Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Bent Fork + Dent = Unsafe?

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Bent Fork + Dent = Unsafe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-25 | 09:59 AM
  #1  
Sedgemop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 3,690
From: Chicago

Bikes: '69 Raleigh Sports '72 Cinelli Super Corsa '78 Motobecane Le Champion '84 Schwinn High Sierra '85 Trek 830 '88 Merckx Team ADR Corsa Extra

Bent Fork + Dent = Unsafe?

I did something i never do and reached out to a seller with some unsolicited advice. Not sure why I did that. Bike appears to me to have a bent fork and a slightly bent top tube, the typical signs of a head on collision. There is a pretty serious downtube dent too. Mentioned to the seller about the fork and that combined with the dent, it may be unsafe to ride. He discloses the dent as a "ding" in his ad description. He responded to my comment that he doesn't think the fork is bent, that it's just the photo angle. What do y'all think? Also, remind me not to give unsolicited advice.



__________________
Sedgemop is online now  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 10:06 AM
  #2  
Trakhak's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,972
Likes: 5,888
From: Baltimore, MD
No good would come of replying to the person who posted the ad, but you're right. The fork is obviously bent, the head tube angle looks suspiciously steep, and there's not much clearance between the front tire and the down tube for a loaded-touring Trek. Top tube and down tube are likely wrinkled behind the head tube lugs.

And the sharp creases in those dents look like stress raisers that will crack the down tube, probably sooner rather than later.
Trakhak is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 10:11 AM
  #3  
Sedgemop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 3,690
From: Chicago

Bikes: '69 Raleigh Sports '72 Cinelli Super Corsa '78 Motobecane Le Champion '84 Schwinn High Sierra '85 Trek 830 '88 Merckx Team ADR Corsa Extra

Originally Posted by Trakhak
No good would come of replying to the person who posted the ad, but you're right. The fork is obviously bent, the head tube angle looks suspiciously steep, and there's not much clearance between the front tire and the down tube for a loaded-touring Trek. Top tube and down tube are likely wrinkled behind the head tube lugs.
Thanks, man. I can see a slight bend in the top tube too. No doubt the wrinkle is there.

Yeah, won't be responding. Wanted to make sure my eyes weren't deceiving me.
__________________
Sedgemop is online now  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 11:31 AM
  #4  
bikingshearer's Avatar
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,721
Likes: 4,359
From: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley

Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.

I agree with your math: bent fork + dent = unsafe.

Heck, that weird dent in the downtube by the bottle cage would be enough to get a hard pass from me, even though it looks to be just about my size.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
bikingshearer is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 11:34 AM
  #5  
Francophile
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 2,088
From: Seattle

Bikes: Lots

Yes, bent. Should be possible to straighten the fork, tho.
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Aubergine is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 11:39 AM
  #6  
randyjawa's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 12,562
Likes: 2,738
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

The fork is definitely bent and in a bad place (my opinion). The top tube also looks bent to me but I say that with caution. The picture is inadequate to make a for sure call on the top tube. That said, were I buying the bike, it would be for the component group only. Perhaps the wheels would add value but I am guessing that the front wheel has suffered trauma also. As for the ding - some ding!
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 12:11 PM
  #7  
bulgie's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,700
Likes: 5,480
From: Seattle
That fork also might be one of the ones that asplode at the crown. I think the "death forks" (*) were made by Ishiwata.

(*) yes "death forks" is hyperbole, only a few broke as far as I know. I can dig up some pics of ones that broke, if anyone hasn't seen them, but they've been on this forum a number of times already.
bulgie is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 12:21 PM
  #8  
Sedgemop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 3,690
From: Chicago

Bikes: '69 Raleigh Sports '72 Cinelli Super Corsa '78 Motobecane Le Champion '84 Schwinn High Sierra '85 Trek 830 '88 Merckx Team ADR Corsa Extra

Originally Posted by bikingshearer
Heck, that weird dent in the downtube by the bottle cage would be enough to get a hard pass from me, even though it looks to be just about my size.
Yeah, this is where I'm at too. It's more than a ding, for sure.
__________________
Sedgemop is online now  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 12:24 PM
  #9  
Sedgemop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 3,690
From: Chicago

Bikes: '69 Raleigh Sports '72 Cinelli Super Corsa '78 Motobecane Le Champion '84 Schwinn High Sierra '85 Trek 830 '88 Merckx Team ADR Corsa Extra

Originally Posted by randyjawa
The fork is definitely bent and in a bad place (my opinion). The top tube also looks bent to me but I say that with caution. The picture is inadequate to make a for sure call on the top tube. That said, were I buying the bike, it would be for the component group only. Perhaps the wheels would add value but I am guessing that the front wheel has suffered trauma also. As for the ding - some ding!
I advised the seller to part it out. There's value in the group. Honestly, I think for his asking price ($250), the dent alone is going to put people off and it won't ever sell as a whole bike.
__________________
Sedgemop is online now  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 12:34 PM
  #10  
Sedgemop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 3,690
From: Chicago

Bikes: '69 Raleigh Sports '72 Cinelli Super Corsa '78 Motobecane Le Champion '84 Schwinn High Sierra '85 Trek 830 '88 Merckx Team ADR Corsa Extra

Originally Posted by bulgie
That fork also might be one of the ones that asplode at the crown. I think the "death forks" (*) were made by Ishiwata.

(*) yes "death forks" is hyperbole, only a few broke as far as I know. I can dig up some pics of ones that broke, if anyone hasn't seen them, but they've been on this forum a number of times already.
Good call. Does look like one of the Ishiwata forks.
__________________
Sedgemop is online now  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 02:08 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 971
Likes: 401
From: Northern CA

Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.

The seller is a dishonest *******! This is not a "ding" or anything minor. This bike suffered a frame/fork-ending event and he's trying to pawn this off on some unsuspecting buyer. Plus, add the fact that it's a large frame, so it will be ridden by a larger rider. More subject to catastrophic failure. Total *******.

I've worked with steel frame builders and the big manufacturers. (Had a dude claim similar on a Specialized mountain bike. He went on, and on, and on about how "It should be a warranty!" We let the rep come in, hold a straight edge to the underside of the top tube to reveal how it was bowed. Only large frontal impact forces do this to a frame/fork. Warranty denied. Dude's fraternity brothers came in the next week and said, "Oh yeah, he ran into a parked car on it riding home drunk from a party!) I can appreciate steel's ability to be cold-worked safely. This, however, does NOT apply to a bike of this age with this damage and unseen other flaws. I'd put good money on the down tube being crimped at the head tube lug. Any potential buyer should run away and fast!

Seller should disclose EVERYTHING about this damaged bike and let the buyer decide. Ultimately, given the used market right now, this bike is almost worthless. Good for parts and hanging the bare frame & fork on the wall. That's it.

Last edited by cb400bill; 08-13-25 at 06:43 PM. Reason: DO NOT change the spelling of words to bypass the forum censor.
LV2TNDM is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 02:09 PM
  #12  
Sedgemop's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 3,690
From: Chicago

Bikes: '69 Raleigh Sports '72 Cinelli Super Corsa '78 Motobecane Le Champion '84 Schwinn High Sierra '85 Trek 830 '88 Merckx Team ADR Corsa Extra

Thanks for the sanity confirmation, everybody. Here's a link to the seller's ad, by the way.

www.facebook.com/share/1EmKfTa4GP/
__________________
Sedgemop is online now  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 02:25 PM
  #13  
zandoval's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 2,460
From: Bastrop Texas

Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites

RATS! - It's Part Out Time...

__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
zandoval is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 04:54 PM
  #14  
do-over candidate
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 627
From: PNW

Bikes: One of everything and three of everything French

I cant tell from this pic if fork is bent or not. Likewise the top tube. Obviously there is a dent in down tube.
__________________
I.C.
Insidious C. is offline  
Reply
Old 08-13-25 | 06:31 PM
  #15  
Chuckk's Avatar
Groupetto Dragon-Ass
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 1,580
From: Lostin Austin, TX
Hey, it's a hundred dollar bike thanks to the imperfections.
I don't know what pictures folks are looking at, but there's no way to see a bent frame from here.
Forks need to be reset.
Frame ding and DING aren't the worst I've seen, But rolling and filling would ruin the original paint.
Looks like it got tangled up with somebody else's pedals.

No whining, it is what it is, it's amazing that it's still here, and it's not worth all that much either as a bike or as parts.
Chuckk is offline  
Reply
Old 08-14-25 | 12:21 AM
  #16  
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2025
Posts: 2
Likes: 1
I did that once too. Contacted a seller to tell them that the frame is bent, which led to an argument about safety. Some people are either ignorant or just don't care, so it's usually pointless to engage with them. Yeah, the forks are definitely bent. There is a way to get them straight again but I wouldn't ride a bike where dis was done. I'm not allowed to post links yet but if you go on YouTube and search for "Straightening a bent bike fork with little brute straightener tool" from RJ The Bike Guy, you can see how its done.

Lumael is offline  
Reply
Old 08-14-25 | 05:05 AM
  #17  
jonwvara's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,039
Likes: 922
From: Washington County, Vermont, USA

Bikes: 1966 Dawes Double Blue, 1976 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1975 Raleigh Sprite 27, 1980 Univega Viva Sport, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1984 Lotus Classique, 1976 Motobecane Grand Record

I try not to get too bent out of shape about stuff like this, so to speak.. Yes, the fork is obviously bent. There's a serious dent, and describing it as a "ding" is obviously an attempt on the seller's part to minimize it. But both problems are there in the pictures for all to see see. Caveat emptor, right? Maybe it's worth $250 to someone, and I have no way or knowing whether or not that person (if he or she exists) is a fool.
__________________
www.redclovercomponents.com

"Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long."
--Ogden Nash
jonwvara is offline  
Reply
Old 08-14-25 | 05:08 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 971
Likes: 401
From: Northern CA

Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.

Originally Posted by jonwvara
I try not to get too bent out of shape about stuff like this, so to speak.. Yes, the fork is obviously bent. There's a serious dent, and describing it as a "ding" is obviously an attempt on the seller's part to minimize it. But both problems are there in the pictures for all to see see. Caveat emptor, right? Maybe it's worth $250 to someone, and I have no way or knowing whether or not that person (if he or she exists) is a fool.
I'd rather badger the seller into not selling it. Why allow some scam artist to put an unknowing person in harm's way? I PM'ed him about the obvious damage and that the bike shouldn't be ridden. Sell for parts only. You think a professional frame builder or mechanical engineer would give their stamp of approval on the bike's safety? HIGHLY DOUBT IT.
LV2TNDM is offline  
Reply
Old 08-14-25 | 06:50 PM
  #19  
Vintage_Cyclist's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 671
From: Big Apple

Bikes: yes

Not worth wasting time with the seller. Caveat emptor.

This faux pas alone should dissuade discerning buyers!


Vintage_Cyclist is offline  
Reply
Old 08-14-25 | 08:20 PM
  #20  
bulgie's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,700
Likes: 5,480
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by LV2TNDM
I'd rather badger the seller into not selling it. Why allow some scam artist to put an unknowing person in harm's way? I PM'ed him about the obvious damage and that the bike shouldn't be ridden. Sell for parts only. You think a professional frame builder or mechanical engineer would give their stamp of approval on the bike's safety? HIGHLY DOUBT IT.
Personally I think you're exaggerating the danger. To a disturbing degree, given that none of can know from the photo. And yes I used to be a professional framebuilder, about 25 years full-time. A few credits short of an ME degree, though I don't claim to be an engineer. I dropped out when I had learned enough to be a bike frame builder, never had any intentions of taking a job that needed a degree.

I've seen plenty worse, that were ridden for ages without any unexpected dental work required.

If you are asking would I call it "safe", then we'd have to define what that means. A brand new bike straight from the bike shop can kill you for sure.
bulgie is offline  
Reply
Old 08-15-25 | 12:00 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 971
Likes: 401
From: Northern CA

Bikes: Cannondale tandems: '92 Road, '97 Mtn. Mongoose 10.9 Ti, Kelly Deluxe, Tommaso Chorus, Cdale MT2000, Schwinn Deluxe Cruiser, Torker Unicycle, among others.

Nah, I'm not exaggerating anything. That bike is already over 40 years old and shows signs of significant damage. It would take an experienced person close inspection to determine it's good. Plus, if that fork crown does indeed have a propensity to fail, then this bike is simply unsafe. And even if it isn't, the seller obviously doesn't know or care, and a potential buyer will be just as in the dark. Sell it honestly and disclose the OBVIOUS front-end damage. This type of damage is a well-known frame/fork destroying event. The ad should clearly state this. It doesn't, so it's defective and the seller is derelict.
LV2TNDM is offline  
Reply
Old 08-15-25 | 04:49 AM
  #22  
kunsunoke's Avatar
spondylitis.org
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 128
From: Fleetwood, PA, USA

Bikes: '84 Colnago Super; '90 Bridgestone MB-1; '81 Trek 930; '01 Cinelli Supercorsa; '62 Ideor Asso; '87 Tommasini Super Prestige; '13 Lynskey R2300; '84 Serotta Nova Special; '94 Litespeed Catalyst; etc.

Deluded FB sellers don't want to hear it.

In another Marketplace ad there's a person in an unnamed New England state that has a "Peugeot PX-10" for sale. It isn't a PX-10, though, it's clearly a UO-8 - as evidenced by the Aztec lugs and the lower-rent build spec. I sent a quick message informing the seller of that fact and was told that 1) my opinion was interesting and that 2) I should send proof that the bike was not a PX-10. I did. The bike is still listed as a PX-10.

kunsunoke is offline  
Reply
Old 08-15-25 | 06:40 AM
  #23  
Senior Member♣️
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,075
Likes: 3,004
Yep , I gave up correcting sellers . It leads nowhere but elevated tension . I was just trying to educate sellers as to what they had and got some pretty nasty replies. Done! Walk on…
bfuser5783920 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-15-25 | 12:17 PM
  #24  
randyjawa's Avatar
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 12,562
Likes: 2,738
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Is the frame/fork set road worthy and safe to ride, even after the mentioned repairs needed? In my mind, the damage to the fork would/will always be in my mind. Just knowing of the potential for catastrophic failure would absolutely deter me from riding and/or ever selling damage to another person. But that is just me. That said...

If it were not for the fork damage, that ding - DING - would be the best thief deterrent money could provide ((short of a darn good lock, locked to a big dog). That is the sort of bike I used to commute to and from work for many years. Looks like poo poo but rides just fine.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Reply
Old 08-16-25 | 08:42 AM
  #25  
noglider's Avatar
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,123
Likes: 6,340
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

Originally Posted by LV2TNDM
I'd rather badger the seller into not selling it. Why allow some scam artist to put an unknowing person in harm's way? I PM'ed him about the obvious damage and that the bike shouldn't be ridden. Sell for parts only. You think a professional frame builder or mechanical engineer would give their stamp of approval on the bike's safety? HIGHLY DOUBT IT.
That doesn't seem likely to work. A fundamental social rule I've noticed is that people don't like to be told they're doing something wrong, especially by strangers.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.