Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Is the frame too big?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Is the frame too big?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-06 | 04:37 PM
  #1  
tokidokizenzen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Marlborough MA

Bikes: Nothing special

Is the frame too big?

I recently purchased a bike which arrived at the LBS this week. It's a Raleigh Rush Hour 50cm. The shop owner had no objections about my height relation to this bike when I ordered it. Anyway, I did not pick it up because of a dent and they put in an order for another. I did however get a chance to stand over it and I'm not sure I'm tall enough. I am 5'2 with no shoes on. When i stood over it the top bar was touching. My optimal frame size is like 42cm right? My question is; When is it really too big?
tokidokizenzen is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 04:43 PM
  #2  
onetwentyeight's Avatar
blah
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,573
Likes: 6
From: Oakland, CA
5'2" w/ a 50cm sounds about right, unless you have disproportionately stumpy legs. When I stand over my bike (which is a tad on the big side for me) it bunches up the crotch of my pants a little. as long as you can stand over it with your feet flat on the ground, I wouldn't trip. Why don't you ride a different sized bike at your LBS to feel what is good for you?
onetwentyeight is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 04:48 PM
  #3  
onetwentyeight's Avatar
blah
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,573
Likes: 6
From: Oakland, CA
Come to think of it, why didnt you just get them to measure you and order you one that fits?
onetwentyeight is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 04:49 PM
  #4  
sloppy robot's Avatar
like, really sloppy
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
From: calipornia
42cm is for a circus midget
sloppy robot is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 04:54 PM
  #5  
ink1373's Avatar
nothing: lasts forever
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 2
From: minneapolis
reach is more important. if you can stand over it, and get the bars a comfortable distance out/in in relation to the saddle, you're fine. the rest is preference.
ink1373 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 04:54 PM
  #6  
tokidokizenzen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Marlborough MA

Bikes: Nothing special

That measuring bit did not occur to me. It didn't occur to the LBS guy either, he basically said 50cm is my size.
When I stand over my bike (which is a tad on the big side for me) it bunches up the crotch of my pants a little.
These words make me feel a lot more at ease That is basically what happens to me over this bike. Thanks man for the info.
tokidokizenzen is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 04:55 PM
  #7  
baxtefer's Avatar
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,847
Likes: 0
From: not where i used to be
standover is overrated.
is the TT the right length with an appropriate stem?
does the HT length let you put the bars where you want without a huge stack of spacers or a ridiculous rise stem?
baxtefer is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 04:57 PM
  #8  
tokidokizenzen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Marlborough MA

Bikes: Nothing special

42cm is for a circus midget
LOL!
From what I have read on how to measure yourself for a frame, this is what they say is my size hahaa. Maybe there is a circus in my future?
tokidokizenzen is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 05:00 PM
  #9  
mcatano's Avatar
Crapzeit!
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sloppy robot
42cm is for a circus midget
Or my girlfriend.

__________________
mcatano is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 05:01 PM
  #10  
baxtefer's Avatar
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,847
Likes: 0
From: not where i used to be
mcatano has a midget fetish!
baxtefer is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 05:01 PM
  #11  
tokidokizenzen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Marlborough MA

Bikes: Nothing special

ink1373, baxtefer: Thanks a bunch, I'll take this into consideration. I'm just so glad that bar touching thing is not a problem.
tokidokizenzen is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 05:04 PM
  #12  
tokidokizenzen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Marlborough MA

Bikes: Nothing special

Well i guess if the frame ends up not fitting I can employ mcatano to build me one
tokidokizenzen is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 05:12 PM
  #13  
mcatano's Avatar
Crapzeit!
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by baxtefer
mcatano has a midget fetish!
You're dead to me.
__________________
mcatano is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 05:19 PM
  #14  
baxtefer's Avatar
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,847
Likes: 0
From: not where i used to be
kidding. I bet my GF is shorter than yours.
baxtefer is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 05:24 PM
  #15  
mcatano's Avatar
Crapzeit!
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
4'11"... shorter than Turd, even.
__________________
mcatano is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 05:33 PM
  #16  
baxtefer's Avatar
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,847
Likes: 0
From: not where i used to be
I win.
baxtefer is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 05:43 PM
  #17  
brunning's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by baxtefer
standover is overrated.
to some extent, yes. it's a silly way to size a frame, but i did sell one of the nicest bikes i've ever ridden because of lack of standover room. everything else fit beautifully, i just got sick of busting my nuts on the top tube.

when straddling the bike while wearing shoes, if you have zero space between your crotch and the top tube, get a smaller frame.

don't be afraid of using a stem with rise or a few headset spacers (though i agree that excess of either looks silly and should be corrected by riding a different frame size/geometry).
brunning is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 06:15 PM
  #18  
sikanna's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: san francisco, ca

Bikes: 1976 schwinn paramount P 14, 80s casati road bike, and 60s mercier fixed conversion

i'm 5'2" and one of my bikes is 51cm (the other is 48cm).
i don't have a problem with it.
sikanna is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 06:16 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
best ballpark for frame sizing is:

your inseam (crotch to ground, not pant length) in centimeters x .65
brian_w is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 06:44 PM
  #20  
baxtefer's Avatar
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,847
Likes: 0
From: not where i used to be
that's a load of crap.

that puts me on a 55cm frame, which is about 4 sizes too small for me.

that's about up there with the circumference of your head method.
baxtefer is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 07:54 PM
  #21  
slopvehicle's Avatar
ass hatchet
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
I'm 5' 11". Inseam is around 32". No idea what my reach is, but I feel just a *hair* over extended on a 54.5cm c to c top tube with 100mm stem. I just ordered a 53cm IRO. I also had a 55cm Pista for a while-- fit like a 57.

I think Bianchi measures by seat tube length, no?
slopvehicle is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 10:41 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by baxtefer
mcatano has a midget fetish!
LOL....

BTW baxtefer is right... why people still getting bikes thinking in the stand over? One of this days some company will came up with a top tube like a U backwards and how the curve will be super high everybody will get super small frames because the stand over will be over the average...

wonder what could happend if the tt is just the opposite, like a real U, then the stand over will be super low, then even midgets will get a frame size 60 because the stand over is the right one...

ultraman6970 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-23-06 | 10:47 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,848
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by brian_w
best ballpark for frame sizing is:

your inseam (crotch to ground, not pant length) in centimeters x .65
r u sure? I have 80 cms or so of inseam and if u do the multiplication i end up with a 52 cms frame? what the hell**********? im a 56 in the old steel times... r u sure????
ultraman6970 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-24-06 | 09:35 AM
  #24  
tlupfer's Avatar
...
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 708
Likes: 2
From: Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by ultraman6970
r u sure? I have 80 cms or so of inseam and if u do the multiplication i end up with a 52 cms frame? what the hell**********? im a 56 in the old steel times... r u sure????
it's pretty close to the "lemond formula", which suggests 2/3 * inseam. it works for me, but i have a long inseam relative to my height.
tlupfer is offline  
Reply
Old 03-24-06 | 09:39 AM
  #25  
hyperRevue's Avatar
King Among Runaways
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,215
Likes: 1
From: MKE

Bikes: 2004 Bianchi Pista, Cannondale Track, Soma Pake, Schwinn Breeze

The difference between a 50cm and a 42cm is enormous.
__________________
"I owe everyone an apology" - hyperrevue
hyperRevue is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.