Is the weight difference between Deep Vs and B43s that drastic?
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Bikes: Vintage French FG Conversion
Is the weight difference between Deep Vs and B43s that drastic?
People say that B43s are boat anchors and are way heavier than Deep Vs but a pair of B43s are just a pound more than a pair of Deep Vs. Unless everything on your bike is super light, wouldn't this be a negligible difference?
#6
This is true. If light if job #1, neither is a very good choice. That said, a pound is a "big deal" in terms of rim weight. The question is is rim weight itself a big deal to you? Both are strong rims, and perfectly rideable, and there's nothing wrong with either. They just aren't light.
#7
#10
THE STUFFED


Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,671
Likes: 21
From: San Francisco, CA
Bikes: R. Sachs Simplicity; EAI Bareknuckle; Madone Gen 8
Because they are; and I happen to own 2 sets 
+1 momentum is the word
QFT; those are doubled walled (which is stronger than you need unless you tarck) while the B43's are triple and were created with bicycle polo in mind

QFT; those are doubled walled (which is stronger than you need unless you tarck) while the B43's are triple and were created with bicycle polo in mind
#11
Let's just say that the B43s are ******** strong when built right. Dear God. They are quite a bit heavier however. I could definitely feel the difference after I changed my rear Miche Pistard (a relatively deep double wall, similar to a deep V) to a B43. Accelerating was noticeably more difficult. You get used to it though.
#14
1mm shallower... For all intents and purposes they're the same depth. If you're riding brakeless I think they look a lot better, you can get them without a parallel braking surface. The V extends all the way to the edge.
__________________
https://blicksbags.com/
https://blicksbags.com/
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
domnit
Fitting Your Bike
0
05-20-15 10:36 PM






