Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Another Bareknuckle Geometry Thread (Standover Height)

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Another Bareknuckle Geometry Thread (Standover Height)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-06 | 12:08 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Austin, TX
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Another Bareknuckle Geometry Thread (Standover Height)

First off, I already read through all of the bareknuckle posts and couldnt' find this information. I was wondering if someone who has one can provide the standover height for the 54 and 56. I called EAI and they won't give out all the angle geometry, and they don't have the standover heights calculated already (I doubt they'd have a problem giving that out if they had it). This would help out a lot, I normally ride a 57 in road geometry, and no LBS stock it so I have to special order.

Also, as a side note (without trying to distract you all from the more important question ^^^), anyone have an idea why they wouldn't want to give out the geometry, especially since they seem to sort of have a reputation for causing sizing issues? I'm not referring to not publishing standover height, I know that's not too common to see, but what would be behind keeping st/ht angles secret?
nausea95 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 12:12 PM
  #2  
eddiebrannan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 0
From: NYC

Bikes: DW

"proprietary"

a few bike companies do this. it's utter bs, and causes needless problems like yours
eddiebrannan is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 12:22 PM
  #3  
MLPROJECT's Avatar
make way for the MGL
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,927
Likes: 0
From: NEW YORK

Bikes: khs aero track

couldn't you just measure these anyway? its not like they're a mystery when someone has a frame in front of them...
MLPROJECT is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 12:55 PM
  #4  
eddiebrannan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 0
From: NYC

Bikes: DW

yea, of course, but if you don't have one to hand you can't figure out necessary info like what the op needs to know.

the only people it affects is prospective customers; if a rival company was planning to make a bootleg bareknuckle they'd have no hesitation in purchasing one and doing the relevant measurements, so keeping them a secret is pointless and counterproductive.

and bs
eddiebrannan is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 01:04 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Austin, TX
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by eddiebrannan
yea, of course, but if you don't have one to hand you can't figure out necessary info like what the op needs to know.

the only people it affects is prospective customers; if a rival company was planning to make a bootleg bareknuckle they'd have no hesitation in purchasing one and doing the relevant measurements, so keeping them a secret is pointless and counterproductive.

and bs
I agree. I was hoping someone could think of a good reason, it's obviously not going to keep competition from getting ahold of it. It sucks but of course that doesn't stop me from wanting that frame, so hopefully someone on here who owns one or even an online retailer can help me out with getting it.
nausea95 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 01:06 PM
  #6  
hyperRevue's Avatar
King Among Runaways
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,215
Likes: 1
From: MKE

Bikes: 2004 Bianchi Pista, Cannondale Track, Soma Pake, Schwinn Breeze

PM rlgosa.
__________________
"I owe everyone an apology" - hyperrevue
hyperRevue is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 02:49 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
I have 54 and the standover is 31"ish. ..maybe 31 1/2.
bolo527 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 04:04 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Allston, MA

Bikes: Burley Pine Grove, Bridgestone fixed conversion

I called EAI asking for the same information a month or so ago. The guy I spoke with said that they basically asked a builder in Italy to make a frame with "traditional track geometry". The way this guy was talking, it's not that EAI won't give out the geometry, but rather that they just don't have it. Strange, if true.
rutt is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 04:34 PM
  #9  
summerinside's Avatar
Member's Only
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: MPLS

Bikes: Bridgesetone RB-1 fixie, Surly CrossCheck, Surly Instigator, Salsa AlaCarte, Bianchi Timberwolf SS

Originally Posted by eddiebrannan
if a rival company was planning to make a bootleg bareknuckle they'd have no hesitation in purchasing one and doing the relevant measurements, so keeping them a secret is pointless and counterproductive.
I thought that is what Bareknuckle was... maybe they dont have that information because they followed the above advice with a Colnago (or insert "Your favroite track frame" here).



Really who cares, as long as you ride what you like. I'm sure Bareknuckle frames are rad, and most of all they're priced right!
summerinside is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 05:36 PM
  #10  
eddiebrannan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 0
From: NYC

Bikes: DW

yea i'm sure they're terrific. no-one has anything bad to say.

but you need to be able to buy the right size, no?
eddiebrannan is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 07:08 PM
  #11  
msneeri2@hotmai's Avatar
>>>>>>>>>
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: philly
yo homeslice,
i measured mine at 33.5" standover for a 56. my guess is the 54 is yer lady. back to being too busy to do anything but lurk. i was just getting the hang of posting! dangit all.
msneeri2@hotmai is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 07:23 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Austin, TX
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rutt
I called EAI asking for the same information a month or so ago. The guy I spoke with said that they basically asked a builder in Italy to make a frame with "traditional track geometry". The way this guy was talking, it's not that EAI won't give out the geometry, but rather that they just don't have it. Strange, if true.

True, that sounds like it could be the case, but still, they should be able to measure it themselves even if they can't be exactly accurate, and I would expect them to do that considering the requests they get for it.
nausea95 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 07:41 PM
  #13  
absntr's Avatar
Frankly, Mr. Shankly
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
I think opting for the smaller would be in your best interests. Oddly enough, the standover for the Bareknuckle's are on the high side. I ride a 53 optimally but can ride a 54 or a 52 but there is no way I can standover a 54. It feels like a 55/56 to me. Incidentally, two people I know who are the same height ride a 50cm! Which feels like a 52.
absntr is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 07:53 PM
  #14  
roscoenyc57's Avatar
knucklehead
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: East Village, NYC

Bikes: Rocky MT Track, Vivalo, Pista Concept, De Bernardi Track

Originally Posted by absntr
I think opting for the smaller would be in your best interests. Oddly enough, the standover for the Bareknuckle's are on the high side. I ride a 53 optimally but can ride a 54 or a 52 but there is no way I can standover a 54. It feels like a 55/56 to me. Incidentally, two people I know who are the same height ride a 50cm! Which feels like a 52.
+1
I rode a friends 54 over christmas break and the standover was snugger than any 56 that I've ridden.
Very nice frame. I'm sure they would sell more of 'em if customers could get some accurate measurements. Its not like you walk into your LBS and they have 5 of 'em built out in various sizes that you can test ride.
__________________
bikes

Studio
roscoenyc57 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-06-06 | 08:18 PM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Austin, TX
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by absntr
I think opting for the smaller would be in your best interests. Oddly enough, the standover for the Bareknuckle's are on the high side. I ride a 53 optimally but can ride a 54 or a 52 but there is no way I can standover a 54. It feels like a 55/56 to me. Incidentally, two people I know who are the same height ride a 50cm! Which feels like a 52.
Originally Posted by msneeri2@hotmai
yo homeslice,
i measured mine at 33.5" standover for a 56. my guess is the 54 is yer lady. back to being too busy to do anything but lurk. i was just getting the hang of posting! dangit all.
The more I hear, the more I think 54 IS right. The 57 road frame I currently have just barely gives me one inch clearance (with shoes), and it's standover is about 32", although for me barely an inch is plenty of clearance and any more than that and i might feel wierd. I've always liked having a long reach, but I guess a 56 would just be too big, period, and the bareknuckle seems to have longer top tubes in proportion to the seat tube on the 54 (54/55.5). Of course anyone who's ridden one of these in 54 or 56 feel free to post your opinions for further assurance.

I'll post some measurements if I can get any accurate ones from having the bike in front of me once it comes in on the boat from italy in a few weeks.
nausea95 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-07-06 | 12:03 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Allston, MA

Bikes: Burley Pine Grove, Bridgestone fixed conversion

I posted this in another thread about this topic, but didn't get any feedback, so pardon the redundancy. One thing I noticed on the Business Cycles page was that the sizes are measured center-center. It seems like most frames are measured center-top. Case in point: my LBS has a Bareknuckle that they call 57 (measured center-top), but it has the same center-to-center measurements for seat tube and top tube as a 54 "Nessuno".

It seems like this could account for the sizing discrepancies that people are describing. So, if you tack on 3cm to the listed size to account for the seat tube extension, how do the measurements compare to other track frames? Is this already obvious to everyone else?
rutt is offline  
Reply
Old 02-07-06 | 12:12 PM
  #17  
jimmat's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
I have a 54 bk and the stand over is high I don't have the measurement in front of me but it is tall like a 56.
I also think the top tube is short, I felt a bit too close until I put on a 120 stem now its tight...in the cool kind of way.
Im 6' have a 34" inseam and the 54 is perfect for me.
Just dont get a pink one...b/c black is the new pink that was the new black
jimmat is offline  
Reply
Old 02-28-06 | 11:42 AM
  #18  
Thread Starter
Austin, TX
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
I'm still waiting on my frame, but someone from euro asia gave me the geometry for the 56. They aren't trying to be secretive, they were never given the info from the builder until recently.

seat angle 73.5
head angle 75
head tube 167
38 fork rake
nausea95 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-09-06 | 04:08 PM
  #19  
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, La.
I am thinking about purchasing the EAI Bare Knuckle too. Either that or a Soma Rush(any objections?). The info I got for a 54cm c-c EAI Bare Knuckle is: 55cm/21.65in. Top Tube Length..........74 degrees Head Tube Angle..........75 degrees Seat Tube Angle..........15cm/5.90in. Head Tube Length.
My question is this. Does anyone know or can find out what the chainstay length, bottom bracket drop and frame weight is? These are really the only two vitals Im missing that are keeping me from making my decision. I have all the specs for the Soma Rush. Maybe thats saying something, should I go for the Rush instead?

Last edited by nola000; 03-09-06 at 04:20 PM.
nola000 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-09-06 | 04:18 PM
  #20  
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, La.
So not to confuse the issue.....EAI Bare Knuckle Chainstay Length, Bottom Bracket Drop, and weight. Also, Soma Rush vs. EAI Bare Knuckle (without price being a factor).
nola000 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-09-06 | 05:25 PM
  #21  
jedi_steve420's Avatar
Rolling the Hard 6
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: The Flip Side -- Ottawa/Toronto

Bikes: not enough

I don't want to hijack or anything but I figured I'd save a new thread since should have a pretty simple non-subjective answer.

I have an inseam of 33 inches. Does this mean I want to look for something with a standover height of 33 inches or should I add the 2 inches of extra space and look for something with a 35 inch stand over?

Thanks
jedi_steve420 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.