Are CAAD9's overrated???
#1
Thread Starter
Banned.
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Are CAAD9's overrated???
I've read lots of reviews and recommendations about the Cannondale CAAD9, so i've decided to see what all the hype is about. My previous bike was some steel bike made by peugeot from maybe 30 years ago. But i recently chose to buy a Cannondale CAAD9 a couple of months ago, choosing them over Italian-made bicycles. What I can say is that the bicycle feels very different and the setup of the bike makes me passionate. However, with all the people praising CAAD9 bikes, I feel it is definitely overrated. The feel is beautiful, but it's not comfortable. But when riding on rough roads, other cyclists tend to look at me and nod. I do feel the weight difference going up hills and I definitely have to work less going up which isn't a bad thing for fitness, and will probably be good for racing.
The thing is that, a lot of people, whether they are new to cycling or not, tend to buy a CAAD9, strip it of its components, and add Top-Of-The-Line components like Dura-Ace and SRAM red. So with all the praise and hype going on with the CAAD9 bikes I only have one question...
Does anyone else think CAAD9 bikes are overrated?
The thing is that, a lot of people, whether they are new to cycling or not, tend to buy a CAAD9, strip it of its components, and add Top-Of-The-Line components like Dura-Ace and SRAM red. So with all the praise and hype going on with the CAAD9 bikes I only have one question...
Does anyone else think CAAD9 bikes are overrated?
#2
Gimme back my gears!
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: San Jose
Bikes: Cannondale Caad9-5 2009, Scattante XLR TT 2009, Trek Y-Foil 77 1998
No, especially if you can get your hands on just the frame and also the fork if you like.
When I first got my Caad9 I thought is was going to bust my balls in half... found out very shortly that it was just the crap seat that came with it San Marco Ponza Power (I think... sold it for 5 bucks). Took my body some conditioning to realize that it isn't anyway near as harsh as many hard-tail MTBs I've ridden and with a better seat... I can ride this damn bike all day!
IMHO... Caad frames are thee performance to price, valued frame to beat.
...shame you gotta buy Tiagra just to get your hands on them most of the time.
When I first got my Caad9 I thought is was going to bust my balls in half... found out very shortly that it was just the crap seat that came with it San Marco Ponza Power (I think... sold it for 5 bucks). Took my body some conditioning to realize that it isn't anyway near as harsh as many hard-tail MTBs I've ridden and with a better seat... I can ride this damn bike all day!
IMHO... Caad frames are thee performance to price, valued frame to beat.
...shame you gotta buy Tiagra just to get your hands on them most of the time.
#4
It boils down to what you expect in a frame. If you want a lightweight, stiff (not harsh like the old-school fat-tubed alum beauties of old), well made, cool looking frame, the CAAD9 delivers as promised. It's also a very good value when you consider it's an American made bike that is one of the last non-boutique frames available (at least until next year). I tested one last year and really wanted to like it but at that stage in my cycling development, it wasn't for me. In fairness, the frame I tested had cheapskate wheels and a saddle that was not right for me. Some of the negatives I attributed to the 9's frame could have been caused by the other factors (and poor fit).
I'm looking forward to testing another CAAD9 before production goes overseas, or maybe trying a used one for the heck of it. Either way, despite the high level of enthusiasm around here for the CAAD9, if you want a solid base with which to build a reasonably priced racing bike, I can't think of a better choice. The ride might not be as forgiving as some CF frames but it does so many things right for the $$$, it's hard to call it overrated.
I'm looking forward to testing another CAAD9 before production goes overseas, or maybe trying a used one for the heck of it. Either way, despite the high level of enthusiasm around here for the CAAD9, if you want a solid base with which to build a reasonably priced racing bike, I can't think of a better choice. The ride might not be as forgiving as some CF frames but it does so many things right for the $$$, it's hard to call it overrated.
#6
Should Be More Popular




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 46,197
Likes: 11,755
From: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
You are new here so we will be kind.
No.
Also, if your ride is too harsh, try lowering the PSI in your tires by 5. What are you running now?? IMO many folks who feel a ride is too harsh have their tires over-inflated.
No.
Also, if your ride is too harsh, try lowering the PSI in your tires by 5. What are you running now?? IMO many folks who feel a ride is too harsh have their tires over-inflated.
#8
the only negative you've stated is that it's not comfortable. almost everyone says that the caad-9 is a harsh frame (which isn't a bad thing to everyone), so by what you're saying, no, it's not over rated.
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin, USA
Bikes: 2010 Specialized Roubaix Comp - Rival Gary Fisher Marlin
So, being completely new to road biking (still trying to decide what to buy), I take it this is more of a full race bike? The other bikes I am considering are more of a "performance" bike. Is this why some find the CAAD9 uncomfortable? I found a couple shops nearby so I will probably ad this to my list of bikes to try, but just wondering if this is a bike most can find comfortable for extended rides.
#18
I'm a bit biased as I bought a 2010 caad 9 5 but this bike is awesome. I got the 105 package whcich is acceptable for a non racing and hard recreational riding.
the seat issue was due to the san marco saddle. 2010"s have a inexpensive prologo kappa but it is very comfortable and even has a nice channel down middle for nice crotchel' region circulation.
What I like is the BB30 bottom bracket. it is rock solid and the frame does little mush flexing during hard climbs or sprints.
I will eventually upgrade the group set from 105.....or maybe just refi the house for a pinarello dogma.
the seat issue was due to the san marco saddle. 2010"s have a inexpensive prologo kappa but it is very comfortable and even has a nice channel down middle for nice crotchel' region circulation.
What I like is the BB30 bottom bracket. it is rock solid and the frame does little mush flexing during hard climbs or sprints.
I will eventually upgrade the group set from 105.....or maybe just refi the house for a pinarello dogma.
#19
Should Be More Popular




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 46,197
Likes: 11,755
From: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
It is good for racing or those who want race-like handling. Perfect for fast club rides too.
If your goal is casual riding, you probably want something more laid back and comfortable
If your goal is casual riding, you probably want something more laid back and comfortable
#20
I'm a bit biased as I bought a 2010 caad 9 5 but this bike is awesome. I got the 105 package whcich is acceptable for a non racing and hard recreational riding.
the seat issue was due to the san marco saddle. 2010"s have a inexpensive prologo kappa but it is very comfortable and even has a nice channel down middle for nice crotchel' region circulation.
What I like is the BB30 bottom bracket. it is rock solid and the frame does little mush flexing during hard climbs or sprints.
I will eventually upgrade the group set from 105.....or maybe just refi the house for a pinarello dogma.
the seat issue was due to the san marco saddle. 2010"s have a inexpensive prologo kappa but it is very comfortable and even has a nice channel down middle for nice crotchel' region circulation.
What I like is the BB30 bottom bracket. it is rock solid and the frame does little mush flexing during hard climbs or sprints.
I will eventually upgrade the group set from 105.....or maybe just refi the house for a pinarello dogma.
105 is perfectly acceptable for racing.
#21
So, being completely new to road biking (still trying to decide what to buy), I take it this is more of a full race bike? The other bikes I am considering are more of a "performance" bike. Is this why some find the CAAD9 uncomfortable? I found a couple shops nearby so I will probably ad this to my list of bikes to try, but just wondering if this is a bike most can find comfortable for extended rides.
#22
#23
#24
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin, USA
Bikes: 2010 Specialized Roubaix Comp - Rival Gary Fisher Marlin
Ok, thanks.........it will put it on the list to try. The 9.5 is in the price range of some of the others I am considering, Trek 2.3,Fisher Ion(pro),Scott S20, Jamis Ventura Elite.
#25
Toughen the pluck up!
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
From: So Fla
Bikes: 1990 KHS Sled; 2004 Specialized Sirrus Pro; 2005 Cannondale Saeco Replica
My oldest bike in the stable is actually a CAAD 7 SAECO replica. I have some other very nice and considerably more expensive bikes but the Cannondale is still the lightest and the most directly responsive. Is it a bit harsher than a CF frame? Maybe but unless you're bombing pot holes probably not enough to make a difference. It also remains my mount of choice when I'm descending at 40mph plus on curves.



