Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Which Is The Better Rain Guard Type????

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Which Is The Better Rain Guard Type????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-07 | 02:24 AM
  #1  
ssspenser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: portland
Which Is The Better Rain Guard Type????

what is better a rain guard like this or something like this . what do you guys use and why
ssspenser is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 02:42 AM
  #2  
marqueemoon's Avatar
or tarckeemoon, depending
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,017
Likes: 2
From: the pesto of cities

Bikes: Davidson Impulse, Merckx Titanium AX, Bruce Gordon Rock & Road, Cross Check custom build, On-One Il Pomino, Shawver Cycles cross, Zion 737, Mercian Vincitore, Brompton S1L, Charge Juicer

Umm... the full coverage ones?
marqueemoon is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 02:47 AM
  #3  
Banned.
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: United States
More fender, more close to tire, less wet.
Less fender, less close to tire, more wet.
Pajaro is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 02:59 AM
  #4  
ssspenser's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: portland
yeah i kind of figured the first kind i showed would have more technical difficulties then the second like getting caught in the tire or something weak like that
ssspenser is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 08:01 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Definitely the first one, but I still use the second kind. Super easy to just throw it on when you know your gonna need it, rather than the first one which looks like it's meant to stay on.
mooseblend is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 08:01 AM
  #6  
kyselad's Avatar
extra bitter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 7

Bikes: Miyata 210, Fuji Royale II, Bridgestone Kabuki, Miyata Ninety

Full fenders are (er, can be) inexpensive, lightweight, and just far better at keeping you dry. I like having a mudflap up front for even better coverage and drier feet. Partial fenders are for frames that won't accept proper fenders (e.g. lack of clearance or eyelets) or in cases where the fenders simply must be quickly removable.

And that first bike is gorgeous.
kyselad is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 08:38 AM
  #7  
The LT's Avatar
spin
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Champaign, IL

Bikes: raleigh m-60, azonic steelhead, schwinn world sport fixed gear

basically my experience is that the clip on fenders will keep **** off of your upper body but not necessarily off your legs where as the full coverage fenders keep you pretty dry all around especially if you have an additional mudflap on the front
The LT is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-07 | 08:52 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Full fenders on track bikes are tricky because of the toe overlap. If you already have some toe overlap, expect it to be much worse once you add fenders. Watch out when you're going slow, you might peddle into your own fender and screw it up.
dizzy101 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.