Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Enve's new 3.4 ARs look hot

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Enve's new 3.4 ARs look hot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-19, 10:28 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by WhyFi
If there was a high chance of blowout at realistic pressures, I would think that a manufacturer like Enve would figure that out before optimizing a 25mm int. width rim for a 28mm tire.
This. Especially since they've been selling a wheel with those stats for that size tire since 2016, it's become their best selling wheelset, and people aren't blowing tires off them.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-14-19, 11:31 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Abe_Froman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,524

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9347 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 51 Posts
Those charts DO make me wonder a bit if I'm running far too much pressure.

I've got 28mm GP4000s which run a tad large, on 17mm internal rims. Been using 70psi for a long time...might try dropping it some.
Abe_Froman is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 12:11 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times in 247 Posts
Originally Posted by Abe_Froman
Those charts DO make me wonder a bit if I'm running far too much pressure.

I've got 28mm GP4000s which run a tad large, on 17mm internal rims. Been using 70psi for a long time...might try dropping it some.
Most people probably are. Your fastest pressure depends on tire construction, tire volume (tire size + rim width) your weight, road conditions, and weather.

a 28mm GP4k on a 17mm rim is a bit lightbulby. So you’re more likely to experience a floppy tire than if you had a 25mm internal width rim, if you choose to drop pressures.

That being said, I have a smaller 28mm tire on a 20mm rim, and at 67kg + 9-10kg bike I find that 50 psi is the upper limit for the rear (which is where most of my weight is). After 50, the bike feels like it’s hitting every square edge in the road. I’ve run as low as 35psi in technical, wet crits and not really felt slower (though the tire does feel floppier when out of the saddle).
smashndash is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 12:22 PM
  #29  
Advocatus Diaboli
 
Sy Reene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,641

Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4739 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times in 1,004 Posts
Originally Posted by smashndash
Most people probably are. Your fastest pressure depends on tire construction, tire volume (tire size + rim width) your weight, road conditions, and weather.

That being said, I have a smaller 28mm tire on a 20mm rim, and at 67kg + 9-10kg bike I find that 50 psi is the upper limit for the rear (which is where most of my weight is). After 50, the bike feels like it’s hitting every square edge in the road.
And has anybody yet done the same type of deflection/inflation tests with tubeless as have been around for a long time for tire/tube setups (Jan Heine et. al)? Yet, I don't recall too many tubed tire people complaining about rough riding.

Does 50psi in your 28mm tubeless feel any harsher than 50psi in a tire+tube configuration, because 50psi would be well under the recommendation for a tubed setup, assuming a rider weight even at 140lbs.
Sy Reene is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 02:13 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Abe_Froman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,524

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9347 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by smashndash
Most people probably are. Your fastest pressure depends on tire construction, tire volume (tire size + rim width) your weight, road conditions, and weather.

a 28mm GP4k on a 17mm rim is a bit lightbulby. So you’re more likely to experience a floppy tire than if you had a 25mm internal width rim, if you choose to drop pressures.

That being said, I have a smaller 28mm tire on a 20mm rim, and at 67kg + 9-10kg bike I find that 50 psi is the upper limit for the rear (which is where most of my weight is). After 50, the bike feels like it’s hitting every square edge in the road. I’ve run as low as 35psi in technical, wet crits and not really felt slower (though the tire does feel floppier when out of the saddle).

I'm 85kg, so I think 50kg would be low even for normal riding for me. I'm not sure I'd want to go under 70 too much during a crit, because as you mentioned it is a bit light bulby as it is, though still handles fine. I might knock it down to 60psi for a few commutes/group rides and see how it goes.
Abe_Froman is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 02:31 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times in 247 Posts
Originally Posted by Abe_Froman
I'm 85kg, so I think 50kg would be low even for normal riding for me. I'm not sure I'd want to go under 70 too much during a crit, because as you mentioned it is a bit light bulby as it is, though still handles fine. I might knock it down to 60psi for a few commutes/group rides and see how it goes.
I’d recommend getting a wider rim if you’d like to fully exploit the advantages of wider tires and lower pressures. There’s a massive difference in tire profile between a 17mm rim and 25mm rim. In my opinion, 17mm rims are too narrow for even normal 28mm tires, let alone 4ks.

When experimenting with tire pressure, remember that the “rumbling” you get with traditional setups will be gone. It took me a while to stop associating that rumble with speed. You need to really believe in “smoother is faster” or maybe do a roll down test on a rough road to convince yourself you’re not losing speed.
smashndash is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 02:36 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410

Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times in 247 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
And has anybody yet done the same type of deflection/inflation tests with tubeless as have been around for a long time for tire/tube setups (Jan Heine et. al)? Yet, I don't recall too many tubed tire people complaining about rough riding.

Does 50psi in your 28mm tubeless feel any harsher than 50psi in a tire+tube configuration, because 50psi would be well under the recommendation for a tubed setup, assuming a rider weight even at 140lbs.
Probably should have mentioned this - I’m using tubed tires. Specifically Pirelli P zeros, which are about as supple as non-cotton tires get. I run orange sealant in my tires and have yet to experience a single puncture (besides a staple that shredded my tube over the course of 10 miles). I have slammed my rim against square edges multiple times and never pinch flatted. I’ve never felt the tire collapse in corners (though I’m not the hardest of chargers).

Unfortunately, while I am switching to tubeless soon, it will probably be with different tires and wheels, so I can’t be of much help when it comes to comparing low psi in tubed vs tubeless. But I highly recommend trying sealant in tubes. Though it may be slower than tubeless setups or clinchers with no sealant, it gives me an excellent compromise.
smashndash is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 02:52 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by smashndash
I’d recommend getting a wider rim if you’d like to fully exploit the advantages of wider tires and lower pressures. There’s a massive difference in tire profile between a 17mm rim and 25mm rim. In my opinion, 17mm rims are too narrow for even normal 28mm tires, let alone 4ks.

When experimenting with tire pressure, remember that the “rumbling” you get with traditional setups will be gone. It took me a while to stop associating that rumble with speed. You need to really believe in “smoother is faster” or maybe do a roll down test on a rough road to convince yourself you’re not losing speed.
I'm riding nominal 28 mm tires on 25 mm internal rims and agree with all of this.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 07:46 PM
  #34  
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,940
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 974 Post(s)
Liked 512 Times in 352 Posts
Originally Posted by Sy Reene
And has anybody yet done the same type of deflection/inflation tests with tubeless as have been around for a long time for tire/tube setups (Jan Heine et. al)? Yet, I don't recall too many tubed tire people complaining about rough riding.

Does 50psi in your 28mm tubeless feel any harsher than 50psi in a tire+tube configuration, because 50psi would be well under the recommendation for a tubed setup, assuming a rider weight even at 140lbs.
Depending on the tire, it might be the equivalent of 32mm.

My 25mm GP4000S on a HED 20.5 mm internal width rim measure 29mm. I use 65 psi front, 80 psi rear with tubes.

The 32mm tires have 20% more air volume than 29mm, so I'd probably try 52F / 60R on my wheels. (The volume is based on the radius squared, so it goes up fast. That's why 25mm can be 10 psi lower, even though they are just 2mm wider.)

~~~

With the threat of pinch flats minimized, I suppose riders get used to the smooth ride at lower pressures and a "normal" road bike ride seems harsh.

I sometimes use 38mm Compass smooth lightweights on my other bike. It's quite amazing to float over chipseal and expansion bumps.

Last edited by rm -rf; 05-17-19 at 07:54 PM.
rm -rf is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 08:03 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Abe_Froman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,524

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9347 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by rm -rf
Depending on the tire, it might be the equivalent of 32mm.

My 25mm GP4000S on a HED 20.5 mm internal width rim measure 29mm. I use 65 psi front, 80 psi rear with tubes.

The 32mm tires have 20% more air volume than 29mm, so I'd probably try 52F / 60R on my wheels. (The volume is based on the radius squared, so it goes up fast. That's why 25mm can be 10 psi lower, even though they are just 2mm wider.)

~~~

With the threat of pinch flats minimized, I suppose riders get used to the smooth ride at lower pressures and a "normal" road bike ride seems harsh.

I sometimes use 38mm Compass smooth lightweights on my other bike. It's quite amazing to float over chipseal and expansion bumps.
But, air volume itself is pretty irrelevant though. What matters is how far off the ground the rim is. Which is going to depend more on the actual width of the tire casing than the volume within it.
Abe_Froman is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 08:05 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Abe_Froman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,524

Bikes: Marin Four Corners, 1960's Schwinn Racer in middle of restoration, mid 70s Motobecane Grand Touring, various other heaps.

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9347 Post(s)
Liked 57 Times in 51 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
I'm riding nominal 28 mm tires on 25 mm internal rims and agree with all of this.

Have you had similar size tires on more traditionally sized rims? Is there a noticeable difference ?
Abe_Froman is offline  
Old 05-17-19, 10:44 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
I had to change my line today because somebody on a lime bike served in front of me. I hit a pothole hard enough to be sure I must have knocked the wheels out of true. But they're still perfect. I can't see how.

I've had 28 mm tires on a cross bike back in the day. Mechanical discs even. Everything he said seems true in my experience. But it's one for the anecdotal record, the whole bike was different, it's not hard data.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
goose70
General Cycling Discussion
12
02-12-18 04:22 PM
Seattle Forrest
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
17
10-08-17 09:04 AM
mrfreezesdefy3
Road Cycling
1
08-09-15 07:03 PM
WantsAPuppy
Road Cycling
8
12-17-10 01:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.