![]() |
Remember the epic Trek bottom bracket thread?
Considering a used Trek?
Add another data point. My 2007 5.2 Madone started creaking last summer something awful. The cause didn't present at that time and I tried everything to get rid of the creak; both myself and the local shop where I bought the bike went through more than one round of tightening/swapping components to isolate the creak with no success. Today the cause finally presented itself: the bottom bracket shell is detached from the frame on the driveside. Fortunately, I am the first owner. Now I get to test the fabled trek warranty. |
If it is a lifetime warranty and you are the original owner it should be covered without a problem.
|
sorry about that.
but this just further convinces me that steel is real and that i'll never go carbon. |
Originally Posted by zazenzach
(Post 13853806)
sorry about that.
but this just further convinces me that steel is real and that i'll never go carbon. |
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
(Post 13853800)
If it is a lifetime warranty and you are the original owner it should be covered without a problem.
Everyone knows carbon spontaneously explodes for no reason, its a feature, not a defect. :rolleyes: |
^^^Funny, I think it was the alloy sleeve bonded inside the carbon that failed and not the carbon itself.
IIRC the problem was the bonding agent and not the carbon/resin. |
rolling your eyes does not negate the fact that carbon is inferior to steel in virtually every way, and that the industry is cornered by carbon because of marketing ploys
come at me bros |
Original owner is covered don't worry about it.
|
Slim must be sleeping.
Let us know how the warranty strategy works for you. |
Originally Posted by zazenzach
(Post 13853838)
rolling your eyes does not negate the fact that carbon is inferior to steel in virtually every way, and that the industry is cornered by carbon because of marketing ploys
come at me bros |
Originally Posted by zazenzach
(Post 13853838)
rolling your eyes does not negate the fact that carbon is inferior to steel in virtually every way, and that the industry is cornered by carbon because of marketing ploys
come at me bros |
They will cover it, youll get a brand spanking new frame. A seed of doubt about the brand has been planted in your brain. :(
|
They should cover it. I have two friends who have had this same issue. One has gone through three or four frames in the last wo to three years - Trek keeps replacing them. The other only one.
|
Originally Posted by zazenzach
(Post 13853838)
rolling your eyes does not negate the fact that carbon is inferior to steel in virtually every way, and that the industry is cornered by carbon because of marketing ploys
come at me bros |
It good to see there are still companies that still stand behind there products.
|
Originally Posted by zazenzach
(Post 13853806)
sorry about that.
but this just further convinces me that steel is real and that i'll never go carbon. |
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
(Post 13854101)
Stupid
|
Originally Posted by echotraveler
(Post 13854122)
They will cover it, youll get a brand spanking new frame. A seed of doubt about the brand has been planted in your brain. :(
Originally Posted by topflightpro
(Post 13854216)
They should cover it. I have two friends who have had this same issue. One has gone through three or four frames in the last wo to three years - Trek keeps replacing them. The other only one.
|
Originally Posted by zazenzach
(Post 13853838)
rolling your eyes does not negate the fact that carbon is inferior to steel in virtually every way, and that the industry is cornered by carbon because of marketing ploys
come at me bros |
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
(Post 13853833)
^^^Funny, I think it was the alloy sleeve bonded inside the carbon that failed and not the carbon itself.
IIRC the problem was the bonding agent and not the carbon/resin. |
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
(Post 13854440)
Not every way. Longevity? Yes, steel wins.
|
Hope everything works out for you.
|
Originally Posted by Hiro11
(Post 13854480)
Eh, maybe. My running coach still rides around on a 1989 Trek 2500 (alloy lugs, bonded carbon tubes) and it's fine. I have easily 10K miles on my 2005 Madone and it's structurally just fine. Steel can last basically forever, but there's a lot of heavily used carbon out there at this point...
|
Originally Posted by datlas
(Post 13853958)
Slim must be sleeping.
|
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
(Post 13854426)
I had always envisioned killing it with some cataclysmic race crash, not having it die quietly from a manufacturing defect.
|
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
(Post 13854453)
Correct, as far as I can tell. Though it is possible the carbon around the bond failed, rather than the bond itself. No way to tell without getting the band saw out.
|
steel is real...good boat anchor.
OP...let us know how you get on with the new frame. Question is...are the latest Madones a press fit for BB30 bearings? Trek took big criticism for having BB30 bearings be slip fit and wonder if they changed? |
Originally Posted by Brian Ratliff
(Post 13854426)
I know, right? Sucks because the bike is the first one I raced and it has sentimental value for me. I had always envisioned killing it with some cataclysmic race crash, not having it die quietly from a manufacturing defect.
This is good to hear. Leaves me wondering if this might have something to do with Trek's migration away from bonded alloy bottom bracket shells. I talked with my LBS about Madones a couple of months back, asked how they were holding up and specifically asked about the bottom bracket. I wanted to find out if they have had any issues with them. The guy told me that a few (4 or so) years ago they did see two or three bikes that came in with your kind of problem, but the newer ones were holding up great. My guess is that since you are the original owner and I am sure you bought it from an LBS, you will be given one of the newer frames. |
Originally Posted by Phil85207
(Post 13854274)
It good to see there are still companies that still stand behind there products.
|
Originally Posted by RJM
(Post 13854910)
Will they not let you keep the old frame?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.