Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Compact crank or triple?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Compact crank or triple?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-24-11 | 04:33 PM
  #26  
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 326
From: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Originally Posted by ZippyThePinhead
What did you use to make the chart above?

The first bike I had that I rode seriously had a triple and I just figured I needed it. My lowest gear was 28/32 (22") and I used it for one climb in particular. Then I started riding a road bike where the lowest gear was 42/28 (41") and when I was able to do that particular climb, I realized that maybe I could live without the triple. Now I ride a compact double where the lowest gear is 34/28 (32"), and I no longer care to have a triple. Mabye when I am older...
I wouldn't choose to ride a double if I wasn't strong enough to handle a big cog that let me have one tooth jumps up to the 19.

With 10 cogs and 11 starting that allows for a 21 large cog, 23 with a 12 first position, and 26 with a 13 starting cog.

With only 9 in back the numbers are 19, 21, and 23 respectively.

Even then the double isn't necessarily better - although 50-34x13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23 has the same range and gear spacing as 50-40-30x13-14-15-16-17-18-19-21 disregarding the fully cross-chained combinations only 50x21 and 34x14 overlap so there's a lot more double shifting with the wrong terrain/wind/fatigue or rest day combinations and both gears near the ends of the cassette are noisier than the equivalent 40x17 in the middle.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-11 | 04:37 PM
  #27  
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 326
From: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Originally Posted by Creatre
I had a triple and recently switched to a standard double on my new bike. I lost about half a mph at 80rpm compared to my triple by using a 11-28 cassette. Half a mph is not worth switching to a triple. Get the compact if you are absolutely set on getting something smaller, but you would probably be okay on the standard with a decent sized rear cassette sprocket setup.
Standard double rings are 53-39. Road triples are often 53-39-30. You can have the exact same gears as on the double plus a lower set. Or ride a cassette with a big cog two sizes smaller to fill in the gaps if you want to ride exactly 80 RPM; although with a little training you should have no problem spinning 100 RPM for as long as it takes.

Last edited by Drew Eckhardt; 04-24-11 at 04:40 PM.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-11 | 04:39 PM
  #28  
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 326
From: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Originally Posted by IcySmooth52
Id just change the cassette. Having a triple doesn't shift as nice and you'd need a new derailleur and probably left shifter. SRAM Apex is real nice and Shimano 105 will be coming with a competitive option next year.
My triple (50-40-30) shifted better than the compact double (50-34) I replaced it with after wearing out the big ring. Apex sucks putting 2 of 3 rings from a hybrid or mountain bike on a road frame so you rarely have the right gear for hard road riding.
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-11 | 08:00 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Drew Eckhardt
My triple (50-40-30) shifted better than the compact double (50-34) I replaced it with after wearing out the big ring. Apex sucks putting 2 of 3 rings from a hybrid or mountain bike on a road frame so you rarely have the right gear for hard road riding.
It might suck but it's selling very well. I compared it to a triple and it shifted better; but then again I'm a more casual rider so your mileage may vary.
Laminarman is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jtexfisher
Road Cycling
104
06-26-12 08:17 PM
metalheart44
Fifty Plus (50+)
42
04-01-11 08:31 AM
baribari
Road Cycling
37
07-14-10 01:38 AM
lymansmtt
Road Cycling
25
06-28-10 09:32 PM
Carbon Unit
Road Cycling
24
05-06-10 09:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.