Helmets Work!
#151
Certifiable Bike "Expert"
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#152
Descends like a rock
Do you have any data on the number of drivers on the road that experience head trauma? In a car you have seat belts, air bags, crumple zones and numerous other factors to alleviate head trauma. I would expect head trauma in car wrecks to be very rare and only in the very most serious wrecks. I notice that race car drivers do wear a helmet. I think that probably makes sense.
#153
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Do you have any data on the number of drivers on the road that experience head trauma? In a car you have seat belts, air bags, crumple zones and numerous other factors to alleviate head trauma. I would expect head trauma in car wrecks to be very rare and only in the very most serious wrecks. I notice that race car drivers do wear a helmet. I think that probably makes sense.
#154
Descends like a rock
No, I don't, I am asking for it. And your point about race car drivers is exactly to my point, it is all about risk mitigation and risk tolerance. Don't judge me for not wearing a helmet on my bike, UNLESS, you can honestly say that you wear one everytime you are in a car.
I also dont think riding a bike without a helmet and driving a car without a helmet are equal risk levels.
#155
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There seems to be 2 sides, both of which are wrong in my opinion; one says helmets are worthless and may even pose additional dangers, and the other saying that a helmet must be worn everytime you go out on a bike or you are stupid. That is just as wrong. In my life, I have been in the 1 major bike wreck, but I have been in a couple major car accidents, so I would have to disagree that a bike poses more of a risk, simply because you are better protected, and again, it should not matter to those that say I need to wear a helmet on every ride, because there is still SOME risk invloved in driving a car. It is all about odds and risk tolerance.
#156
Descends like a rock
I believe that you and I are actually in the same camp. If you look back on my previous couple of posts, you will see that I too, assess the risks of each of my rides and will wear a helmet if I deem there are other variables beyond my control, ie. a large pack of riders or lots of congested traffic. I believe that helmets have a place and perform a function, but it is up to the individual to determine at what point it should be worn.
There seems to be 2 sides, both of which are wrong in my opinion; one says helmets are worthless and may even pose additional dangers, and the other saying that a helmet must be worn everytime you go out on a bike or you are stupid. That is just as wrong. In my life, I have been in the 1 major bike wreck, but I have been in a couple major car accidents, so I would have to disagree that a bike poses more of a risk, simply because you are better protected, and again, it should not matter to those that say I need to wear a helmet on every ride, because there is still SOME risk invloved in driving a car. It is all about odds and risk tolerance.
There seems to be 2 sides, both of which are wrong in my opinion; one says helmets are worthless and may even pose additional dangers, and the other saying that a helmet must be worn everytime you go out on a bike or you are stupid. That is just as wrong. In my life, I have been in the 1 major bike wreck, but I have been in a couple major car accidents, so I would have to disagree that a bike poses more of a risk, simply because you are better protected, and again, it should not matter to those that say I need to wear a helmet on every ride, because there is still SOME risk invloved in driving a car. It is all about odds and risk tolerance.
#157
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: St. Martin, Ohio
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To be honest, I didn't know until I opened this thread that there existed a debate on
whether or not it was good to wear a helmet.
I've crashed once. When I got up off of the ground my helmet was cracked in half.
That would have been my head.
To me, there is no debate.
whether or not it was good to wear a helmet.
I've crashed once. When I got up off of the ground my helmet was cracked in half.
That would have been my head.
To me, there is no debate.
#158
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,099
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
RE: Head Trauma - modern cars are filled with tech designed to protect your head. Seatbelts. Multiple airbargs. Crumple zones, etc. Bikes aren't. It's your head against the pavement/tree/whatever, and crashes on a bike are considerably more likely.
#159
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm glad you came out of your crash ok.
All I ask is that you let me have that same debate with myself to reach my own conclusion, without being ridiculed for coming to a different conclusion.
All I ask is that you let me have that same debate with myself to reach my own conclusion, without being ridiculed for coming to a different conclusion.
#160
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Regardless of what side you fall on in this debate, I think it's worth saying:
Please don't go off telling noncyclists that they must wear a helmet and you wear one and it saved your life and they're stupid for not wearing one. You just make this sport seem dangerous, and high risk. I think we're all aware this isn't an adrenaline junky sport. Some non-cyclists seem to think it is.
I'd much rather see people ride, sans helmet, than not ride. Then I can politely suggest that a helmet is worth purchasing and wearing. Otherwise I'm left trying to convince them I'm not an adrenaline junky and it doesn't entitle them to run me down.
Please don't go off telling noncyclists that they must wear a helmet and you wear one and it saved your life and they're stupid for not wearing one. You just make this sport seem dangerous, and high risk. I think we're all aware this isn't an adrenaline junky sport. Some non-cyclists seem to think it is.
I'd much rather see people ride, sans helmet, than not ride. Then I can politely suggest that a helmet is worth purchasing and wearing. Otherwise I'm left trying to convince them I'm not an adrenaline junky and it doesn't entitle them to run me down.
#161
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pennsyl-tuckey
Posts: 684
Bikes: '86 Cannondale SR400, '86 Pugeot PX10, '92 Bianchi Axis, '95 Bianchi Campione d'Italia, '00 Fondriest X-Status, '08 Specialized Roubaix, '13 Cannondale CAADX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Wow, I just wanted say "hey, look at the missing foam & cracks but my head is OK". I didn't expect this to be my longest thread ever...Great discussion!
We can each make adult choices about helmets. With or without, enjoy your next ride!
We can each make adult choices about helmets. With or without, enjoy your next ride!
#162
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550
Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times
in
145 Posts
Whew! I thought for a moment this was the A&S.
#163
Senior Member
I stand corrected, thanks for the link and I will look at the study, one which I have not seen . Again thanks and as Rosanne Rosanna Danna said " Nevermind"
#164
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Next you should start a thread with the title "Which chain lube should I use for my bikesdirect bike?"
__________________
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
Telemachus has, indeed, sneezed.
#165
Senior Member
#167
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
And for a more recent and contrary point of view.
https://www.cyclehelmets.org/1052.html
https://www.cyclehelmets.org/1052.html
#168
Descends like a rock
Some of it is good. A lot of it is not. The rotational injury stuff is pretty weak, based on "some doctors think". Sure, its worth looking into, but it pretty weak right now. The whole population stuff deals with helmet laws being introduced. Its very difficult to draw any solid conclusion from these - there are a lot of factors at work there. The less exercise and people being more risky with helmets is irrelevant. The answer to those is not to stop wearing helmets, but to get out and ride and don't be stupid just because you're wearing a helmet.
I would be curious if anyone has published any crash test data with and without helmets. The only way to really know if helmets are effective is to try to simulate typical bike crashes with a test dummy fitted with sensors. I realize this is pretty difficult to pull off, but I'm sure it can be done. Look at the same kind of crash 100 times and compare the sensor data from a helmeted head and a non helmeted head. Of course a dummy doesnt have the curl up instincts and such that a human has, but I still think that would be the best way to know exactly how much impact a helmet can absorb.
I would be curious if anyone has published any crash test data with and without helmets. The only way to really know if helmets are effective is to try to simulate typical bike crashes with a test dummy fitted with sensors. I realize this is pretty difficult to pull off, but I'm sure it can be done. Look at the same kind of crash 100 times and compare the sensor data from a helmeted head and a non helmeted head. Of course a dummy doesnt have the curl up instincts and such that a human has, but I still think that would be the best way to know exactly how much impact a helmet can absorb.
#170
well hello there
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
206 Posts
I don't care if you choose not to wear a helmet.
I think that for the most part the issue of riding with others that don't wear a helmet relates to organized group rides. Unfortunately in our litigious society, if you injured on a group ride, not wearing a helmet, it's going to increase the legal risk of the organizers. Also a policy requiring helmets is likely to decrease insurance costs for the Organizers.
I think that for the most part the issue of riding with others that don't wear a helmet relates to organized group rides. Unfortunately in our litigious society, if you injured on a group ride, not wearing a helmet, it's going to increase the legal risk of the organizers. Also a policy requiring helmets is likely to decrease insurance costs for the Organizers.
__________________
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
#171
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Some of it is good. A lot of it is not. The rotational injury stuff is pretty weak, based on "some doctors think". Sure, its worth looking into, but it pretty weak right now. The whole population stuff deals with helmet laws being introduced. Its very difficult to draw any solid conclusion from these - there are a lot of factors at work there. The less exercise and people being more risky with helmets is irrelevant. The answer to those is not to stop wearing helmets, but to get out and ride and don't be stupid just because you're wearing a helmet.
I would be curious if anyone has published any crash test data with and without helmets. The only way to really know if helmets are effective is to try to simulate typical bike crashes with a test dummy fitted with sensors. I realize this is pretty difficult to pull off, but I'm sure it can be done. Look at the same kind of crash 100 times and compare the sensor data from a helmeted head and a non helmeted head. Of course a dummy doesnt have the curl up instincts and such that a human has, but I still think that would be the best way to know exactly how much impact a helmet can absorb.
I would be curious if anyone has published any crash test data with and without helmets. The only way to really know if helmets are effective is to try to simulate typical bike crashes with a test dummy fitted with sensors. I realize this is pretty difficult to pull off, but I'm sure it can be done. Look at the same kind of crash 100 times and compare the sensor data from a helmeted head and a non helmeted head. Of course a dummy doesnt have the curl up instincts and such that a human has, but I still think that would be the best way to know exactly how much impact a helmet can absorb.
#172
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Along those same lines, if some negligent driver creams you and causes severe head injury, you can bet that they're going to raise the defense of comparative negligence, if you're not wearing a helmet. In other words they will argue that the cyclist caused his own head injury by not wearing a helmet. The same argument is made all the time in auto accidents where injured victims weren't wearing their seat belts.
Seat belts are legally mandatory, so you are actually breaking the traffic laws by not wearing one. Where helmets aren't (most states for adults), you're not breaking a law. Is it due care to others bank accounts that you wrap your head in Styrofoam now?
(And, I would say, seat belts are better demonstrated to be more effective than motorcycle helmets, much less bicycle helmets).
#173
Senior Member
1) The helmet is not designed to provide protection from 28 mph horizontal speeds.
2) The helmet is designed to provide protection from a vertical fall of 5-6 feet.
3) As such, the real benefit of bicycle helmets would be for those walking and or running, do we see people wearing them for the use for which they were designed-no!
4) The process of wearing a helmet increases apparent head size by at least 50%, creating a risk for torsional injuries for which they were not designed and increasing the likelihood of head/helmet contact with the ground. This may be part of the reason for increased injury/death rates in whole population studies.
5) The manufacturers themselves state that helmets will not prevent concussions.
6) The AMA position statement is based upon the terribly flawed data posited by Thompson in 1989 and again in 1996. Once bad data gets into the system it can be devilish difficult to get it removed. For evidence of this read the Bio of Inaz Philipp Semmelwies
2) The helmet is designed to provide protection from a vertical fall of 5-6 feet.
3) As such, the real benefit of bicycle helmets would be for those walking and or running, do we see people wearing them for the use for which they were designed-no!
4) The process of wearing a helmet increases apparent head size by at least 50%, creating a risk for torsional injuries for which they were not designed and increasing the likelihood of head/helmet contact with the ground. This may be part of the reason for increased injury/death rates in whole population studies.
5) The manufacturers themselves state that helmets will not prevent concussions.
6) The AMA position statement is based upon the terribly flawed data posited by Thompson in 1989 and again in 1996. Once bad data gets into the system it can be devilish difficult to get it removed. For evidence of this read the Bio of Inaz Philipp Semmelwies
In any case, I won't tell you to wear a helmet. You are convinced by population statistics. I don't trust them in determining the best course of action for me. Population statistics pertain to populations. Not individuals. I ride in pack situations. I know for a fact that the type of crashes that happen in pack situations are not controllable. When your front wheel gets swept out, there is no time for the body to react in the normal way to protect your head. I've fallen a fair amount in the course of the last 15 years or so I've been riding road bikes; it wasn't until I started racing three years ago that I started getting into situations where I couldn't protect my head in a fall.
Thus, for me, I wear a helmet (most of the time) because 1) I know the type of risks I expose myself to involve crashes where I cannot control my body position, and 2) my falls typically happen onto horizontal pavement, meaning a fall from 5-6 vertical feet, which is the type of crash the helmet is optimized to absorb. A helmet makes sense for me. If most of my riding were short, 5 mile, low exposure, non-pack riding, commuting, then I probably wouldn't wear a helmet . If my riding was solo training in low car traffic areas, I might not wear a helmet (I do, though it's just out of habit, not because I believe I actually need it). And I don't wear a helmet on my rollers (too hot) even though the risk of falling is similar to that of riding solo on a country road. But in a race or group training ride, a helmet is an essential piece of equipment for injury prevention.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#174
The Weird Beard
Join Date: May 2005
Location: COS
Posts: 8,554
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
A well-stated point of view, but I have to ask why on this one point. Peril doesn't care how far you are from your house. My rabbit encounter (commute, low traffic, non-pack) was a mere 500 yards from my point of origin. I do not believe anymore that there is a thing called 'low-exposure.' To say that your risk is lowered, sure, I can go with that, but the unexpected can happen anywhere, and at any time. It's not like wearing a helmet is asking someone to endure excruciating torture while riding. It's a freaking helmet: A kind of hat for cycling.
#175
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The mechanical engineer in me says that a fall, regardless of horizontal speed, onto a horizontal surface (IOW, not a curb, lamppost, garbage bin, car bumper, etc), is a fall from 5-6 vertical feet.
In any case, I won't tell you to wear a helmet. You are convinced by population statistics. I don't trust them in determining the best course of action for me. Population statistics pertain to populations. Not individuals. I ride in pack situations. I know for a fact that the type of crashes that happen in pack situations are not controllable. When your front wheel gets swept out, there is no time for the body to react in the normal way to protect your head. I've fallen a fair amount in the course of the last 15 years or so I've been riding road bikes; it wasn't until I started racing three years ago that I started getting into situations where I couldn't protect my head in a fall.
Thus, for me, I wear a helmet (most of the time) because 1) I know the type of risks I expose myself to involve crashes where I cannot control my body position, and 2) my falls typically happen onto horizontal pavement, meaning a fall from 5-6 vertical feet, which is the type of crash the helmet is optimized to absorb. A helmet makes sense for me. If most of my riding were short, 5 mile, low exposure, non-pack riding, commuting, then I probably wouldn't wear a helmet . If my riding was solo training in low car traffic areas, I might not wear a helmet (I do, though it's just out of habit, not because I believe I actually need it). And I don't wear a helmet on my rollers (too hot) even though the risk of falling is similar to that of riding solo on a country road. But in a race or group training ride, a helmet is an essential piece of equipment for injury prevention.
In any case, I won't tell you to wear a helmet. You are convinced by population statistics. I don't trust them in determining the best course of action for me. Population statistics pertain to populations. Not individuals. I ride in pack situations. I know for a fact that the type of crashes that happen in pack situations are not controllable. When your front wheel gets swept out, there is no time for the body to react in the normal way to protect your head. I've fallen a fair amount in the course of the last 15 years or so I've been riding road bikes; it wasn't until I started racing three years ago that I started getting into situations where I couldn't protect my head in a fall.
Thus, for me, I wear a helmet (most of the time) because 1) I know the type of risks I expose myself to involve crashes where I cannot control my body position, and 2) my falls typically happen onto horizontal pavement, meaning a fall from 5-6 vertical feet, which is the type of crash the helmet is optimized to absorb. A helmet makes sense for me. If most of my riding were short, 5 mile, low exposure, non-pack riding, commuting, then I probably wouldn't wear a helmet . If my riding was solo training in low car traffic areas, I might not wear a helmet (I do, though it's just out of habit, not because I believe I actually need it). And I don't wear a helmet on my rollers (too hot) even though the risk of falling is similar to that of riding solo on a country road. But in a race or group training ride, a helmet is an essential piece of equipment for injury prevention.