Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Once you go Parrafin, You will never go back!

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Once you go Parrafin, You will never go back!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-13, 07:31 AM
  #26  
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
 
Myosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times in 17 Posts
Went parrafin, went back fast. Way too much PITA, doesn't lube any better IMHO, and only last 50-100 miles before you have to do it again. I ride way too much to be pulling the chain off the bike, heating up the wax, etc. etc. every 100 miles. I went to Dupont Silicone lube with Teflon. Easy to apply on bike, gets sucked into the rollers very quickly, wipes quite clean, and doesn't attract dust and grit. Also lasts 100 miles or so, but doesn't get stiff in cold weather and takes 30 seconds to apply. I only have to take the chain off the bike about once a month for a thorough cleaning. You can still get a chain mark but it's a lot cleaner than any petroleum based lubes I've used. I think the mark actually comes from the teflon which gives the lube a slightly gray cast and since you also use teflon with paraffin, I'm guessing it isn't any better.
Myosmith is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 07:37 AM
  #27  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times in 1,470 Posts
Originally Posted by abstractform20
dude, did you get really high before writing this?
He needed to be high to numb the finger pain from all that typing
StanSeven is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 07:39 AM
  #28  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times in 1,470 Posts
Originally Posted by thirdgenbird
Despite the "white lightning sucks" comments, I dont recall the last squeaking chain i had while using it. My guess is some people are applying it before rides, not after. Applying it after gives it time to set up. Once it does, it seems to react just like paraffin wax (the test winner)
Read the test. White Lighting was just about the test loser
StanSeven is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 07:54 AM
  #29  
Cyclist
 
storckm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 639
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Where can we find the results of this test?

Did they test chains by actually riding them on the road, or by running them in a clean room?
storckm is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 08:26 AM
  #30  
absent
 
Ferrous Bueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DC
Posts: 621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yesterday I wrote a heartfelt and supportive comment related to this topic. A recipe suggestion and personal experience were shared. Unfortunately, a moderator saw it as unfit for these forums and erased it.
Too bad.
Ferrous Bueller is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 09:16 AM
  #31  
Beer >> Sanity
 
bikerjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449

Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by storckm
Where can we find the results of this test?

Did they test chains by actually riding them on the road, or by running them in a clean room?
It was in the March issue of Velo. I don't think it's available online.
bikerjp is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 09:35 AM
  #32  
Resident Alien
 
Racer Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Location, location.
Posts: 13,089
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 349 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
You're making me wax nostalgic.
Punditry.
Racer Ex is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 09:52 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
danvuquoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mountain View, California
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by storckm
Where can we find the results of this test?

Did they test chains by actually riding them on the road, or by running them in a clean room?
They tested 3 chains top of the line for Campy, Sram, and Shimano. They were cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner first in mineral spirits, and then immersed in 100F bath of each chain lube in an ultrasonic machine for 5 minutes. Dried for 30 minutes, wiped clean, and mounted to a test rig with chain tension of 250 watts for 5 minutes, accuracy within +/- 0.02 watts.



Mods feel free to take this down if you see fit. You should buy the magazine or go read it in a store if you want all the details.
danvuquoc is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 09:55 AM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
danvuquoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mountain View, California
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thirdgenbird
Based off what criteria though? Application lenght, friction, chain wear?

odd they didn't test clean ride. Despite the "white lightning sucks" comments, I dont recall the last squeaking chain i had while using it. My guess is some people are applying it before rides, not after. Applying it after gives it time to set up. Once it does, it seems to react just like paraffin wax (the test winner)

regardless, I may try chain-l or rock n roll gold for comparison. White lightning isn't the best lube for long, wet rides.
Friction (efficiency test), you still haven't said which White Lightning you're using. Again, neither of the White Lightning lubes in this test were wax based.
danvuquoc is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 09:59 AM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midcoast Maine
Posts: 52

Bikes: Merlin Titanium serial #170 (29th road frame ever built, March '88), 1988 Cannondale Black Lightning, 2 fixed gear (46/17), Salsa El Kaboing fully mountain, Surly Pugsley modified

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by patentcad
You're making me wax nostalgic.
Is that waxing gibbous or waxing crescent? Or would that be wax-on or wax-off.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks for posting the chart, I appreciate it.

I tried many of them, but am currently happy with Chain-L. It's thick (and very smelly) but stays and is super quiet. I ride long distance (50-100 miles) on my fixed gears and haven't found anything that holds up as well on a 1/8" chain, but am always willing to try another product. Most of the others lubes I tried seem to lose adhesion quickly and the chain gets loud. I tried it on the wife's new Cannondale and it seems to work well on the thinner chains as well, but time will tell. I've never tried the paraffin though, might have to give it a go for myself.
hikerinmaine is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 10:26 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by danvuquoc
They tested 3 chains top of the line for Campy, Sram, and Shimano. They were cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner first in mineral spirits, and then immersed in 100F bath of each chain lube in an ultrasonic machine for 5 minutes. Dried for 30 minutes, wiped clean, and mounted to a test rig with chain tension of 250 watts for 5 minutes, accuracy within +/- 0.02 watts.
What happens when you ride for more than 5 minutes?
gregf83 is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 10:33 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 789
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mod - please delete the chart, it is a clear violation of copyright, and it directly hurts a guy who is just trying to make a living.
happybday29475 is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 11:07 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
What happens when you ride for more than 5 minutes?
canam73 is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 11:11 AM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3376 Post(s)
Liked 5,518 Times in 2,860 Posts
Originally Posted by danvuquoc
They tested 3 chains top of the line for Campy, Sram, and Shimano. They were cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner first in mineral spirits, and then immersed in 100F bath of each chain lube in an ultrasonic machine for 5 minutes. Dried for 30 minutes, wiped clean, and mounted to a test rig with chain tension of 250 watts for 5 minutes, accuracy within +/- 0.02 watts.



Mods feel free to take this down if you see fit. You should buy the magazine or go read it in a store if you want all the details.
Whoa!
A chain-lube thread with *data*???

So what I am seeing in the graph is they are measuring for efficiency here.
Did they test for other variables like: wear, durability, etc?

Also, is that "WD-40" the traditional product, or the new "WD-40"-branded lubricant?

Last edited by Shimagnolo; 02-26-13 at 11:14 AM.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 11:30 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
Read the test. White Lighting was just about the test loser
Epic ride. Completely different product. I couldn't care less how epic ride scored as it had absolutely no relavence to clean ride.

Originally Posted by danvuquoc
Friction (efficiency test), you still haven't said which White Lightning you're using. Again, neither of the White Lightning lubes in this test were wax based.
Sorry, I loosely inferred that I used clean ride. Again, surprised they didn't test it.
thirdgenbird is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 11:35 AM
  #41  
Rubber side down
 
Clipped_in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Teh Quickie Mart
Posts: 1,769

Bikes: are fun! :-)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times in 105 Posts
Cylists are an interesting lot...

Ok, so parrafin reduces friction a little better than the commonly used chain lubes on the market and may save you a few watts of power. Unless you are riding in a real race, "BIG DEAL!!!!"

In reality the margins are pretty small, and its mostly recreational riders getting all worked up over this report. As such, we really need to get over ourselves.
Clipped_in is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 11:44 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Clipped_in
Cylists are an interesting lot...

Ok, so parrafin reduces friction a little better than the commonly used chain lubes on the market and may save you a few watts of power. Unless you are riding in a real race, "BIG DEAL!!!!"

In reality the margins are pretty small, and its mostly recreational riders getting all worked up over this report. As such, we really need to get over ourselves.
I thought it was nice to see that both motor oils did middle of the road.
canam73 is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 11:54 AM
  #43  
Beer >> Sanity
 
bikerjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449

Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rapwithtom
Mod - please delete the chart, it is a clear violation of copyright, and it directly hurts a guy who is just trying to make a living.
Actually, it might fall into fair use as it's for non-commercial use and rather than harm the magazine might actually encourage others to read it. The fact that it's an image might be a sticking point.
bikerjp is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 12:01 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Shimagnolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3376 Post(s)
Liked 5,518 Times in 2,860 Posts
Originally Posted by bikerjp
Actually, it might fall into fair use as it's for non-commercial use and rather than harm the magazine might actually encourage others to read it. The fact that it's an image might be a sticking point.
Indeed!
I just added the March issue to my shopping list.
Shimagnolo is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 12:12 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Chain-L will be the only thing on my chains until they invent lube free drivetrains. Applied and used properly it lasts much longer than anything else and the chain is silent.
NWS Alpine is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 12:12 PM
  #46  
Rubber side down
 
Clipped_in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Teh Quickie Mart
Posts: 1,769

Bikes: are fun! :-)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times in 105 Posts
Originally Posted by Shimagnolo
I just added the March issue to my shopping list.
It's a good magazine. I think you'll like it.
Clipped_in is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 12:18 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by NWS Alpine
Chain-L will be the only thing on my chains until they invent lube free drivetrains. Applied and used properly it lasts much longer than anything else and the chain is silent.
Im very tempted to go chain- l this spring.
thirdgenbird is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 12:22 PM
  #48  
Fixie Infamous
 
Nagrom_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 10,474

Bikes: 2007 CAAD Optimo Track, 2012 Cannondale CAAD10, 1996 GT Force restomod, 2015 Cannondale CAADX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by thirdgenbird
Im very tempted to go chain- l this spring.
Do it. I switched during the Fall, Never going back. I'm about 1500 miles from my last lubing. I'll probably get another 500 easy.
Nagrom_ is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 12:28 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by danvuquoc
They tested 3 chains top of the line for Campy, Sram, and Shimano. They were cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner first in mineral spirits, and then immersed in 100F bath of each chain lube in an ultrasonic machine for 5 minutes. Dried for 30 minutes, wiped clean, and mounted to a test rig with chain tension of 250 watts for 5 minutes, accuracy within +/- 0.02 watts.

[img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2397662/Screen%20Shot%202013-02-26%20at%207.48.21%20AM.png[/ img]
Color me skeptical. Also, 1+ on the question about what happens after 5 minutes. There are tradeoffs between staying power and resistance that drive most lubrication decisions. I would also question the decision to immerse each chain in a bath at 100F. That is wildly different from the conditions most people use to apply chain lube and probably benefits lubes which don't use a solvent as a delivery system. The use of only three chains for all the lubes means that the initial wear conditions change from lube to lube. You might dismiss this as nitpicking, then again, I'm not the one claiming +-.02W accuracy in my measurements.

You want a real answer, you pony up $2k for 30 chains and run them each on that machine for several 10's of hours making measurements along the way, characterizing how the chains wear and how the resistance curve changes in time. But this is a magazine study that had to be done inside a day or two so the author could make the submission deadline. This information is actually worse than no information as it is almost certainly wrong. I would rather have acknowledged uncertainty than false certainty.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Brian Ratliff is offline  
Old 02-26-13, 12:32 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
Brian Ratliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Portland, OR
Posts: 10,123

Bikes: Three road bikes. Two track bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
Read the test. White Lighting was just about the test loser
Or it drew the short straw and was the first test they ran on a brand new chain newly stripped of its factory lubricant. What, you all didn't think that a part made from a hundred bearing surfaces breaks in after a bit of use? We are talking about a 1% difference in a big number subtraction problem.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter

Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 02-26-13 at 12:35 PM.
Brian Ratliff is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.