Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Getting Into Road Biking

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway
View Poll Results: Which first road bike?
Trek Madone 4.7
0
0%
Trek Madone 5.1
2
11.76%
Trek Madone 5.2
1
5.88%
Don't get a Trek
14
82.35%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Getting Into Road Biking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-11 | 01:17 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Awesome
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO

Bikes: 2011 Trek XO1, 2007 Trek 3900

Getting Into Road Biking

I've always owned mountain bikes and recently got into Cyclocross. Picked up a 2011 Trek XO1 for the upcoming cross season a few weeks ago. Been riding a lot on streets due to trail conditions after rain.

I'm also training for the Tour de Cure ride coming up in June. I'm going to do the Century on my cross bike (adding road slick tires).

I decided that I want to pick up a road bike now and start seriously getting into the sport. I was looking at the Trek Madone 4.7 and now I've started looking at the Madone 5.1 and 5.2. Originally, I wanted to stay around the $2,000-$2,500 range. However, I'm not married to that range.

Does anybody have experience with any of these bikes? I'm already used to the SRAM doubletap system so I'm leaning towards the 5.1. However, I could easily get used to the Shimano system. Would you suggest a different bike over the Trek?
StevenSTL is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-11 | 02:20 AM
  #2  
javal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 1
From: Örebro, Sweden

Bikes: Monark sportser 1970, Monark sportser 1970ish, Monark folder, Mustand 1985, Monark Tempo 1999, Monark 318 1975, Crescent 319 1979, Crescent 325 c:a 1965, Crescent Starren 2002 (hybrid/sport), Nordstjernan 1960`s cruiser.

Well you narrowed it down, didnt you? I would look at other brands if trek isnt your holy grail.
javal is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-11 | 02:32 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Awesome
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO

Bikes: 2011 Trek XO1, 2007 Trek 3900

Originally Posted by javal
Well you narrowed it down, didnt you? I would look at other brands if trek isnt your holy grail.
I own 3 Treks right now and I've always had awesome experiences with the brand. However, I'm willing to look at other options. I looked at a Giant TCR today. Don't recall which one or the price though. What company do you suggest I take a look at?
StevenSTL is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-11 | 02:39 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
When your spending $2,000+ dollars on a bicycle you really can't buy a bad bike. If it fits, you like the ride and your comfortable with the amount your spending then its a good buy. Specialized and Cannondale offer good bikes in your range with the Tarmac and Supersix lines. Also check out Felt, Giant, Scott, Wilier, Pinarello. Theirs tons of brands out there.
wrr1020 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-11 | 03:29 AM
  #5  
Full Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 447
Likes: 18
From: Seattle
FWIW, I wouldn't buy another Trek. Part of that, I'll freely admit, is brand snobbery. I'd rather be seen on a Pinarello, Cannondale, Scott, Specialized, etc, over a Trek.

That said, I'd 100% overlook that if I felt Trek built a better bike. They make good stuff, but after riding quite a few frames looking for my replacement, I feel Treks are pertty boring. I ended up choosing a Scott, but there are a lot of bikes that offer a great ride, great geometry, and overall solid build.
JustinHorne is offline  
Reply
Old 05-01-11 | 03:38 AM
  #6  
twobadfish's Avatar
Riding
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
From: Bend, Oregon

Bikes: Motobecane Fantom Cross Pro; Motobecane Nemesis Pro

Kind of bad poll options. They're basically the same bike with different components. If you're going to get a 5 series I would get the SRAM setup.
twobadfish is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xXXFR8TRNXXx
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
32
01-18-15 08:41 AM
bennybenny
Mountain Biking
5
04-02-14 12:40 PM
bbbean
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
3
01-10-14 01:51 PM
once a runner
Road Cycling
17
07-06-10 06:06 PM
jack85
Mountain Biking
9
06-07-10 02:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.