Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

New Wheels

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

New Wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-11 | 01:44 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by littlewing6283
I was seriously looking at the Williams 38's and 58's. I have system 30's and use them to train on and they've been bombproof. I've even raced on them. Needless to say im very happy with Williams products.

I know PCAD raves about the 38's. What kind of riding do you do ? How windy is it in your area ? What is your weight ? I went with 38mm clinchers from easton mainly because I climb a lot and the winds could get nasty where i'm at. I rode some 60mm clinchers before and they were a PITA when the wind started gusting. I liked them though. Somebody correct me if i'm wrong but wouldn't it be more beneficial to run a 58mm frt and a 38mm rear opposed to a 38mm front and 58mm real. I imagine a 38mm front would handle better in windy conditions though.



Completely agree with you. They may only make you marginally faster (or faster in your head hahahha) but they completely change the bike.
I'm not a huge hill guy, i'm slowly getting better at them but i prefer the flats and sprints. I'll be getting into crits soon and wanna use the wheels mainly for that. I mainly wanted the 58 for the rear simply cause there gonna be stiffer then the 38. Not like the 38 isn't stiff but figure i'd go with the stiffer wheel, and like you said it'll be a bit easier to control a 38 front wheel in the wind. Will probably be a pain either way though if i'm getting wind from the side. Spin up speed will be a bit slower with a 58 rear probably but i don't think it'll be something i will notice. Being only 145 pounds most expect me to be great at climbing but its quite the opposite.

At this point i'm pretty set on the 38s but since i'm still saving up some dough for them its giving me time to decide.
wrr1020 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 05:58 AM
  #27  
lennyparis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 679
Likes: 1
From: Long Island

Bikes: 2017 Tarmac Pro, 2014 S-Works Tarmac, 2011 Trek Madone 6.2, 2014 Trek Madone 5.9 & 2009 Specialized Hardtail

I am 5'6" 135lbs
Just went better overall wheel
Faster, aero - not too much as don't want to get blown around in cross wind
Lighter
Can afford any wheel out there but don't want to wast money for no reason
Somehow feel that extra money will not make big difference to me
That being said a thousand or more might make a difference
lennyparis is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 09:07 AM
  #28  
pgjackson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Originally Posted by NathanC
Sounds just as irrational as buying new wheels.
Going from a 25lb entry level Fuji with Sora components and triple chainring to a sub-19lb Felt with 105s is irrational? It's actually probably closer to 18lbs with the Titans on there (the stock Mavics weighed at ton).

The OP is asking what he's going to get with a set of $2000 wheels. He thinks it's suddenly going to make him faster. I doubt it. If he has $2000 to blow, I would recommend he just get a whole new bike instead of just wheels. I'm not saying there is NO difference in cheap and expensive wheels...just that a recreational rider doing the occasional century is not going to notice a difference. I think there are better things for the OP to spend his money on that WOULD make an immediate difference.
pgjackson is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 09:27 AM
  #29  
Cateye's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Lactate Threshold

Bikes: Orbea

Originally Posted by WHOOOSSHHH...
Zipps are the only wheel that I have ever actually broken. 3 years ago bought Reynolds Assaults. They are still going strong, for less than half the price.
I wouldn't recommend Reynolds Assaults. I have seen two different pair by two different riders delaminate on the brake area after hard braking.
Cateye is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 09:50 AM
  #30  
lennyparis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 679
Likes: 1
From: Long Island

Bikes: 2017 Tarmac Pro, 2014 S-Works Tarmac, 2011 Trek Madone 6.2, 2014 Trek Madone 5.9 & 2009 Specialized Hardtail

First I heard of that with Assaults
Thanks for the feedback
lennyparis is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 10:32 AM
  #31  
Administrator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,652
Likes: 2,698
From: Delaware shore

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

I've got almost 5 years now of daily riding with Zipp 303s. They are durable and I've never touched them. That's better than any wheel I've own (actually I can say the same about Kysriums).
StanSeven is online now  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 03:09 PM
  #32  
Campag4life's Avatar
Voice of the Industry
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,572
Likes: 8
To the long time roadies reading this thread with amusement...does it make sense why you see middle aged guys
out on the road with $2K wheels that can barely average 16 mph? Sorry...had to say something.
Campag4life is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 03:13 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL

Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er

Originally Posted by Campag4life
To the long time roadies reading this thread with amusement...does it make sense why you see middle aged guys
out on the road with $2K wheels that can barely average 16 mph? Sorry...had to say something.
Maybe it's because they are recovering.

I've seen fast and slow riders of all ages and on all kinds of wheels. The equipment they're riding has a lot more to do with preference and income than ability. Doesn't puzzle me, don't know why it doesn't make sense to you.
svtmike is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 03:20 PM
  #34  
NathanC's Avatar
Shut up legs
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 2
From: Sydney

Bikes: Merckx

Originally Posted by pgjackson
Going from a 25lb entry level Fuji with Sora components and triple chainring to a sub-19lb Felt with 105s is irrational? It's actually probably closer to 18lbs with the Titans on there (the stock Mavics weighed at ton).

The OP is asking what he's going to get with a set of $2000 wheels. He thinks it's suddenly going to make him faster. I doubt it. If he has $2000 to blow, I would recommend he just get a whole new bike instead of just wheels. I'm not saying there is NO difference in cheap and expensive wheels...just that a recreational rider doing the occasional century is not going to notice a difference. I think there are better things for the OP to spend his money on that WOULD make an immediate difference.
That only works if he plans to put these wheels onto a Windsor Fens. I am sure the OP has a decent enough bike to put $2k wheels on. How much quicker are you on your 18 pound Felt than you are on your Fuji? If the triple annoyed you so much, you could have just changed that. Going from Sora to 105 did not make you quicker.
NathanC is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 03:26 PM
  #35  
Psimet2001's Avatar
I eat carbide.
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,678
Likes: 1,417
From: Elgin, IL

Bikes: Lots. Chapter2, Van Dessel, Giant, Trek, etc Dealers for BMC, Chapter2

Originally Posted by Campag4life
To the long time roadies reading this thread with amusement...does it make sense why you see middle aged guys
out on the road with $2K wheels that can barely average 16 mph? Sorry...had to say something.
I love seeing that. Odds are they went to a local shop to buy them as well. Awesome I just hope they find someone else to ride with because that will keep them riding and after all that's the most important thing here. Wait....maybe I missed your point. Were you trying to say that wheels should have minimum speed limits?

I wonder how fast they'd be going if they didn't have the wheels?

....wonder how their enjoyment of riding is impacted by having them....
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 03:36 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, Canada

Bikes: Brodie Force w/ Xtracycle, Dahon Helios, Merida Folding, Pacific Carryme, Softride Classic

My next upgrade will probably be Psimet wheels. And yes, I can average better than 16 mph ...
puppypilgrim is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 03:44 PM
  #37  
Quel's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,653
Likes: 1
From: Washington, DC
Originally Posted by pgjackson
Why do recreational riders really believe that wheels will make them faster? Save your money. $2000 wheels will do squat for you. Tell you what, OP. Go get some Forte Titan wheels from Performance bike for $150, and give me $1000. I will be your personal trainer for 3 months. In that time I guarantee you will lose 10-15lbs and at the end you will have saved yourself about $800. Your bike will feel lighter and you will be faster.
Why do "serious" riders really believe that improvements have to be either to equipment OR fitness, as if the two are mutually exclusive? Buy sweet gear, get faster. Ride more, lose weight, get faster. Bam.
Quel is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 03:52 PM
  #38  
Psimet2001's Avatar
I eat carbide.
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,678
Likes: 1,417
From: Elgin, IL

Bikes: Lots. Chapter2, Van Dessel, Giant, Trek, etc Dealers for BMC, Chapter2

Originally Posted by Quel
Why do "serious" riders really believe that improvements have to be either to equipment OR fitness, as if the two are mutually exclusive? Buy sweet gear, get faster. Ride more, lose weight, get faster. Bam.

Along those lines - where do you draw the line? (posed to those that think there are levels of equipment that "slower" riders should not "waste" their money on) Do you draw the line at simply having a functional bike? Should there be a test before anyone is allowed to get anything nicer than a walmart version of a bike? Until then that's all they "need"?

I don't know about anyone else but when I personally have nice gear it makes me want to ride more often.

I am a sow fat old guy who rides nice gear. I race just about every weekend as well....but I suck at it so I should not waste my money on entry fees either I guess. Would hate to help support the local race scene.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 03:57 PM
  #39  
coachboyd's Avatar
Boyd Cycling owner
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 414
Likes: 10
I have never understood this need to be fast to own fast equipment. If you have nice equipment you'll enjoy riding it more and that's all that counts.
Look how many people own nice cars, fast cars, even though they never professionally drive them. Yet every car commercial shows the car tearing through a desert or up some crazy hill. Driving would be pretty boring if we were all relegated to a Geo Metro because that is the car best suited to our driving needs (sorry to any Geo Metro drivers out there. . .well, maybe not).
coachboyd is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 04:01 PM
  #40  
handz98's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
I love seeing that. Odds are they went to a local shop to buy them as well. Awesome I just hope they find someone else to ride with because that will keep them riding and after all that's the most important thing here. Wait....maybe I missed your point. Were you trying to say that wheels should have minimum speed limits?

I wonder how fast they'd be going if they didn't have the wheels?

....wonder how their enjoyment of riding is impacted by having them....

Hey... I AM that guy! Does that mean I need to trade in my golf clubs for something cheaper 'cause I only shoot in the nineties....and that I need to trade in my pickup truck 'cause I'm not hauling/towing something everyday?

That reminds me, I need to e-mail Rob about some new wheels. Feel free to laugh and point when you pass me out on the road...I'll still be having a good time!
handz98 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 04:04 PM
  #41  
NathanC's Avatar
Shut up legs
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 2
From: Sydney

Bikes: Merckx

Exactly, Boyd.
NathanC is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 04:38 PM
  #42  
pdedes's Avatar
ka maté ka maté ka ora
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 4
From: wessex

Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra

i just got these
pdedes is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 04:48 PM
  #43  
pjn0629's Avatar
is The Stig
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 1
From: Long Island

Bikes: 2010 Trek Madone 5.2, 2003 Trek 5500, 2001 trek 8000 disc, 2006 Rocky ETSX-30, 1999 Raleigh R-700

I've had a great experience with my rol race sl set I picked up last summer, not too pricey, and they look great on the bike. They make a carbon clincher, with an aluminum rim, I'd take a look at those if I were you, they're not super expensive, and aluminum brakes better than carbon. I also have a set of Reynolds SDV66T wheels that I take out on occasion, but I don't ride them as much as I would if they were clinchers, they're kind of only my race/gran fondo/bling up my bike wheels. But day in/day out I use the rols the most.
pjn0629 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 04:51 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Campag4life
To the long time roadies reading this thread with amusement...does it make sense why you see middle aged guys
out on the road with $2K wheels that can barely average 16 mph? Sorry...had to say something.
So, how old are you, you whipper-snapper?

One of the things that appeals to me about biking is that it appeals to a lot of different people with different backgrounds. Be it a middle aged guy (like me) or some one twenty years older than me. I think we all get enjoyment out of cycling, and that's all that matters. I just got a new bike - a nice one in my opinion. And no, I didn't have to fill out an application to see I was physically qualified to buy it.
AllezDada is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 05:03 PM
  #45  
Administrator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,652
Likes: 2,698
From: Delaware shore

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Originally Posted by Campag4life
To the long time roadies reading this thread with amusement...does it make sense why you see middle aged guys
out on the road with $2K wheels that can barely average 16 mph? Sorry...had to say something.
So, why not? Actually slower riders benefit more by aero wheels proportionally than do faster riders.

Or maybe you get enjoyment telling others how you think they should spend their money.
StanSeven is online now  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 08:56 PM
  #46  
pgjackson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Originally Posted by Quel
Why do "serious" riders really believe that improvements have to be either to equipment OR fitness, as if the two are mutually exclusive? Buy sweet gear, get faster. Ride more, lose weight, get faster. Bam.
The OP thinks $2000 wheels are going to magically make him faster. I say it is very doubtful and probably a huge waste of money if that is his goal. Am I wrong?
pgjackson is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 08:59 PM
  #47  
NathanC's Avatar
Shut up legs
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 2
From: Sydney

Bikes: Merckx

Originally Posted by pgjackson
The OP thinks $2000 wheels are going to magically make him faster. I say it is very doubtful and probably a huge waste of money if that is his goal. Am I wrong?

The new wheels could make him marginally faster, marginally better handling bike, marginally more comfortable, marginally better looking, marginally make him ride more.
NathanC is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 09:03 PM
  #48  
pgjackson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Originally Posted by NathanC
That only works if he plans to put these wheels onto a Windsor Fens. I am sure the OP has a decent enough bike to put $2k wheels on. How much quicker are you on your 18 pound Felt than you are on your Fuji? If the triple annoyed you so much, you could have just changed that. Going from Sora to 105 did not make you quicker.
I actually looked in to upgrading the Fuji. A new chain ring (and probably cranks), FD, and shifter would have cost more than just selling the Fuji (which I did for $100 profit) and buying the Felt (which I got a great deal on). Worked out great. I don't think I am much faster, but the bike shifts much better, the chain never comes off (which it did a lot on the triple) and I didn't spend a small fortune.

By the way, the OP never said what bike he has.
pgjackson is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 09:04 PM
  #49  
pgjackson's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,128
Likes: 119
From: Gulf Breeze, FL

Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo

Originally Posted by NathanC
The new wheels could make him marginally faster, marginally better handling bike, marginally more comfortable, marginally better looking, marginally make him ride more.
I guess that's the answer to his question. Or not.
pgjackson is offline  
Reply
Old 03-21-11 | 09:30 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL

Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er

Originally Posted by pgjackson
The OP thinks $2000 wheels are going to magically make him faster. I say it is very doubtful and probably a huge waste of money if that is his goal. Am I wrong?
I don't think the OP said anything of the sort - he doesn't know what, if anything, to expect out of an expensive wheelset. And you could probably make the case that wheels like Zipp 303's are a huge waste of money for everyone when you consider the marginal benefits over more ordinary aluminum clinchers.
svtmike is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.