Component question
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Palmer, Alaska
Bikes: Marin San Rafael
Component question
I've tested ridden several bikes and have liked the Shimano components on entry level bikes versus the SRAM system. It seems that you can fine tune and adjust the front derailleur (from the shifter) on the Shimano and not the SRAM as the biggest difference for me.
Another question I have is whether the Shimano 105 components are noticeably better than the Tiagra components. Any comments would be appreciated.
Another question I have is whether the Shimano 105 components are noticeably better than the Tiagra components. Any comments would be appreciated.
Last edited by Cycle Alaska; 07-05-12 at 12:02 AM.
#2
Full Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 447
Likes: 18
From: Seattle
This is a big ole can of worms, but:
1. You can definitely adjust Sram. I dunno exactly what you mean about 'not being able to fine tune the FD,' but you can. Are you talking about cable tension? Perhaps the bike with Sram you tried had cable tension adjusters in an odd place.
2. That's another up for debate question. Basically it boils down to: It's better, but it's up to you to decide if it's enough for you to care. Subaru vs BMW. One is objectively better, they're both good. Some people are 100% honest to god happy with a Subaru, but some people think the BMW is worth the extra cost difference for that little bit extra. Same issue.
1. You can definitely adjust Sram. I dunno exactly what you mean about 'not being able to fine tune the FD,' but you can. Are you talking about cable tension? Perhaps the bike with Sram you tried had cable tension adjusters in an odd place.
2. That's another up for debate question. Basically it boils down to: It's better, but it's up to you to decide if it's enough for you to care. Subaru vs BMW. One is objectively better, they're both good. Some people are 100% honest to god happy with a Subaru, but some people think the BMW is worth the extra cost difference for that little bit extra. Same issue.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 1
From: Pennsylvania
Bikes: Pedal Force RS2, Canyon, Basso, Tommaso, Rock Racing, Schwinn, SWOBO, Trek
SRAM is adjustable all day long in many ways, barrel adj. as stated above and also reach. Like is subjective, both shim. and sram are xcellent high quality systems. In some respects, I would give sram a one up in quality....they use metal internals at lever and their hard anodizing over upgraded metals is surperb.
105 is shimano's entry level race system and yes, it is better than tiagra in shifting performance, weight, durability, etc.
105 is shimano's entry level race system and yes, it is better than tiagra in shifting performance, weight, durability, etc.
#4
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 10,664
Likes: 7
From: Someplace trying to figure it out
Bikes: Cannondale EVO, CAAD9, Giant cross bike.
SRAM can be adjusted....I did it yesterday while riding...new cables...I like it better for a number of reasons but ride what you find the most fun.
#5
South Carolina Ed

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 320
From: Greer, SC
Bikes: Holdsworth custom, Macario Pro, Ciocc San Cristobal, Viner Nemo, Cyfac Le Mythique, Giant TCR, Tommasso Mondial, Cyfac Etoile
All the groups work pretty much equally well, and as a practical matter it makes little difference which one you use. It really boils down to taste and how much you are willing to pay to shave a pound or so off the weight,
#6
Lula Mae = 15 lbs.
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: I keep hitting <Escape>, but I'm still here!
Bikes: 2011 Trek Madone 6.5 w/SRAM Red 22
#7
#8
Treble Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Bikes: '07 Cervelo P2C, '12 Specialized Roubaix SL3 Expert, 2011 Specialized TriCross Comp.
properly adjusted you probably won't see too much difference.
I definitely have noticed a difference between my Dura-ace cervelo vs my 105 specialized over the past few years...never had any issues with my Dura-ace and shifts just so smooth and quickly but the 105 was always good and not an issue. I don't notice much difference between the Ultegra components I have now on my 2012 Roubaix vs the 105 components I had on my Allez. I do know my Roubaix is (in general) much lighter and tighter and stiffer than my Allez so it feels a lot faster. I assume the weight difference in components helps to contribute to this.
if you can afford it I would step up to 105 just so you don't want to upgrade sooner than you really need to.
I definitely have noticed a difference between my Dura-ace cervelo vs my 105 specialized over the past few years...never had any issues with my Dura-ace and shifts just so smooth and quickly but the 105 was always good and not an issue. I don't notice much difference between the Ultegra components I have now on my 2012 Roubaix vs the 105 components I had on my Allez. I do know my Roubaix is (in general) much lighter and tighter and stiffer than my Allez so it feels a lot faster. I assume the weight difference in components helps to contribute to this.
if you can afford it I would step up to 105 just so you don't want to upgrade sooner than you really need to.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 7
From: Northern VA
Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Colnago C60, Santa Cruz Stigmata CC, and too many other bikes I don't ride
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bianchi10
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
22
11-20-10 07:43 PM





