Once you go Parrafin, You will never go back!
#26
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
17 Posts
Went parrafin, went back fast. Way too much PITA, doesn't lube any better IMHO, and only last 50-100 miles before you have to do it again. I ride way too much to be pulling the chain off the bike, heating up the wax, etc. etc. every 100 miles. I went to Dupont Silicone lube with Teflon. Easy to apply on bike, gets sucked into the rollers very quickly, wipes quite clean, and doesn't attract dust and grit. Also lasts 100 miles or so, but doesn't get stiff in cold weather and takes 30 seconds to apply. I only have to take the chain off the bike about once a month for a thorough cleaning. You can still get a chain mark but it's a lot cleaner than any petroleum based lubes I've used. I think the mark actually comes from the teflon which gives the lube a slightly gray cast and since you also use teflon with paraffin, I'm guessing it isn't any better.
#27
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,470 Posts
#28
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558
Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,180 Times
in
1,470 Posts
Despite the "white lightning sucks" comments, I dont recall the last squeaking chain i had while using it. My guess is some people are applying it before rides, not after. Applying it after gives it time to set up. Once it does, it seems to react just like paraffin wax (the test winner)
#30
absent
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: DC
Posts: 621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yesterday I wrote a heartfelt and supportive comment related to this topic. A recipe suggestion and personal experience were shared. Unfortunately, a moderator saw it as unfit for these forums and erased it.
Too bad.
Too bad.
#31
Beer >> Sanity
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mountain View, California
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mods feel free to take this down if you see fit. You should buy the magazine or go read it in a store if you want all the details.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mountain View, California
Posts: 574
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Based off what criteria though? Application lenght, friction, chain wear?
odd they didn't test clean ride. Despite the "white lightning sucks" comments, I dont recall the last squeaking chain i had while using it. My guess is some people are applying it before rides, not after. Applying it after gives it time to set up. Once it does, it seems to react just like paraffin wax (the test winner)
regardless, I may try chain-l or rock n roll gold for comparison. White lightning isn't the best lube for long, wet rides.
odd they didn't test clean ride. Despite the "white lightning sucks" comments, I dont recall the last squeaking chain i had while using it. My guess is some people are applying it before rides, not after. Applying it after gives it time to set up. Once it does, it seems to react just like paraffin wax (the test winner)
regardless, I may try chain-l or rock n roll gold for comparison. White lightning isn't the best lube for long, wet rides.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Midcoast Maine
Posts: 52
Bikes: Merlin Titanium serial #170 (29th road frame ever built, March '88), 1988 Cannondale Black Lightning, 2 fixed gear (46/17), Salsa El Kaboing fully mountain, Surly Pugsley modified
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is that waxing gibbous or waxing crescent? Or would that be wax-on or wax-off.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks for posting the chart, I appreciate it.
I tried many of them, but am currently happy with Chain-L. It's thick (and very smelly) but stays and is super quiet. I ride long distance (50-100 miles) on my fixed gears and haven't found anything that holds up as well on a 1/8" chain, but am always willing to try another product. Most of the others lubes I tried seem to lose adhesion quickly and the chain gets loud. I tried it on the wife's new Cannondale and it seems to work well on the thinner chains as well, but time will tell. I've never tried the paraffin though, might have to give it a go for myself.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks for posting the chart, I appreciate it.
I tried many of them, but am currently happy with Chain-L. It's thick (and very smelly) but stays and is super quiet. I ride long distance (50-100 miles) on my fixed gears and haven't found anything that holds up as well on a 1/8" chain, but am always willing to try another product. Most of the others lubes I tried seem to lose adhesion quickly and the chain gets loud. I tried it on the wife's new Cannondale and it seems to work well on the thinner chains as well, but time will tell. I've never tried the paraffin though, might have to give it a go for myself.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
They tested 3 chains top of the line for Campy, Sram, and Shimano. They were cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner first in mineral spirits, and then immersed in 100F bath of each chain lube in an ultrasonic machine for 5 minutes. Dried for 30 minutes, wiped clean, and mounted to a test rig with chain tension of 250 watts for 5 minutes, accuracy within +/- 0.02 watts.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 789
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Mod - please delete the chart, it is a clear violation of copyright, and it directly hurts a guy who is just trying to make a living.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3376 Post(s)
Liked 5,518 Times
in
2,860 Posts
They tested 3 chains top of the line for Campy, Sram, and Shimano. They were cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner first in mineral spirits, and then immersed in 100F bath of each chain lube in an ultrasonic machine for 5 minutes. Dried for 30 minutes, wiped clean, and mounted to a test rig with chain tension of 250 watts for 5 minutes, accuracy within +/- 0.02 watts.
Mods feel free to take this down if you see fit. You should buy the magazine or go read it in a store if you want all the details.
Mods feel free to take this down if you see fit. You should buy the magazine or go read it in a store if you want all the details.
A chain-lube thread with *data*???
So what I am seeing in the graph is they are measuring for efficiency here.
Did they test for other variables like: wear, durability, etc?
Also, is that "WD-40" the traditional product, or the new "WD-40"-branded lubricant?
Last edited by Shimagnolo; 02-26-13 at 11:14 AM.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 7,075
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Epic ride. Completely different product. I couldn't care less how epic ride scored as it had absolutely no relavence to clean ride.
Sorry, I loosely inferred that I used clean ride. Again, surprised they didn't test it.
Sorry, I loosely inferred that I used clean ride. Again, surprised they didn't test it.
#41
Rubber side down
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Teh Quickie Mart
Posts: 1,769
Bikes: are fun! :-)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times
in
105 Posts
Cylists are an interesting lot...
Ok, so parrafin reduces friction a little better than the commonly used chain lubes on the market and may save you a few watts of power. Unless you are riding in a real race, "BIG DEAL!!!!"
In reality the margins are pretty small, and its mostly recreational riders getting all worked up over this report. As such, we really need to get over ourselves.
Ok, so parrafin reduces friction a little better than the commonly used chain lubes on the market and may save you a few watts of power. Unless you are riding in a real race, "BIG DEAL!!!!"
In reality the margins are pretty small, and its mostly recreational riders getting all worked up over this report. As such, we really need to get over ourselves.
#42
Senior Member
Cylists are an interesting lot...
Ok, so parrafin reduces friction a little better than the commonly used chain lubes on the market and may save you a few watts of power. Unless you are riding in a real race, "BIG DEAL!!!!"
In reality the margins are pretty small, and its mostly recreational riders getting all worked up over this report. As such, we really need to get over ourselves.
Ok, so parrafin reduces friction a little better than the commonly used chain lubes on the market and may save you a few watts of power. Unless you are riding in a real race, "BIG DEAL!!!!"
In reality the margins are pretty small, and its mostly recreational riders getting all worked up over this report. As such, we really need to get over ourselves.
#43
Beer >> Sanity
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,449
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Actually, it might fall into fair use as it's for non-commercial use and rather than harm the magazine might actually encourage others to read it. The fact that it's an image might be a sticking point.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3376 Post(s)
Liked 5,518 Times
in
2,860 Posts
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Chain-L will be the only thing on my chains until they invent lube free drivetrains. Applied and used properly it lasts much longer than anything else and the chain is silent.
#49
Senior Member
They tested 3 chains top of the line for Campy, Sram, and Shimano. They were cleaned with an ultrasonic cleaner first in mineral spirits, and then immersed in 100F bath of each chain lube in an ultrasonic machine for 5 minutes. Dried for 30 minutes, wiped clean, and mounted to a test rig with chain tension of 250 watts for 5 minutes, accuracy within +/- 0.02 watts.
[img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2397662/Screen%20Shot%202013-02-26%20at%207.48.21%20AM.png[/ img]
[img]https://dl.dropbox.com/u/2397662/Screen%20Shot%202013-02-26%20at%207.48.21%20AM.png[/ img]
You want a real answer, you pony up $2k for 30 chains and run them each on that machine for several 10's of hours making measurements along the way, characterizing how the chains wear and how the resistance curve changes in time. But this is a magazine study that had to be done inside a day or two so the author could make the submission deadline. This information is actually worse than no information as it is almost certainly wrong. I would rather have acknowledged uncertainty than false certainty.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
#50
Senior Member
Or it drew the short straw and was the first test they ran on a brand new chain newly stripped of its factory lubricant. What, you all didn't think that a part made from a hundred bearing surfaces breaks in after a bit of use? We are talking about a 1% difference in a big number subtraction problem.
__________________
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Cat 2 Track, Cat 3 Road.
"If you’re new enough [to racing] that you would ask such question, then i would hazard a guess that if you just made up a workout that sounded hard to do, and did it, you’d probably get faster." --the tiniest sprinter
Last edited by Brian Ratliff; 02-26-13 at 12:35 PM.