Merier Kilo TT vs. Steamroller
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Merier Kilo TT vs. Steamroller
Looking for expert opinion on the Mercier Kilo TT vs. the Surly Steamroller.
Is the Steamroller a fixed gear bike designed for the road, while the Kilo an actual track bike?
I may use on road and track, but not for any real racing.
Is the Steamroller a fixed gear bike designed for the road, while the Kilo an actual track bike?
I may use on road and track, but not for any real racing.
#2
yeah the steamroller is generally considered to have 'road geometry,' while the kilo is 'track geometry.'
if you plan on spending a significant amount of time on the track and/or budget is a big factor, kilo may be a better bet. if you want an extremely versatile road fg with clearance for big tires/fenders, and you want a generally nice bike, get the steamroller. see sig for my obvious preference.
if you plan on spending a significant amount of time on the track and/or budget is a big factor, kilo may be a better bet. if you want an extremely versatile road fg with clearance for big tires/fenders, and you want a generally nice bike, get the steamroller. see sig for my obvious preference.
#5
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
yeah you got it right. the roller has a lower bottom bracket so may not be "legal" on some velodromes, also is more prone to pedal strike (never happened with me though, but I get toeclip strike a lot since I tend to point my toes down while pedalling).
the mercier is also cheaper.
the mercier is also cheaper.
#9
jack of one or two trades
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
From: Suburbia, CT
Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB
#10
baller.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: madison wi and twin cities
Bikes: trek madone, schwinn moab, orbea team euskatel, iro mark v, trek 7000 (ss in progress), few other fixed conversions in progress
surly comes stock much better than a kilo, and the frame is way better. it just depends if you dont care about a cheaper frame and can build up stuff urself, you can probably spend less on a kilo. i do like the $ green color on the kilo too, but powder coating isn't tough to do on bikes
#11
The steamroller is actually somewhere in between "road" and "track" geometry (i cringe when i make such simplistic generalizations). The HTA is steeper and the wheelbase shorter than some typical road bikes. Plus, in most sizes the 'roller has a steeper HTA and more rake than the Kilo. i.e. "twitchier"
the only negative the steamroller would have towards basic fooling around at the track is that it's BB is about 1cm lower. This is essentially negligible, unless you plan on riding on the absolute steepest of tracks.
Finally, the steamroller complete come with much better components than the KiloTT and the tire clearance alone makes for a much more versatile road bike
note that the KHS frame is no longer the same as the Kilo. Check the geo charts, they're different. i think Mercier kept the geometry of the KHS frames from a couple years back, while KHS tweaked theirs a little bit?
or the geometry chart on the mercier site is just wrong.
#12
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
one more vote for the steamroller. great street bike that comes with way better components vs. kilo tt complete. rides like a dream - very comfortable.
get a track-only bike in the future when you actually get into track. and in the meantime, ride the steamroller around town.
get a track-only bike in the future when you actually get into track. and in the meantime, ride the steamroller around town.
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
yeah you got it right. the roller has a lower bottom bracket so may not be "legal" on some velodromes, also is more prone to pedal strike (never happened with me though, but I get toeclip strike a lot since I tend to point my toes down while pedalling).
the mercier is also cheaper.
the mercier is also cheaper.
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Hey, have you seen the Jamis Sputnick? That bike has an awesome steel frame and a carbon composite fork.
https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/bikes/...08sputnik.html
That, in my opinion, is a good bike, better than the Mercier.
https://www.jamisbikes.com/usa/bikes/...08sputnik.html
That, in my opinion, is a good bike, better than the Mercier.
#19
With the Kilo TT now threadless, I think it's even more of a better choice over a Steamroller if money is the primary concern. To me, the ride on Steamrollers and Kilo TTs is very similar, so I'd tend to opt for the less expensive, then replace things as they break.
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
both are nice bikes but I went with a steamroller. The feeling i get when riding this bike is that its super sturdy I would go so far as to say indestructible. I play polo on my bike and have gotten in and out of some fairly hairy situations but the frame is still true and begging for more. Also If you haven't already ridden a track bike and don't understand how they handle the steamroller may be better for you. depending on your size. Its nice to be able to effortlessly ride with no hands, fit huge tires and hit the trails, or just pound the crap out of the bike on the pavement. Versatility definitely goes to the steamroller.






