Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Why horizontal droputs?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Why horizontal droputs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-07 | 10:41 AM
  #1  
Bob Ross's Avatar
Thread Starter
your god hates me
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 3,493

Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse

Why horizontal droputs?

What's the reason for having horizontal droputs on fixed & SS bike frames? Is it just so you have some way to adjust chain tension (which would otherwise be controlled via derailleur adjustment on a geared bike), or is there some other explanation?

Just wonderin'.
Bob Ross is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 10:43 AM
  #2  
Banned.
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 1
Horizontal dropouts or track ends?

And I think you answered you own question.
BostonFixed is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 10:45 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
"Is it just so you have some way to adjust chain tension"

yes.

just for clarification, most of the bikes here have track ends (open backwards). horizontal dropouts are the older style that open forward but are longer.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/singlespeed.html
zip22 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 10:48 AM
  #4  
mattface's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 36
From: Williston, VT

Bikes: Bridgestone RB-T, Soma Rush, Razesa Racer, ⅔ of a 1983 Holdsworth Professional, Nishiki Riviera Winter Bike

Originally Posted by Bob Ross
Is it just so you have some way to adjust chain tension (which would otherwise be controlled via derailleur adjustment on a geared bike)...
yup
mattface is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 11:03 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
From: Van BC
Originally Posted by zip22
just for clarification, most of the bikes here have track ends (open backwards). horizontal dropouts are the older style that open forward but are longer.
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/singlespeed.html
I'm pretty sure that track ends are much older, maybe someone else can confirm this. In my understanding (forward facing) drop-outs were invented so that you could get the wheel off without derailing the chain, i.e. drop the wheel out of the chain loop.

Can anyone give a more specific timeline or correct me if I'm wrong here?
mander is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 12:01 PM
  #6  
Aeroplane's Avatar
jack of one or two trades
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
From: Suburbia, CT

Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB

Originally Posted by mander
I'm pretty sure that track ends are much older, maybe someone else can confirm this. In my understanding (forward facing) drop-outs were invented so that you could get the wheel off without derailing the chain, i.e. drop the wheel out of the chain loop.

Can anyone give a more specific timeline or correct me if I'm wrong here?
If you want to get hard-core technical, the oldest bikes were closer to track ends than horizontal dropouts.

But odds are, if you see a bike on the street, and it's got horizontal dropouts, it's not new.
Aeroplane is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 12:08 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
From: Van BC
My mistake, I thought the guy was saying that (h.) dropouts are older than track ends, as if track ends were an innovation of some clever person who was unsatisfied with drop outs.
mander is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 12:14 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
I had the impression that the rear entry fork ends were in case the wheel slipped you wouldn't lose it and crash. Makes sense on a track bike where you're putting enormous energy into a sprint say, or a bmx with tricks and jumps and stuff. Maybe I just made that up.

And they look cool, almost as cool as a horizontal dropout conversion bike.
mascher is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 12:17 PM
  #9  
DoshKel's Avatar
RIP Shiznaz.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,603
Likes: 0
From: World

Bikes: 1983 Bianchi Eco Pista

I think we to go back to the Draisienne. Seriously awesome.
DoshKel is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 12:35 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
From: Van BC
Originally Posted by ieatrats
I had the impression that the rear entry fork ends were in case the wheel slipped you wouldn't lose it and crash. Makes sense on a track bike where you're putting enormous energy into a sprint say, or a bmx with tricks and jumps and stuff. Maybe I just made that up.

And they look cool, almost as cool as a horizontal dropout conversion bike.
AFAIK this has been debunked by armchair analysis on this forum though perhaps it may be a possibility. The idea is, if one of your track nuts or dropouts fails, the other one will still be there to hold on regardless of which direction the dropout is facing. So your axle will slide back, and your wheel will go into the chainstay (but not fall off) and you will go into a skid, whether you have track ends or not.

It seems to me like track ends are just the most bone simple way to mount a rear wheel on a ss bike that allows for adjustable chain tension, and that's why they are the oldest and still frequently used. But I'm far from certain so I would appreciate it if someone who knows what they're talking about would pipe in.

Last edited by mander; 03-16-07 at 12:50 PM.
mander is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 12:44 PM
  #11  
Banned.
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by ieatrats
I had the impression that the rear entry fork ends were in case the wheel slipped you wouldn't lose it and crash. Makes sense on a track bike where you're putting enormous energy into a sprint say, or a bmx with tricks and jumps and stuff. Maybe I just made that up.

And they look cool, almost as cool as a horizontal dropout conversion bike.
Sounds cool and all, but when you actaully look at the forces applied, derailleur bikes apply way way way more torque and force to the rear axle/etc than ANY single geared bike, regardless of rider's strength or ability.

And if the wheel slips on either a bike with horizontal dropouts or a bike with track ends, the wheel end up in the same place: locked against the non-drive side chainstay, sending you into a uncontrollable skid.


Horizontal dropouts are actually way better and more functional than track ends.
BostonFixed is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 01:17 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Yeah, I think that actually makes more sense. I've even had that happen with a broken QR on a derailleur bike with horizontal drops, and that's exactly what happened - wheel hit the non-drive chainstay and I skidded, all confused.

I've always been on the horizontal dropouts are better functionally than track ends tip though.
mascher is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 01:20 PM
  #13  
Hocam's Avatar
Ho-Jahm
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,228
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
Horizontal dropouts are only more functional with a rear brake so you never have to re-adjust the pads when changing chain tension.

How does a RD put more force on the axle? Because of the mechanical advantage of the gearing? I don't follow if that's why.
Hocam is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 01:31 PM
  #14  
:)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,391
Likes: 1
From: duluth

Bikes: '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450

Originally Posted by Hocam
Horizontal dropouts are only more functional with a rear brake so you never have to re-adjust the pads when changing chain tension.

How does a RD put more force on the axle? Because of the mechanical advantage of the gearing? I don't follow if that's why.

edit.

my ascii art didn't work... a geared bike will have the rear wheel dished while a proper track/ss wheel will be dished to center....



I ended up bending a couple axles when I converted to ss/fixed with a wheel like the one to the right.
ianjk is offline  
Reply
Old 03-16-07 | 02:11 PM
  #15  
Banned.
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Hocam
Horizontal dropouts are only more functional with a rear brake so you never have to re-adjust the pads when changing chain tension.
Rear brake adjustment, if you ever want to run full fenders without hassle, versatility.

Track ends are only really useful if you want to jam the rear wheel 1/8" from the seat tube.

How does a RD put more force on the axle? Because of the mechanical advantage of the gearing? I don't follow if that's why
It's not the RD, it's the gearing that puts force on the chain/axle. Lower gears=more torque/force.

A weak 110# person spinning in a granny gear will generate more torque/force on the chain and on the qr/axle than any world champion track rider. This is why QRs can be used on fixed rear wheels- they are under way higher loads on geared bikes. Same thing with chains- they are under way higher stresses on geared bikes than on any fixed bike.
BostonFixed is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.