Frame Drop Spacing changed, HED3 front and rear
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 19
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
Frame Drop Spacing changed, HED3 front and rear
I have always liked the HED3 wheels and have used them on two different bikes. I put one on the front of our tandem in January and wanted one on the rear but the spacing was wrong. By replacing the original fixed RD mount with a removable mount I created an opportunity to add spacers to the drops and reduce the spacing from 145 down to 130. I ordered a pair of Calfee titanium drops and modified them by cutting off the tabs where they attach to the chainstays. The LH side was a bolt on using the stock Calfee bolt and the two holes for mounting a disc brake. The RH side was more complicated, I had to drill and tap 3 holes in the titanium drop, a bit of a challenge but with some patience it was accomplished. The new wheel arrived today and I installed the spacers, spaced the wheel a few millimeters and the bike now looks complete. HED3 wheels front and rear.
I will order new titanium fasteners later this evening or tomorrow.
Pictures below.



I will order new titanium fasteners later this evening or tomorrow.
Pictures below.



#3
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 620
Likes: 7
From: Anchorage, Ak
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
nice looking with the new wheels and innovative. However I don't see why you would have needed the replaceable hanger for this setup. In fact you have now defeated the benefit of that replaceable hanger. I think that the drop outs are now so strong the derailleur is the weakest link hopefully. Non the less a great idea to be able to use other spaced wheels when you want. Did the two spacers equal 15mm or so you have to machine them to get the right dimensions.
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 19
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
nice looking with the new wheels and innovative. However I don't see why you would have needed the replaceable hanger for this setup. In fact you have now defeated the benefit of that replaceable hanger. I think that the drop outs are now so strong the derailleur is the weakest link hopefully. Non the less a great idea to be able to use other spaced wheels when you want. Did the two spacers equal 15mm or so you have to machine them to get the right dimensions.
The dropouts on our bike are right at 6.5mm thick so if the new dropouts would have been 6.5mm thick the spacing would have been 132, however the new parts are just a little over 5mm thick so I have a 135mm opening. I initially installed a washer on each side of the axle on the new wheel which made it fit perfect. When I talked to Steve at Calfee asking him about the difference in the parts he stated that the rear triangle would flex enough so as to not require the washers. I removed the washers and the wheel fits, the rear triangle does in fact flex enough for the quick release to tighten it up. The only downside is that I will have to use the middle ring more than I have in the past as the chain line in the big/big sprockets is a bit extreme.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 4
From: Ft Worth, TX
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Nice modification. Your comment about chain line is well made. There are usually tradeoffs involved with any change and hopefully you have found the approach that makes you enjoy the bike as much as possible.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 261
Well done Wayne.
I am not familiar with the construction of the shimano tandem cranks. Is the right hand stoker crank interchangeable with a regular right hand shimano crank? If it was you could replace it with that and get the chainline correct. A compact double may cover your gear requirements anyway.
I am not familiar with the construction of the shimano tandem cranks. Is the right hand stoker crank interchangeable with a regular right hand shimano crank? If it was you could replace it with that and get the chainline correct. A compact double may cover your gear requirements anyway.
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 19
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
Well done Wayne.
I am not familiar with the construction of the shimano tandem cranks. Is the right hand stoker crank interchangeable with a regular right hand shimano crank? If it was you could replace it with that and get the chainline correct. A compact double may cover your gear requirements anyway.
I am not familiar with the construction of the shimano tandem cranks. Is the right hand stoker crank interchangeable with a regular right hand shimano crank? If it was you could replace it with that and get the chainline correct. A compact double may cover your gear requirements anyway.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 620
Likes: 7
From: Anchorage, Ak
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Well done Wayne.
I am not familiar with the construction of the shimano tandem cranks. Is the right hand stoker crank interchangeable with a regular right hand shimano crank? If it was you could replace it with that and get the chainline correct. A compact double may cover your gear requirements anyway.
I am not familiar with the construction of the shimano tandem cranks. Is the right hand stoker crank interchangeable with a regular right hand shimano crank? If it was you could replace it with that and get the chainline correct. A compact double may cover your gear requirements anyway.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 2
From: Central Coast, California
Bikes: Colnago C-50, Calfee Dragonfly Tandem, Specialized Allez Pro, Peugeot Competition Light
How do you like the ride of those wheels? I used to run a set of HED3s on my calfee and they were just too stiff in combination with my frame. They were great (and fast) if the pavement was smooth but if you hit a bump in a fast corner the ride got pretty exciting. There was just no give. I was running 23's and 25's on mine and I know not all Calfees are identical. Since I race, they might have made mine a little stiffer than normal. I'm pretty sure it was the wheels that caused the handling problems because I don't have those issues with my Topolinos or Zipps.
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 19
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
How do you like the ride of those wheels? I used to run a set of HED3s on my calfee and they were just too stiff in combination with my frame. They were great (and fast) if the pavement was smooth but if you hit a bump in a fast corner the ride got pretty exciting. There was just no give. I was running 23's and 25's on mine and I know not all Calfees are identical. Since I race, they might have made mine a little stiffer than normal. I'm pretty sure it was the wheels that caused the handling problems because I don't have those issues with my Topolinos or Zipps.


#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 19
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
How do you like the ride of those wheels? I used to run a set of HED3s on my calfee and they were just too stiff in combination with my frame. They were great (and fast) if the pavement was smooth but if you hit a bump in a fast corner the ride got pretty exciting. There was just no give. I was running 23's and 25's on mine and I know not all Calfees are identical. Since I race, they might have made mine a little stiffer than normal. I'm pretty sure it was the wheels that caused the handling problems because I don't have those issues with my Topolinos or Zipps.


#12
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,370
Likes: 2
From: Central Coast, California
Bikes: Colnago C-50, Calfee Dragonfly Tandem, Specialized Allez Pro, Peugeot Competition Light
Let us know how it goes. Just to clarify a little, the handling was really only an issue when going really fast, like over 40mph. I do a lot of fast descents (because of my well developed descending muscles) and it was a bit disconcerting to have the bike skipping over bumps in corners at 50-60 mph. If you're riding around the mid-west you're probably not seeing those speeds often. It'll just be a stiff ride. The bike looks awfully cool with those wheel on it though and they are fast.
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 19
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
In the past 2 years we have only gone over 40 1 time and that was in Tulsa. I do not see fast down hills at 50-60 MPH in our future. LOL!
#15
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 19
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
On our ride this morning i dropped the air pressure on the front from 117 to 110 and dropped the rear from 120 to 115. The bike rode and felt just like it did with the Spinergy wheels.
#16
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 4
From: Ft Worth, TX
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
I am understanding correctly that the HED wheels at 100-115 felt the same as Spinergy wheels with tires inflated to about 120 psi?
#17
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 19
From: Central Illinois
Bikes: Trek Speed Concept 9.9, 2011 Calfee Tetra Tandem
Wayne, I have had a HED3 on the front of our tandem for the last 3,000 + miles, at 120 it is a little harsh, at 117 it is firm but comfortable. On our ride Thursday the front tire was inflated to 117psi and the rear to 120psi. We could both tell that the ride was harsher than what we were experiencing with the HED3 on the front at 117 and the Spinergy on the rear at 120. So as an experiment I set the pressures at 110 and 115, the ride was comparable to the way it rode with the Spinergy rear, tomorrow I will go with 115 and 115 to see how that feels. BTW we rode the exact same route both days and will probably ride that same route tomorrow as those roads have not been chipped and oiled recently.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sephorous
Bicycle Mechanics
1
10-31-13 04:13 PM





