Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   Wind (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/550085-wind.html)

chadteck 06-09-09 11:33 AM

Wind
 
I hate the wind. Just completed my daily ride with a 2 mph lower average speed than I have been due to the wind.

This motivated me to do a bit of reading. I always knew that in an out and back course any wind, no matter the direction, would lead to increased completion time, but never really put too much thought in to it. On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true.

Here are some nice graphs. I particularly like the last one. A 25 mph wind at 0 degrees to the course increases completion time by ~22 minutes on a 25 mile out and back course.

Sure, everyone knows that wind is bad unless you are going one way with a tailwind, but this helps understand just how bad it is.

merlinextraligh 06-09-09 11:36 AM

HED has a cool tool for calculating the Apparent Wind.

http://www.hedcycling.com/aerodynami...calculator.asp

All of this basically just confirms what every cyclist already knew, the vast majority of winds are headwinds.

hocker 06-09-09 11:36 AM

Hmmm...that is interesting. I ride in the drops against wind, it seems to help.

Doohickie 06-09-09 11:43 AM

Wind is one thing, but when combined with heat it feels like I'm riding in a convection oven.

chadteck 06-09-09 12:06 PM


Originally Posted by hocker (Post 9070185)
Hmmm...that is interesting. I ride in the drops against wind, it seems to help.

Anything to reduce the effect of the wind definitely helps. But even so, in an out and back course, any wind will increase your completion time as compared to no wind.


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
HED has a cool tool for calculating the Apparent Wind.

http://www.hedcycling.com/aerodynami...calculator.asp

Kinda cool, although it would be cooler if it could estimate speed loss due to wind resistance for a rider given weight, height and position (I know it would be rough).


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
All of this basically just confirms what every cyclist already knew, the vast majority of winds are headwinds.

Yeah, although it might not be apparent to everyone. Also, it's hard to estimate the effect that the wind actually has on speed. My reason for posting is mainly that I was surprised there would be such a noticeable effect on an out and back course.

umd 06-09-09 12:06 PM


Originally Posted by chadteck (Post 9070156)
This motivated me to do a bit of reading. I always knew that in an out and back course any wind, no matter the direction, would lead to increased completion time, but never really put too much thought in to it. On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true.

Intuitively, it is pretty clear that you spend more time going against the wind than with the wind for an out-and-back course, so you can't possibly make up the lost time.

timster 06-09-09 12:14 PM


Originally Posted by chadteck (Post 9070156)
I hate the wind. Just completed my daily ride with a 2 mph lower average speed than I have been due to the wind.

IMO, this is the major disadvantages of tracking rides and performance based on average mph.

chadteck 06-09-09 12:16 PM


Originally Posted by umd (Post 9070461)
Intuitively, it is pretty clear that you spend more time going against the wind than with the wind for an out-and-back course, so you can't possibly make up the lost time.

Right, but what I'm saying is this (with really rough numbers):

No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.

Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.

Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.

Total average: 20 mph.

I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.

chadteck 06-09-09 12:17 PM


Originally Posted by timster (Post 9070517)
IMO, this is the major disadvantages of tracking rides and performance based on average mph.

Lol. I had that exact thought near the end of my ride. Maybe I'll spring for a power meter at some point.

timster 06-09-09 12:17 PM

double post accident

timster 06-09-09 12:17 PM


Originally Posted by chadteck (Post 9070532)
Right, but what I'm saying is this (with really rough numbers):

No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.

Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.

Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.

Total average: 20 mph.

I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.

You're doing it wrong. You have to use time not distance.

20 mph, 20 miles = 1 hour
average speed = 20 mph

25 mph, 10 miles = 24 minutes
15 mph, 10 miles = 40 minutes
average speed = 18.75 mph

merlinextraligh 06-09-09 12:22 PM


Originally Posted by chadteck (Post 9070532)
Right, but what I'm saying is this (with really rough numbers):

No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.

Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.

Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.

Total average: 20 mph.

I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.

the math doesn't work like that. Take a 25mile TT (essentially 40K) Rider one does 20mph out and back with no wind. His time is 1:15.

Rider 2 with a wind on the course does 25 miles an hour out, and 15 miles an hour back, Rider 2's time is 1:20

Rider 2 only averages 18.75 mph.


So part of the problem is as UMD says, you spend more time going into the headwind than you save with the tail.

Then in the real world, the second part of the problem is that for every wind angle other than 0 and 180, the fact that cross winds present themselves as more of a headwind when the force vectors are taken into consdieration. That's the point of the HED tool.

umd 06-09-09 12:43 PM


Originally Posted by chadteck (Post 9070532)
Right, but what I'm saying is this (with really rough numbers):

No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.

Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.

Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.

Total average: 20 mph.

I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.

But I am saying that *intuitively* you can't think has half the distance. Average speed is total distance / total time. You spend a lot less time going 25mph for half the distance than 15mph for the other half the distance and therefore the average has to be less than the no wind average. That's not taking into account that a 10mph wind doesn't affect each direction equally either...

chadteck 06-09-09 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by timster (Post 9070547)
You're doing it wrong. You have to use time not distance.

20 mph, 20 miles = 1 hour
average speed = 20 mph

25 mph, 10 miles = 24 minutes
15 mph, 10 miles = 40 minutes
average speed = 18.75 mph

Yeah, when I typed out my post I was thinking time, but typed distance.


Originally Posted by umd
But I am saying that *intuitively* you can't think has half the distance. Average speed is total distance / total time. You spend a lot less time going 25mph for half the distance than 15mph for the other half the distance and therefore the average has to be less than the no wind average. That's not taking into account that a 10mph wind doesn't affect each direction equally either...

When I said "On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true", that basically means "considering it for 2 second during the ride."

I understand what you are saying, but IMO it isn't apparent when thought about briefly during a ride, given no prior thoughts / research on the subject.

Tulex 06-09-09 12:59 PM


Originally Posted by chadteck (Post 9070794)
Yeah, when I typed out my post I was thinking time, but typed distance.



When I said "On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true", that basically means "considering it for 2 second during the ride."

I understand what you are saying, but IMO it isn't apparent when thought about briefly during a ride, given no prior thoughts / research on the subject.

I get what you are saying, that without much thought.

It's the same for hills, at least for me.

Kotts 06-09-09 01:45 PM


Originally Posted by umd (Post 9070461)
Intuitively, it is pretty clear that you spend more time going against the wind than with the wind for an out-and-back course, so you can't possibly make up the lost time.

In addition, a headwind hurts your road speed more than an equivalent tailwind helps it.

The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases with the square of the speed increase. So, given the same power output, even though your "airspeed" decreases with the tailwind just as much as your "airspeed" increases with the headwind, your road speed is decreased more by the headwind than it is improved by the tailwind.

joe_5700 06-09-09 01:59 PM


Originally Posted by chadteck (Post 9070156)
Sure, everyone knows that wind is bad unless you are going one way with a tailwind, but this helps understand just how bad it is.

I have been training for an upcoming Duathlon and I have been timing myself (tracking in a spreadsheet)on a loop just over 4 miles in my neighborhood. I also noted the conditions with wind speed and direction. I thought for sure that winds at my back up most of the climbs would give me a better overall time....not true. My best times are always on calm days.

malpag3 06-09-09 02:00 PM

This is strange. I mean sure, I get frustrated by the wind, but I know I'm working harder, therefore getting a better work out, no?

HTFU?

umd 06-09-09 02:07 PM


Originally Posted by chadteck (Post 9070794)
When I said "On a very basic level, one would intuitively think that the tailwind would make up for the headwind, but this is not true", that basically means "considering it for 2 second during the ride."

I understand what you are saying, but IMO it isn't apparent when thought about briefly during a ride, given no prior thoughts / research on the subject.

Just because it is not "intuitive" to you does not mean it is not blindingly obvious to others...


Originally Posted by Kotts (Post 9071195)
In addition, a headwind hurts your road speed more than an equivalent tailwind helps it.

Yes, I didn't want to muddy the waters with that more complex discussion. But I did cover it in my next post:


Originally Posted by umd (Post 9070722)
That's not taking into account that a 10mph wind doesn't affect each direction equally either...


joe_5700 06-09-09 02:12 PM


Originally Posted by malpag3 (Post 9071310)
This is strange. I mean sure, I get frustrated by the wind, but I know I'm working harder, therefore getting a better work out, no?

HTFU?


I invite you to ride in the country in Nebraska (or myriads of other windy areas). You will be more than frustrated at times. I have been in headwinds on flats where 10mph in the drops was still a good workout.

Booger 06-09-09 02:14 PM

Wind would be considerably more tolerable it if wasn't so deafening.

Scorer75 06-09-09 02:16 PM


Originally Posted by Kotts (Post 9071195)
In addition, a headwind hurts your road speed more than an equivalent tailwind helps it.

The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases with the square of the speed increase. So, given the same power output, even though your "airspeed" decreases with the tailwind just as much as your "airspeed" increases with the headwind, your road speed is decreased more by the headwind than it is improved by the tailwind.

God, I love it when you talk dirty.

Creakyknees 06-09-09 02:16 PM

Whatta buncha noobs. This is why we have wives / girlfriends. Ride the tailwind with your buddies, have the missus come pick you up.

malpag3 06-09-09 02:42 PM


Originally Posted by joe_5700 (Post 9071377)
I invite you to ride in the country in Nebraska (or myriads of other windy areas). You will be more than frustrated at times. I have been in headwinds on flats where 10mph in the drops was still a good workout.

Yeah, I hear ya for sure. We have this crazy wind that comes off of these giant bodies of water called the Great Lakes here. I'm no stranger to huffing and puffing just to stay above 10mp/h! It's demoralizing, but hell, you sure do appreciate calm days when you're doin' 20+mp/h effortlessly.


Wind would be considerably more tolerable it if wasn't so deafening.
+1! I wish earplugs didn't make me feel like I was in a bubble. I'm sure there's hearing loss associated with this.

lotek 06-09-09 02:52 PM


Originally Posted by Doohickie (Post 9070247)
Wind is one thing, but when combined with heat it feels like I'm riding in a convection oven.

welcome to my world


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.