Rollers are over-rated
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
Rollers are over-rated
I got a set of rollers about 6 weeks ago, and have been using them on and off. I also use a CycleOps Fluid2 trainer, but live in Socal so riding outdoors is the norm unless it's dark out. Haven't had any problems with the rollers - can get a good sweat on them, and rarely fell over, even on my first time on them. Have gone up to 90 mins on them.
I'm not sold on them. They're not bad, but I far prefer my trainer. I can go much, much harder and focus on power, which seems to be the most critical thing for riding/racing.
I heard a ton about the "technique" benefits from the rollers, and I'll agree that you need a lot more technique to hold a line on the rollers compared to road. But, it's not THAT hard, and as well, I seriously question if it's that important to have a roller-riding degree of balance anyway. To me, the degree of line-holding is irrelevant to real-world riding. Far more important in fast pacelines are fast reaction times and experience. The rapid swerves you need to pull out when someone in front of you goes down (has happened to me) have nothing to do with roller skills. I feel a bit like roller skills are like knowing to do wheelies - more difficult to real world riding, but largely irrelevant in terms of actual racing and road performance.
Someone convince me to keep riding these things.
I'm not sold on them. They're not bad, but I far prefer my trainer. I can go much, much harder and focus on power, which seems to be the most critical thing for riding/racing.
I heard a ton about the "technique" benefits from the rollers, and I'll agree that you need a lot more technique to hold a line on the rollers compared to road. But, it's not THAT hard, and as well, I seriously question if it's that important to have a roller-riding degree of balance anyway. To me, the degree of line-holding is irrelevant to real-world riding. Far more important in fast pacelines are fast reaction times and experience. The rapid swerves you need to pull out when someone in front of you goes down (has happened to me) have nothing to do with roller skills. I feel a bit like roller skills are like knowing to do wheelies - more difficult to real world riding, but largely irrelevant in terms of actual racing and road performance.
Someone convince me to keep riding these things.
#3
Should Be More Popular




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 46,166
Likes: 11,742
From: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
If I lived in SoCal I would have neither rollers nor a trainer. I would just ride outside.
Compared to riding outside, both these devices are a form of torture.
That being said, I still prefer riding the rollers over the trainer, it's the lesser of the two evils. Both have their place, and I grant that if your goal is to do a set of intervals the trainer is better.
But since you live in SoCal just go outside and ride....you can sell the rollers and trainer and use the proceeds to buy a good set of lights.
Compared to riding outside, both these devices are a form of torture.
That being said, I still prefer riding the rollers over the trainer, it's the lesser of the two evils. Both have their place, and I grant that if your goal is to do a set of intervals the trainer is better.
But since you live in SoCal just go outside and ride....you can sell the rollers and trainer and use the proceeds to buy a good set of lights.
#4
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
See discussion starting here
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...1#post10464491
#5
Senior Member


Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,465
Likes: 4,547
From: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
use them. I don't use indoor trainers but I am a big fan of applying a variety of training methods. you will gain something from it. even if that something isn't apparent right now. but someday, at sometime, you will be racing and something will happen or you will do something, and something will click and you will recognize where it came from.
for me swimming in a pool even though I have access to outdoor water lets me concentrate on form much more than when I'm outside dealing with environmental issues. but you know that already due to your experience with your trainer. if I had access to some other kind of pool I would use it. I also do weight training and use various movements for the same muscle groups.
anyway - you bought it - tear it up
for me swimming in a pool even though I have access to outdoor water lets me concentrate on form much more than when I'm outside dealing with environmental issues. but you know that already due to your experience with your trainer. if I had access to some other kind of pool I would use it. I also do weight training and use various movements for the same muscle groups.
anyway - you bought it - tear it up
#7
Senior Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 15,410
Likes: 188
From: Tariffville, CT
Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track
It's not just about line holding, it's about smoothness in general. Maybe not important in a club ride paceline but it is for racing. It's also the kind of thing that may benefit others more than you.
See discussion starting here
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...1#post10464491
See discussion starting here
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...1#post10464491
Usually those that don't find a benefit from a form building thing either mash their way through the benefits (I have a friend that has a bad pedal stroke and rides rollers with that unsmooth pedal stroke. I dunno how, he just does) or they don't need them (Powercranks).
But having said that, I find it beneficial to ride rollers on a semi-regular basis.
As OP pointed out, not for power. It's for smoothness. You want power, trainer or outside. Smoothness, rollers, in the drops, fast and smooth.
cdr
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
It's not just about line holding, it's about smoothness in general. Maybe not important in a club ride paceline but it is for racing. It's also the kind of thing that may benefit others more than you.
See discussion starting here
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...1#post10464491
See discussion starting here
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...1#post10464491
To me at least, it seems that the smoothness is more a function of riding within your O2 limits and less a function of technique. I don't think all the technique in the world would allow me to ride smoothly if I'm going all-out on the rollers.
Trouble is, for me, the key benefit of the roller/trainer is to be able to go hard. No traffic, no stops, and good reliable computer data. Backing off the top speed just so I can go smoothly seems to detract from this training stimulus.
#9
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,123
Likes: 4
From: Near Portland, OR
Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.
I got a set of rollers about 6 weeks ago, and have been using them on and off. I also use a CycleOps Fluid2 trainer, but live in Socal so riding outdoors is the norm unless it's dark out. Haven't had any problems with the rollers - can get a good sweat on them, and rarely fell over, even on my first time on them. Have gone up to 90 mins on them.
I'm not sold on them. They're not bad, but I far prefer my trainer. I can go much, much harder and focus on power, which seems to be the most critical thing for riding/racing.
I heard a ton about the "technique" benefits from the rollers, and I'll agree that you need a lot more technique to hold a line on the rollers compared to road. But, it's not THAT hard, and as well, I seriously question if it's that important to have a roller-riding degree of balance anyway. To me, the degree of line-holding is irrelevant to real-world riding. Far more important in fast pacelines are fast reaction times and experience. The rapid swerves you need to pull out when someone in front of you goes down (has happened to me) have nothing to do with roller skills. I feel a bit like roller skills are like knowing to do wheelies - more difficult to real world riding, but largely irrelevant in terms of actual racing and road performance.
Someone convince me to keep riding these things.
I'm not sold on them. They're not bad, but I far prefer my trainer. I can go much, much harder and focus on power, which seems to be the most critical thing for riding/racing.
I heard a ton about the "technique" benefits from the rollers, and I'll agree that you need a lot more technique to hold a line on the rollers compared to road. But, it's not THAT hard, and as well, I seriously question if it's that important to have a roller-riding degree of balance anyway. To me, the degree of line-holding is irrelevant to real-world riding. Far more important in fast pacelines are fast reaction times and experience. The rapid swerves you need to pull out when someone in front of you goes down (has happened to me) have nothing to do with roller skills. I feel a bit like roller skills are like knowing to do wheelies - more difficult to real world riding, but largely irrelevant in terms of actual racing and road performance.
Someone convince me to keep riding these things.
Now, about rollers in general. Paceline riding has very little to do (you hope) with reaction time, and very much to do with control. Rollers teach you how to control your bike. That way, when some little snot of a kid (sorry Hammer dude if you are reading, just using you as an example, no bad blood
) comes up under your elbow in the last 2km before the sprint and hooks your arm going past, you stay balanced and don't overreact. It enables you to confidently handle your bike within inches of others without relying on your reaction time. While it won't help you with the emergency swerve per se, it might help you ride a skinny line past a crash without causing one of your own. Ultimately it's up to your preference. Anything that's hard to do (like generating power while keeping balanced on a line) is going to teach your body and refine your fine motor control better than doing the easy thing where you can squeeze your eyes shut and not worry about what your wheels are doing. But that said, I don't use the rollers for threshold work, though I know riders who are better than me that do.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 03-05-10 at 09:13 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 1
From: Lexington, SC
Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10
Rollers have changed my handling of my bike more dramatically than any other training tool. I've had them for just around 2 months, but saw huge improvements outside, after just 60 minutes on the rollers the day before. As far as a training tool used for resistance, they're good for Zone 2/3 efforts. Actually, ideal for zones 2 and 3 because of the stability requirements, smoothness of the upper body and smoothness of the pedal stroke you need in order to maintain a solid Z 2/3 workout.
Also, I work on riding with no hands as that helps my ability to do so outside. Why is this beneficial? Ever need to put on a jacket, fix your junk, or do other things that require both hands, yet you don't want to stop riding? I ride out of the saddle on the rollers. This has really helped my out-of-the-saddle skills tremendously.
I've only put around 20 hours on the rollers to date and words cannot express how much more stable I feel on my bike, or how much more smooth I have become. It's not a placebo-effect.
I have a Cycleopd Fluid 2 as well, but it's reserved for higher resistance workouts. Also, it's more consistent in its power curve, so when I want certain targets, I'll use that.
Also, I work on riding with no hands as that helps my ability to do so outside. Why is this beneficial? Ever need to put on a jacket, fix your junk, or do other things that require both hands, yet you don't want to stop riding? I ride out of the saddle on the rollers. This has really helped my out-of-the-saddle skills tremendously.
I've only put around 20 hours on the rollers to date and words cannot express how much more stable I feel on my bike, or how much more smooth I have become. It's not a placebo-effect.
I have a Cycleopd Fluid 2 as well, but it's reserved for higher resistance workouts. Also, it's more consistent in its power curve, so when I want certain targets, I'll use that.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 1
From: Lexington, SC
Bikes: Lynskey R240, 2013 CAAD10
Which would you take though - smoothness or power? I can always ride smoothly (esp on the rollers) if I'm not going at a pace that's very hard for me. Crank it up to VO2 or above levels though, and it gets substantially more difficult.
To me at least, it seems that the smoothness is more a function of riding within your O2 limits and less a function of technique. I don't think all the technique in the world would allow me to ride smoothly if I'm going all-out on the rollers.
Trouble is, for me, the key benefit of the roller/trainer is to be able to go hard. No traffic, no stops, and good reliable computer data. Backing off the top speed just so I can go smoothly seems to detract from this training stimulus.
To me at least, it seems that the smoothness is more a function of riding within your O2 limits and less a function of technique. I don't think all the technique in the world would allow me to ride smoothly if I'm going all-out on the rollers.
Trouble is, for me, the key benefit of the roller/trainer is to be able to go hard. No traffic, no stops, and good reliable computer data. Backing off the top speed just so I can go smoothly seems to detract from this training stimulus.
Learn to ride the rollers at VO2 or above. If you can't do it, and think you're good on rollers then you're doing it wrong. I can smoothly ride my rollers at 150 rpm, dialing it up to 400W. Work on it, get better at it and see your riding improve.
The benefit is not just to go hard, it's to focus on targeted workouts when the condition outdoors is not suitible for your training goals.
#12
I have both...I use the trainer more because in the MN winter that's my primary for of cardio exercise (aside from table tennis
) so on the trainer I'm usually trying to burn as many calories as possible. I use the rollers to provide another mentally different way of working indoors. Neither is better, both have their place. And, as another poster mentioned, if I lived in SoCal I'd have neither. Eff all you people who live in year 'round warmth
) so on the trainer I'm usually trying to burn as many calories as possible. I use the rollers to provide another mentally different way of working indoors. Neither is better, both have their place. And, as another poster mentioned, if I lived in SoCal I'd have neither. Eff all you people who live in year 'round warmth
#13
fuggitivo solitario

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,107
Likes: 13
From: Northern NJ
Also, not to be glib, there are resistance units for rollers, and even on low resistance, the workout can get difficult in a hurry. Looking at my minoura unit, if all the roller drums have a groove for pulleys, then it's not so hard to attach a resistance unit to your roller.
#14
Banned
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28,387
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT
Which would you take though - smoothness or power? I can always ride smoothly (esp on the rollers) if I'm not going at a pace that's very hard for me. Crank it up to VO2 or above levels though, and it gets substantially more difficult.
To me at least, it seems that the smoothness is more a function of riding within your O2 limits and less a function of technique. I don't think all the technique in the world would allow me to ride smoothly if I'm going all-out on the rollers.
Trouble is, for me, the key benefit of the roller/trainer is to be able to go hard. No traffic, no stops, and good reliable computer data. Backing off the top speed just so I can go smoothly seems to detract from this training stimulus.
To me at least, it seems that the smoothness is more a function of riding within your O2 limits and less a function of technique. I don't think all the technique in the world would allow me to ride smoothly if I'm going all-out on the rollers.
Trouble is, for me, the key benefit of the roller/trainer is to be able to go hard. No traffic, no stops, and good reliable computer data. Backing off the top speed just so I can go smoothly seems to detract from this training stimulus.
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 1
From: SoCal Baby
Bikes: o5 Specilized roubaix Comp, 06 Tequilo
Rollers teach your body to react automaticlly, making small adjustments that need to happen before you would ever be able to think about them. Roller drills for me are high cadence spin drill (over 100 rpm up to 160 rpm). Do I ever aactually ride like that ? No . They are drills to develop real world skills. Pro's say that the best training for racing is racing.
They still drill however.
They still drill however.
#16
Senior Member


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 15,410
Likes: 188
From: Tariffville, CT
Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track
There's technique and strength. Technique, at a certain level, determines your ultimate potential. So does genetics and training, but it's a multiple variable thing.
If you ride rollers and get good technique, great technique, you max out one variable. Then you can focus on other things.
If you have bad form, you could be handicapping yourself. It's relative to ability - no one will accuse Delgado or Tyler Hamilton of having smooth form - but if you're chopping at the pedals, you can probably do better.
So rollers (with no resistance) don't affect power. It's a good tool for form. Use it for form.
cdr
If you ride rollers and get good technique, great technique, you max out one variable. Then you can focus on other things.
If you have bad form, you could be handicapping yourself. It's relative to ability - no one will accuse Delgado or Tyler Hamilton of having smooth form - but if you're chopping at the pedals, you can probably do better.
So rollers (with no resistance) don't affect power. It's a good tool for form. Use it for form.
cdr
#18
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
For me thus far (granted, limited roller experience of 6 weeks of intermittent use), roller riding has not helped one bit on downhill fast mountain curves. I've felt much more comfortable on the rollers since I started for sure, from feeling really, really unstable (but still able to ride at a good clip), to riding confidently even at a good intensity, but for me, it translates zilch to fast mountain curves. Unless you really had egregious bike handling to begin with, the only way to ride those curves really fast is to practice riding them, faster and faster. The choice of line, degree of lean, and degree of braking needed on those sharp fast downhills is does not seem to be acquired by roller riding (which seems to improve pedal smoothness and balancing while pedaling.)
In terms of resistance, I don't deny that you can get crazy high resistances and all-out efforts on the rollers. Of course you can. But I don't think you're quite going all out vs a trainer, when you can put in that extra few % even when your form is deteriorating to mush, the world is blacking out, and everything screams QUIT! I'd have fallen off the rollers well before that point, and I would not even consider pushing that hard on the road as well due to safety concerns (ok on a totally closed course I would.) But on the trainer, where all is safe and secured, I can push into that zone.
In terms of resistance, I don't deny that you can get crazy high resistances and all-out efforts on the rollers. Of course you can. But I don't think you're quite going all out vs a trainer, when you can put in that extra few % even when your form is deteriorating to mush, the world is blacking out, and everything screams QUIT! I'd have fallen off the rollers well before that point, and I would not even consider pushing that hard on the road as well due to safety concerns (ok on a totally closed course I would.) But on the trainer, where all is safe and secured, I can push into that zone.
Last edited by agarose2000; 03-05-10 at 10:48 AM.
#21
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
I agree. But nobody views the trainer as helping one bit on downhills. Whereas MANY people view roller skills as helping a lot with downhill riding, which I disagree with. (Ok, if you're a wobbly rider even on flats, it'll help you, but that's an egregious case.)
#22
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,123
Likes: 4
From: Near Portland, OR
Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.
Who said anything about going downhill fast? There's more to "handling" than just swerving out of crashes and taking downhill turns fast. It's about fine control of your bike.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#24
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,870
Likes: 356
From: Right where I'm supposed to be
Bikes: Franklin Frames Custom, Rivendell Bombadil
I got a set of rollers about 6 weeks ago, and have been using them on and off. I also use a CycleOps Fluid2 trainer, but live in Socal so riding outdoors is the norm unless it's dark out. Haven't had any problems with the rollers - can get a good sweat on them, and rarely fell over, even on my first time on them. Have gone up to 90 mins on them.
I'm not sold on them. They're not bad, but I far prefer my trainer. I can go much, much harder and focus on power, which seems to be the most critical thing for riding/racing.
I heard a ton about the "technique" benefits from the rollers, and I'll agree that you need a lot more technique to hold a line on the rollers compared to road. But, it's not THAT hard, and as well, I seriously question if it's that important to have a roller-riding degree of balance anyway. To me, the degree of line-holding is irrelevant to real-world riding. Far more important in fast pacelines are fast reaction times and experience. The rapid swerves you need to pull out when someone in front of you goes down (has happened to me) have nothing to do with roller skills. I feel a bit like roller skills are like knowing to do wheelies - more difficult to real world riding, but largely irrelevant in terms of actual racing and road performance.
Someone convince me to keep riding these things.
I'm not sold on them. They're not bad, but I far prefer my trainer. I can go much, much harder and focus on power, which seems to be the most critical thing for riding/racing.
I heard a ton about the "technique" benefits from the rollers, and I'll agree that you need a lot more technique to hold a line on the rollers compared to road. But, it's not THAT hard, and as well, I seriously question if it's that important to have a roller-riding degree of balance anyway. To me, the degree of line-holding is irrelevant to real-world riding. Far more important in fast pacelines are fast reaction times and experience. The rapid swerves you need to pull out when someone in front of you goes down (has happened to me) have nothing to do with roller skills. I feel a bit like roller skills are like knowing to do wheelies - more difficult to real world riding, but largely irrelevant in terms of actual racing and road performance.
Someone convince me to keep riding these things.
You want us to convince you to keep riding rollers ? What's to convince ? ...... either you like riding them or you don't. No explanations necessary.
#25
Blast from the Past

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,253
Likes: 89
From: Schertz TX
Bikes: Cervelo Soloist, Felt Breed & a few more
Which would you take though - smoothness or power? I can always ride smoothly (esp on the rollers) if I'm not going at a pace that's very hard for me. Crank it up to VO2 or above levels though, and it gets substantially more difficult.
To me at least, it seems that the smoothness is more a function of riding within your O2 limits and less a function of technique. I don't think all the technique in the world would allow me to ride smoothly if I'm going all-out on the rollers.Trouble is, for me, the key benefit of the roller/trainer is to be able to go hard. No traffic, no stops, and good reliable computer data. Backing off the top speed just so I can go smoothly seems to detract from this training stimulus.
To me at least, it seems that the smoothness is more a function of riding within your O2 limits and less a function of technique. I don't think all the technique in the world would allow me to ride smoothly if I'm going all-out on the rollers.Trouble is, for me, the key benefit of the roller/trainer is to be able to go hard. No traffic, no stops, and good reliable computer data. Backing off the top speed just so I can go smoothly seems to detract from this training stimulus.
Don't believe me? Put a pedal at the bottom or top and push on it as hard as you can.






