Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Upscale Framesets with Base Components -- Why?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Upscale Framesets with Base Components -- Why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-10 | 06:10 PM
  #51  
BengeBoy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,955
Likes: 10
From: Seattle, Washington, USA

Bikes: 2009 Chris Boedeker custom; 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 2021 Bill Davidson custom gravel bike; 2022 Specialized Turbo Vado e-bike

Originally Posted by FlashBazbo
Ignorance rears its ugly head . . . sigh.

Let's just say . . . Al Gore lives not too far down the street. He's made a little over $1 billion in a little environmental sideline since leaving public service. And Al's got one of the "little" houses.

Always happy to contribute an ignorant comment; it's my specialty. Still sounds like Al ought to buy his bikes on BikesDirect instead of going to the local shop.
BengeBoy is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-10 | 09:37 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by patentcad
Cheap wheels make the MSRP of the bike lower, and ultimately I want to pick out my own nice wheel set anyway.
It took a while for someone to hit the head of the nail. It is all about price points. If you load up a frame with high end components that push it over say $8000 you are cutting down your potential market quit a bit. So you make it a $5000 price point with components.

I have always thought you should start with the best quality frame you can afford, wheels next and then the drive train. Other than weight and bling is there really that much functional difference between 105 and DA? It does bug me however when you see a very high end frame with the lowest end wheels out there.
oilman_15106 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-04-10 | 09:49 PM
  #53  
patentcad's Avatar
Peloton Shelter Dog
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 90,508
Likes: 32
From: Chester, NY

Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB

That cheapo wheel strategy made the 2009 Cervelo S2 more attractive, with a very competitive (with its competition) MSRP of $5500 (I paid $5K even at the time). The only shortcut components were the cheesy R80 Shimano hoops and the Ultegra cassette. I didn't care about the wheels (bought Williams 38c's for $999 and sold the R80's on ebay for $250 or so) and I eventually got a D.A. cassette. So I wound up with a bike that cost about $6K with precisely the component mix I wanted, and at the time that was actually a bit cheaper than competing models from Scott and Cannondale, and I thought the S2 was a better bike, at least for me. The Scott and Cannondale models in the same range came with Mavic wheels I didn't want and had MSRPs of $6500+ as I recall. That did factor into my decision to go with the S2 at the time.
patentcad is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Alexandra92
Road Cycling
23
01-20-17 11:30 AM
Ltactics
Road Cycling
26
03-03-13 10:40 PM
dooodstevenn
Road Cycling
7
01-10-13 03:14 AM
dt4211
Road Cycling
2
10-21-10 01:59 PM
Vinylisbest
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing
32
08-08-10 11:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.