![]() |
117F 20mph w/30mph gusts headwind feels special - a common summer commute condition
Competitively I like wind (and heat) as they seem to affect others more than they affect me. |
Originally Posted by chadteck
(Post 9070532)
Right, but what I'm saying is this (with really rough numbers):
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average. Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average. Headwind half distance: 15 mph average. Total average: 20 mph. I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course. |
Originally Posted by joe_5700
(Post 9071377)
I invite you to ride in the country in Nebraska (or myriads of other windy areas). You will be more than frustrated at times. I have been in headwinds on flats where 10mph in the drops was still a good workout.
|
Originally Posted by umd
(Post 9071348)
Just because it is not "intuitive" to you does not mean it is not blindingly obvious to others...
To summarize: I incorrectly assumed that a constant wind on an out and back course would have less effect than it actually does. I thought about it and did some reading, and understood why I was wrong. I posted my thoughts and a link for others that might have been curious about the subject. Despite my acknowledgement that my initial assumption was incorrect and an attempt to provide the correct information to any others that might be curious, you decided it was appropriate to mock me for thinking the way that I did ( even though I had already stated that I realized it was incorrect ). Are you arguing that I shouldn't have thought that way in the first place? Do you instantly know everything there is to know about a subject when you are first introduced to it? |
Originally Posted by chadteck
(Post 9072884)
I'm not posting any misinformation here, so I guess you take issue with me assuming that others might have initially thought the same way as I did?
To summarize: I incorrectly assumed that a constant wind on an out and back course would have less effect than it actually does. I thought about it and did some reading, and understood why I was wrong. I posted my thoughts and a link for others that might have been curious about the subject. Despite my acknowledgement that my initial assumption was incorrect and an attempt to provide the correct information to any others that might be curious, you decided it was appropriate to mock me for thinking the way that I did ( even though I had already stated that I realized it was incorrect ). Are you arguing that I shouldn't have thought that way in the first place? Do you instantly know everything there is to know about a subject when you are first introduced to it? |
Originally Posted by RideCO
(Post 9072948)
Sometimes tone is lost or confused on the internet, I doubt he meant to mock you.
|
As bad as 25-40mph headwinds are (that's all I've seen), you don't know what a workout is until you've done a few miles in 10+ inches of snow. You'll wish you were dead.
|
All of this might be a moot point if we keep mucking up the planet: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090610/...inishing_winds
(Before the flames begin (global warming play on words), I know that these are tentative findings and reported in a second party source; but upon seeing this in the morning, I thought immediately of this thread) |
Originally Posted by Tio
(Post 9077503)
All of this might be a moot point if we keep mucking up the planet: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090610/...inishing_winds
(Before the flames begin (global warming play on words), I know that these are tentative findings and reported in a second party source; but upon seeing this in the morning, I thought immediately of this thread) |
Originally Posted by Doohickie
(Post 9070247)
Wind is one thing, but when combined with heat it feels like I'm riding in a convection oven.
|
Originally Posted by Scorer75
(Post 9071408)
God, I love it when you talk dirty.
|
Originally Posted by shouldberiding
(Post 9074071)
As bad as 25-40mph headwinds are (that's all I've seen), you don't know what a workout is until you've done a few miles in 10+ inches of snow. You'll wish you were dead.
|
i like riding in the wind on hot days. it never feels hot. only when i stop do i realise how hot the day is.
where i normally ride, it always feels like coming back i am riding into a headwind but going out there was no tailwind. it's just not fair. |
Something that interests me in this equation is who suffers more -- little guys like me who blow around like leaves, or big guys with more "windage?"
In my experience, big guys (or girls) come out on top because they compensate with power. They even seem at an advantage with a tailwind too, 'cause they have more "sail area." I might be good in the hills but I sure suck in the wind. And it always blows on the coast! |
Originally Posted by Randochap
(Post 9077837)
Something that interests me in this equation is who suffers more -- little guys like me who blow around like leaves, or big guys with more "windage?"
In my experience, big guys (or girls) come out on top because they compensate with power. They even seem at an advantage with a tailwind too, 'cause they have more "sail area." I might be good in the hills but I sure suck in the wind. And it always blows on the coast! |
Originally Posted by coasting
(Post 9077782)
i like riding in the wind on hot days. it never feels hot. only when i stop do i realise how hot the day is.
|
Originally Posted by Velo Vol
(Post 9078063)
Have you ever even ridden on a hot day? 75F doesn't count as "hot."
|
All I know about wind (and the @$%*#@! wind we have here in MN seemingly all the time):
- It's a workout going into it. - It's a blast with it at your back. As long as a burn my calories for the ride (my primary goal) I don't care which....although the speed with a good 25mph constant MN tailwind is really a blast. Nothing like matching that fast wind at 20+ mph and barely hearing any wind rush as you pedal, looking down and seeing 25 mph on the speedo. Greatest feeling in the world....for this amateur noob anyway. When I get the itch to race I'll probably care more. :) |
Originally Posted by Randochap
(Post 9077837)
They even seem at an advantage with a tailwind too, 'cause they have more "sail area."
|
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
(Post 9070575)
Then in the real world, the second part of the problem is that for every wind angle other than 0 and 180, the fact that cross winds present themselves as more of a headwind when the force vectors are taken into consdieration. That's the point of the HED tool.
I didn't look at the tool, but the formula I've used since I was a kid is basically that the wind helps you for just over 90 degrees. It hurts you through most of the arc (sidewinds really slow you down) and even a wind coming from partially behind can either be no help or a hindrance. |
Originally Posted by Kotts
(Post 9071195)
In addition, a headwind hurts your road speed more than an equivalent tailwind helps it.
(At least as far as _wind_ is concerned. Eventually, as speeds increase due to a strong tailwind, rolling and bearing resistances become much more important.)
Originally Posted by Kotts
(Post 9071195)
The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases with the square of the speed increase. So, given the same power output, even though your "airspeed" decreases with the tailwind just as much as your "airspeed" increases with the headwind, your road speed is decreased more by the headwind than it is improved by the tailwind.
Originally Posted by umd
Just because it is not "intuitive" to you does not mean it is not blindingly obvious to others...
Originally Posted by Kotts View Post "In addition, a headwind hurts your road speed more than an equivalent tailwind helps it." Yes, I didn't want to muddy the waters with that more complex discussion. But I did cover it in my next post: Originally Posted by umd View Post "That's not taking into account that a 10mph wind doesn't affect each direction equally either..."
Originally Posted by mxl
Then in the real world, the second part of the problem is that for every wind angle other than 0 and 180, the fact that cross winds present themselves as more of a headwind when the force vectors are taken into consdieration. That's the point of the HED tool.
|
Originally Posted by Pedaleur
(Post 9078278)
This is ironic.
All I wrote was that "wind oesn't affect each direction equally either". I did not mean by "yes" to imply that I agreed with Kotts entire post (I must admit I did not actually read it very carefully), I was just aknowledging that there was more to the discussion. |
wind sucks ... err ... blows
whatever. |
Originally Posted by umd
(Post 9078401)
All I wrote was that "wind doesn't affect each direction equally either". I did not mean by "yes" to imply that I agreed with Kotts entire post (I must admit I did not actually read it very carefully), I was just aknowledging that there was more to the discussion.
|
Originally Posted by Pedaleur
(Post 9078278)
A side wind _might_ actually increase your speed.
One other thing that is completely left out of wind calculations is the fact that neither wind speed nor direction is constant which will cause rider speed and cadence to vary even if you are a clicker. This is less efficient. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.