![]() |
Rode the CAAD 10 today...
Freaking amazing, definitely putting in my order asap.
|
Do they look better in person? Online they looked a little... blocky? Didn't appear to have the same balanced form as previous iterations, I suppose.
|
Umm I liked it, the tubing is a bit different, the rear stays look great more like a Super Six but the front end is a bit funky with that hydroformed down tube. Either way, the ride was awesome, going to make a fantastic crit bike.
|
Where did you ride the new Caad 10? What group, wheels, size, etc. (Is the Caad 10 already available for sale at Cannondale dealers)
Thanks |
You didn't happen to hear about it being offered as a frame set, did you?
|
Originally Posted by ADSR
(Post 11149426)
You didn't happen to hear about it being offered as a frame set, did you?
frameset only is expensive for whatever reason. |
Originally Posted by AEO
(Post 11149443)
it's very likely that the cheapest model with tiagra or something will be cheaper if you buy it as a complete bike and sell off the groupset.
frameset only is expensive for whatever reason. |
Originally Posted by AEO
(Post 11149443)
it's very likely that the cheapest model with tiagra or something will be cheaper if you buy it as a complete bike and sell off the groupset.
frameset only is expensive for whatever reason. |
Originally Posted by ADSR
(Post 11149426)
You didn't happen to hear about it being offered as a frame set, did you?
|
I think Cannondale should offer its customers the choice of purchasing a frame made here in the United States - with the obvious premium that carries - or offshored to Taiwan. Maybe if companies respected their customers enough to allow them to decide where the products they purchase are made we could actually let the market solve the question of outsourcing. Unfortunately, the profit takers (business owners) make that decision for the consumer, which sort of slaps market theory in the face.
|
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11156618)
I think Cannondale should offer its customers the choice of purchasing a frame made here in the United States - with the obvious premium that carries - or offshored to Taiwan. Maybe if companies respected their customers enough to allow them to decide where the products they purchase are made we could actually let the market solve the question of outsourcing. Unfortunately, the profit takers (business owners) make that decision for the consumer, which sort of slaps market theory in the face.
|
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11156618)
I think Cannondale should offer its customers the choice of purchasing a frame made here in the United States - with the obvious premium that carries - or offshored to Taiwan. Maybe if companies respected their customers enough to allow them to decide where the products they purchase are made we could actually let the market solve the question of outsourcing. Unfortunately, the profit takers (business owners) make that decision for the consumer, which sort of slaps market theory in the face.
|
Originally Posted by wens
(Post 11156823)
I think you should go read your economics book again and report your conclusions.
I'm just saying that consumers in this case - and likely in most cases of oursourcing - would prefer to be able to purchase a product made in the United States. I'm also saying that there is ample demand for such products as to justify a price premium to compensate for the higher labor costs here in the United States, so the decision to oursource is purely one of greed on the part of Cannondale's ownership. Cannondale could have maintained high-end domestic production for their top-of-the-line aluminum bikes, but they chose to outsource all development so as to maximize profits even if that means diminished satisfaction in the aggregate. |
Cannondale, or Dorel?
|
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11156939)
I'm also saying that there is ample demand for such products as to justify a price premium to compensate for the higher labor costs here in the United States, so the decision to oursource is purely one of greed on the part of Cannondale's ownership.
|
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11156939)
I'm just saying that consumers in this case - and likely in most cases of oursourcing - would prefer to be able to purchase a product made in the United States. I'm also saying that there is ample demand for such products as to justify a price premium to compensate for the higher labor costs here in the United States |
For many products I agree with what you're all saying, but for something as personal and precise as a bike frame I think there are plenty of people who'd be willing to pay that premium. Plus, it's a nice way to show some national pride. There will always be people for whom the bottom line is all that matters, but fortunately there are other types of people, too.
|
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11156939)
I actually have a degree in economics, cupcake, but thanks for the advice. Since you're clearly having some difficulty understanding what I was trying to say, I'll dumb it down a bit for you.
I'm just saying that consumers in this case - and likely in most cases of oursourcing - would prefer to be able to purchase a product made in the United States. I'm also saying that there is ample demand for such products as to justify a price premium to compensate for the higher labor costs here in the United States, so the decision to oursource is purely one of greed on the part of Cannondale's ownership. Cannondale could have maintained high-end domestic production for their top-of-the-line aluminum bikes, but they chose to outsource all development so as to maximize profits even if that means diminished satisfaction in the aggregate. Keep dreaming. |
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11156939)
I actually have a degree in economics, cupcake, but thanks for the advice. Since you're clearly having some difficulty understanding what I was trying to say, I'll dumb it down a bit for you.
I'm just saying that consumers in this case - and likely in most cases of oursourcing - would prefer to be able to purchase a product made in the United States. I'm also saying that there is ample demand for such products as to justify a price premium to compensate for the higher labor costs here in the United States, so the decision to oursource is purely one of greed on the part of Cannondale's ownership. Cannondale could have maintained high-end domestic production for their top-of-the-line aluminum bikes, but they chose to outsource all development so as to maximize profits even if that means diminished satisfaction in the aggregate. Just remember, D's get degrees. :thumb: |
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11157120)
For many products I agree with what you're all saying, but for something as personal and precise as a bike frame I think there are plenty of people who'd be willing to pay that premium. Plus, it's a nice way to show some national pride. There will always be people for whom the bottom line is all that matters, but fortunately there are other types of people, too.
|
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11157120)
For many products I agree with what you're all saying, but for something as personal and precise as a bike frame I think there are plenty of people who'd be willing to pay that premium. Plus, it's a nice way to show some national pride. There will always be people for whom the bottom line is all that matters, but fortunately there are other types of people, too.
also the majority of bikes are made in Asia and are still top notch... their not grabage or inferior to American made bikes like others have said how many people would really buy the same bike with the frame made in the USA and pay say 500.00 more |
Nick, give us more info on the '10 please.
As for the made in the USA debate, it will come back and bite us in the butt. If all the high paying jobs are being sent overseas (because labor rates are far less), and we all lose our jobs, who will be left to buy the nice shiny objects? The factory worker in China earning a couple bucks per day is not going to have the money for a $2000 bike. A US factory worker making $20-30/hr + overtime + benefits probably could afford such luxuries. The only difference is that the corporation makes more profit by going overseas. If jobs keep flowing outwards it will be interesting to see what is left, and who will be left to buy up products. |
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11156939)
I actually have a degree in economics, cupcake, but thanks for the advice. Since you're clearly having some difficulty understanding what I was trying to say, I'll dumb it down a bit for you.
I'm just saying that consumers in this case - and likely in most cases of oursourcing - would prefer to be able to purchase a product made in the United States. I'm also saying that there is ample demand for such products as to justify a price premium to compensate for the higher labor costs here in the United States, so the decision to oursource is purely one of greed on the part of Cannondale's ownership. Cannondale could have maintained high-end domestic production for their top-of-the-line aluminum bikes, but they chose to outsource all development so as to maximize profits even if that means diminished satisfaction in the aggregate. |
Another great thread ruined by petty arguments. Great job guys :thumb:
|
Originally Posted by mocolotion
(Post 11156618)
I think Cannondale should offer its customers the choice of purchasing a frame made here in the United States - with the obvious premium that carries - or offshored to Taiwan. Maybe if companies respected their customers enough to allow them to decide where the products they purchase are made we could actually let the market solve the question of outsourcing. Unfortunately, the profit takers (business owners) make that decision for the consumer, which sort of slaps market theory in the face.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.