Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Riding mountains vs flat lands

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Riding mountains vs flat lands

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-12, 05:11 PM
  #126  
Senior Member
 
rangerdavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094

Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here's a you tube on these guys trying to ride stage 16 of the Tour, which is a ton of climbing. One did well, the other DNF'd.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35lH2...1B422C&index=5





climbing in mountains makes you a better climber.
rangerdavid is offline  
Old 12-30-12, 10:29 AM
  #127  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,745

Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rangerdavid
Here's a you tube on these guys trying to ride stage 16 of the Tour, which is a ton of climbing. One did well, the other DNF'd.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35lH2...1B422C&index=5

climbing in mountains makes you a better climber.
The bigger guy looks like he weighs about 250. That's a really tough climbing assignment but I bet he's awesome to draft on the flats.
svtmike is offline  
Old 12-30-12, 12:05 PM
  #128  
Portland Fred
 
banerjek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by ericm979
The only ride where I suffer on descents is the Everest Challenge stage race, which has 29k' of climbing in two days with three big climbs and two descents each day. The descents have relatively few turns so you need to stay in a tuck the whole way down. Since it's a race I don't want to sit up and slow down. 20 or 30 minutes of that and my back is hurting. This year I did some core strengthening exercises in the gym as part of my training. That helped but on the second descent on the second day I was really looking forward to the last climb.

But normally it's not a problem.
I did that ride a few years ago. Descents didn't seem that difficult as grades are not bad and the roads are good as well as straight so you barely need your brakes. What makes that ride tough is the length. Long descents through steep switchbacks on crappy surfaces are considerably more tiring.

I agree it's normally not a problem. But if you're spending the day climbing and descending, it can be an issue. I haven't done any serious climbing on a bike since August. In all honesty, I don't miss it. A couple steeps here and there is fun. I'm starting to question the suffering thing.

Originally Posted by FLvector
If you're being bugged by mosquitoes and deer flies you aren't pedaling fast enough. Be splattered by love bugs during season is another issue.
Easy to do on flats and light inclines. Not so easy on steeper grades.
banerjek is offline  
Old 12-30-12, 02:13 PM
  #129  
Senior Member
 
Gallo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 775

Bikes: 2019 KonaLibre- 2003 Litespeed Vortex -2016 Intense Spider Factory Build -2008 Wilier Mortorolio- Specialized Stumpjumper Hardtail converted to bafang 750 mid drive -1986 Paramount 2014 - --- Pivot Mach 429c

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
I will chime in on 19 percent not being a problem. For me anyway it is a HUGE problem. My toughest climb I have ever done was on La Pinarello. The accent up Mt Grappa broke me like an egg in a room full of swinging sledgehammers. Salto di Capra or Jump the Goat is a 9 kilometer climb at 11 percent with 20 percent max areas and as far as i am concerned is a wall with asphalt on it. The total accent of Mt Grappa is 6.7 percent over 19 kilometers and was a brutal climb.

being from San Diego I climbed Japutal and Palomar in preparation as well as local training miles. Got some climbing in Lago di Garda up from Bardolino right before the event and barley survived Mt Grappa. Grappa is the foothills of the Alps not even the real deal.

Climbing even when prepared is always a challenge for me
Gallo is offline  
Old 12-30-12, 02:56 PM
  #130  
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 67 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times in 44 Posts
Originally Posted by Gallo
I will chime in on 19 percent not being a problem. For me anyway it is a HUGE problem.
19% is a problem for every mortal. Well, except for people with active imaginations on the interwebs
rebel1916 is offline  
Old 12-30-12, 05:38 PM
  #131  
Senior Member
 
ericm979's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Santa Cruz Mountains
Posts: 6,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by banerjek
I did that ride a few years ago. Descents didn't seem that difficult as grades are not bad and the roads are good as well as straight so you barely need your brakes. What makes that ride tough is the length.
It's trying to maintain a deep aero tuck for every descent that makes them hard. If you sit up it's cake; they're easy albeit fast descents. But if I sit up I get dropped or get caught by the guys I just dropped. Not what I want in a race. It used to really chap my hide to spend the last 45 minutes of a climb reeling in some guys and then losing them again on the descent. Now that I'm faster on the descents I can use them to drop people or at least make them work more to catch me.

Originally Posted by banerjek
I'm starting to question the suffering thing.
What? Heresy!

Actually by the time EC comes around I am looking forward to just riding around. That's why I don't race cross.
ericm979 is offline  
Old 12-31-12, 07:27 AM
  #132  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 728 Times in 373 Posts
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
BDop disagrees with you Merlin.
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
I still hold that the best way to climb WELL is to climb unless you don't have access to sustained vertical then you need to make due with what you have.
I don't hink we disagree that much. There's no doubt that the best way to get better at riding mountains is riding mountains. My point is that if you don't have ready access to sustained climbs you can still do a lot to improve your ability to climb by working on your threshold power.

Living in Florida, where it's a 7 hour drive to real mountains, my approach in getting ready for races like Everest Challenge, is to do a lot of work on threshold power, work on core strength, do some time on the trainer with the front wheel propped up to mimic a climbing position, and make as many weekend trips to the mountains as possible.

Taking this back to the OP's quetion, he can absolutely do reasonably well in a event like Blood Sweat and Gears with little or no time in the Mountains, but it will be helpful if can do some riding in similar terrain before hand.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 12-31-12, 07:32 AM
  #133  
Smell something fishy?
 
RedHerring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 67
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mike12
Just for a little background, I'm new to road cycling (riding about 2 months) and have been using this forum as a resource.

We live where there are small hills but no real mountains - we are about 2 hours away from the NC mountains. There's a century ride in the mountains in June that has roughly 9,000 ft of cumulative climbing elevation. There's also a half century that has about 4,000 ft climbing elevation. I want to participate in one of these rides this summer. Is there any general rule of thumb where "x" number of flat miles equate to "x" number of mountainous miles???

I know it would be best to ride the mountains some, but I don't want to waste 4 hours (2 hrs each way) driving just to get to the mountains. I'm thinking it'd be best to use those 4 hours on the bike.
I would make the drive. You need to do some real climbing before you tackle a 100 miles of hills.
RedHerring is offline  
Old 12-31-12, 07:48 AM
  #134  
Portland Fred
 
banerjek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by ericm979
It's trying to maintain a deep aero tuck for every descent that makes them hard. If you sit up it's cake; they're easy albeit fast descents. But if I sit up I get dropped or get caught by the guys I just dropped.
I don't have a comfort issue maintaining the tuck. But I don't like riding in the praying mantis position at high speed for control reasons -- hit anything, develop a shimmy, or whatever, and you're screwed. I'll get in the position except hands stay on the drops which costs a couple mph so people who are serious about speed get by me. I've seen too many really bad crashes, and over the years, I've hit holes, developed shimmies, and had front tires go down over 40mph but I've always stayed up *knock* *knock*
banerjek is offline  
Old 12-31-12, 05:18 PM
  #135  
A Mountaineering thing
 
Hillbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Under Mt Baldy in Glendora,California
Posts: 848

Bikes: 4 Road 2 Mtn

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rebel1916
Hamster is giving you absolutely terrible advice. Everyone else is being helpful. I would do a ton of intervals, and find the biggest hill in your area and and spend a few hour a week just riding up and down it. The way to get better at riding hills is to ride hills!
this
Hillbasher is offline  
Old 12-31-12, 06:11 PM
  #136  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by banerjek
I don't have a comfort issue maintaining the tuck. But I don't like riding in the praying mantis position at high speed for control reasons -- hit anything, develop a shimmy, or whatever, and you're screwed. I'll get in the position except hands stay on the drops which costs a couple mph so people who are serious about speed get by me. I've seen too many really bad crashes, and over the years, I've hit holes, developed shimmies, and had front tires go down over 40mph but I've always stayed up *knock* *knock*
I move my arse back over the saddle an inch or so and take my weight off and use my legs as good ol' shock absorbers. In some ways, I feel in better control on the drops speeding downhill. Moving too far forward can make the bike feel twitchier than it might already be.

Plus inside pedal up on corners...
Rowan is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 06:04 AM
  #137  
Senior Member
 
JimF22003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,654

Bikes: 2008 Trek Madone 5.5, 2009 Cervelo R3SL tdf edition, Cervelo R5 with Di2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I don't think all "mountain" climbs are the same either, and require adjustments to technique. I've done a few of the long western 6%-for-10-mile climbs that really are pretty similar to riding a flat route, only slower. You just find a gear and keep going till you finish.

With the Eastern hills I'm more familiar with, there's a lot more technique involved -- when to sit or stand when the pitch changes for a short section, what line to take on a sharp switchback, how to handle the short but insanely steep 17-18% sections where you're pretty sure you're going to fall over, and worry if you'll be able to clip out in time. I don't think there's any real flat-land substitute for experience on these types of climbs.
JimF22003 is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 08:15 AM
  #138  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by JimF22003
I don't think all "mountain" climbs are the same either, and require adjustments to technique. I've done a few of the long western 6%-for-10-mile climbs that really are pretty similar to riding a flat route, only slower. You just find a gear and keep going till you finish.

With the Eastern hills I'm more familiar with, there's a lot more technique involved -- when to sit or stand when the pitch changes for a short section, what line to take on a sharp switchback, how to handle the short but insanely steep 17-18% sections where you're pretty sure you're going to fall over, and worry if you'll be able to clip out in time. I don't think there's any real flat-land substitute for experience on these types of climbs.
+1.

It really does make a difference. I find it very hard to climb here because of the VERY technical nature of all vertical. There is no 'settling into a gear' which greatly increases both the impact of technique and of being familiar with the climb thereby being able to time work and recovery.

You can't learn that glued to a PM spinning away in your living room.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 01-02-13, 08:42 AM
  #139  
Portland Fred
 
banerjek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548

Bikes: Custom Winter, Challenge Seiran SL, Fuji Team Pro, Cattrike Road/Velokit, РOS hybrid

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 232 Post(s)
Liked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
+1.

It really does make a difference. I find it very hard to climb here because of the VERY technical nature of all vertical. There is no 'settling into a gear' which greatly increases both the impact of technique and of being familiar with the climb thereby being able to time work and recovery.

You can't learn that glued to a PM spinning away in your living room.
Next you'll be saying you can't practice descending without hills.

Just elevate your rear wheel on the trainer, crank up the fan to full blast, get in an aero tuck, and brake/coast/steer just like you would on a real incline. The movement is the identical.
banerjek is offline  
Old 05-27-13, 07:38 PM
  #140  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I promised an update so here it is. I have been riding about 200 miles/month since I originally asked this question with about 1/4 of the miles on mountain bike trails. Today I took the bike to the closest mountain (hill???) around. This mountain has about 1,000 foot gain over 7 miles on one side and the same gain over 6 miles on the other side. I rode a total of 52 miles with Strava showing 4,445 elevation gain. My Bontrager node 2 did something funny today so I can't compare Strava's elevation to the Bontrager's.

Anyway, I was slow at 14.7 mph, but I was able to hit the 4k elevation gain and 50 total mile total which is what I set out to do. I'm doing an event next weekend that has very similar distance and elevation gain so I should be OK for the event. I guess this means you can train for small mountains by riding flat lands. However, I bet my time would have been much better if I'd ridden in these conditions more. It's just hard for me to find time to haul the bike when I can jump on and ride from my house.
mike12 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
woodcraft
Road Cycling
12
05-15-18 05:02 AM
Oldguyonoldbike
Fifty Plus (50+)
106
09-14-15 10:29 AM
WNCGoater
Fifty Plus (50+)
16
09-13-15 01:11 PM
PatrickGSR94
Road Cycling
18
03-29-13 09:36 PM
lem0ndrider
Road Cycling
11
09-03-12 07:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.