Chainring Questions
#1
C3 H6 O3 ACID
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Old Peoplesville
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Chainring Questions
I am looking at replacing my chain rings.
I currently have FSA SL-K 50/39 crankset.
Am I correct in saying that as long as the chainrings are 50/39 and the correct size and bolt location then the chain rings are universal?
Reason being...I've seen FSA chain rings and Ultegra chain rings on ebay....prices are about $10 less for the ultegras.
I currently have FSA SL-K 50/39 crankset.
Am I correct in saying that as long as the chainrings are 50/39 and the correct size and bolt location then the chain rings are universal?
Reason being...I've seen FSA chain rings and Ultegra chain rings on ebay....prices are about $10 less for the ultegras.
#2
Steel Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,427
Bikes: N + 1
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
check the bolt center diameter (BCD...google sheldon brown & BCD if you want to learn what it is/how to calculate/etc.), but generally these days I think if it's road (not compact) & not Campy, it's 130 BCD. That said, with the tooth counts you have, you could also have a 'compact' crank, which would be 110 BCD. I'm probably making this sound more complicated than it is...it's simple.
#3
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
OP is mistaken about one of his rings. He probably has 50/34 compact with 110BCD but he might have 53/39 standard with 130BCD. You need to be very sure about this, obviously.
rings aren't quite universal, but FSA, Shimano, SRAM (except for X-Glide), Praxis and Rotor will all fit your compact or standard crankset. Shimano and Praxis have significantly better ramp & pin design than FSA, at least the FSA I've used. so I think the Ultegra rings are a good option.
rings aren't quite universal, but FSA, Shimano, SRAM (except for X-Glide), Praxis and Rotor will all fit your compact or standard crankset. Shimano and Praxis have significantly better ramp & pin design than FSA, at least the FSA I've used. so I think the Ultegra rings are a good option.
#4
Steel Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,427
Bikes: N + 1
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have a 105 crank that is 39/50..sort of a nice touring/commuting range & this one happens to be 130bcd, so such a combination does exist....and, yep, it came from a factory that way.
#5
FSA makes a 50T, 130 BCD ring, so the OP may be correct.
#6
C3 H6 O3 ACID
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Old Peoplesville
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
OP is mistaken about one of his rings. He probably has 50/34 compact with 110BCD but he might have 53/39 standard with 130BCD. You need to be very sure about this, obviously.
rings aren't quite universal, but FSA, Shimano, SRAM (except for X-Glide), Praxis and Rotor will all fit your compact or standard crankset. Shimano and Praxis have significantly better ramp & pin design than FSA, at least the FSA I've used. so I think the Ultegra rings are a good option.
rings aren't quite universal, but FSA, Shimano, SRAM (except for X-Glide), Praxis and Rotor will all fit your compact or standard crankset. Shimano and Praxis have significantly better ramp & pin design than FSA, at least the FSA I've used. so I think the Ultegra rings are a good option.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gus6464
Bicycle Mechanics
5
05-09-11 01:17 PM
RiverHills
Road Cycling
16
04-01-11 01:46 PM