open pro vs. deep v
#3
He drop me
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 13
From: Central PA
Bikes: '03 Marin Mill Valley, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '12 Giant Defy Advance, '20 Giant Revolt 1, '20 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1, some random 6KU fixie
Not to muddy the waters here too much but if you are considering the Open Pro also look at the DT Swiss RR1.1. Same sort of design but they are a little lighter (10g per rim) and they are a couple of bucks cheaper too. https://www.dtswiss.com/index.asp?fus...ikedetail&id=8
__________________
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
#6
Eyelets are supposed to make for more durable wheels by reinforcing the spoke hole, but I believe it depends on how they're done. The MA3, for example, uses single eyelets which actually require a larger hole and can weaken the rim leading to spoke pull through. The Open Pro uses a double eyelet--also known as a socket--so that the both the inside and outside surface of the box section end up supporting the spoke tension. Using stainless sockets also allow you to use aluminum nipples if you're so inclined.
The Deep-V has no eyelets, but it's not really a detriment in practice. They can handle a much higher tension than the Mavics. They are also stronger due to their deeper cross-section (there's no aero benefit for such a low profile though, you have to get quite a bit deeper for that), but heavier.
I really like Open Pros. Strong, light, and wicked easy to build with because they come so true off the peg.
The Deep-V has no eyelets, but it's not really a detriment in practice. They can handle a much higher tension than the Mavics. They are also stronger due to their deeper cross-section (there's no aero benefit for such a low profile though, you have to get quite a bit deeper for that), but heavier.
I really like Open Pros. Strong, light, and wicked easy to build with because they come so true off the peg.
#8
Member's Only
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: MPLS
Bikes: Bridgesetone RB-1 fixie, Surly CrossCheck, Surly Instigator, Salsa AlaCarte, Bianchi Timberwolf SS
Ok, this is nothing like anything else... but I just built up a pair of Mavic T520 ceramic rims and am currently all about them.
#10
Senior Member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 4
From: NYC
Bikes: Custom DeanUSA El Diente CTI, Rich Adams Track, Johnny Coast Fixed, Argon18 Gallium Pro
Originally Posted by bostontrevor
They can handle a much higher tension than the Mavics. They are also stronger due to their deeper cross-section (there's no aero benefit for such a low profile though, you have to get quite a bit deeper for that), but heavier.
My go to rims are always Mavic OPs. And a well-built wheel by a competent wheel builder will be strong regardless of rim.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Albany, CA
What about the Velocity "Fusion" rim? I have two pairs of wheels with this rim -- Dave Thomas from Speed Dream Wheels builds with it -- and have had no problems so far. (Actually, one set is on a CX bike, so it takes a beating well.) It's an aero design, no eyelets, but not quite as deep/tall as the DV. Not sure about weight and cost differences from OP or DV.
#13
MADE IN TAIWAN
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: SF
Bikes: Tarmac, Humble, Makino, Schwinn
whats the benefits of a ceramic rim, I've seen them for sale but never actually seen anyone with them around. Are they lighter? they seem to be more expensive so just wondering what the differences are. Don't the OP or CXP come in ceramic?
#14
Senior Member

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 574
Likes: 4
From: NYC
Bikes: Custom DeanUSA El Diente CTI, Rich Adams Track, Johnny Coast Fixed, Argon18 Gallium Pro
Ceramic rims are irrelevent to fixed gear, since their purpose is better braking surface. A little heavier, a little pricier. Not worth it.





