![]() |
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
(Post 13564258)
I honestly have no idea what you're on about. The point of my last post was that nice BMX platforms are WAY better than rat traps. Take that as you will.
Look, guys, I'm not being ignorant here. The only pedal variation I haven't used yet is toeclips and straps with dedicated, hard-soled, cleated cycling shoes. I hardly count Power Grips as different enough from regular clips with regular shoes, either. |
Originally Posted by BarracksSi
(Post 13564275)
And what I'm "on about" is your "If you spent a little time on platforms..." bit. Yeah, I have, from before puberty through college. I'll even count last Friday since I can't add in tomorrow morning when I ride to work yet again on my platform-equipped commuter bike.
The "spend a little time on..." post was in response to bikerjp's post about having trouble keeping feet on pedals, BTW. In addition, you seem to be in mega troll mode. WUWT? |
So I'd have to relearn pushing my feet onto the pedals on every upstroke... or unlearn the opportunity to lift my feet on the upstroke?
That still seems more like regression than progression. I'm on a roll tonight probably because my wife's got a head start on Christmas vacation and, being home alone, I've got nothing else to do. :p |
Originally Posted by ellenman
(Post 13564186)
Thanks for the spirited debate gentlemen; So are clipless pedals worth it in the end? I mean are the benefits of safety and control really that great?
I have clipless pedals on all my bikes except for my commuter/errand bike. I just want to be able to wear normal shoes on that one. |
Originally Posted by ellenman
(Post 13564186)
Thanks for the spirited debate gentlemen; So are clipless pedals worth it in the end? I mean are the benefits of safety and control really that great?
|
Originally Posted by ellenman
(Post 13564186)
Thanks for the spirited debate gentlemen; So are clipless pedals worth it in the end? I mean are the benefits of safety and control really that great?
Old style toe clips are way better than nothing, and clipless are way better than toe clips & straps.
Originally Posted by bikerjp
(Post 13564216)
There are times, especially when climbing, that if I wasn't attached to the pedal I'd probably fall. I can't be bothered to try focus on keeping my feet on a pedal. I'm just telling myself to keep moving. I can't imagine how much it would suck to ride platforms in these types of situations. Well, basically, I wouldn't be able to.
If I were to putter around town casually on a bike for a few miles, then I can see riding in street shoes. But doing 55 miles of hills yesterday would have been miserable and slower without clipless pedals. Being able to pull up while climbing makes a big difference. |
Originally Posted by matimeo
(Post 13563900)
There is absolutely no performance (read increased power or speed) advantage and anybody who tells you there is is misinformed.
I got 4th in a climbing race in loafers and Look Keo pedals a while back. If I had a brain and had remembered my shoes I might have won it. Sprinting was greatly compromised (though I still beat some guys), and climbing was no bucket of fun. People pull out of pedals on the upstroke in sprints, you lose that power on platform pedals. When I do sprint and shorter distance events on the track I use clipless and toe straps. Huge amount of force generated there and even with the pedal adjusted to maximum resistance, I was still pulling out. |
Originally Posted by matimeo
(Post 13563900)
There is absolutely no performance (read increased power or speed) advantage and anybody who tells you there is is misinformed. They actually have some studies and there is zero difference. Now there may be comfort reasons or an advantage because they do keep your feet on the pedal and you wont slip. The rest is in peoples heads. If you buy them, buy them for comfort but don't buy them dreaming they'll turn you into Lance. In my experience they not worth it and they were hard on my knees. I actually like being able to move my foot to different spots on the pedal.
I'm betting that you are referring to studies which show that you don't actually produce power pulling up on the pedal, but at most are partially unweighting it. That's far from saying that in the real world you can't ride faster with your feat clipped in than you can with street shoes on platforms. |
Originally Posted by Racer Ex
(Post 13565621)
When I do sprint and shorter distance events on the track I use clipless and toe straps.
|
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
(Post 13565628)
Let's see the studies.
I'm betting that you are referring to studies which show that you don't actually produce power pulling up on the pedal, but at most are partially unweighting it. That's far from saying that in the real world you can't ride faster with your feat clipped in than you can with street shoes on platforms. |
I don't know anyone who rides platform pedals, clips or no clips, with carbon soled sneakers (or loafers :)). When the sole flexes, power is lost. We don't need a study to determine that.
|
I ride platforms in boots with a steel shank on rainy days. Not very flexy but I'm pretty slow in 'em. ;)
There are even platforms for weight weenies these days: http://www.bikemag.com/files/2011/01...h_FSAped_4.jpg |
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
(Post 13565666)
See post #34. I like Racer EX's anecdote better, though. He didn't even have good platforms OR good shoes and didn't being unclipped slow him down.
And any study that say you (well, me anyway) don't produce power on the upstroke is seriously flawed (see "pulling out during a sprint"). That said you can still go pretty good on platform pedals sitting down. Standing to climb or sprint is a different story. If you're a casual rec rider clipless might help, or it might be very bad depending on how you're set up. |
Originally Posted by shovelhd
(Post 13565682)
I don't know anyone who rides platform pedals, clips or no clips, with carbon soled sneakers (or loafers :)). When the sole flexes, power is lost. We don't need a study to determine that.
http://www.os2.dhs.org/~john/shoes.jpg |
Yeah, I've got a set of Duegi's and a set if Diadora's from my 80's racing days at home. You missed the point. If you're going to wear cleated shoes, you might as well wear clipless.
|
Definitely - clipless is safer than slotted cleats.
|
Originally Posted by matimeo
(Post 13564067)
Common sense says to me that the crank arm and pedal don't need much help being efficient on the upstroke. Even though there is a minute dead spot, research just doesn't point to an advantage. Here's a study I ran across recently: https://www.thieme-connect.com/ejour...s-2008-1038374
It doesn't say that you can't sprint, climb, and time trial faster with clipless pedals versus platforms. It would be pretty easy to do a study measuring time on various TT courses, and maximum sprinting speed. I'd bet dollars to donuts, the clock would show an advantage to clipless. As for my own anecdote, 2 years ago at the Tour of Bahamas I was 2nd in the Circuit race, 3rd on GC after the time trial, and only needed to finish the Road race with the group I was in to finish on th podium, when my cleat imploded. After riding 20 plus miles barefoot on speedplays I abandonded. Stif shoes, and clipless pedals are definitely advantageous. |
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
(Post 13566110)
That study doesn't begin to say what you want it to. It simply says they didn't find a significant efficiency advantage at submaximal efforts.
It doesn't say that you can't sprint, climb, and time trial faster with clipless pedals versus platforms. It would be pretty easy to do a study measuring time on various TT courses, and maximum sprinting speed. I'd bet dollars to donuts, the clock would show an advantage to clipless. |
Ow! I had a pair of Dueggi's, I'd forgotten just how uncomfortable they were, especially on long rides. The cleats would squeak, and loosen up since they only had 1 screw, and you couldn't walk in them. In comparison, clipless shoes are a vast improvement. But you can wear a touring shoe or Chuck Taylor's and do just fine with toeclips.
Clipless is lighter, or course, and it's easy to wear booties for winter riding. I don't get a speed difference, but my efforts are "sub-optimal" |
Originally Posted by shovelhd
(Post 13566065)
Yeah, I've got a set of Duegi's and a set if Diadora's from my 80's racing days at home. You missed the point. If you're going to wear cleated shoes, you might as well wear clipless.
I still use those shoes on a regular basis. |
Good for you. My toe strap days are over. Wanna buy my old ones?
|
Originally Posted by hyhuu
(Post 13566279)
Agree. I don't understand why people quote research or study but don't even know how to read it in the first place.
|
Originally Posted by shovelhd
(Post 13567920)
Good for you. My toe strap days are over. Wanna buy my old ones?
|
Too big. Oh well.
|
Originally Posted by LesterOfPuppets
(Post 13567966)
I spend 98% of my time riding submaximally. Study applies to me.
|
Originally Posted by oldbobcat
(Post 13564017)
.... riders us(e) foot attachment actually pull up....
Originally Posted by Commodus
(Post 13564031)
You can do all of this without attachment.
|
For those of you considering clipless, let me tell you how it is:
The day you start using clipless, you will probably be disappointed that you did not gain 2 mph (just like you were when you got those new wheels). But.... After riding only a thousand miles clipless, try going back to platforms. - That is when it becomes immediately and unequivocably obvious that clipless gives you more power. - That is when you know you made the right choice. - That is when you know that all the peeps who said clipless isn't any better were plum outta their gourds. - That is when you can author awesome posts like this. |
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
(Post 13569947)
Only if they're size 41.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.