Upscale Framesets with Base Components -- Why?
#51
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,955
Likes: 10
From: Seattle, Washington, USA
Bikes: 2009 Chris Boedeker custom; 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 2021 Bill Davidson custom gravel bike; 2022 Specialized Turbo Vado e-bike
Always happy to contribute an ignorant comment; it's my specialty. Still sounds like Al ought to buy his bikes on BikesDirect instead of going to the local shop.
#52
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,900
Likes: 0
I have always thought you should start with the best quality frame you can afford, wheels next and then the drive train. Other than weight and bling is there really that much functional difference between 105 and DA? It does bug me however when you see a very high end frame with the lowest end wheels out there.
#53
Peloton Shelter Dog
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 90,508
Likes: 32
From: Chester, NY
Bikes: 2017 Scott Foil, 2016 Scott Addict SL, 2018 Santa Cruz Blur CC MTB
That cheapo wheel strategy made the 2009 Cervelo S2 more attractive, with a very competitive (with its competition) MSRP of $5500 (I paid $5K even at the time). The only shortcut components were the cheesy R80 Shimano hoops and the Ultegra cassette. I didn't care about the wheels (bought Williams 38c's for $999 and sold the R80's on ebay for $250 or so) and I eventually got a D.A. cassette. So I wound up with a bike that cost about $6K with precisely the component mix I wanted, and at the time that was actually a bit cheaper than competing models from Scott and Cannondale, and I thought the S2 was a better bike, at least for me. The Scott and Cannondale models in the same range came with Mavic wheels I didn't want and had MSRPs of $6500+ as I recall. That did factor into my decision to go with the S2 at the time.






