Photographers??
#101
Rebel Rouser
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, TX
Bikes: kilo TT, dawes touring lightning, unknown BCM lugged conversion
I used to shoot for a newspaper a year or so back. Was pretty fun. Just really crazy hours and low pay...
Not my best work, but its what i was allowed to post online. I also have to have a link to the site if i do post anything. I got in a bit of trouble for not doing that once..haha
.Chris
Not my best work, but its what i was allowed to post online. I also have to have a link to the site if i do post anything. I got in a bit of trouble for not doing that once..haha
.Chris

That's some good photojournalism though! I'm unfortunately working with an old camera (saving right now for the 5d..should be in the next few months.)
Last edited by redfb; 04-12-11 at 08:25 PM.
#102
Rebel Rouser
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, TX
Bikes: kilo TT, dawes touring lightning, unknown BCM lugged conversion
#104
#106
Thread Starter
Tri Fixed Road
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 507
Likes: 1
From: NYC
Bikes: Litespeed, Kestrel, KHS, Pinarello, GT, Mustang, Giant
which lens did you use for these?
#109
Newbie
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
I shoot with a Nikon D90, but I just got my bike this week, so I haven't had a chance to shoot it yet.
Here's some of my other work though:



And when I'm not shooting cars..

more of my work on flickr: https://flickr.com/__max
Here's some of my other work though:



And when I'm not shooting cars..

more of my work on flickr: https://flickr.com/__max
#111
The design on the Sigma is newer and has bigger glass, so the color rendition is better and it creates better bokeh. It is also sharper at f/1.4 than Canon, but when it is stopped down, the Canon becomes sharper. I was lucky enough to buy mine for the same price as the Canon though. There isn't enough difference between the 2 to justify the higher price on the Sigma. So if you're looking at getting the Canon, it will be just fine.
#112

Untitled by nick◮wujcik., on Flickr

my bike. by nick◮wujcik., on Flickr

Wale at MSU by nick◮wujcik., on Flickr
#114
As no one answered my newb-ass question about a good starter camera, google search led me to the nikon D3100, i'm wathcing a youtube review of one, but does anyone have any imput on this?
#115
Rebel Rouser
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, TX
Bikes: kilo TT, dawes touring lightning, unknown BCM lugged conversion
i would stay away from the 3100..i tried it and hated it. If you're looking at Nikon I'd say d90, d5000, or wait for the d5100 coming out soon
#116
The best camera is the one you have with you. The smaller, the better.
Disclaimer: I'm a former professional photojournalist and sports photographer. I've used everything from pocket cameras to 400mm f2.8 and lots in-between. My favorite photos are the ones that were taken with small basic cameras.
#118
Peace man, I really appreciate it. That shot was taken with the Nikkor 24mm f/2.8. That, the 50 f/1.4, and a manual focus 85mm f/2 are the only lenses I use (mostly the first two).

Buggin' Out by Gilmatic, on Flickr

Little Farm on the Ghetto by Gilmatic, on Flickr

Concrete Jungle by Gilmatic, on Flickr

Make You Feel That Way by Gilmatic, on Flickr

Never Obsolete by Gilmatic, on Flickr

Buggin' Out by Gilmatic, on Flickr

Little Farm on the Ghetto by Gilmatic, on Flickr

Concrete Jungle by Gilmatic, on Flickr

Make You Feel That Way by Gilmatic, on Flickr

Never Obsolete by Gilmatic, on Flickr
#119
First shot with my Sigma 85 on the 5Dmk2

Chalka-licious by Unregistered Coward, on Flickr
Canon 70-200L on the 1dmk2

Boardwalk Talk by Unregistered Coward, on Flickr
Canon 24-70L on the T2i

Eye, Always Focus Eye by Unregistered Coward, on Flickr
Sigma 30 on the T2i

Fade Away by Unregistered Coward, on Flickr
Sigma 150 Macro on the T2i

Word by Unregistered Coward, on Flickr
Canon 60 on the XS

Colors by Unregistered Coward, on Flickr
#120
Get the D90 with the 35mm f/1.8. Great lens and focal length, also the camera is ****in awesome and you can get it for pretty cheap on craigslist.
#121
If you have an iPhone, that has a great camera in it. I think an SLR is probably the worst camera to start with. They are expensive and bulky. They get left home a lot.
The best camera is the one you have with you. The smaller, the better.
Disclaimer: I'm a former professional photojournalist and sports photographer. I've used everything from pocket cameras to 400mm f2.8 and lots in-between. My favorite photos are the ones that were taken with small basic cameras.
The best camera is the one you have with you. The smaller, the better.
Disclaimer: I'm a former professional photojournalist and sports photographer. I've used everything from pocket cameras to 400mm f2.8 and lots in-between. My favorite photos are the ones that were taken with small basic cameras.
Though what do I know lol. My mindset is kind of set on buying one, but blah. I don't know yet. I always thought of entry-level DSLR's as the way to go if you wanted to learn more.
#122
Hmm. I had a Canon Powershot for like 3 years, but it broke on me last year. Haven't been taking pictures since other than with my HTC Evo. How do I know when I'm ready for a DSLR (sounds like I'm totally jumping the gun, lol)?? The only reason why I wanted to upgrade is because I want to learn how to shoot nicer photos, and I figure if I'm willing to learn to use a lot of the features that a point-and-shoot camera doesn't have, I thought it would be nice to finally invest in a DSLR.
Though what do I know lol. My mindset is kind of set on buying one, but blah. I don't know yet. I always thought of entry-level DSLR's as the way to go if you wanted to learn more.
Though what do I know lol. My mindset is kind of set on buying one, but blah. I don't know yet. I always thought of entry-level DSLR's as the way to go if you wanted to learn more.
To paraphrase Helmut Newton, [Newton points to his camera] "This? It's automatic." [points to his head] "The photo is made in here."
You have to imagine the photo in your head then use whatever camera you have to make it happen. There are MILLIONS of hacks with $10K worth of camera gear, lights, computers, and software that couldn't shoot their way out of a wet paper bag.
A DSLR with a full kit of lenses won't make you a good photographer. Understanding light and composition will.
Many of the great photos of the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s, were taken with cameras FAR less sophisticated than the $100 point and shoots at every Target and Walmart.
Also, don't get caught up in megapixels. That's a red herring. I've had magazine covers with images that were shot with a 2.7MP camera.
The best camera to learn with is the cheapest one with a wide lens that can go full manual so you can control the light and depth of field. Something like a Canon G12.
#123
Do you want to learn how to make good photos or do you want to learn how to operate a DSLR?
To paraphrase Helmut Newton, [Newton points to his camera] "This? It's automatic." [points to his head] "The photo is made in here."
You have to imagine the photo in your head then use whatever camera you have to make it happen. There are MILLIONS of hacks with $10K worth of camera gear, lights, computers, and software that couldn't shoot their way out of a wet paper bag.
A DSLR with a full kit of lenses won't make you a good photographer. Understanding light and composition will.
Many of the great photos of the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s, were taken with cameras FAR less sophisticated than the $100 point and shoots at every Target and Walmart.
Also, don't get caught up in megapixels. That's a red herring. I've had magazine covers with images that were shot with a 2.7MP camera.
The best camera to learn with is the cheapest one with a wide lens that can go full manual so you can control the light and depth of field. Something like a Canon G12.
To paraphrase Helmut Newton, [Newton points to his camera] "This? It's automatic." [points to his head] "The photo is made in here."
You have to imagine the photo in your head then use whatever camera you have to make it happen. There are MILLIONS of hacks with $10K worth of camera gear, lights, computers, and software that couldn't shoot their way out of a wet paper bag.
A DSLR with a full kit of lenses won't make you a good photographer. Understanding light and composition will.
Many of the great photos of the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s, were taken with cameras FAR less sophisticated than the $100 point and shoots at every Target and Walmart.
Also, don't get caught up in megapixels. That's a red herring. I've had magazine covers with images that were shot with a 2.7MP camera.
The best camera to learn with is the cheapest one with a wide lens that can go full manual so you can control the light and depth of field. Something like a Canon G12.
#125
sɹɐʇsɟoןןnɟsʇıbɟɯo
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,986
Likes: 0
From: seattle, too many links
Bikes: fixed gear recumbent trike
take it you're not a hüsker du fan then














