Waving, drag revealed!
#51
Senior Member
#52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
You failed to simulate a hard effort while riding. Coasting is a relaxed form and and easy position as to "wave" if one chooses to. I wave most times out on the bike. But in a concentrated effort, while hammering on the bike, both hands clutched on the bars, I will by no means lift my hand to return a wave. As doing so my jeopardize my health with a nasty crash. I ask that you please add another test, this time going in an all out effort, eyes fixed on the road ahead, concentrating on your position, form and speed, cadence and projected power output. Then, think of waving added in. If this is possible, then you are not training hard enough. Casual riding, yes, by all means wave at the fellow rider. Otherwise, get your mo-jo on and RIDE!
Cheers
Cheers
I'd love to test it the way you suggest but with no power meter I'm afraid that the data would be subjective and otherwise non-repeatable. I did consider trying a pair of time trials on the local MUP, once waving to everyone and once not - my difficulty there is that not all MUP users share our high regard for science.
#53
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,105 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Can you separate the effects of weaving from aerodynamic drag? :-D
#62
Senior Member
#63
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I know, I got a little defensive about the climate change denial science - compare me to any other goofy experiment I'd have laughed it off and probably agreed.
#66
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 728 Times
in
373 Posts
Can we look for your full paper in International Journal of Aerodynamics (IJAD) - Inderscience Publishers ?
The Journal of Irreproducible Results
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It comes up with such frequency, and is debated with so much passion, that it may be one of the most important questions in the sport of cycling, yet no one has really examined it scientifically. Until now.
The roadie in full regalia, his steely gaze is focused and intent, you give a wave and you're ignored. What's up with that? Would it really hurt him to wave? That's usually a rhetorical question but I set out to find an answer. What does it cost him to wave?
So I took my road bike to a local hill to perform some coast-down tests while simulating a roadie in training. I selected a hill with a relatively gentle grade so that speeds would be similar. In half the tests I coasted in a regular roadie position, and in half I waved all the way down while trying to maintain the same position. I wanted to make the simulation as real as possible so I wore an actual jersey, tight, and spandex cycling shorts. Helmet, sunglasses. All tests were with hands on the hoods (since careful observation has indicated that training roadies ride on the hoods, or with the same back angle while in the drops).
This is the test rig: although it's Fredded up it is, as you can see, a road bike with standard road bike geometry, normal saddle to bar drop, 700x25c tires.
To complete the simulation I strapped on a HR monitor and also turned on Strava, as if I were doing hill repeats. For you doubters out there Bike Ride Profile | Coast-down test repeats near Alpharetta | Times and Records | Strava although I didn't use Strava data since my flight recorder box is more accurate. I did three tests coasting, three waving, with no pedaling at any time. Except uphill of course. I started each test at precisely the same point in the road, with the magnet positioned 1/8th of a wheel behind the sensor.
I threw the second waving run out because passing traffic distorted the data. The final repeat in Strava was not a test run - I just did it because just coasting is pretty boring. Here is the result:
The vertical axis is miles per hour, the horizontal is units traveled (unit representing approximately 7 feet, one wheel revolution)
It's pretty clear that waving costs a significant amount of speed, presumably by adding drag. If we need a number, how much drag, here is a real general estimate. Assuming that the highest speed is the terminal velocity for that grade and object (I haven't proven that, but I've been up and down that hill a lot and it is or is close to) then the drag force is equal to the force of gravity. The force of gravity is the same for both roadie and waving, and therefore the ratio of CdxA (Coefficient of drag times area) is the inverse ratio of squared velocities. From the basic drag equation.
In this case, that comes to about 12% greater drag created by waving. So there you have it: drag is increased by 12% when he waves.
The roadie in full regalia, his steely gaze is focused and intent, you give a wave and you're ignored. What's up with that? Would it really hurt him to wave? That's usually a rhetorical question but I set out to find an answer. What does it cost him to wave?
So I took my road bike to a local hill to perform some coast-down tests while simulating a roadie in training. I selected a hill with a relatively gentle grade so that speeds would be similar. In half the tests I coasted in a regular roadie position, and in half I waved all the way down while trying to maintain the same position. I wanted to make the simulation as real as possible so I wore an actual jersey, tight, and spandex cycling shorts. Helmet, sunglasses. All tests were with hands on the hoods (since careful observation has indicated that training roadies ride on the hoods, or with the same back angle while in the drops).
This is the test rig: although it's Fredded up it is, as you can see, a road bike with standard road bike geometry, normal saddle to bar drop, 700x25c tires.
To complete the simulation I strapped on a HR monitor and also turned on Strava, as if I were doing hill repeats. For you doubters out there Bike Ride Profile | Coast-down test repeats near Alpharetta | Times and Records | Strava although I didn't use Strava data since my flight recorder box is more accurate. I did three tests coasting, three waving, with no pedaling at any time. Except uphill of course. I started each test at precisely the same point in the road, with the magnet positioned 1/8th of a wheel behind the sensor.
I threw the second waving run out because passing traffic distorted the data. The final repeat in Strava was not a test run - I just did it because just coasting is pretty boring. Here is the result:
The vertical axis is miles per hour, the horizontal is units traveled (unit representing approximately 7 feet, one wheel revolution)
It's pretty clear that waving costs a significant amount of speed, presumably by adding drag. If we need a number, how much drag, here is a real general estimate. Assuming that the highest speed is the terminal velocity for that grade and object (I haven't proven that, but I've been up and down that hill a lot and it is or is close to) then the drag force is equal to the force of gravity. The force of gravity is the same for both roadie and waving, and therefore the ratio of CdxA (Coefficient of drag times area) is the inverse ratio of squared velocities. From the basic drag equation.
In this case, that comes to about 12% greater drag created by waving. So there you have it: drag is increased by 12% when he waves.
#68
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#69
Full Member
Thanks for sharing your results.
My experiment: I wave to every cyclist I see and about 50-60 percent return the waves. Most all ladies, casual riders and older folks wave back at me. The 20-something to mid 40s guys with expensive bikes and outfits are the ones typically who do not wave back.
Don't think that at all I
IMO, The real reason some "roadies" don't wave back is they are judgmental A-holes plain and simple. If your not as cool as they are, you don't deserve a wave.
My experiment: I wave to every cyclist I see and about 50-60 percent return the waves. Most all ladies, casual riders and older folks wave back at me. The 20-something to mid 40s guys with expensive bikes and outfits are the ones typically who do not wave back.
Don't think that at all I
IMO, The real reason some "roadies" don't wave back is they are judgmental A-holes plain and simple. If your not as cool as they are, you don't deserve a wave.
#70
Full Member
I used to think the same thing when the roadies never waved back then became one and once while waving back while doing about 25 mph I missed a small bump in the road almost threw me off the bike and to the dentist so I don't think its out of disrespect but more
#71
Full Member
[QUOTE=ridingfool;19605202]I used to think the same thing when the roadies never waved back then became one and once while waving back while doing about 25 mph I missed a small bump in the road almost threw me off the bike and to the dentist so I don't think its out of disrespect but more[/QUOTEout of safty]
#72
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
#73
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
This investigation was limited to strictly waving. I'm in the process of upgrading my test equipment, and hopefully in the near future we finally investigate many of the other burning issues that have been brought up in this thread.
#74
Senior Member
It wasn't until I had almost finished reading the 1st page that I realised this was a 3 year old thread.
I'm not angry, just disappointed, that no-one in the three intervening years has repeated the experiment to verify the findings.
I'm not angry, just disappointed, that no-one in the three intervening years has repeated the experiment to verify the findings.
#75
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
My fault for stirring up the zombie from another thread, sorry.