Steel frame
#126
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
I don't think that for most riders, there is much difference between steel, carbon or Ti in terms of performance or ride. The best thing about steel is that it is pretty easy to get a custom frame made that fits you perfectly. A perfectly fit bicycle is going to ride great and you have plenty of ways to adjust the ride with tires, wheels, seats, handlebars that can make a huge difference.
FWIW, I had a Gunnar Crosshairs frame made a while ago and Gunnar made the thing super stiff to the point where I wished I hadn't pushed the stiff issue so hard. This, after my last steel bike, a late '80's Basso racing frame was pretty much a noodle but with an absolutely beautiful ride and great performance. So stiff or a noodle are just characteristics of how the frame was designed, not of the material so much.
Incidentally, after seeing lots of miles, there isn't a spot of rust on that bike and we live in Minnesota where salt on the roads in the early season is not all unusual and it can be quite humid in the summer. These bikes will outlive me.
I'm having a custom stainless frame built for me that will be done this month. I have an unusual fit problem with shortish arms, a long torso and long legs. Makes for a difficult fit on most bikes. This one will fit perfectly. This will be an Ultegra Di2 bike on a modern compact geometry frame in a 56cm size will come in at about 16.25 lbs built up ready to ride with nice, but not exotic components. The frame weight is 1660g. I'm pretty sure this bike is going to have exactly the ride quality I'm looking for and I can hardly wait to get it out on the road next month some time.
J.
FWIW, I had a Gunnar Crosshairs frame made a while ago and Gunnar made the thing super stiff to the point where I wished I hadn't pushed the stiff issue so hard. This, after my last steel bike, a late '80's Basso racing frame was pretty much a noodle but with an absolutely beautiful ride and great performance. So stiff or a noodle are just characteristics of how the frame was designed, not of the material so much.
Incidentally, after seeing lots of miles, there isn't a spot of rust on that bike and we live in Minnesota where salt on the roads in the early season is not all unusual and it can be quite humid in the summer. These bikes will outlive me.
I'm having a custom stainless frame built for me that will be done this month. I have an unusual fit problem with shortish arms, a long torso and long legs. Makes for a difficult fit on most bikes. This one will fit perfectly. This will be an Ultegra Di2 bike on a modern compact geometry frame in a 56cm size will come in at about 16.25 lbs built up ready to ride with nice, but not exotic components. The frame weight is 1660g. I'm pretty sure this bike is going to have exactly the ride quality I'm looking for and I can hardly wait to get it out on the road next month some time.
J.
#127
Senior Member
If you are aware of the design the builder will be using for you, it might be instructive to describe how they are coping with your dimensional peculiarities. I'm wondering, for example, whether one builds a bike differently for long torso/short arms than for short torso/long arms, assuming the leg lengths are the same in both cases. Any information you can share with us?
My previous bike had been a cf frame with a short BB drop of 67mm, short chain stays and a trail measurement that made it uber quick - even aggressive geometry for a crit bike. They quick handling took a lot of rider input to keep it going where I wanted it to go and adds to fatigue in long rides. Most of my riding is longer rides and I wanted this to be a performance ride but all day long.
On the old bike, because of the torso length and the leg length, I wound up with a shorter stem than I wanted and a longer top tube on this stock frame I had. Shortening the top tube, lengthening the stem back to where it should be and dropping the bottom bracket to a drop of about 75mm with slightly longer chain stays should give me the comfort and ride quality I was looking for - pretty much into traditional "stage race"/sportif frame geometry category. The modern compact geometry gives the stiffness and the reasonable frame weight. A slightly longer head tube accommodates a chronic neck issue. The fork will be an Enve 2.0 to dampen road buzz and to keep weight down. With a stainless fork, the bike would have been around 17 lbs.
J.
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
There really doesn't seem to be any one thing. What happens is that one issue impacts all the others - everything ties together. Steel lends itself well to accommodating personal differences.
My previous bike had been a cf frame with a short BB drop of 67mm, short chain stays and a trail measurement that made it uber quick - even aggressive geometry for a crit bike. They quick handling took a lot of rider input to keep it going where I wanted it to go and adds to fatigue in long rides. Most of my riding is longer rides and I wanted this to be a performance ride but all day long.
On the old bike, because of the torso length and the leg length, I wound up with a shorter stem than I wanted and a longer top tube on this stock frame I had. Shortening the top tube, lengthening the stem back to where it should be and dropping the bottom bracket to a drop of about 75mm with slightly longer chain stays should give me the comfort and ride quality I was looking for - pretty much into traditional "stage race"/sportif frame geometry category. The modern compact geometry gives the stiffness and the reasonable frame weight. A slightly longer head tube accommodates a chronic neck issue. The fork will be an Enve 2.0 to dampen road buzz and to keep weight down. With a stainless fork, the bike would have been around 17 lbs.
J.
My previous bike had been a cf frame with a short BB drop of 67mm, short chain stays and a trail measurement that made it uber quick - even aggressive geometry for a crit bike. They quick handling took a lot of rider input to keep it going where I wanted it to go and adds to fatigue in long rides. Most of my riding is longer rides and I wanted this to be a performance ride but all day long.
On the old bike, because of the torso length and the leg length, I wound up with a shorter stem than I wanted and a longer top tube on this stock frame I had. Shortening the top tube, lengthening the stem back to where it should be and dropping the bottom bracket to a drop of about 75mm with slightly longer chain stays should give me the comfort and ride quality I was looking for - pretty much into traditional "stage race"/sportif frame geometry category. The modern compact geometry gives the stiffness and the reasonable frame weight. A slightly longer head tube accommodates a chronic neck issue. The fork will be an Enve 2.0 to dampen road buzz and to keep weight down. With a stainless fork, the bike would have been around 17 lbs.
J.
#129
.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Rocket City, No'ala
Posts: 12,763
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 5.2, 1985 Pinarello Treviso, 1990 Gardin Shred, 2006 Bianchi San Jose
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times
in
13 Posts
For a couple of years Raleigh had the Record Ace, 2010-2012 I think. It was lugged Reynolds 520 with Ultegra and Brooks saddle. Even the fork was lugged steel. I see their 2015 steel bikes are all tig welded, even the Record Ace and they went with a relaxed geometry. Kind of sad.
2010 Record Ace
2010 Record Ace
While I prefer the look of lugged bikes, there's nothing wrong with TIG welded frames.
__________________
#130
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
would have loved a fat city cycles slim chance
#132
Decrepit Member
John, would you mind telling us who the builder is? Since you're in Minnesota, I'm guessing maybe Dave Anderson?
#133
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,837
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12768 Post(s)
Liked 7,684 Times
in
4,078 Posts
Felt had some steel in 2012.
#134
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,440
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3143 Post(s)
Liked 1,707 Times
in
1,031 Posts
#136
Senior Member
#137
Decrepit Member
Great choice!
#138
pluralis majestatis
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206
Bikes: a DuhRosa
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Agree with the first statement. But the second - it is much easier to create custom carbon because one is not limited to preformed tubes. It can take on any shape and layup
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times
in
36 Posts
Wut? Most custom carbon is a glued tube and lug cluster construction. The tubes are purchased from a supplier much like steel tubes are. Some custom carbon is made of similar tubes that are joined by wrapping them at the ends with prepreg strips. Custom monocoque layups are very unusual, essentially unheard of, due to the cost of the molds needed to make them. Custom tube are more feasible, but still not the norm. There are exceptions to everything, but saying it is easier to get custom carbon isn't accurate. Depending upon the style of construction, like say the prepreg wrapped tube joints, a custom carbon bike and a custom steel bike would be about equally available. But for the most part custom in that case would refer to size/geometry. Ride could also be customized by the choice of tubes (weights, stiffness, gauge, etc.), but once again bikes from either material would not be truly custom in sense of mm-by-mm control of the mechanical properties.
#140
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'm having a custom stainless frame built for me that will be done this month. I have an unusual fit problem with shortish arms, a long torso and long legs. Makes for a difficult fit on most bikes. This one will fit perfectly. This will be an Ultegra Di2 bike on a modern compact geometry frame in a 56cm size will come in at about 16.25 lbs built up ready to ride with nice, but not exotic components. The frame weight is 1660g. I'm pretty sure this bike is going to have exactly the ride quality I'm looking for and I can hardly wait to get it out on the road next month some time.
That's why I prefer a retired pro cyclist who owns an old school conservative bike shop rather than these typical hipster bike shops.
#141
pluralis majestatis
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Posts: 4,206
Bikes: a DuhRosa
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 537 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Wut? Most custom carbon is a glued tube and lug cluster construction. The tubes are purchased from a supplier much like steel tubes are. Some custom carbon is made of similar tubes that are joined by wrapping them at the ends with prepreg strips. Custom monocoque layups are very unusual, essentially unheard of, due to the cost of the molds needed to make them. Custom tube are more feasible, but still not the norm. There are exceptions to everything, but saying it is easier to get custom carbon isn't accurate. Depending upon the style of construction, like say the prepreg wrapped tube joints, a custom carbon bike and a custom steel bike would be about equally available. But for the most part custom in that case would refer to size/geometry. Ride could also be customized by the choice of tubes (weights, stiffness, gauge, etc.), but once again bikes from either material would not be truly custom in sense of mm-by-mm control of the mechanical properties.
one cant simply "add material" to steel tubesets. one is limited to the series of gauges and butting profiles provided by the manufacturer.
in a general sense, both follow a template, but also in a general sense i argue cf provides a larger degree of freedom
#142
Senior Member
And at that point, for most average non racing riders like me, the differences in performance get to be pretty tiny.
#143
Decrepit Member
carbon layup is additive. from a base mould, they can further thicken the tubing with layup at almost any portion by almost any arbitrary amount. or they can do external wrap like e.g. BB cluster to further reinforce that area.
one cant simply "add material" to steel tubesets. one is limited to the series of gauges and butting profiles provided by the manufacturer.
in a general sense, both follow a template, but also in a general sense i argue cf provides a larger degree of freedom
one cant simply "add material" to steel tubesets. one is limited to the series of gauges and butting profiles provided by the manufacturer.
in a general sense, both follow a template, but also in a general sense i argue cf provides a larger degree of freedom
That's why most custom carbon frames are built as rpenmanparkers says. Adding material to beef up CF frames in certain areas is an advantage over steel, but hardly meets the generally accepted definition of "custom."
#144
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,786
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3588 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
But one can mix and match different gauge and diameter tubes from various tube sets and/or manufacturers to achieve a desired result. And geometry (tube lengths, angles, etc.) and accessories (brake and rack mounts, etc.) can also be varied to meet specific needs in a manner that can be difficult to do with a CF mold.
#145
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
carbon layup is additive. from a base mould, they can further thicken the tubing with layup at almost any portion by almost any arbitrary amount. or they can do external wrap like e.g. BB cluster to further reinforce that area.
one cant simply "add material" to steel tubesets. one is limited to the series of gauges and butting profiles provided by the manufacturer.
in a general sense, both follow a template, but also in a general sense i argue cf provides a larger degree of freedom
one cant simply "add material" to steel tubesets. one is limited to the series of gauges and butting profiles provided by the manufacturer.
in a general sense, both follow a template, but also in a general sense i argue cf provides a larger degree of freedom
#146
Old Fart
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Bumpkinsville
Posts: 3,348
Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Yeah, he assembles bikes would probably be the right term. I just went to that shop once and the guy seems to be a stoner with an attitude.
That's why I prefer a retired pro cyclist who owns an old school conservative bike shop rather than these typical hipster bike shops.
#147
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,863
Bikes: too many of all kinds
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1147 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times
in
335 Posts
4. I get more respect if I win a spurt on my steel frame, since people are convinced it must be a lot slower.
#148
Senior Member
Generally speaking, "custom" includes tubing lengths and frame angles "made to measure" for a specific rider. In that sense, custom is difficult or impossible to do with fixed molds.
That's why most custom carbon frames are built as rpenmanparkers says. Adding material to beef up CF frames in certain areas is an advantage over steel, but hardly meets the generally accepted definition of "custom."
That's why most custom carbon frames are built as rpenmanparkers says. Adding material to beef up CF frames in certain areas is an advantage over steel, but hardly meets the generally accepted definition of "custom."
But one can mix and match different gauge and diameter tubes from various tube sets and/or manufacturers to achieve a desired result. And geometry (tube lengths, angles, etc.) and accessories (brake and rack mounts, etc.) can also be varied to meet specific needs in a manner that can be difficult to do with a CF mold.
I don't need to have a bike that is UCI compliant in weight, but I think I could get there if I was willing to pony up some very serious coin to take another 500g off my bike. I can get a 16 lb bike out of a stainless tube set, then I'm thinking we're pretty much into the area where the frame material is not an issue.
J.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RNAV
Road Cycling
69
09-07-16 03:41 AM
ModeratedUser150120149
Fifty Plus (50+)
71
09-09-10 08:29 AM