Why do trainer climbing blocks exist?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why do trainer climbing blocks exist?
like this: https://www.amazon.com/CycleOps-Stack...0927504&sr=8-6
It clearly says that this is used to level the bike and/or raise the bike up to "simulate climbing workouts." I'm pretty sure that's impossible.
I'm in college to be a mechanical engineer and I like to believe I have a firm grasp on how physics works and interactions between forces. On a trainer, the resistance is provided by the magnets/fluid in the trainer, and raising the front wheel should have zero effect on the resistance. You could even be riding a vertical bike on a trainer and it should be the same workout.
Now, I know CycleOps employs many engineers to design these things (plus every other trainer manufacturer out there), and I don't believe they would sell and market a product that absolutely does not perform its function. Am I missing something? or is this a full blown marketing scam?
It clearly says that this is used to level the bike and/or raise the bike up to "simulate climbing workouts." I'm pretty sure that's impossible.
I'm in college to be a mechanical engineer and I like to believe I have a firm grasp on how physics works and interactions between forces. On a trainer, the resistance is provided by the magnets/fluid in the trainer, and raising the front wheel should have zero effect on the resistance. You could even be riding a vertical bike on a trainer and it should be the same workout.
Now, I know CycleOps employs many engineers to design these things (plus every other trainer manufacturer out there), and I don't believe they would sell and market a product that absolutely does not perform its function. Am I missing something? or is this a full blown marketing scam?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,099
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
If you don't ride much when not on trainers, perhaps you don't realize this - but when riding uphill, bikes do not remain level.
If you want to simulate riding uphill, you have to do more than just turn up the resistance. You'll want to...raise the front end of the bike.
If you want to simulate riding uphill, you have to do more than just turn up the resistance. You'll want to...raise the front end of the bike.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yeah, but its the exact same workout. Its the exact same thing to have a level bike and have the front wheel be higher than the back on a trainer. So people pay $20 for something that literally does nothing?
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,420
Bikes: Baum Romano, Brompton S2, Homemade Bamboo!
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 474 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times
in
129 Posts
Another example...Your bike doesn't notice if you are out of the saddle - it's a dumb lump of metal/carbon/etc. After a couple of minutes you as sure as hell notice the difference!
Typical engineer - always forgetting the end user!
#8
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 35
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
like this: https://www.amazon.com/CycleOps-Stack...0927504&sr=8-6
It clearly says that this is used to level the bike and/or raise the bike up to "simulate climbing workouts." I'm pretty sure that's impossible.
I'm in college to be a mechanical engineer and I like to believe I have a firm grasp on how physics works and interactions between forces. On a trainer, the resistance is provided by the magnets/fluid in the trainer, and raising the front wheel should have zero effect on the resistance. You could even be riding a vertical bike on a trainer and it should be the same workout.
Now, I know CycleOps employs many engineers to design these things (plus every other trainer manufacturer out there), and I don't believe they would sell and market a product that absolutely does not perform its function. Am I missing something? or is this a full blown marketing scam?
It clearly says that this is used to level the bike and/or raise the bike up to "simulate climbing workouts." I'm pretty sure that's impossible.
I'm in college to be a mechanical engineer and I like to believe I have a firm grasp on how physics works and interactions between forces. On a trainer, the resistance is provided by the magnets/fluid in the trainer, and raising the front wheel should have zero effect on the resistance. You could even be riding a vertical bike on a trainer and it should be the same workout.
Now, I know CycleOps employs many engineers to design these things (plus every other trainer manufacturer out there), and I don't believe they would sell and market a product that absolutely does not perform its function. Am I missing something? or is this a full blown marketing scam?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,420
Bikes: Baum Romano, Brompton S2, Homemade Bamboo!
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 474 Post(s)
Liked 204 Times
in
129 Posts
It reminds me of the scene in the film "The Right Stuff" (about the early space program) where the engineers build the capsule, but don't even put a window in for the astronauts (amongst other things).
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Someplace trying to figure it out
Posts: 10,664
Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
like this: https://www.amazon.com/CycleOps-Stack...0927504&sr=8-6
It clearly says that this is used to level the bike and/or raise the bike up to "simulate climbing workouts." I'm pretty sure that's impossible.
I'm in college to be a mechanical engineer and I like to believe I have a firm grasp on how physics works and interactions between forces. On a trainer, the resistance is provided by the magnets/fluid in the trainer, and raising the front wheel should have zero effect on the resistance. You could even be riding a vertical bike on a trainer and it should be the same workout.
Now, I know CycleOps employs many engineers to design these things (plus every other trainer manufacturer out there), and I don't believe they would sell and market a product that absolutely does not perform its function. Am I missing something? or is this a full blown marketing scam?
It clearly says that this is used to level the bike and/or raise the bike up to "simulate climbing workouts." I'm pretty sure that's impossible.
I'm in college to be a mechanical engineer and I like to believe I have a firm grasp on how physics works and interactions between forces. On a trainer, the resistance is provided by the magnets/fluid in the trainer, and raising the front wheel should have zero effect on the resistance. You could even be riding a vertical bike on a trainer and it should be the same workout.
Now, I know CycleOps employs many engineers to design these things (plus every other trainer manufacturer out there), and I don't believe they would sell and market a product that absolutely does not perform its function. Am I missing something? or is this a full blown marketing scam?
By the way, when my treadmill goes to 5 degrees of incline and my heart rate goes up rapidly, it must be a figment of my imagination.
Last edited by roadwarrior; 11-28-10 at 07:05 AM.
#16
Throw the stick!!!!
I prefer to raise the rear wheel that way I can ride downhill the entire time I'm on the trainer.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
#18
Come on you Spurs!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 653
Bikes: Trek 2.1, BMC Roadracer SL01
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree with awesomejack. When you go uphill it's harder not because of your bike position but because you gain elevation. Changing bike position when stationary makes no difference in how much effort you put into it. The only benefit I can see is that it allows you to practice the riders position on the bike when climbing.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 2,620
Bikes: Orbea Orca Trek 5500 Trek Equinox
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree with awesomejack. When you go uphill it's harder not because of your bike position but because you gain elevation. Changing bike position when stationary makes no difference in how much effort you put into it. The only benefit I can see is that it allows you to practice the riders position on the bike when climbing.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I use the training block because it's annoying to ride without one and be tilted downwards. I tend to agree that unless you're jacking your bike up a LOT, the positional differences are near-meaningless compared to the actual power/work you put out on the trainer which can be done regardless of position.
I've got the CycleOps climbing block with multiple heights, and I just ignore the heights and use the level one - I wasn't getting any more climbing benefit from the inclined ones.
And while you can just use a block of wood, phone book, etc to prop up your bike, I found all the solutions wanting, as I use my trainer a fair amount. The big CycleOps block is very stable, which is useful when doing a lot of hard riding on the trainer. (Damn you SPinervals!)
I've got the CycleOps climbing block with multiple heights, and I just ignore the heights and use the level one - I wasn't getting any more climbing benefit from the inclined ones.
And while you can just use a block of wood, phone book, etc to prop up your bike, I found all the solutions wanting, as I use my trainer a fair amount. The big CycleOps block is very stable, which is useful when doing a lot of hard riding on the trainer. (Damn you SPinervals!)
#22
Fred-ish
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I agree with awesomejack. When you go uphill it's harder not because of your bike position but because you gain elevation. Changing bike position when stationary makes no difference in how much effort you put into it. The only benefit I can see is that it allows you to practice the riders position on the bike when climbing.
I guess Voltaire was right, common sense is not so common.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,742
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 157 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2340 Post(s)
Liked 5,189 Times
in
1,822 Posts
Uh, no. You body position on the bike changes and if you ride a lot this is quite apparent. In fact I feel the difference when I don't level the back at all on the trainer because the rear tire is higher. Of course a couple of cookbooks work as well as a climbing block and cost me nothing
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#24
Senior Member
As for the case at hand, the OP's correct. The relative position of the bars, saddle and pedal is fixed at any angle of rotation of the bike, and all pedaling resistance comes through the chain tangent to the chainring; gravity plays no significant part in the mechanics of rotating the crank. If different muscle groups are used when climbing, it's only due to the difference in inertia and has nothing to do with the very slight change in the angle of the gravity vector.
#25
Senior Member
Think of the relative position of the feet hips and shoulders on a road bike and a recumbent (not to mention the relative weight and CdA of the two). Talk about teaching people to think critically.