Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Fork decision help

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Fork decision help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-15 | 10:28 AM
  #1  
xVoris's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lauderdale

Bikes: Nashbar Hounder

Fork decision help

I'm building up a Pake Rum Runner and have most of the parts picked out but don't know a whole lot about forks. I see the rake on the Pake Unicrown fork that it's usually matched with is a 38mm rake. Could I go less than this for tighter clearance but still make it?

I'm looking for either a steel (Not unicrown, I believe they're just called lugged) or aluminum fork. Is the steel worth the supposed more absorbing ride. Is the aluminum worth the lighter weight? I know it all depends on design more than material but I don't know which designs and brands are good and which aren't.

My price range doesn't have to be anything super cheap but nothing over $120.

Thanks for any input.
xVoris is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-15 | 10:57 AM
  #2  
prooftheory's Avatar
pro in someone's theory
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 3
From: Las Cruces, NM

Bikes: FTP

The rake of the fork makes an important difference in the handling of a bike. The tightness of clearances has almost no appreciable value for anything. Your prose was a little confusing. Do you want a unicrown fork or a lugged fork? Honestly, the pake fork seems like your best bet. Soma makes a lugged straight blade track fork with a 38mm rake.

Last edited by prooftheory; 01-12-15 at 11:01 AM.
prooftheory is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-15 | 11:08 AM
  #3  
xVoris's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lauderdale

Bikes: Nashbar Hounder

I've had a good bit of experience with a cheap steel unicrown fork but have no other experience to compare it with. In the OP I meant that I wanted a lugged fork (due to hearing that they're better in general quality of ride and long term wear, but again I have no experience to compare with). Is there a sort of average rake (I'll be riding only on the road) that most people use for easy but quick handling, sort of an in between of the two extremes? Or does it depend more on the frame?
xVoris is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-15 | 11:38 AM
  #4  
SquidPuppet's Avatar
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,861
Likes: 41
From: Coeur d' Alene

Bikes: 3 Chinese Gas Pipe Nerdcycles and 2 Chicago Electroforged Boat Anchors

Originally Posted by xVoris
I've had a good bit of experience with a cheap steel unicrown fork but have no other experience to compare it with. In the OP I meant that I wanted a lugged fork (due to hearing that they're better in general quality of ride and long term wear, but again I have no experience to compare with). Is there a sort of average rake (I'll be riding only on the road) that most people use for easy but quick handling, sort of an in between of the two extremes? Or does it depend more on the frame?
You should try to stay with a rake close to what the frame was designed with. When you change the rake (and nothing else) you alter the trail measurement. If you go too far in either direction you can ruin the handling. Read more about trail.

Unicrown vs lugged are not really the factors that determine ride quality. It's more about the tubing itself, tapers, and bends.

Are you racing or competing? If not, weight shouldn't be your first priority, ride quality should be.

Don't forget that your new fork should have the correct (what the frame was originally designed with) axle-to-crown measurement too.

Last edited by SquidPuppet; 01-12-15 at 11:41 AM.
SquidPuppet is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-15 | 04:41 PM
  #5  
AristoNYC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 6
From: Manhattan

Bikes: AristoNYC's PedalRoom

I would personally avoid aluminum and would stick with steel or carbon (w/ alloy steerer). I had an aluminum fork on my first cyclocross bike and man it sucked (even riding on the streets).
AristoNYC is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-15 | 05:10 PM
  #6  
FarHorizon's Avatar
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,856
Likes: 2
From: Directly above the center of the earth

Bikes: Varies by day

And I'm just the opposite - I'd prefer an aluminum fork (but that said, I'm in the minority).
FarHorizon is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-15 | 05:20 PM
  #7  
GENESTARWIND's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 15
From: las vegas

Bikes: purty blue undefeated II 57cm

soma fab lugged steel fork, its 38mm rake and 90 bucks at outsideoutfitters.com
GENESTARWIND is offline  
Reply
Old 01-12-15 | 05:42 PM
  #8  
GENESTARWIND's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 15
From: las vegas

Bikes: purty blue undefeated II 57cm

looks damn good too, me and another guy on pedal room run it on our pakes. you won't be disappointed.
GENESTARWIND is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pisces8113
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
1
02-27-15 06:38 PM
GravelMN
Framebuilders
2
10-30-14 06:52 PM
corwin1968
Framebuilders
5
03-30-13 08:12 AM
RoboIsGod
Classic & Vintage
9
07-18-10 10:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.