Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Anyone use 650C wheels?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Anyone use 650C wheels?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-07 | 12:29 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Commuting Fool
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: North Hollywood, CA

Bikes: Raleigh Rush Hour (SS/fixie)

Anyone use 650C wheels?

Advantage over 700c?
Autobus is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-07 | 12:30 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
From: Van BC
You can fit huge tires and therefore run at lower psi. The rivendell beardsley type touring cyclists seem to like them for this reason.

Last edited by mander; 06-02-07 at 12:36 PM.
mander is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-07 | 12:34 PM
  #3  
bonechilling's Avatar
Run What 'Ya Brung
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,694
Likes: 5
They're also popular for smaller size bikes that cannot
comfortably fit 700c wheels. And with "hipsters" who
want to do bar-spins.

Anyone know why these are so popular in triathlon now?
It seems like even average size riders are using them.
bonechilling is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-07 | 12:37 PM
  #4  
babychris's Avatar
sharkfin.
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
From: philllaaaaay.

Bikes: davidson track. landshark

650 for barspins.
babychris is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-07 | 12:51 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
From: out and on the parkway
Originally Posted by mander
You can fit huge tires and therefore run at lower psi. The rivendell beardsley type touring cyclists seem to like them for this reason.
i'm pretty sure the wheels you're talking about are 650B, not C. 650C wheels are either for really small frames, or barspins.
Jesse M is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-07 | 12:59 PM
  #6  
Banned.
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,416
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bonechilling
Anyone know why these are so popular in triathlon now?
It seems like even average size riders are using them.
Smaller wheels accelerate faster.
Smaller wheels might make more room for crazy tri frame designs/geometry?
BostonFixed is offline  
Reply
Old 06-02-07 | 01:05 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
From: Van BC
^ My mistake Jesse M! wheel sizes confuse me

Edit: just got schooled here: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/650b.html

Last edited by mander; 06-02-07 at 01:14 PM.
mander is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-07 | 08:26 AM
  #8  
mintyai's Avatar
a litte bit fixed
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Brick Lane, London, UK

Bikes: 24" wheel, fixed, folding airnimal chameleon

Originally Posted by bonechilling
Anyone know why these are so popular in triathlon now?
It seems like even average size riders are using them.
Tri riders have the saddle almost directly above the BB, this allows makes it more comfortable when they ride aero, and puts less strain on the muscles they use when running. Having the BB further back means less space for a rear wheel. I think it is mostly habit and ease of parts that means people use 700C wheels. Check out the research by Alex Moulton on wheel size, he made a 20" bike that I think still holds the speed record for riding in an upright position.

Smaller wheels are lighter, but you have to spin them faster so I don't think there is any real difference in acceleration/speed, the conclusions from alex moulton is that tyre construction and pressure makes a much bigger difference to speed and there are just more tyre options for 700C bikes.
mintyai is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-07 | 04:09 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BostonFixed
Smaller wheels accelerate faster.
Smaller wheels might make more room for crazy tri frame designs/geometry?
The latter seems plausible; who knows? The former is less likely. In time trialling, the name of the game is to maintain the maximum average speed, and it seems larger wheels (well, technically, wheels with a greater moment of inertia) would help this since it would take more force to slow them down. This is similar to one reason many downhill bikes weigh so much -- more momentum means they slow down less when they hit things.
xsdg is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-07 | 06:18 PM
  #10  
sniks's Avatar
JuNKie! bike junkie!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
you can fit your foot between front wheel and fork for endo tail whips!

https://www.flickr.com/photos/redridi...7600300276374/
__________________
www.cranks505.com

Last edited by sniks; 06-03-07 at 06:58 PM.
sniks is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-07 | 06:50 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
barspin wheelies
alexfranko is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-07 | 07:12 PM
  #12  
abeabe's Avatar
a drinking idea
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
i run one in the front for the look of it.

sue me.
abeabe is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-07 | 07:18 PM
  #13  
na975
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i have two bikes,both 650c front wheels w/650 fork thats the way i roll!
 
Reply
Old 06-03-07 | 08:14 PM
  #14  
raodmaster shaman
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
From: G-ville
Originally Posted by bonechilling
Anyone know why these are so popular in triathlon now?
It seems like even average size riders are using them.
in addition to the geometry issues, they are more areo-dynamic since they are smaller. triathlons arent governed by the UCI which mandates 700c front and back on all bikes, otherwise TT bikes would have them too.
roadgator is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-07 | 08:34 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: NYC

Bikes: Nashbar CR-5

could you run a 650 up front, with a fork made for 650 to lower the front end for more aggressive geometry?
TedC is offline  
Reply
Old 06-03-07 | 08:45 PM
  #16  
out of shape
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: va
you could, but it would lower the bb. depending on the geometry, anywhere from 2–4cm sounds right by estimation (~50mm difference in wheel sizes, bb is roughly halfway in the wheelbase)
chase. is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-07 | 09:59 AM
  #17  
é wot?
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Inner Canuckistan

Bikes: Gary Fisher Montare, 1973 Bottechia, IRO Jamie Roy,1998 Cervelo Eyre Tri, 1982 Peugeot Sport fixed gear, and some kind of red bike hanging in the rafters

Originally Posted by bonechilling
Anyone know why these are so popular in triathlon now?
It seems like even average size riders are using them.
They were popular, five years ago or so. Now everything is 700C. My tri bike is 650C; it's a '98 model. 56cm. Now that company only makes 650C bikes in the smallest sizes. A large part of the reason for 650C in the first place was that it was difficult to get the head tube short enough with conventional headsets and quill stems, in order to get the low aero position. My bike is rather absurdly low (I think about an 10" drop, haven't measured it), but the new bikes can do the same thing with 700C and integrated headsets. 650C is marginally more aero too as was mentioned, and that helped its popularity; however, they also have a bit higher rolling resistance than 700C and people have really come to understand how important that is in the last few years. And now that everyone rides deep-section wheels (except me, too broke for that stuff) the aero difference is minimal. Still, a lot of the current small sizes of tri bikes really ought to be 650C for fit reasons (which is the only good reason IMO) and aren't.
yairi is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-07 | 10:12 AM
  #18  
-
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Banned in DC
Originally Posted by yairi
They were popular, five years ago or so.
+1. This is why 650 tri-spokes were so cheap up until track bike fashion blew them up. All the triatheletes were ditching them for 700 stuff.
zacked is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-07 | 11:01 AM
  #19  
baxtefer's Avatar
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,847
Likes: 0
From: not where i used to be
Originally Posted by roadgator
in addition to the geometry issues, they are more areo-dynamic since they are smaller. triathlons arent governed by the UCI which mandates 700c front and back on all bikes, otherwise TT bikes would have them too.

not quite. UCI does not mandate a specific wheel size. They actually give a range of allowable wheel diameters (55-70cm incluing tires, I think)

650c fits into this range.
The only requirement would be that both wheels be the same size.
baxtefer is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-07 | 02:06 PM
  #20  
raodmaster shaman
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
From: G-ville
^^^ oops. thanks for the correction.
roadgator is offline  
Reply
Old 06-04-07 | 02:13 PM
  #21  
battles's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: phillyy

Bikes: 83 panasonic sport deluxe

I think I learned something!

It's been like, 8 months! Thank you!
battles is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.