy), I could never get comfortable with a compact, though I was wishing for one on that 21% climb today...
Last edited by MONGO!; 05-02-09 at 05:01 PM.
#13
impressive member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: fort collins
Posts: 2,706
Bikes: c'dale supersix, jamis trilogy, spec. tricross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
yeah i gues it'd be useful to qualify that i spend nearly all my roadie time climbing in the foothills/rockies and dont paceline or sprint.
#15
Senior Member
Standard. Few hills here. If I had any hills to worry about I'd definitely want to try out a compact.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Standard on a tribike.
I'd caution anyone, especially new riders, that if you may possibly be riding mountain grade-roads at ANY time (even once!), get the compact. My standard gearing 53-39/12-25 is really tough on climbs exceeding 15% (steep). At super-steep climbs of 18-20% (rare, but they are often sought out by local bike clubs), odds are that if you're not a bike racer, you'll have to dismount on the climb.
I'd caution anyone, especially new riders, that if you may possibly be riding mountain grade-roads at ANY time (even once!), get the compact. My standard gearing 53-39/12-25 is really tough on climbs exceeding 15% (steep). At super-steep climbs of 18-20% (rare, but they are often sought out by local bike clubs), odds are that if you're not a bike racer, you'll have to dismount on the climb.
#18
Live to ride ride to live
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 4,896
Bikes: Calfee Tetra Pro
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't have any experience with them, but an FSA compact crankset can accept chain rings larger than a 53 and smaller than a 50. The small chain ring can also accept a variety of chain ring sizes. However, I had heard from some that FSA cranksets do not shift as well as Campy or Shimano but I wouldn't know.
On an FSA you can use these TA 110MM
https://www.peterwhitecycles.com/chainrings.asp
On an FSA you can use these TA 110MM
https://www.peterwhitecycles.com/chainrings.asp
Last edited by Carbon Unit; 05-02-09 at 06:25 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 1,113
Bikes: '06 Specialized Allez Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've got both...compact on one bike, standard on the other. I suck at climbing, and having a 34-26 gear combo helps a lot with some of the climbs around here. I also like that with the compact I pretty much stay in the mid-range cassette cogs on flats and rollers. Main advantage of the standard tends to be on group rides; with the slightly closer gear ratios it's a little easier to match the pace of the group or paceline without under or over pedaling.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,454
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Standard because I can take it...
Actually I would probably go with a compact and a small cassette in the back. Small gear jumps in the back and lighter weight.
Actually I would probably go with a compact and a small cassette in the back. Small gear jumps in the back and lighter weight.
#21
Senior Member
Got through my first ride with a compact today. Normally ride a 52/39 but the tri-relay i'm doing is about 85% uphill so I borrowed a crank off one of our floor models. And the stuff said about the FSA Gossamer, unfortunately is all correct. Shifting is horrible. Can't wait for the Red compact crank to show up. Anyway, back on topic, I climbed one of the tougher climbs in the immediate area and though it wasn't a night and day difference there definitely was a difference. I think I'm a believer in the compact crank now.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cobourg Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,206
Bikes: ParleeZ5/Parlee Chebacco/Trek Farley/Cannondale Slice/Burley Tandem
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
4 Posts
I'm actually going from a compact to a standard. Right now it's a 50-34 with 11-25 I can't remember the last time I was on 34-25 and the LBS group I ride with all pretty much ride standard so I thought I'd join the flock and give the standard a try. 53-39 with 11-26 Sram Force coming with my soon to arrive project one.
#23
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,111
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3432 Post(s)
Liked 3,567 Times
in
1,793 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
53/39 and 12-25 or 11-23.
I race in Texas, but I have not had any problems climbing in AR with the 12-25. If you are racing, and you are not incredibly slow, I would say go with a standard.
I race in Texas, but I have not had any problems climbing in AR with the 12-25. If you are racing, and you are not incredibly slow, I would say go with a standard.
#25
crazy bike girl
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CA Central Coast
Posts: 3,325
Bikes: '07 Orbea Onix, '07 Birdy Yellow, '06 Cannondale Bad Boy (stolen)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Compact, I live and ride in the hills.
__________________
Countries I've ridden in: US, Canada, Ireland, UK, Germany, Netherlands, France, China, Singapore, Malaysia
States I've ridden in: Illinois, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, California, Nevada, Missouri, Colorado
Countries I've ridden in: US, Canada, Ireland, UK, Germany, Netherlands, France, China, Singapore, Malaysia
States I've ridden in: Illinois, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, California, Nevada, Missouri, Colorado