Why SS?
#26
Seņor Blues
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 6
From: upstate NY
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD 10, Breezer Venturi Custom Build, IRO Singlespeed
SS/FG has less moving parts, less to maintain or go bad or out of adjustment. I've put ~1000 miles on mine with zero maintenance beyond cleaning/lubing the chain, and I've only done that a couple times. Cleaning a cog or single freewheel is considerably easier than cleaning a 10x cassette, and the same for a single chainring vs. a 3x.
Wheel for wheel, spoke for spoke, a non-dished configuration is stronger than a dished. SS/FG chains are thicker, stronger, last longer. SS/FG has a more efficient chain line.
Riding a SS/FG demands that you become a stronger, more efficient rider as compared to riding a geared bike.
Works for me...
Wheel for wheel, spoke for spoke, a non-dished configuration is stronger than a dished. SS/FG chains are thicker, stronger, last longer. SS/FG has a more efficient chain line.
Riding a SS/FG demands that you become a stronger, more efficient rider as compared to riding a geared bike.
Works for me...
#27
The space coyote lied.



Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 48,696
Likes: 10,965
From: dusk 'til dawn.
Bikes: everywhere
#28
Senior Member

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, Canada
Bikes: Brodie Force w/ Xtracycle, Dahon Helios, Merida Folding, Pacific Carryme, Softride Classic
For me, riding FG is liberating. It's limitation is a self-embraced choice for expression within a single gear. I feel powerful on an FG. On the road, I keep up with my friends on $5000 bikes and drop them on the hills. Riding FG makes me a stronger, better rider.
Simplicity is a value and aesthetic I cherish.
Yes, gears are more mechanically efficient. But with my 1/8 chain, 1/8 chainring and 1/8 cog, my drivetrain is gonna last longer than an ultra narrow chain and cassette. Unless I am riding with geared people going 9/10 to 10/10ths, they are not faster than me anyways. On FG, I am fast enough.
Lastly, I am happier riding FG than other forms of cycling. I will not presume to preach to anyone, but if they ask, I share my love for FG.
Simplicity is a value and aesthetic I cherish.
Yes, gears are more mechanically efficient. But with my 1/8 chain, 1/8 chainring and 1/8 cog, my drivetrain is gonna last longer than an ultra narrow chain and cassette. Unless I am riding with geared people going 9/10 to 10/10ths, they are not faster than me anyways. On FG, I am fast enough.
Lastly, I am happier riding FG than other forms of cycling. I will not presume to preach to anyone, but if they ask, I share my love for FG.
#29
Chainstay Brake Mafia
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,007
Likes: 19
From: California
i want to build up a bike around an internally geared hub to get the sexy look of a single speed chain but still have a few speeds to choose from
#30
Thread Starter
DisMember
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Central Arkansas
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix, 1984 Schwinn World Sport
#31
Thread Starter
DisMember
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Central Arkansas
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix, 1984 Schwinn World Sport
I have a geared bike for distance, recreation, and fitness riding, and a fixed gear bike for riding to work. Tune-ups are expensive for us common folk. Yeah yeah I can tune it myself, but I can't dial it in like a shop can. Fixed gears take less maintenance, and thus are better for short distance rides around town. Now, why do people ride long distance on fixed gears? I dunno, to be badass? So you can worry less about parts failing? Maybe people enjoy the challenge of getting from point A to point B by the power of their own legs without the assistance of derailleurs. What's wrong with personal preference?
Someone EDUCATE me on why RASPBERRY jelly is better than GRAPE. When I'm with my friends at a group PB&J and someone brings RASPBERRY everyone makes a big stink about it, I'm like so what?
Someone EDUCATE me on why RASPBERRY jelly is better than GRAPE. When I'm with my friends at a group PB&J and someone brings RASPBERRY everyone makes a big stink about it, I'm like so what?
#32
It's fun!
I live in the Ozarks. It's ungodly hilly here, and I've found the SS conversion is faster than the original 10 speed because I'm not waiting on the cludgy shifting. If I travel, I can throw the bike in the back of my car with the chain on and not worry about it getting hooked on anything. Instead of trying to hit the right gear, it's more about spinning/stomping to carry momentum downhill and getting up the next hill.
As for weight, my other regular ride is a 45+lb. 3 speed so a 23-ish lb. bike boom frame feels like nothing. I'm starting work on a more practical granny-geared bike, but I'll still take my SS out when I want to go for a quick spin. I think most of us have multiple bikes, so it's just another option.
I live in the Ozarks. It's ungodly hilly here, and I've found the SS conversion is faster than the original 10 speed because I'm not waiting on the cludgy shifting. If I travel, I can throw the bike in the back of my car with the chain on and not worry about it getting hooked on anything. Instead of trying to hit the right gear, it's more about spinning/stomping to carry momentum downhill and getting up the next hill.
As for weight, my other regular ride is a 45+lb. 3 speed so a 23-ish lb. bike boom frame feels like nothing. I'm starting work on a more practical granny-geared bike, but I'll still take my SS out when I want to go for a quick spin. I think most of us have multiple bikes, so it's just another option.
#34
#35
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
I got my SS because I enjoy riding off-road on fire-roads and some single track. With SS I don't need to worrry about shifting. My only concern is the path I take and how hard or fast I pedal. It allows me to ride fast as I must keep up momentum for the hills and stand up and mash if I lose that momentum.
It requires less maintenance and keeps my legs in better shape than my geared mountain bike.
It requires less maintenance and keeps my legs in better shape than my geared mountain bike.
#36
You are correct. There is little difference between riding one of your bikes in one gear and not touching the shifters and riding a SS bike. You go and ride your multispeed bike in one gear, you'll be running SS. Have fun.
#37
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Castle Rock, CO
Bikes: '09 Gary Fisher "Kaitai, '09 Raleigh Team", '91 Trek 8700, '97 Cannondale SR500, '12 Raleigh Twin Six
Until you try it, the reasons for SS/FG are not really comprehensable. Sure, it's less maintenence, more efficient (arguable), quieter (arguable), but the real reason is that its just more fun. There's just something visceral about getting there without having to shift gears. SS frees your mind up to enjoy things besides the bike.
I did a cheap SS conversion on my old mtn. bike last summer as well as build up a light, fast, expensive, carbon roadbike. If I had done the SS conversion first, there wouldn't be a roadbike in my stable. I put more miles on my SS over the last year than my other two bikes combined. That incudes recreation as well as commuting. The added bennefit in my case is that is has definately made me a better cyclist.
I did a cheap SS conversion on my old mtn. bike last summer as well as build up a light, fast, expensive, carbon roadbike. If I had done the SS conversion first, there wouldn't be a roadbike in my stable. I put more miles on my SS over the last year than my other two bikes combined. That incudes recreation as well as commuting. The added bennefit in my case is that is has definately made me a better cyclist.
#39
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
I don't think that's the point, at least not for me. I find that when I'm on my geared bike (on the road, at least), I'm frequently up- or downshifting one cog at a time...usually back and forth between 2 or 3 cogs...slight upgrade, click down a gear, downhill, click up 1 or 2. Point being, with a geared bike, and thus available options, I'm often in a "grass is greener in the other gear" mode of thought, never wholly satisfied with my current combo. On the SS, none of that even factors in. I just ride.
#40
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,327
Likes: 5,238
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
#41
Old fart



Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,327
Likes: 5,238
From: Appleton WI
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
I was on a group ride earlier this week and got caught in a downpour. The multi-gear guys with their caliper brakes had issues with brake response with all the water. The two of us on fixed gears did just fine.
#43
Still kicking.


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey
Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.
Also remember the track bikes can be even lighter. But lighter may not always be better with a fixed gear or singlespeed. Stuff has to be durable as well.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Last edited by Dannihilator; 06-24-11 at 09:21 PM.
#44
Neither of these have really been a huge factor for me. I've found that with brifters constantly under my fingers, shifting takes about as much thought as pedalling. As far as brake response goes, I have never run my FG low at a low enough ratio that I could stop by backpedalling more safely and reliably than with the caliper brakes. Maybe I just don't have the requisite leg finesse, or maybe my brakes are just that awesome, but I would wager a beer that properly set up, decent-quality brakes should always trump backpedalling.
These are the real reasons. I enjoy the variety of riding different drivetrains. Sometimes mashing uphill in a gear that's way too hard and then spinning like mad down the other side is what I feel like doing, just not all the time. I would definately argue that putting in some hours on a fixie can help improve your cycling. Also, reliability.
#45
Still kicking.


Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 47
From: Annandale, New Jersey
Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.
I have 2 functional bikes at the moment, one is a fixed gear, the other is a singlespeed. I enjoy my fixed gear more than my singlespeed and prefer both of them to any geared bike that I have ever owned. I just enjoy simplicity.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#46
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 8
From: Columbus, OH
Bikes: '08 Surly Cross-Check, 2011 Redline Conquest Pro, 2012 Spesh FSR Comp EVO, 2015 Trek Domane 6.2 disc
Seattle is far from flat, and I do a decent amount of time riding in the Cascade foothills and mountains. If you pick the right gearing, you should be fine. Heck, people race the Cannonball!, S2S, and the GRR-1200 on singles and fixed bikes.
OK, so the GRR isn't a race; but you get the point.
__________________
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
"I feel like my world was classier before I found cyclocross."
- Mandi M.
Last edited by CliftonGK1; 06-24-11 at 10:38 PM. Reason: GRR-1200 isn't a race
#47
Chainstay Brake Mafia
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,007
Likes: 19
From: California
I don't think that's the point, at least not for me. I find that when I'm on my geared bike (on the road, at least), I'm frequently up- or downshifting one cog at a time...usually back and forth between 2 or 3 cogs...slight upgrade, click down a gear, downhill, click up 1 or 2. Point being, with a geared bike, and thus available options, I'm often in a "grass is greener in the other gear" mode of thought, never wholly satisfied with my current combo. On the SS, none of that even factors in. I just ride.
I just picked up a Hardrock mtb that i saw had horizontal drop outs and i was like sweet i can SS it.. but when i pulled out the wheel it had "fake out" drops lol.. there's some metal in the middle of the drop so it's kinda like a vertical drop.. bastards
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
steve-in-kville
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
4
06-29-14 02:57 AM
MikeOCS
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
13
10-24-11 10:22 AM





