Caad 10
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Canad,.Qc
Bikes: ccm targa
Caad 10
Hey guys I usally post in the ss/fg forum but I am leaning toward the road bike community as I am going to purchase a caad 10 in the next days
the only probleme I can not decide between the caad10 4 SRAM rival or the caad 10 3 Ultegra
Prices are really good as I can have both in staff deal differences between the two is a hundred dollar
I test drove the shimano 105 and the rival to have an idea on how they shift
the only probleme I can not decide between the caad10 4 SRAM rival or the caad 10 3 Ultegra
Prices are really good as I can have both in staff deal differences between the two is a hundred dollar
I test drove the shimano 105 and the rival to have an idea on how they shift
#6
moth -----> flame


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,919
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area
Bikes: 18 Tarmac SL6, 11 CAAD 10-4, 07 Specialized Roubaix Comp, 98 Peugeot Horizon
If after testing 105 and Rival bikes you have no preference, then I'd choose based on which hoods fit your hands better.
__________________
BF, in a nutshell
BF, in a nutshell
#7
Go by hood ergonomics and color scheme if you don't have a preference for either STI or Doubletap shifting. Or if you don't care about those things and prefer to save a few bucks, get the less expensive one... Either way, enjoy it and remember to post pics when you get the bike!!!
#8
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Daly City, California
Bikes: Trek 2.1, CAAD10
Hmm these are what I would keep in mind:
- Which brand components am I most familiar with (for me, Shimano)
- Which one better has better ergonomics
- Which one has a better wheelset, saddle, cockpit, etc...
- Am I going to upgrade components?
- If yes, then it will depend on my favorite frame color.
A lot of it will be up to you. But the CAAD10 frame in general is a stellar frame, you'll love it.
- Which brand components am I most familiar with (for me, Shimano)
- Which one better has better ergonomics
- Which one has a better wheelset, saddle, cockpit, etc...
- Am I going to upgrade components?
- If yes, then it will depend on my favorite frame color.
A lot of it will be up to you. But the CAAD10 frame in general is a stellar frame, you'll love it.
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Canad,.Qc
Bikes: ccm targa
I would be only upgrading the wheels if i had two in a season or two because in the end I want to participate in some few events and even races
#11
Beer >> Sanity
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
OP, buy the one you like best whatever that criteria is for you - be it color, shape of hoods, etc.
#12
Chieftain
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: Oakland
Bikes: 2012 Cannondale CAADX 105; Wabi Classic Fixed Gear
I've never heard that about a Sram FD, nor have I experienced any difficulty. I've built up bikes myself with both Shimano and Sram and they are 100% identical as far as ease of setup and maintenance. If either bike has a better crankset, go with that one. The quality of the chainrings will make a much larger difference on the performance of the drivetrain than anything else will since you're comparing two quality products. Also, check out if either comes with better brakes, though I believe both come with Tektro.
If all else is equal, go with the purdier one.
If all else is equal, go with the purdier one.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
The Ultegra bike has the C2 seatpost (C2 seatpost is carbon C3 is aluminum wrapped in carbon) but both have C3 handlebars. Obviously the cranks are different but depending on who you talk to either one is better. The SLK light on the untegra bike is really nice. Also the brakes are much better on the Ultegra bike as the Rival bike has generic Sram brakes not the rival line. Kind of like how the 105 version has tektro brakes and not 105 brakes(I have the '12 10-5). Just upgrading the pads alone would fix that to an extent.
Also wheels are are about the same level on both. Not stellar but easily can upgrade later to somehting like the Boyd Vitesse wheels and sell your stock ones for $100-200.
Also wheels are are about the same level on both. Not stellar but easily can upgrade later to somehting like the Boyd Vitesse wheels and sell your stock ones for $100-200.
Last edited by NWS Alpine; 05-08-12 at 02:46 PM.
#14
▒▒▒▒▒▒

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: New York
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,719
Likes: 4
From: London, UK
Bikes: 2006 road bike, 2012 cx bike, 2012 carbon rb, 2014 hardtail
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix 2.0. 2006 Iron Horse Azure Expert
https://totalcycling.com/component-weights.html
#17
Beer >> Sanity
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Kind of annoyed they keep dropping the specs. My 2010 caad9-4 came with the C2 carbon post, C2 stem, and Force cranks. Now the 10-4 has the C3 stem and C3 carbon-wrapped post and a lower level crank. Plus it costs more. Guess that's just part of the whole rising costs issues across the industry and everything else.
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ribble Nero Corsa, Surly Karate Monkey, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Cannondale MT800, Evil Insurgent
I would pick Shimano because I like the shifters better. Double tap only allows shifting one gear down at a time per throw, whereas Shimano allows 2 or 3 depending on the generation of shifter.
In the real world, this might not matter, although I am used to Shimano, and so it'd be a strange transition to move to SRAM.
I do not think that there are any quality differences at all, so it really comes down to preference (and weight as mentioned above)
In the real world, this might not matter, although I am used to Shimano, and so it'd be a strange transition to move to SRAM.
I do not think that there are any quality differences at all, so it really comes down to preference (and weight as mentioned above)
Last edited by twodownzero; 05-08-12 at 11:30 PM.
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Bikes: Cervelo S2, Workswell 062, Banshee Spitfire
I would pick Shimano because I like the shifters better. Double tap only allows shifting one gear down at a time per throw, whereas Shimano allows 2 or 3 depending on the generation of shifter.
In the real world, this might not matter, although I am used to Shimano, and so it'd be a strange transition to move to SRAM.
I do not think that there are any quality differences at all, so it really comes down to preference (and weight as mentioned above)
In the real world, this might not matter, although I am used to Shimano, and so it'd be a strange transition to move to SRAM.
I do not think that there are any quality differences at all, so it really comes down to preference (and weight as mentioned above)
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ribble Nero Corsa, Surly Karate Monkey, Surly Ice Cream Truck, Cannondale MT800, Evil Insurgent
Other than playing with it to observe its operation, no.
If I rode SRAM, I think that I would either learn to love or hate the double tap design.
I really like the fact that it would be easier for me to reach the shift mechanism from the drops/sprinting position with my shorter fingers, maybe enough to negate the other differences.
Like I said, it's preference.
If I rode SRAM, I think that I would either learn to love or hate the double tap design.
I really like the fact that it would be easier for me to reach the shift mechanism from the drops/sprinting position with my shorter fingers, maybe enough to negate the other differences.
Like I said, it's preference.
Last edited by twodownzero; 05-09-12 at 12:13 AM.
#22
Beer >> Sanity
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Isn't he correct about the shifting down (smaller cogs) though. I've never figured out how to drop two cogs at once. If it's possible, please let me know. However, it's easy to click several times so I don't see it as an issue. However, shifting up (larger cogs) you can jump at least three. Not sure I've tired more than that.
Last edited by bikerjp; 05-09-12 at 09:17 AM.
#23
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,903
Likes: 5
From: Wichita
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Isn't he correct about the shifting down (smaller cogs) though. I've never figured out how to drop two cogs at once. If it's possible, please let me know. However, it's easy to click several times so I don't see it as an issue. However, shifting up (larger cogs) you can jump at least three. Not sure I've tired more than that.
your terminology is bass-ackwards by most standards.
shifting down to most people means fewer gear inches-- an easier gear to pedal. sram can go down 3 gears in the rear in one swoop if you push inward as far as the lever goes, 4 clicks.
shifting up to most people means more gear inches and harder to pedal. sram can only go up 1 gear per lever press, but you can push it in rapid succession or even multiple times before you pedal and voila! you've gone up 2-3 gears really fast.
#24
Beer >> Sanity
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Fair enough. However, I was just trying to clarify what was said. Most casual riders have no clue what a gear inch is and shifting "down" the cassette is a logical explanation for some since you go down from larger to smaller cogs.
#25
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 2
From: Antioch, IL
Bikes: 2013 Synapse 4
Completely different brands man. Apples to oranges, different engineering/technology. Within Sram, the lighter you go, the more expensive. The same thing with Shimano. But just because sram is lighter than shimano, doesn't mean it is more expensive. If that was the case, Apex would be cheaper than Ultegra.
https://totalcycling.com/component-weights.html
https://totalcycling.com/component-weights.html
lol, apex is cheaper than ultegra...

j/k



