![]() |
Those super-short 31.8mm clamp stems were originally intended for mountainbike use. The leverage and effective steering angles aren't as much of an issue when you have a wide, flat bar.
But seriously, I'm not going to sit here and say that bike is 'wrong'. If it works for you, ride the hell out of it. |
Plenty of folks here will say it's wrong....
I would not go that far but still stand by my prior posting that doing this is a serious red flag for a sizing problem and is going to be a compromise. |
I agree that it is a red flag but may be correct.
My wife is 5'8" and runs an 80mm stem with a 55cm top tube. If we dropped to a better fitting 53-54cm top tube the seat tube and head tube would be too short. As pictured the stem is all the way up. She is a prime candidate for a WSD frame (all legs) but wanted vintage steel: http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/k...m/DSC01126.jpg |
Originally Posted by datlas
(Post 13516925)
I think needing a stem shorter than 80 or 90 is a "red flag" for MAJOR sizing problems.
You can try to compensate for a poorly fitted frame by tweaking stem and saddle position, but these will be compromises at best. Why do people get bikes that are not properly fitted??!?? |
http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/v...g?t=1268018374
This guy from the Scattante thread uses a short stem too http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ur-Scattante-* |
Originally Posted by thirdgenbird
(Post 13517507)
I agree that it is a red flag but may be correct.
My wife is 5'8" and runs an 80mm stem with a 55cm top tube. If we dropped to a better fitting 53-54cm top tube the seat tube and head tube would be too short. As pictured the stem is all the way up. She is a prime candidate for a WSD frame (all legs) but wanted vintage steel: http://i280.photobucket.com/albums/k...m/DSC01126.jpg People often forget to account for differences in reach for various handlebar and brake hood designs. |
Originally Posted by Biscayne05
(Post 13517541)
http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/v...g?t=1268018374
This guy from the Scattante thread uses a short stem too http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ur-Scattante-* That doesn't surprise me on a tiny frame. A 60cm is different. He probably bought the smallest size they have. |
Originally Posted by tagaproject6
(Post 13517211)
LOL! I want to see that bike posted in the "HOT or NOT" thread. :roflmao:
|
Originally Posted by Fiery
(Post 13517545)
People often forget to account for differences in reach for various handlebar and brake hood designs.
|
Originally Posted by Biscayne05
(Post 13517541)
http://i668.photobucket.com/albums/v...g?t=1268018374
This guy from the Scattante thread uses a short stem too http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ur-Scattante-* |
I feel like people here that are saying they have long legs and a short upper body just need to go down an additional frame size and then buy a longer seat post if the stock seat post needs to be raised above the minimum insert.
|
Originally Posted by wkg
(Post 13518366)
I feel like people here that are saying they have long legs and a short upper body just need to go down an additional frame size and then buy a longer seat post if the stock seat post needs to be raised above the minimum insert.
|
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
(Post 13518409)
Maybe, but they'd need to check the head tube length so that they don't end up with huge saddle-to-bar drop, too.
Basically, the top tube does not get any shorter than 21.5"/54.5cm |
Originally Posted by wkg
(Post 13518366)
I feel like people here that are saying they have long legs and a short upper body just need to go down an additional frame size and then buy a longer seat post if the stock seat post needs to be raised above the minimum insert.
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
(Post 13518409)
Maybe, but they'd need to check the head tube length so that they don't end up with huge saddle-to-bar drop, too.
More seatpost and more stem would be a worse fit than the short stem. I would question a short stem with very little rise on any frame over 53cm. In that case a different frame may be better. In my wifes case a wsd frame or touring frame would be better but it was what she wanted, it was cheap, and she is a casual cyclist. |
Originally Posted by wkg
(Post 13518366)
I feel like people here that are saying they have long legs and a short upper body just need to go down an additional frame size and then buy a longer seat post if the stock seat post needs to be raised above the minimum insert.
|
How many miles are you riding? What percentage do you ride in the drops? Reagrdless of set up if you dont ride in the drops you wont be comfortable in the drops. Make a conscious effort to spend a percentage of your rides in the drops and see if you dont develop the flexibility to use them comfortably. It will take some time.
|
Originally Posted by Looigi
(Post 13516705)
It does, but not in any important or significant way.
|
Originally Posted by Menel
(Post 13516788)
It will not impact control. It will feel different when you ride, so go easy at first, but your mind and body will quickly adapt and it will be a non issue.
I have long legs and shortish reach. 5'9, with a 54 frame, and 60 stem AND short reach ritchey bars. Don't alter saddle position, you can introduce other issues such as knee pain, every fitter I have talked to have said I did correctly. Adjust saddle so lower body is in position properly in relation to crank and pedals. Adjust stem, bar reach positioning for upper body. Don't sacrifice lower body geometry for upper body reach. http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/2034/800m.png Uploaded with ImageShack.us |
Also, another thing to keep in mind is that some bikes need a shorter stem to speed up steering.
Take for example, most XS and S size bikes. Many of them have 71 deg head tube angles. This prevents toe overlap and allows the top tube to be shorter. The slacker head angle (71 vs 73-74 on a regular sized bike) will slow down the steering. Thus to speed it up the steering, a shorter stem is needed. The shorter stem also works well because it allows an even shorter reach to the handlebars. |
Originally Posted by Menel
(Post 13516788)
It will not impact control. It will feel different when you ride, so go easy at first, but your mind and body will quickly adapt and it will be a non issue.
I have long legs and shortish reach. 5'9, with a 54 frame, and 60 stem AND short reach ritchey bars. Don't alter saddle position, you can introduce other issues such as knee pain, every fitter I have talked to have said I did correctly. Adjust saddle so lower body is in position properly in relation to crank and pedals. Adjust stem, bar reach positioning for upper body. Don't sacrifice lower body geometry for upper body reach. http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/2034/800m.png |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.