Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Merier Kilo TT vs. Steamroller

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Merier Kilo TT vs. Steamroller

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-08 | 09:34 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Merier Kilo TT vs. Steamroller

Looking for expert opinion on the Mercier Kilo TT vs. the Surly Steamroller.
Is the Steamroller a fixed gear bike designed for the road, while the Kilo an actual track bike?
I may use on road and track, but not for any real racing.
bklein is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 09:42 AM
  #2  
Judge_Posner's Avatar
god
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: SFC

Bikes: cannondale f300, surly steamroller

yeah the steamroller is generally considered to have 'road geometry,' while the kilo is 'track geometry.'

if you plan on spending a significant amount of time on the track and/or budget is a big factor, kilo may be a better bet. if you want an extremely versatile road fg with clearance for big tires/fenders, and you want a generally nice bike, get the steamroller. see sig for my obvious preference.
Judge_Posner is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 09:48 AM
  #3  
roadfix's Avatar
hello
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18,710
Likes: 136
From: Los Angeles
Steamroller!
roadfix is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 09:58 AM
  #4  
Rusty Piton's Avatar
Watcher
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 258
Likes: 1
From: Chi-O
'roller!
Rusty Piton is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 10:00 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
yeah you got it right. the roller has a lower bottom bracket so may not be "legal" on some velodromes, also is more prone to pedal strike (never happened with me though, but I get toeclip strike a lot since I tend to point my toes down while pedalling).

the mercier is also cheaper.
str8flexed is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 10:16 AM
  #6  
Lexicon Devil
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
If you're not going to do any real racing I would say go with the steamroller because it sounds like you'll be riding on the road a lot more and the steamroller is definitely the better option.
Nick_Phooey is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 10:21 AM
  #7  
Elderberry's Avatar
Elemental Child
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Minnesoter

Bikes: 1989 Schwinn World workhorse, 1979 Trek Summer Bike, 1995 Schwinn Moab that never gets ridden

Plus, "Steamroller" is a way cooler name. And Surly is swell.

You can't lose.
Elderberry is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 10:55 AM
  #8  
NeilMonday's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk, VA

Bikes: Surly Steamroller

As a former surly steamroller owner I say get a kilo. Unless you like threadless stems or you like wide tires.
NeilMonday is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 11:02 AM
  #9  
Aeroplane's Avatar
jack of one or two trades
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
From: Suburbia, CT

Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB

Originally Posted by NeilMonday
Unless you like threadless stems...
The KHS (same frame as the kilo) has a threadless fork, so don't let that be a deal-breaker.
Aeroplane is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 11:05 AM
  #10  
baller.
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: madison wi and twin cities

Bikes: trek madone, schwinn moab, orbea team euskatel, iro mark v, trek 7000 (ss in progress), few other fixed conversions in progress

surly comes stock much better than a kilo, and the frame is way better. it just depends if you dont care about a cheaper frame and can build up stuff urself, you can probably spend less on a kilo. i do like the $ green color on the kilo too, but powder coating isn't tough to do on bikes
bfoz is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 11:23 AM
  #11  
baxtefer's Avatar
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,847
Likes: 0
From: not where i used to be
Originally Posted by NeilMonday
As a former surly steamroller owner I say get a kilo. Unless you like threadless stems or you like wide tires.
As a former Kilo (KHS actually) and current steamroller owner, I say get the steamroller.
The steamroller is actually somewhere in between "road" and "track" geometry (i cringe when i make such simplistic generalizations). The HTA is steeper and the wheelbase shorter than some typical road bikes. Plus, in most sizes the 'roller has a steeper HTA and more rake than the Kilo. i.e. "twitchier"

the only negative the steamroller would have towards basic fooling around at the track is that it's BB is about 1cm lower. This is essentially negligible, unless you plan on riding on the absolute steepest of tracks.

Finally, the steamroller complete come with much better components than the KiloTT and the tire clearance alone makes for a much more versatile road bike

note that the KHS frame is no longer the same as the Kilo. Check the geo charts, they're different. i think Mercier kept the geometry of the KHS frames from a couple years back, while KHS tweaked theirs a little bit?
or the geometry chart on the mercier site is just wrong.
baxtefer is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 12:43 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
one more vote for the steamroller. great street bike that comes with way better components vs. kilo tt complete. rides like a dream - very comfortable.

get a track-only bike in the future when you actually get into track. and in the meantime, ride the steamroller around town.
bionnaki is offline  
Reply
Old 05-05-08 | 04:41 PM
  #13  
unofficial
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: san rafael, CA
surly surly surly
dervish is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-08 | 05:27 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Surly Steamroller all the way. I am biased. But the bias is produced by experience with the bike. It is a really fun bike that you can bang around without worry.
Sinn is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-08 | 05:32 PM
  #15  
Judge_Posner's Avatar
god
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: SFC

Bikes: cannondale f300, surly steamroller

thats a hot bump
Judge_Posner is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-08 | 05:51 PM
  #16  
reedreeder
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by str8flexed
yeah you got it right. the roller has a lower bottom bracket so may not be "legal" on some velodromes, also is more prone to pedal strike (never happened with me though, but I get toeclip strike a lot since I tend to point my toes down while pedalling).

the mercier is also cheaper.
you get toeclip strike? i didn't even know that was possible.
 
Reply
Old 07-16-08 | 06:07 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Judge_Posner
thats a hot bump
And, of course, I recommend this sort of activity only while wearing the proper protection.
Sinn is offline  
Reply
Old 07-16-08 | 08:27 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Hey, have you seen the Jamis Sputnick? That bike has an awesome steel frame and a carbon composite fork.

https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/bikes/...08sputnik.html

That, in my opinion, is a good bike, better than the Mercier.
Sinn is offline  
Reply
Old 07-17-08 | 09:47 AM
  #19  
ZiP0082's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 1
From: Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: 2008 Mercier Kilo TT

With the Kilo TT now threadless, I think it's even more of a better choice over a Steamroller if money is the primary concern. To me, the ride on Steamrollers and Kilo TTs is very similar, so I'd tend to opt for the less expensive, then replace things as they break.
ZiP0082 is offline  
Reply
Old 07-17-08 | 11:43 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
both are nice bikes but I went with a steamroller. The feeling i get when riding this bike is that its super sturdy I would go so far as to say indestructible. I play polo on my bike and have gotten in and out of some fairly hairy situations but the frame is still true and begging for more. Also If you haven't already ridden a track bike and don't understand how they handle the steamroller may be better for you. depending on your size. Its nice to be able to effortlessly ride with no hands, fit huge tires and hit the trails, or just pound the crap out of the bike on the pavement. Versatility definitely goes to the steamroller.
Jenkinsal2 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.