Touring Tire width
#26
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Bikes: IF steel deluxe 29er tourer
[QUOTE=10 Wheels;12336521]Here is my bike with the 28's.
I weight 215 lbs, the bike 33 lbs, the gear weighted 56 lbs, I could ride it with no hands.
QUOTE]
What are those wheels, 10 Wheels. Hub, number and type of spokes, kind of rims. Curious minds....
I weight 215 lbs, the bike 33 lbs, the gear weighted 56 lbs, I could ride it with no hands.
QUOTE]
What are those wheels, 10 Wheels. Hub, number and type of spokes, kind of rims. Curious minds....
#27
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Bikes: IF steel deluxe 29er tourer
The Mr Tuffy's definitely affect handling. But also unless they are installed correctly they will cut into your tube. I gave up on them years ago and use Spin Skins instead - pricey but effective when used to extend the life of a well-worn tire.
#29
I have toured quite a bit on 28mm Continental Ultra Gatorskins and really like them for their responsiveness and feel. I toured last summer on 32mm Schwalbe Marathon tires , and while I found them more comfortable, they dampened the ride a little too much; seemimg "dead". We use Continental tires from 23 to 28mm on all our bikes, and have not had any problems with them.
__________________
Pete in Tallahassee
Check out my profile, articles, and trip journals at:
https:/www.crazyguyonabike.com/staehpj1
Pete in Tallahassee
Check out my profile, articles, and trip journals at:
https:/www.crazyguyonabike.com/staehpj1
#30
Macro Geek

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 12
From: Toronto, Ontario
Bikes: True North tourer (www.truenorthcycles.com), 2004; Miyata 1000, 1985
Tire width is a personal preference. There are no right or wrong answers, just what you feel comfortable with. If 28 mm feels squirrely, go back to 32 mm. For some people, comfort doesn't even begin until the tires are 35 mm or wider. Yet I know somebody who has toured for decades on 20 mm tires.
#31
A 300 pound load?
The tires I have on my 700c bike are 32c, but they are an actual 32, which means they
are larger than most tires claiming to be 32....
You want at least a 32, a real 32, IMHO.
The next step is what sort of tire you want.
The Contact strikes me as an odd choice, what do you want in a tire?
I do lite touring, so I can pick a tire that is big, but lively, like
my Vittoria Rando Hypers. The tire is a bit schizophrenic.
While I like it, it is a bit too eager for me. It's a really big performance tire.
So what are your top priorities in a tire.
https://www.bikeradar.com/gear/catego...ur-hyper-33552
The tires I have on my 700c bike are 32c, but they are an actual 32, which means they
are larger than most tires claiming to be 32....
You want at least a 32, a real 32, IMHO.
The next step is what sort of tire you want.
The Contact strikes me as an odd choice, what do you want in a tire?
I do lite touring, so I can pick a tire that is big, but lively, like
my Vittoria Rando Hypers. The tire is a bit schizophrenic.
While I like it, it is a bit too eager for me. It's a really big performance tire.
So what are your top priorities in a tire.
https://www.bikeradar.com/gear/catego...ur-hyper-33552
#32
I am surprised at how many people are running 28's on a touring rig. I usually run 700 x 32 and that is the skinniest I would go. But I guess it all comes down to personal preference. On my last tour I road my other bike that had 26 x 2.0. Nice and wide. I actually loved it.
#33
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Missoula, MT
Bikes: Giant TCX 1 touring conversion
I put a pair of Conti Contact 700x28 on my bike once. They measured about 25mm wide, handled like crap, and they weren't even round. Thankfully, REI has an awesome return policy. Got some Vittoria Randonneur Cross 700x32 which I was VERY happy with. There IS something wrong with the tread pattern on the Contacts in that size. It's the "lightning bolt" shaped center ridge. The Vittorias have a symmetrical double center ridge that rolls nice and straight.
Just so you know you aren't the only one who has had this problem.
Just so you know you aren't the only one who has had this problem.
Last edited by sunset1123; 03-13-11 at 05:04 PM.
#35
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
I put a pair of Conti Contact 700x28 on my bike once. They measured about 25mm wide, handled like crap, and they weren't even round. Thankfully, REI has an awesome return policy. Got some Vittoria Randonneur Cross 700x32 which I was VERY happy with. There IS something wrong with the tread pattern on the Contacts in that size. It's the "lightning bolt" shaped center ridge. The Vittorias have a symmetrical double center ridge that rolls nice and straight.
Just so you know you aren't the only one who has had this problem.
Just so you know you aren't the only one who has had this problem.
My Continental Top Contact tires have the "lightning bolt" center ridge and I've never ridden a smoother, better rolling touring tire. The Continental Top Touring 2000 tires they replaced also had the "lightning bolt" center ridge and, although not quite a smooth rolling as the Top Contact tires, they were also quite nice.
It's not the lightning bolt pattern.
Last edited by xyzzy834; 03-14-11 at 07:54 AM.
#36
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo, CO
I tried switching front to back, reversing tread, removing tire liners, and even put on an old pair of treadless 28s to see if for some reason my balance wasn't used to a skinnier tire. Nothing helped, the Conti still seemed very squirrely. I noticed after about 100 miles that the ridge down the center of the tire was getting the most scuffed up and obviously in more contact with the pavement. It seems like that initial ridge has worn down enough now and the tire seems to handle better.
#37
I just mounted some 700x37c Conti Contacts (on 24mm wide Velocity rims), and they measure approx 34mm wide after being inflated to max psi for 24 hours. I was really hoping they'd be closer to 37mm rather than 35mm.
#38
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 13,929
Likes: 1,243
From: Montreal Canada
another person here who has toured only on 28s. I too prefer the lively feel (unloaded) compared to 32s, but preference notwithstanding, I have toured only in areas with paved roads, reasonably good ones, not terrible in other words, and they have worked fine. Never even had one flat over 5 three week to a month long tours (luck probably).
I could see that with rougher roads, 32s or 35 would be better for comfort. Unloaded however, I really like the responsive of a 28 compared to a 32, lighter steering etc and my experience touring does show that they are fine for that as well.
only real way to decide is to try diff tires and see what you prefer.
oh, and never had weird handling issues like you describe, lighter quicker steering, but not weird like what you say.
I could see that with rougher roads, 32s or 35 would be better for comfort. Unloaded however, I really like the responsive of a 28 compared to a 32, lighter steering etc and my experience touring does show that they are fine for that as well.
only real way to decide is to try diff tires and see what you prefer.
oh, and never had weird handling issues like you describe, lighter quicker steering, but not weird like what you say.






