Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

1986 Trek 560 = Solid Fixie Conversion?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

1986 Trek 560 = Solid Fixie Conversion?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-09 | 02:42 AM
  #76  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Just incase anyone actually still cares or has read through this entire thread. I have finally completed my very first fixed gear conversion. This one was from the original title here "1986 Trek 560 = Solid Fixie Conversion?". I purchased the bike for $90.00 from a guy who got into mountain biking after riding this trek since he purchased it in the 80s. I found out from vintagetrek.com that it was actually an 84 Trek 560 by checking the serial number on the bottom bracket shell.


Here is the before...





Here is the after...




I ending up replacing the bottom bracket, crank set, wheels, tires and handle bars. The frame was somewhat rusty so I stripped, sanded, primed and painted it all myself with store bought spray paint. Most of the parts were scavenged from either this bike or parts I had from other bikes along the journey. I am a complete newbie so this was totally a learning experience. Thank you to everyone here for the help and suggestions throughout the project. Please leave questions and comments on the project here! Thanks.

Last edited by thespacerockkid; 03-09-09 at 02:50 AM.
thespacerockkid is offline  
Reply
Old 03-09-09 | 03:35 AM
  #77  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 0
From: Davis/Lafayette, CA

Bikes: too many

very nice. great buy too.

I just picked up an older steel trek. definitely a lower end model though (one of the ones with a 9 digit serial number on the seat tube rather than the bottom bracket. so I guess made in japan). I thought it was a decent buy considering the bay area and sacto have pretty inflated prices. small dent on the top tube, and a passable powdercoat job (looks almost exactly like the one on page 2).

can't wait to get it built up, waiting on getting the rest of my parts.
LupinIII is offline  
Reply
Old 03-09-09 | 12:43 PM
  #78  
JohnDThompson's Avatar
Old fart
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,327
Likes: 5,238
From: Appleton WI

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Originally Posted by thespacerockkid
Just incase anyone actually still cares or has read through this entire thread. I have finally completed my very first fixed gear conversion. This one was from the original title here "1986 Trek 560 = Solid Fixie Conversion?". I purchased the bike for $90.00 from a guy who got into mountain biking after riding this trek since he purchased it in the 80s. I found out from vintagetrek.com that it was actually an 84 Trek 560 by checking the serial number on the bottom bracket shell.




I ending up replacing the bottom bracket, crank set, wheels, tires and handle bars. The frame was somewhat rusty so I stripped, sanded, primed and painted it all myself with store bought spray paint. Most of the parts were scavenged from either this bike or parts I had from other bikes along the journey. I am a complete newbie so this was totally a learning experience. Thank you to everyone here for the help and suggestions throughout the project. Please leave questions and comments on the project here! Thanks.
Looks nice!

Thanks for not "drewing" the frame!
JohnDThompson is offline  
Reply
Old 03-10-09 | 01:42 AM
  #79  
sunburst's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 187
From: SF Bay Area

Bikes: Peugeot, Motobecane, Joannou, Kona, Specialized, Ironhorse, Royal Scot, Dahon

Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
No, Skyrocker had it right. The first digit indicates the frame material "5xx" used Ishiwata 022 tubing,
My '87 560 Pro has 531. Did Trek change things in '87 or is it because it's a "Pro" model?
sunburst is offline  
Reply
Old 03-13-09 | 10:57 PM
  #80  
tmh657's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 59
From: SoCal

Bikes: A few BSO's.

I had to bump this thread. 1985 660. Reynolds 531cs so the tubes fork and stays are Reynolds.
Just built this today and it rocks. Best conversion I have ever ridden. The toe overlap will take a little getting used to.
I think the rear tire will become black.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Trek_2.jpg (102.7 KB, 53 views)
tmh657 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.