Wind
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Wind
I hate the wind. Just completed my daily ride with a 2 mph lower average speed than I have been due to the wind.
This motivated me to do a bit of reading. I always knew that in an out and back course any wind, no matter the direction, would lead to increased completion time, but never really put too much thought in to it. On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true.
Here are some nice graphs. I particularly like the last one. A 25 mph wind at 0 degrees to the course increases completion time by ~22 minutes on a 25 mile out and back course.
Sure, everyone knows that wind is bad unless you are going one way with a tailwind, but this helps understand just how bad it is.
This motivated me to do a bit of reading. I always knew that in an out and back course any wind, no matter the direction, would lead to increased completion time, but never really put too much thought in to it. On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true.
Here are some nice graphs. I particularly like the last one. A 25 mph wind at 0 degrees to the course increases completion time by ~22 minutes on a 25 mile out and back course.
Sure, everyone knows that wind is bad unless you are going one way with a tailwind, but this helps understand just how bad it is.
#2
pan y agua

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,810
Likes: 1,232
From: Jacksonville
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
HED has a cool tool for calculating the Apparent Wind.
https://www.hedcycling.com/aerodynami...calculator.asp
All of this basically just confirms what every cyclist already knew, the vast majority of winds are headwinds.
https://www.hedcycling.com/aerodynami...calculator.asp
All of this basically just confirms what every cyclist already knew, the vast majority of winds are headwinds.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#4
You gonna eat that?
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14,917
Likes: 543
From: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
HED has a cool tool for calculating the Apparent Wind.
https://www.hedcycling.com/aerodynami...calculator.asp
https://www.hedcycling.com/aerodynami...calculator.asp
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
All of this basically just confirms what every cyclist already knew, the vast majority of winds are headwinds.
#6
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
This motivated me to do a bit of reading. I always knew that in an out and back course any wind, no matter the direction, would lead to increased completion time, but never really put too much thought in to it. On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true.
#7
ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: MD
Bikes: 2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.
Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.
Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.
Total average: 20 mph.
I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
#11
ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: MD
Bikes: 2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400
Right, but what I'm saying is this (with really rough numbers):
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.
Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.
Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.
Total average: 20 mph.
I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.
Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.
Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.
Total average: 20 mph.
I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.
20 mph, 20 miles = 1 hour
average speed = 20 mph
25 mph, 10 miles = 24 minutes
15 mph, 10 miles = 40 minutes
average speed = 18.75 mph
Last edited by timster; 06-09-09 at 12:23 PM.
#12
pan y agua

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,810
Likes: 1,232
From: Jacksonville
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Right, but what I'm saying is this (with really rough numbers):
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.
Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.
Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.
Total average: 20 mph.
I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.
Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.
Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.
Total average: 20 mph.
I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.
Rider 2 with a wind on the course does 25 miles an hour out, and 15 miles an hour back, Rider 2's time is 1:20
Rider 2 only averages 18.75 mph.
So part of the problem is as UMD says, you spend more time going into the headwind than you save with the tail.
Then in the real world, the second part of the problem is that for every wind angle other than 0 and 180, the fact that cross winds present themselves as more of a headwind when the force vectors are taken into consdieration. That's the point of the HED tool.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
Last edited by merlinextraligh; 06-09-09 at 12:27 PM.
#13
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Right, but what I'm saying is this (with really rough numbers):
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.
Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.
Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.
Total average: 20 mph.
I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.
Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.
Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.
Total average: 20 mph.
I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by umd
But I am saying that *intuitively* you can't think has half the distance. Average speed is total distance / total time. You spend a lot less time going 25mph for half the distance than 15mph for the other half the distance and therefore the average has to be less than the no wind average. That's not taking into account that a 10mph wind doesn't affect each direction equally either...
I understand what you are saying, but IMO it isn't apparent when thought about briefly during a ride, given no prior thoughts / research on the subject.
#15
Yeah, when I typed out my post I was thinking time, but typed distance.
When I said "On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true", that basically means "considering it for 2 second during the ride."
I understand what you are saying, but IMO it isn't apparent when thought about briefly during a ride, given no prior thoughts / research on the subject.
When I said "On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true", that basically means "considering it for 2 second during the ride."
I understand what you are saying, but IMO it isn't apparent when thought about briefly during a ride, given no prior thoughts / research on the subject.
It's the same for hills, at least for me.
#16
Recreational Commuter
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 5
From: Central Ohio
Bikes: One brand-less build-up, and a Connondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra Disc. A nicer bike than I need, but it was a good deal, so... ;-)
The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases with the square of the speed increase. So, given the same power output, even though your "airspeed" decreases with the tailwind just as much as your "airspeed" increases with the headwind, your road speed is decreased more by the headwind than it is improved by the tailwind.
#17
CAT4
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, Nebraska
Bikes: 2009 Cervélo S1, 2009 Felt F75, 2010 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5, 2011 Cannondale CAADx, 2011 Specialized Transition Elite
I have been training for an upcoming Duathlon and I have been timing myself (tracking in a spreadsheet)on a loop just over 4 miles in my neighborhood. I also noted the conditions with wind speed and direction. I thought for sure that winds at my back up most of the climbs would give me a better overall time....not true. My best times are always on calm days.
#18
takin' it to the streets
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: Denv-arrrgghhh
Bikes: 1999 Kona Kapu; late 70's/early 80's Araya road bike/commuter bike.
This is strange. I mean sure, I get frustrated by the wind, but I know I'm working harder, therefore getting a better work out, no?
HTFU?
HTFU?
#19
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
When I said "On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true", that basically means "considering it for 2 second during the ride."
I understand what you are saying, but IMO it isn't apparent when thought about briefly during a ride, given no prior thoughts / research on the subject.
I understand what you are saying, but IMO it isn't apparent when thought about briefly during a ride, given no prior thoughts / research on the subject.
#20
CAT4
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, Nebraska
Bikes: 2009 Cervélo S1, 2009 Felt F75, 2010 Cannondale Synapse Carbon 5, 2011 Cannondale CAADx, 2011 Specialized Transition Elite
I invite you to ride in the country in Nebraska (or myriads of other windy areas). You will be more than frustrated at times. I have been in headwinds on flats where 10mph in the drops was still a good workout.
#22
In addition, a headwind hurts your road speed more than an equivalent tailwind helps it.
The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases with the square of the speed increase. So, given the same power output, even though your "airspeed" decreases with the tailwind just as much as your "airspeed" increases with the headwind, your road speed is decreased more by the headwind than it is improved by the tailwind.
The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases with the square of the speed increase. So, given the same power output, even though your "airspeed" decreases with the tailwind just as much as your "airspeed" increases with the headwind, your road speed is decreased more by the headwind than it is improved by the tailwind.
#24
takin' it to the streets
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: Denv-arrrgghhh
Bikes: 1999 Kona Kapu; late 70's/early 80's Araya road bike/commuter bike.
Wind would be considerably more tolerable it if wasn't so deafening.
#25
Senior Member


Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 12
From: n.w. superdrome
Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
welcome to my world
__________________
Sono piů lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.
Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
Sono piů lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.
Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.





