Wind
#26
Arizona Dessert

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 2,170
From: AZ
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
117F 20mph w/30mph gusts headwind feels special - a common summer commute condition
Competitively I like wind (and heat) as they seem to affect others more than they affect me.
Competitively I like wind (and heat) as they seem to affect others more than they affect me.
#27
Bike Freak
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Greeley, CO
Bikes: 2005 Cannondale R500
Right, but what I'm saying is this (with really rough numbers):
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.
Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.
Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.
Total average: 20 mph.
I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.
No wind entire distance: 20 mph average.
Tailwind half distance: 25 mph average.
Headwind half distance: 15 mph average.
Total average: 20 mph.
I understand you will spend more time in the headwind, but you partially made up for that lost time (vs. zero wind) when you had the tailwind. The point I am making is that I underestimated the effect of a constant wind on an out and back course.
#28
Scarlet Knight
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 11,271
Likes: 14
From: In a Haggard Song
Bikes: 2009 ORBEA Onix Rival. 2012 Felt Breed, 1999 Raleigh 500
#29
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
To summarize: I incorrectly assumed that a constant wind on an out and back course would have less effect than it actually does. I thought about it and did some reading, and understood why I was wrong. I posted my thoughts and a link for others that might have been curious about the subject.
Despite my acknowledgement that my initial assumption was incorrect and an attempt to provide the correct information to any others that might be curious, you decided it was appropriate to mock me for thinking the way that I did ( even though I had already stated that I realized it was incorrect ).
Are you arguing that I shouldn't have thought that way in the first place? Do you instantly know everything there is to know about a subject when you are first introduced to it?
#30
Indefatigable
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Boulder, CO
Bikes: 09 Motobecane Grand Sprint and a couple others not worth mentioning.
I'm not posting any misinformation here, so I guess you take issue with me assuming that others might have initially thought the same way as I did?
To summarize: I incorrectly assumed that a constant wind on an out and back course would have less effect than it actually does. I thought about it and did some reading, and understood why I was wrong. I posted my thoughts and a link for others that might have been curious about the subject.
Despite my acknowledgement that my initial assumption was incorrect and an attempt to provide the correct information to any others that might be curious, you decided it was appropriate to mock me for thinking the way that I did ( even though I had already stated that I realized it was incorrect ).
Are you arguing that I shouldn't have thought that way in the first place? Do you instantly know everything there is to know about a subject when you are first introduced to it?
To summarize: I incorrectly assumed that a constant wind on an out and back course would have less effect than it actually does. I thought about it and did some reading, and understood why I was wrong. I posted my thoughts and a link for others that might have been curious about the subject.
Despite my acknowledgement that my initial assumption was incorrect and an attempt to provide the correct information to any others that might be curious, you decided it was appropriate to mock me for thinking the way that I did ( even though I had already stated that I realized it was incorrect ).
Are you arguing that I shouldn't have thought that way in the first place? Do you instantly know everything there is to know about a subject when you are first introduced to it?
#31
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
#33
Peddler of the cycle
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Bikes: 1998 Serotta Legend (Dura Ace), 2007 Merlin Cyrene (Dura Ace/Ultegra mix)
All of this might be a moot point if we keep mucking up the planet: https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090610/...inishing_winds
(Before the flames begin (global warming play on words), I know that these are tentative findings and reported in a second party source; but upon seeing this in the morning, I thought immediately of this thread)
(Before the flames begin (global warming play on words), I know that these are tentative findings and reported in a second party source; but upon seeing this in the morning, I thought immediately of this thread)
#34
All of this might be a moot point if we keep mucking up the planet: https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090610/...inishing_winds
(Before the flames begin (global warming play on words), I know that these are tentative findings and reported in a second party source; but upon seeing this in the morning, I thought immediately of this thread)
(Before the flames begin (global warming play on words), I know that these are tentative findings and reported in a second party source; but upon seeing this in the morning, I thought immediately of this thread)
#35
#36
Recreational Commuter
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 5
From: Central Ohio
Bikes: One brand-less build-up, and a Connondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra Disc. A nicer bike than I need, but it was a good deal, so... ;-)
#37
Recreational Commuter
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 5
From: Central Ohio
Bikes: One brand-less build-up, and a Connondale Synapse Carbon Ultegra Disc. A nicer bike than I need, but it was a good deal, so... ;-)
#38
Still can't climb
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,024
Likes: 6
From: Limey in Taiwan
i like riding in the wind on hot days. it never feels hot. only when i stop do i realise how hot the day is.
where i normally ride, it always feels like coming back i am riding into a headwind but going out there was no tailwind. it's just not fair.
where i normally ride, it always feels like coming back i am riding into a headwind but going out there was no tailwind. it's just not fair.
#39
Something that interests me in this equation is who suffers more -- little guys like me who blow around like leaves, or big guys with more "windage?"
In my experience, big guys (or girls) come out on top because they compensate with power. They even seem at an advantage with a tailwind too, 'cause they have more "sail area."
I might be good in the hills but I sure suck in the wind. And it always blows on the coast!
In my experience, big guys (or girls) come out on top because they compensate with power. They even seem at an advantage with a tailwind too, 'cause they have more "sail area."
I might be good in the hills but I sure suck in the wind. And it always blows on the coast!
#40
Still can't climb
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,024
Likes: 6
From: Limey in Taiwan
Something that interests me in this equation is who suffers more -- little guys like me who blow around like leaves, or big guys with more "windage?"
In my experience, big guys (or girls) come out on top because they compensate with power. They even seem at an advantage with a tailwind too, 'cause they have more "sail area."
I might be good in the hills but I sure suck in the wind. And it always blows on the coast!
In my experience, big guys (or girls) come out on top because they compensate with power. They even seem at an advantage with a tailwind too, 'cause they have more "sail area."
I might be good in the hills but I sure suck in the wind. And it always blows on the coast!
#41
#43
All I know about wind (and the @$%*#@! wind we have here in MN seemingly all the time):
- It's a workout going into it.
- It's a blast with it at your back.
As long as a burn my calories for the ride (my primary goal) I don't care which....although the speed with a good 25mph constant MN tailwind is really a blast. Nothing like matching that fast wind at 20+ mph and barely hearing any wind rush as you pedal, looking down and seeing 25 mph on the speedo. Greatest feeling in the world....for this amateur noob anyway.
When I get the itch to race I'll probably care more.
- It's a workout going into it.
- It's a blast with it at your back.
As long as a burn my calories for the ride (my primary goal) I don't care which....although the speed with a good 25mph constant MN tailwind is really a blast. Nothing like matching that fast wind at 20+ mph and barely hearing any wind rush as you pedal, looking down and seeing 25 mph on the speedo. Greatest feeling in the world....for this amateur noob anyway.
When I get the itch to race I'll probably care more.
#44
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
As long as you are moving faster than the air it is best to be as small an aerodynamic as possible. "sail area" only helps if you are moving slower than the wind, i.e. going 20 with a 30 mph tailwind...
#45
Portland Fred
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 54
Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid
I didn't look at the tool, but the formula I've used since I was a kid is basically that the wind helps you for just over 90 degrees. It hurts you through most of the arc (sidewinds really slow you down) and even a wind coming from partially behind can either be no help or a hindrance.
#46
Je pose, donc je suis.
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 6
From: Back. Here.
(At least as far as _wind_ is concerned. Eventually, as speeds increase due to a strong tailwind, rolling and bearing resistances become much more important.)
The power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases with the square of the speed increase. So, given the same power output, even though your "airspeed" decreases with the tailwind just as much as your "airspeed" increases with the headwind, your road speed is decreased more by the headwind than it is improved by the tailwind.
Originally Posted by umd
Just because it is not "intuitive" to you does not mean it is not blindingly obvious to others...
Originally Posted by Kotts View Post
"In addition, a headwind hurts your road speed more than an equivalent tailwind helps it."
Yes, I didn't want to muddy the waters with that more complex discussion. But I did cover it in my next post:
Originally Posted by umd View Post
"That's not taking into account that a 10mph wind doesn't affect each direction equally either..."
Originally Posted by Kotts View Post
"In addition, a headwind hurts your road speed more than an equivalent tailwind helps it."
Yes, I didn't want to muddy the waters with that more complex discussion. But I did cover it in my next post:
Originally Posted by umd View Post
"That's not taking into account that a 10mph wind doesn't affect each direction equally either..."
Originally Posted by mxl
Then in the real world, the second part of the problem is that for every wind angle other than 0 and 180, the fact that cross winds present themselves as more of a headwind when the force vectors are taken into consdieration. That's the point of the HED tool.
#47
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
All I wrote was that "wind oesn't affect each direction equally either". I did not mean by "yes" to imply that I agreed with Kotts entire post (I must admit I did not actually read it very carefully), I was just aknowledging that there was more to the discussion.
#49
Je pose, donc je suis.
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 6
From: Back. Here.
My bad. I _did_ think it was strange you missed something blindingly obvious.
#50
Portland Fred
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,553
Likes: 54
Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid
On paper or in a computer model, maybe. But I've had yet to experience this myself or meet a rider who didn't dislike sidewinds. Side winds catch clothing, the cyclist, spokes, you name it. This means they'll increase the amount of wind you need to push.
One other thing that is completely left out of wind calculations is the fact that neither wind speed nor direction is constant which will cause rider speed and cadence to vary even if you are a clicker. This is less efficient.
One other thing that is completely left out of wind calculations is the fact that neither wind speed nor direction is constant which will cause rider speed and cadence to vary even if you are a clicker. This is less efficient.







