Bike Forums
1  2  3 
Page 2 of 3
Go to

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   To hell with the super bikers (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/589222-hell-super-bikers.html)

oldpedalpusher 09-28-09 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WalksOn2Wheels (Post 9758259)
Without getting into it, I'm both a motorcyclist and a cyclist. Share the road works both ways and unfortunately, those guys are asses. That is, there are ways to enjoy a nice road like that and check up when you see a cyclist or two so as to not buzz them, etc.

My best advice is to ride early morning to avoid any peak traffic. Unfortunately, sometimes this is when the people in fast cars and fast motorcycles like to do their acts of stupidity.

When I did go on "fast" rides with my motorcycle buddies, we usually did it at 2 a.m. No cyclists out and certainly not many cars.

I'm both too... :)
And live right in the middle of a canyon racing Disneyland. When I hear those engines echoing through the canyons at 2 a.m. it's like beautiful music. :thumb:

Being an individual I can only be personally responsible for my own biking behavior, and always defer to cyclists.


Greg

silversx80 09-28-09 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by botto (Post 9758350)
apparently you're either unwilling, or incapable , of understanding a very simple point.

a series of motorcycles ramping it up to 70+ MPH on back roads is both dangerous, and idiotic. duh.

it's the equivalent of a balls to the wall group ride on a MUP, but a hell of a lot more dangerous.

got it? good.

ok, bye.

Hmmm, doesn't seem that way. Visit a motorcycle board. Listen to them b!tch about the cyclist going <20mph up a 55mph canyon road, inside the lane and around a blind corner. They want you off the road.

Of course, listening to the other side would force you to challenge your own bias :rolleyes:...

I give them the same ball busting over there. It is both dangerous and idiotic, I agree.

rizz 09-28-09 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758391)
Hmmm, doesn't seem that way. Visit a motorcycle board. Listen to them b!tch about the cyclist going <20mph up a 55mph canyon road, inside the lane and around a blind corner. They want you off the road.

Don't forget riding two wide while talking to each other or swerving side-to-side while doing little climbs. Oh, and rolling through stop signs and red lights!

botto 09-28-09 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758391)
Hmmm, doesn't seem that way. Visit a motorcycle board.

why in the hell would i want to do that?

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758391)
Listen to them b!tch about the cyclist going <20mph up a 55mph canyon road, inside the lane and around a blind corner. They want you off the road.

you seem to be under the mistaken belief that i give a ****, but hey- nice try at changing the subject.

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758391)
Of course, listening to the other side would force you to challenge your own bias :rolleyes:...

yep. you clearly don't get it. did you do a gary busey, back in the day?

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758391)
I give them the same ball busting over there.

a two-front troll. who'd have thought? :twitchy:

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758391)
It is both dangerous and idiotic, I agree.

:thumb:

tubescreamerx 09-28-09 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rizz (Post 9758354)
Hardly. The argument goes both ways.

Heck, if we watch the video the ``super bikes'' (which most of them likely are not) are going rather slow and only encroach on the yellow line so as to give more distance to some non-disabled cyclists that have decided to take a holiday on the shoulder and they did it in a poor spot on a technical section of road.

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758311)
Perfect post.


They enjoy the road in their way, we in ours. Both can be seen as a danger to other traffic.

both of you are completely missing the point.

tubescreamerx 09-28-09 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758391)
Hmmm, doesn't seem that way. Visit a motorcycle board. Listen to them b!tch about the cyclist going <20mph up a 55mph canyon road, inside the lane and around a blind corner. They want you off the road.

Of course, listening to the other side would force you to challenge your own bias :rolleyes:...

I give them the same ball busting over there. It is both dangerous and idiotic, I agree.

one of those is legal, the other is not. stop thinking too hard before you hurt yourself.

the argument does not legitimately go both ways.

calamarichris 09-28-09 11:26 AM

There are irresponsible cyclists (moto & pedal) all over. You can't point to the actions of a few and judge an entire group.
I sure don't like it when I see one of ours blitzing red lights or taking-a-lane of a 50+ mph two-lane road (willfully inconveniencing and sometimes endangering anyone stuck behind them), just as much as I mislike seeing your (lame) video.
What were these motorcyclists doing wrong, exactly? They were annoyingly loud, and it is indeed against the law to change the exhaust pipe on their motorcycles.
Speeding? How fast were they going?
What was the speed limit on that road? (They white-sign speed limit, not the yellow-sign advisory limit.)

Pedal-partisans may claim it's perfectly legal for them to ride two-abreast or take-a-lane, even as traffic backs up behind them. But this is just as irresponsible & dangerous, and only sows hostility & hatred like the OP seems to have for these 'super bikers'. Did you know that the yellow speed limit signs (they usually say 25 or 35) around many corners are advisory speed limits, and are not binding or citable? Even if the yellow sign says 25, if it's a public highway, the actual speed limit is 55, or whatever the most recent white sign decreed.

There are responsible, reasonable cyclists (pedal & motor) out there too. We have a lot more in common with those people than you might think.

surfengine 09-28-09 11:36 AM

my regular ride is a haven for motorcyclists. i never even once thought of it as a negative thing.
they do their thing...i do my thing. seems to work.

gr@sshopper 09-28-09 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by botto (Post 9758269)
had a similar experience with motorcycle morons thinking they owned the entire road, while i was descending the stelvio.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...stel_bonus.jpg

Yup. My nuts are hiding in my abdomen. Holy crap, just the picture makes me nearly wet myself.

permanentjaun 09-28-09 11:45 AM

Thanks for the cool video.

calamarichris 09-28-09 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by surfengine (Post 9758715)
my regular ride is a haven for motorcyclists. i never even once thought of it as a negative thing.
they do their thing...i do my thing. seems to work.

:)

A hostile person lives in a hostile world.
A loving person lives in a loving world.
Everyone you meet is your mirror. --Ken Keyes, Coos Bay, OR

silversx80 09-28-09 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by botto (Post 9758447)
why in the hell would i want to do that?

you seem to be under the mistaken belief that i give a ****, but hey- nice try at changing the subject.

You must, if you felt compelled to respond. :p

I'm just trying to point out that there are two sides to every coin. Not trolling by any means, just playing the devil's advocate here.


Quote:

Originally Posted by tubescreamerx (Post 9758515)
one of those is legal, the other is not. stop thinking too hard before you hurt yourself.

the argument does not legitimately go both ways.

One lane is not necessarily legal. In my state, and in many others I have lived, it is only legal to ride in the lane (as a bicyclist) if there is an obstacle to be avoided. Otherwise, it is law to stay to the furthest right as deemed safe by whichever LEO decides to, or not to cite you with a moving violation. I've been warned by an LEO, while on my bicycle, for illegal passing by passing a line of cars (I was on the shoulder).


Now, to caveat on that, I would argue that the motorcyclists are being safer than many bicyclists. Bicyclists have the inherent flaw of nearly always being an obstruction to motorized traffic flow. The motorcyclists in question seemed to be in control of their vehicles, capable of exceeding traffic flow and having their wits about them and completely motivated to pay attention to the road. Hey, their decision is putting their lives at stake, don't want to lose it because of target fixation.

I would much rather prefer that the OP post videos of every car driver chatting away on the cell phone, eating and 'taking in the sights' while not having trained eyes on the road. Also, cyclists not holding a line, not signaling turns and stops and 'taking in the sights.'

botto 09-28-09 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758788)
You must, if you felt compelled to respond. :

I'm just trying to point out that there are two sides to every coin. Not trolling by any means,
just playing the devil's advocate here.

keep your day job.

silversx80 09-28-09 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by botto (Post 9758794)
keep your day job.

Don't worry, it pays better than being a blowhard on BF. :thumb:

8Lives 09-28-09 11:54 AM

I am both a motorcyclist (Ducati 999) and cyclist. My tolerance for relatively high speeds is...high. 90% of the time the moto's give plenty of room and all is fine. The 10% of the time they don't it is because they are riding far too fast for the conditions and generally their abilities. Take it to the f'ing track - that is why it is there. Anyplace in LA or the Bay Area you are a few hours from multiple racetracks where for $100 you can ride all day as fast as you want/can.

gregf83 09-28-09 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by botto (Post 9758350)
a series of motorcycles ramping it up to 70+ MPH on back roads is both dangerous, and idiotic. duh.

I'm sure it's a lot of fun though! Whether it is dangerous or idiotic is relative to the degree of risk you are willing to take. To many people descending a winding mountain road on a bike at 50mph, with skinny tires is also dangerous and idiodic.

Sonoma76 09-28-09 12:15 PM

Quote:

Heck, if we watch the video the ``super bikes'' (which most of them likely are not) are going rather slow and only encroach on the yellow line so as to give more distance to some non-disabled cyclists that have decided to take a holiday on the shoulder and they did it in a poor spot on a technical section of road.
You didn't read the original post. They passed us three times. The second time they came within 2 feet of us while we were riding northbound (they were cornering southbound and were taking up the entire road) Had we not stopped they would have likely hit us or caused us to crash.

That video is only one of three instances where they passed us.

In any event, they knew what they were doing; that's why they had a scout rider ahead of the pack. They all had radios on their shoulders. As for the super bikes; they left noxious fumes in their wake. My friend suspected they were using a special racing fuel.

I'd estimate they were cornering at 60+ mph and on the straights they were above 100+ mph. The road is 45mph white sign. They were passing cars on blind corners over a double yellow.

bdcheung 09-28-09 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9758788)
Now, to caveat on that, I would argue that the motorcyclists are being safer than many bicyclists. Bicyclists have the inherent flaw of nearly always being an obstruction to motorized traffic flow. The motorcyclists in question seemed to be in control of their vehicles, capable of exceeding traffic flow and having their wits about them and completely motivated to pay attention to the road. Hey, their decision is putting their lives at stake, don't want to lose it because of target fixation.

Assume much?

silversx80 09-28-09 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdcheung (Post 9758979)
Assume much?

Do you ride a sport bike?

AEO 09-28-09 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregf83 (Post 9758945)
I'm sure it's a lot of fun though! Whether it is dangerous or idiotic is relative to the degree of risk you are willing to take. To many people descending a winding mountain road on a bike at 50mph, with skinny tires is also dangerous and idiodic.

the amount of destruction one can leave behind is very different between the two.

I for one wouldn't want a 400kg motorbike plowing through my windshield at 160km/h. (assuming I'm going 50km/h and they're going 110km/h)

bdcheung 09-28-09 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silversx80 (Post 9759001)
Do you ride a sport bike?

Red herring.

Were you one of the riders in the video?

DenisMenchov 09-28-09 12:39 PM

I don't see how whining about this on BF solves anything. Share the road. If you want to bike on the road you might get hit by numerous two wheel and four wheel vehicles. End of story, +

End of thread.

patentcad 09-28-09 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwible (Post 9758136)
Squids.

Correct.

That kind of motorcycle riding belongs on a closed track.

bdcheung 09-28-09 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenisMenchov (Post 9759141)
I don't see how whining about this on BF solves anything.

This isn't a solutions forum.

It's a discussion forum.

Continuation of thread.

jwible 09-28-09 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patentcad (Post 9759143)
Correct.

That kind of motorcycle riding belongs on a closed track.

Eggsactly

I raced motorcycles. Tracks are much safer for riders and the risks to others are much much lower. Plus, tracks are more better funner.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:13 AM.
1  2  3 
Page 2 of 3
Go to


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.