Why SS?
#1
Thread Starter
DisMember
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Central Arkansas
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix, 1984 Schwinn World Sport
Why SS?
I scrolled through the topics here and didn't really see anything that specifically treats the question: Why single speed? Why not just put your multi-gear road bike in a gear and leave it there if you want single speed? splain? I see hotshots in racing clubs show up for club rides with a simple single-speed sometimes and everybody makes a big deal about it, and I'm thinking "so what?"... So anyway, I have an old cromoly bike in great condition that would be a good candidate for a SS, but... why? I'm not trying to be a smart__, I'm trying to get my head around the notion.
Thanks in advance for your time.
Thanks in advance for your time.
#3
Your cog is slipping.



Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Likes: 100
From: Beverly MA
Bikes: EAI Bareknuckle
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Yorktown, VA
Bikes: IRO SS / Trek 2.1 / Trek 5.1
When I built my SS up I debated on going FG, but since I use it to commute and run errands, and I like to coast on occasion, I went SS. To be honest, It's probably the most fun bike I own, and hands down the most maintenance free. Perfect as an all-around-get-around bike. I can't see a time when I'll never have a SS in my stable. I can forsee a time when it might be the only bike I have.
#5
Thread Starter
DisMember
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Central Arkansas
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix, 1984 Schwinn World Sport
yeah but yeah but... you have half a dozen bikes and the rest of them have 27 speeds. The SSs I see are steel frames, 20+ pounds... my multi-speed road bike is lighter. You still haven't educated me...
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Middle Tennessee
Bikes: Ross Professional Gran Tour (SS Conversion)
It's all the rage man!

But being serious, it's so much more fun than worrying about gears, much easier to maintain and it just looks GORGEOUS. I've caught the bug and plan on turning my current SS into my townie and getting a Kilo TT for the weekends. It's a different way to ride a bike!

But being serious, it's so much more fun than worrying about gears, much easier to maintain and it just looks GORGEOUS. I've caught the bug and plan on turning my current SS into my townie and getting a Kilo TT for the weekends. It's a different way to ride a bike!
Last edited by RaiderInBlue47; 06-24-11 at 09:46 AM.
#7
I don't know.

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 1,233
From: South Meriden, CT
Bikes: '90 B'stone RB-1, '92 B'stone RB-2, '89 SuperGo Access Comp, '03 Access 69er, '23 Trek 520, '14 Ritchey Road Logic, '09 Kestrel Evoke, '08 Windsor Tourist, '17 Surly Wednesday, '89 Centurion Accordo, '15 CruX, '17 Ridley X-Night, '89 Marinoni
fun fun fun to ride.. and finding old 10 and 12 speeds and converting them is fun too.
#8
Banned.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,975
Likes: 29
From: Winnipeg
Bikes: Fiori Fixie powder blue w/ granny bars
#10
I cant vouche for single speed, but fixed gives you a certain amount of control that I could never achieve from a geared bike. When I used a geared bike I rarely used more than 3-4 gears anyway, so why add all the uneccessary weight and components that could just cause more mechanical issues? Most people find a gear ratio that is perfect for them in most situations, so its convenient to not worry about constantly shifting or having derailer issues. I never really understood the rage behind fixed until I gave it a go, but now I will never go back - its too fun.
#11
Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Maybe when you answer those questions, you'll know the answer to yours.
Or, maybe you prefer a full-on carbon road-bike with stripes and stickers and marketing gobbeldeygook all over the side, and words that are misspelled like "X-Treme" so that they could be copyrighted and trademarked.
Others prefer absolute simplicity.
#14
Senior Member
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
My first bike, when I was about 5 years old, was a single speed. As a kid, I have a lot of fun on that bike. I just rode. Relating to the above-post asking why ride a bike at all? Well, it's fun. For me, a single speed was a great way to re-capture what made riding so much fun when I was a little tike.
#15
Veteran Racer


Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 2
From: Charleston, WV
Bikes: Trek Mountaineer modified with a NuVinci; Montegue Paratrooper folding mountain bike; Greenspeed recumbent; Surly Big Dummy with Stokemonkey
SS is fine if you live somewhere flat as a pancake. WV is called 'the Mountain State' for good reason.
#19
Chainstay Brake Mafia
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,007
Likes: 19
From: California
i think the popularity of FG/SS is a reaction to the non-stop technology arms race that has consumed the road and mtb markets. Mountain bikes look like something the terminator would ride, and road bikes will soon have electronic shifting!
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 287
Likes: 3
If you are in the country and have smooth roads and hills, a road bike is nice, but where I am nobody really needs gears.
#21
Lighter is nice I am sure, but I will take 22 pounds of steel in an urban environment all day long over that. The SS/FG thing works in cities where potholes and brick roads can suck on a road bike.
If you are in the country and have smooth roads and hills, a road bike is nice, but where I am nobody really needs gears.
If you are in the country and have smooth roads and hills, a road bike is nice, but where I am nobody really needs gears.
#22
The space coyote lied.



Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 48,684
Likes: 10,955
From: dusk 'til dawn.
Bikes: everywhere
+1 even the crappy bars and seatpost on my crappy SS are steel.
I'm with Elkhound I don't hit the hills on my SS. Somewhat because it has flat bars and hitting the hills means I'm gonna be on a long ride and flats suck for long rides. I'm geared pretty low so the climbs aren't bad but spinning and coasting on the downhills is unpleasant.
Last edited by LesterOfPuppets; 06-24-11 at 10:44 AM.
#23
I have a geared bike for distance, recreation, and fitness riding, and a fixed gear bike for riding to work. Tune-ups are expensive for us common folk. Yeah yeah I can tune it myself, but I can't dial it in like a shop can. Fixed gears take less maintenance, and thus are better for short distance rides around town. Now, why do people ride long distance on fixed gears? I dunno, to be badass? So you can worry less about parts failing? Maybe people enjoy the challenge of getting from point A to point B by the power of their own legs without the assistance of derailleurs. What's wrong with personal preference?
Someone EDUCATE me on why RASPBERRY jelly is better than GRAPE. When I'm with my friends at a group PB&J and someone brings RASPBERRY everyone makes a big stink about it, I'm like so what?
Someone EDUCATE me on why RASPBERRY jelly is better than GRAPE. When I'm with my friends at a group PB&J and someone brings RASPBERRY everyone makes a big stink about it, I'm like so what?
#25
To answer the question of why not leave it in one gear, along with all the other answers like weight (who cares), simplicity, easy to maintain, etc. is the fact that derailleurs means more **** the chain has to go through, slowing it down along the way. If you remove the derailleurs the chain only has to go around a cog and a chainring, freeing it up of the resistance caused be derailleurs, thus making it easier to pedal in the same gear.
On top of all of that, it looks really pretty.
On top of all of that, it looks really pretty.



