Track Frames
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Track Frames
I've been riding a mercier kilo TT for 7 or 8 months-ish and am considering about upgrading my frame (components have already been upgraded)
I'm just wondering what a higher quality frame entails when compared to a lower end. Is it just lighter/stronger? Or is there something else I'm missing?
I'm just wondering what a higher quality frame entails when compared to a lower end. Is it just lighter/stronger? Or is there something else I'm missing?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,014
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Mostly though, it's all about the stiffness.
#7
what? NO!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 253
Bikes: 1988 Bridgestone RB-2 converted to ss
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think the most important thing to consider when picking a frame (assuming it's not straight-gauge steel), is the geometry and fit. Just pick your preferred metal, steel or aluminum, then find the frame that suits your needs and fits you best.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,041
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I say stick with the kilo, getting a fancy track frame is more for the simple idea that once one outgrows riding the starter bike, buying some $1000 NJS Stamped super rare Keirin racer's old bike is in order. It isn't, some of the most dedicated fixed gear riders I know has 3Renshos built up yet still continues to ride a bikeisland frame. If you want one for cool points I'm not gonna advise against it as it's your money, if you want one cause you think it will improve your riding speed/comfort/enjoyment it's not gonna give you that unless all you care about is the name on the downtube.
#14
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ok, so i guess I'll stick with my kilo frame. I don't really require a better transfer of power because i'm only riding through town.
Thanks for the input everybody
Thanks for the input everybody
#15
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
+1 this.
If you're riding on the street (as opposed to competitive riding in a velodrome), a track frame is arguably not the ideal frame for street riding. Keep in mind as well that there are several types of "track" frames available, depending on the particular event you intend to compete in. In general, though, track frames will have short wheelbases, steep angles, and tight clearances (tire and pedal) compared to bikes used outside a velodrome.
The bottom line is the "ideal" frame is the frame designed for the type of riding *YOU* do. If you plan on doing a substantial fraction of your riding competitively in a velodrome, then a high-end track frame may be a good investment for you. If you're riding is more casual and on potholed streets, a frame designed for that type of environment will be more suitable.
#16
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
Just over 6 months and you've upgraded everything?
Anybody got the link to that BSNYC post on that topic?
I had a VW buddy that spent 3-4 years upgrading damn near everything on his MKIII Jetta. He spent tens of thousands of dollars on top of the original cost of the car. With the total amount of money he spent on the Jetta making it into a sports car he could have easily bought a BMW M3 or Porsche 911...and those cars would have retained significant resale value. His Jetta did not.
Anybody got the link to that BSNYC post on that topic?
I had a VW buddy that spent 3-4 years upgrading damn near everything on his MKIII Jetta. He spent tens of thousands of dollars on top of the original cost of the car. With the total amount of money he spent on the Jetta making it into a sports car he could have easily bought a BMW M3 or Porsche 911...and those cars would have retained significant resale value. His Jetta did not.
#17
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
The bottom line is the "ideal" frame is the frame designed for the type of riding *YOU* do. If you plan on doing a substantial fraction of your riding competitively in a velodrome, then a high-end track frame may be a good investment for you. If you're riding is more casual and on potholed streets, a frame designed for that type of environment will be more suitable.
This is why people own multiple bikes.
A race-spec track bike isn't great on the road, especially when compared to bikes made for road riding.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jaytron
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area
14
05-14-12 06:12 PM