Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

what would you upgrade?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

what would you upgrade?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-13, 02:38 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
what would you upgrade?

currently have a 2009 cervelo s2. upgrades so far are a new saddle (selle) to fix the 'numbness' and new wheels, ksyrium elites. i replaced the chain, bottom bracket, brake pads, and rear cassette at 3000 miles. using mountain bike shoes and spd pedals. what would you guys upgrade next?

i was thinking of road shoes and pedals. just wanted to get you guys/gals' thoughts. LBS said the person who put together the bike didn't even use the right bottom bracket in the first place! no wonder that LBS (forgot the name, but in pleasanton, CA) is no longer in business.

i didn't want to spend over $500 so i was thinking either:
-pedals/shoes
-gopro helmet camera (i know it's not an upgrade but was thinking it would be nice to have)
-crankset
dimabear is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 03:17 AM
  #2  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434

Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis

Liked 273 Times in 153 Posts
In order of importance:
~Pro-fitting. (Money spent on the engine is never money wasted.)
~Shoes & insoles
~Road pedals

You might want to show up at the profitting with the new shoes and pedals.
For decades, I wasted money on sewups, cooler looking cranksets, different brake pads, and the latest, designer Oakley sunglasses. Really wish I'd spent that $150 on the profitting first. By far the best bang-for-buck.

After you've got the fitting and the contact points all wired, next I'd go for is either slick wheels or a power meter. Good luck and let us know how it goes.

Last edited by calamarichris; 01-16-13 at 03:21 AM.
calamarichris is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 07:27 AM
  #3  
Señor Member
 
Sir Real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indy
Posts: 595

Bikes: 2011 Litespeed M1 (Rival)

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by calamarichris
In order of importance:
~Pro-fitting. (Money spent on the engine is never money wasted.)
~Shoes & insoles
~Road pedals

You might want to show up at the profitting with the new shoes and pedals
.
For decades, I wasted money on sewups, cooler looking cranksets, different brake pads, and the latest, designer Oakley sunglasses. Really wish I'd spent that $150 on the profitting first. By far the best bang-for-buck.

After you've got the fitting and the contact points all wired, next I'd go for is either slick wheels or a power meter. Good luck and let us know how it goes.
So then shouldn't the order of importance be reversed?
1) pedals
2) shoes (worthless without pedals)
3) fit
Sir Real is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 07:31 AM
  #4  
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 18,150

Bikes: GMC Denali

Liked 93 Times in 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Sir Real
So then shouldn't the order of importance be reversed?
1) pedals
2) shoes (worthless without pedals)
3) fit
Stiff shoes are more important than pedal choice. A proper fit even with cheaper shoes / pedals is more beneficial than anything else you can do. If you aren't in a position that you can put out power for long periods of time without being uncomfortable / damaging knees, hips, etc, then you are wasting your money on upgrades.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 07:41 AM
  #5  
Señor Member
 
Sir Real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indy
Posts: 595

Bikes: 2011 Litespeed M1 (Rival)

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LowCel
Stiff shoes are more important than pedal choice. A proper fit even with cheaper shoes / pedals is more beneficial than anything else you can do. If you aren't in a position that you can put out power for long periods of time without being uncomfortable / damaging knees, hips, etc, then you are wasting your money on upgrades.
I agree, I was merely commenting on calamarchris' statement that a pro fit is more important than new shoes and pedals, but you should show up to your fitting with your new shoes and pedals.
Sir Real is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 08:51 AM
  #6  
Klickety-Klackety
 
Jeepnut22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NoVa, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,609

Bikes: Ones with 2 wheels...

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
"GOOD" fitment locations will let you come back for a tweak after a new shoe/pedal purchase (or other similar change) for free. Investigate their policies and guarantees on fitment before deciding on which fitment place to use.

Other than that, I like the shoe/pedal option as the next upgrade. Did make a big difference for me when I finally made that change.
__________________
Wut
Jeepnut22 is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 09:17 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,780

Bikes: Felt AR1, Cervelo S2

Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
pedals and shoes, because:

- the idea of having an S2 with mountain bike pedals is cringeworthy.
- it will provide the greatest benefit
- you won't notice the difference any crankset would make...even if you buy some ultralight cranks, you're still using MTB shoes.
- helmet camera, please don't.
Inertianinja is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 10:07 AM
  #8  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434

Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis

Liked 273 Times in 153 Posts
Originally Posted by Sir Real
So then shouldn't the order of importance be reversed?
Negative. If you cannot afford to get all three, get the pro-fit first. If you have enough for all three, get the pedals & shoes, so you can get them set up properly by the fitter.
I still think the fitting is the most important, even if it means riding with mountainbike shoes on a road bike for a few weeks or months.
calamarichris is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 10:14 AM
  #9  
Flying Under the Radar
 
X-LinkedRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northeast PA
Posts: 4,116

Bikes: 10' SuperiorLite SL Club | 06' Giant FCR3 | 2010 GT Avalanche 3.0 Disc

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Hey Dima. I completely agree with the above in regards to the fitting, shoes/pedals. But a picture of the bike would be nice so the vultures on here can say, raise this, lower this, and buy new tires.
X-LinkedRider is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 10:16 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Westchester County, NY
Posts: 1,299

Bikes: Giant TCR SL3 and Trek 1.5

Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Personally, I'd go pro fit or nothing. I don't really get why some are obsessed about pedal and shoe combinations. I have a nice road bike that has SPD mountain pedals on it and while the shop that sold it to me didn't understand why I didn't want to go with new pedals and shoes, I just didn't get the point. You never see the pedals someone's using when they're actually riding, so it should come down to how well they actually work for you. And if they work, why change 'em?
cafzali is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 10:29 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 429
Liked 22 Times in 10 Posts
Get a Garmin Edge 500, 510, 800, or 810 with HRM and speed/cadence if you don't already have one. I would also recommend a Strava premium account for analysing the rides from your Garmin.
bobones is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 10:52 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Flame decals...
atallen223 is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 04:38 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks for the replies everyone. i used to mountain bike and so that's why i had spd pedals on the s2 so didn't have to buy 2nd pair of shoes/pedals. i don't mountain bike anymore though. i noticed that no matter how tight i make my shoes, my heel still rises on the upswing, perhaps my shoes are getting old...matter of fact, i think i bought 2 sizes too big (41 instead of 39) when i purchased them back in 2009.

thanks again for the input, i think i'll go to my LBS and get a fit/shoe/pedals this weekend!
dimabear is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 04:43 PM
  #14  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 6,434

Bikes: '09 Felt F55, '84 Masi Cran Criterium, (2)'86 Schwinn Pelotons, '86 Look Equippe Hinault, '09 Globe Live 3 (dogtaxi), '94 Greg Lemond, '99 GT Pulse Kinesis

Liked 273 Times in 153 Posts
Good luck and keep us abreast of how it goes. (Or two.)
If you're getting all three, get the shoes & pedals first, so the fitter can set you up with them.
(Be a mistake to have the fitter set you up with your current shoes/pedals, then replace them.)
calamarichris is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 04:56 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Liked 10,647 Times in 6,055 Posts
Originally Posted by Inertianinja
pedals and shoes, because:

- the idea of having an S2 with mountain bike pedals is cringeworthy.
- it will provide the greatest benefit
- you won't notice the difference any crankset would make...even if you buy some ultralight cranks, you're still using MTB shoes.
- helmet camera, please don't.
Road pedals will provide almost no benefit over mountain pedals. You can get road pedals that weigh less, but at several times the price.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 07:09 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
garysol1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Traverse City Michigan
Posts: 10,244
Liked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Incorrect in my opinion. First off a road pedal has a wider contact area and after 5 hours in the saddle you will feel a thinner MTB cleat.Also in MOST cases there are many many more stiff road shoes than there are mountain shoes. Light weight carbon road shoes will not allow for a MTB cleat. For touring where you are not putting down a lot of power for long periods of time MTB cleats are fine but for performance road biking its just a bad idea.



Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
Road pedals will provide almost no benefit over mountain pedals. You can get road pedals that weigh less, but at several times the price.
__________________
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
garysol1 is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 07:23 PM
  #17  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,577

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Liked 2,373 Times in 1,578 Posts
Yep. You want road pedals and road shoes for the reasons Gary mentioned. You can get by with mtn shoes and pedals even for things like touring. But serious road use requires stiff shoes and pedals with a wide contact area.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 07:25 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,863

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Liked 3,111 Times in 1,418 Posts
Midrange pedals, top of the line shoes.
caloso is offline  
Old 01-16-13, 08:43 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
garysol1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Traverse City Michigan
Posts: 10,244
Liked 17 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
Midrange pedals, top of the line shoes.
Agreed......
__________________
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
garysol1 is offline  
Old 01-17-13, 05:36 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Liked 10,647 Times in 6,055 Posts
Originally Posted by garysol1
Incorrect in my opinion. First off a road pedal has a wider contact area and after 5 hours in the saddle you will feel a thinner MTB cleat.Also in MOST cases there are many many more stiff road shoes than there are mountain shoes. Light weight carbon road shoes will not allow for a MTB cleat. For touring where you are not putting down a lot of power for long periods of time MTB cleats are fine but for performance road biking its just a bad idea.
That's funny because I have a few pairs of light carbon-fiber soled MTB shoes. I wore them while riding my Cervelo up the highest paved road in the state, up Mt Rainier, up Mt Baker, and over a few mountain passes: Snoqualmie, Steven's, Cayuse, Chinook, Rainy, Blewett, and Swauk.

Road pedals are nice, too, but they don't make you a better or stronger cyclist. And you definitely don't need them to ride a road bike.

The ironic part is if you ride your bike a lot on mountain roads, it's easy and common to run out of water. Scrambling down to the nearest creek to get more is a great solution (and a UV purifier weighs ounces), and it winds up being really nice to have shoes that you can walk around in.

Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 01-17-13, 06:08 PM
  #21  
The Recumbent Quant
 
cplager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Fairfield, CT
Posts: 3,094

Bikes: 2012 Cruzbike Sofrider, 2013 Cruzigami Mantis, 2016 Folding CruziTandem

Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
That's funny because I have a few pairs of light carbon-fiber soled MTB shoes. I wore them while riding my Cervelo up the highest paved road in the state, up Mt Rainier, up Mt Baker, and over a few mountain passes: Snoqualmie, Steven's, Cayuse, Chinook, Rainy, Blewett, and Swauk.

Road pedals are nice, too, but they don't make you a better or stronger cyclist. And you definitely don't need them to ride a road bike.

The ironic part is if you ride your bike a lot on mountain roads, it's easy and common to run out of water. Scrambling down to the nearest creek to get more is a great solution (and a UV purifier weighs ounces), and it winds up being really nice to have shoes that you can walk around in.
+1

I don't see how a stiff mountain bike shoe is any less efficient than a stiff road shoe. And once you are attached to the pedal with a stiff shoe, how is the road combination more efficient?
cplager is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WT21
Mountain Biking
9
09-04-17 07:03 PM
PnA83
Road Cycling
20
05-31-16 08:11 PM
bdelarosa7
Road Cycling
17
02-28-13 02:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.