Lightweight Tubes
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Westbrook, Maine
Bikes: 2011 Litespeed M-1, 1991 Raleigh Technium (Commuter)
Lightweight Tubes
How big of a difference does it make on the performance of the bike, and which ones do you use? And how much more likely do you get flats?
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 3
From: Burnaby, BC
I've been using the Vittoria ultra lights. How big of a difference? Close to zero probably. But you need tubes, so you might as well get the lighter ones...assuming similar performance, and that has been my experience. I don't get any more flats using them. I think that if anything pokey gets through the tire, it's going through the tube regardless if it's 150g or 80g.
#3
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,903
Likes: 5
From: Wichita
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Edit: you stop punctures with the tires, not tubes. Use a thin tire with no/minimal puncture belts and you get flats regardless of tube type. Use a tough tire and thin vs regular tube seems not to matter, in my experience.
I like the Vittoria tubes as well; Michelin and Kenda seem fine also. The only tube I haven't liked is Specialized. Their presta valve often sticks.
The Conti ultra-lite tubes come with removable valve cores, which I find annoying and I use loc-tite blue to seal them.
I like the Vittoria tubes as well; Michelin and Kenda seem fine also. The only tube I haven't liked is Specialized. Their presta valve often sticks.
The Conti ultra-lite tubes come with removable valve cores, which I find annoying and I use loc-tite blue to seal them.





