Another new Calfee build
#26
Senior Member
Even with a super stiff Thomson Elite post, my stoker never thought the Calfee ride needed more comfort, even after riding the roughest roads ever in Puglia Italy. She uses a Terry Carbon Butterfly saddle and that was all.
I splurged and got her a Specialized S-Works Pave SL seatpost which to her surprise did take the edge off rough road vibration and heavier wheel hits. She likes this setup a lot.
Other nice things about the Pave is that is a fairly standard looking post and nothing odd about the install as far as a carbon post goes. It is also light weight (210gm with the very long, uncut post length) and not outrageously expensive. I think it is a great addition to the Calfee with only a few grams penalty over the lightest posts available.
Downside to any carbon post is that you should not ever use a seatpost attached rack.
I splurged and got her a Specialized S-Works Pave SL seatpost which to her surprise did take the edge off rough road vibration and heavier wheel hits. She likes this setup a lot.
Other nice things about the Pave is that is a fairly standard looking post and nothing odd about the install as far as a carbon post goes. It is also light weight (210gm with the very long, uncut post length) and not outrageously expensive. I think it is a great addition to the Calfee with only a few grams penalty over the lightest posts available.
Downside to any carbon post is that you should not ever use a seatpost attached rack.
I do mount a rack to the seat post, its a tubus rack and is also attached at the rear dropouts so the seatpost is not taking much of the load.
The only other way to mount a rack would be use the brake mounting bolt or straps around seats stays neither of which i liked.
Next time she complains I will let her decide if she wants us to spend $300 on the Ergon.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lafayette, Colorado
Posts: 1,047
Bikes: 1998 Co-Motion Co-Pilot, 2015 Calfee Tetra
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Though I have never tried Di2, the Luddite in me wants to stay away. A bike is one of the last entirely mechanical machines that I use on a regular basis. As a Mechanical Engineer I appreciate that. I like the convergent evolution of all of the components. That said, the Shimano brifters are very complicated and un-repairable. The Di2 replaces a very complex mechanical device with a switch. I would like to try Di2 without buying (yet).
With regard to brakes: My mountain bike has hydraulic discs. My old bike had direct-pull rim brakes. I'm not certain that the discs are "better". They do add a level of complexity. Our tandem has direct-pull "V" brakes. They have worked very well but they do squeal occasionally. On the normal rides we do, I try to plan very carefully to avoid using the brakes whenever possible. However when we have descended a steep hill with lots of switchbacks, we do have to use the brakes a lot. The rims get hot and sometimes the brakes squeal but they do work. I've heard instances of heavy use of disc brakes where the brakes can fade.
Tandem Cycle Works here in Denver is a Calfee dealer. We haven't been there in a long time but a visit is probably in our near future.
With regard to brakes: My mountain bike has hydraulic discs. My old bike had direct-pull rim brakes. I'm not certain that the discs are "better". They do add a level of complexity. Our tandem has direct-pull "V" brakes. They have worked very well but they do squeal occasionally. On the normal rides we do, I try to plan very carefully to avoid using the brakes whenever possible. However when we have descended a steep hill with lots of switchbacks, we do have to use the brakes a lot. The rims get hot and sometimes the brakes squeal but they do work. I've heard instances of heavy use of disc brakes where the brakes can fade.
Tandem Cycle Works here in Denver is a Calfee dealer. We haven't been there in a long time but a visit is probably in our near future.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lafayette, Colorado
Posts: 1,047
Bikes: 1998 Co-Motion Co-Pilot, 2015 Calfee Tetra
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Another thing occurred to me. We bought our current bike used and have lived with the geometry that it is. Now that we have the opportunity have a custom made frame, how do we choose the geometry? I know that the stoker compartment in our bike is pretty short & the stoker would like more room. How much is enough? How much is too much?
#29
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 36
Bikes: Serotta Single, Litespeed Ultimate, Cannondale CAAD 4, Calfee Tetra Tandem, Trek 1000 Sold, Santana Arriva, Sold
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Regarding stoker compartments......check out the Tandem Geek's blog ....very informational.....and call Mel at Tandems East and he can advise frame sizing based on measurements.
The Calfee has 29.5in of rear compartment space second only to CoMotion and or Ericksson....and Calfee can custom build to spec the rear compartment as well
The Calfee has 29.5in of rear compartment space second only to CoMotion and or Ericksson....and Calfee can custom build to spec the rear compartment as well
#30
Senior Member
Though I have never tried Di2, the Luddite in me wants to stay away. A bike is one of the last entirely mechanical machines that I use on a regular basis. As a Mechanical Engineer I appreciate that. I like the convergent evolution of all of the components. That said, the Shimano brifters are very complicated and un-repairable. The Di2 replaces a very complex mechanical device with a switch. I would like to try Di2 without buying (yet).
With regard to brakes: My mountain bike has hydraulic discs. My old bike had direct-pull rim brakes. I'm not certain that the discs are "better". They do add a level of complexity. Our tandem has direct-pull "V" brakes. They have worked very well but they do squeal occasionally. On the normal rides we do, I try to plan very carefully to avoid using the brakes whenever possible. However when we have descended a steep hill with lots of switchbacks, we do have to use the brakes a lot. The rims get hot and sometimes the brakes squeal but they do work. I've heard instances of heavy use of disc brakes where the brakes can fade.
Tandem Cycle Works here in Denver is a Calfee dealer. We haven't been there in a long time but a visit is probably in our near future.
With regard to brakes: My mountain bike has hydraulic discs. My old bike had direct-pull rim brakes. I'm not certain that the discs are "better". They do add a level of complexity. Our tandem has direct-pull "V" brakes. They have worked very well but they do squeal occasionally. On the normal rides we do, I try to plan very carefully to avoid using the brakes whenever possible. However when we have descended a steep hill with lots of switchbacks, we do have to use the brakes a lot. The rims get hot and sometimes the brakes squeal but they do work. I've heard instances of heavy use of disc brakes where the brakes can fade.
Tandem Cycle Works here in Denver is a Calfee dealer. We haven't been there in a long time but a visit is probably in our near future.
I am an electrical engineer and when i first got Di2 I tried to reverse engineer it thinking I would make my own Di2 shifter using Campy shifter bodies. I got to a certain point but then decided it was going to be very hard or impossible to decode the protocol. Its even possible Shimano used encryption. That is why they can sell a brake lever with a switch and chip that cost then a few bucks for several hundred dollars, the profit margin must be huge. I also thought if I did spend the time to try and figure it out I couldn't do much with it without Shimano suing me.
As far as brakes go, our previous tandem had V-brakes. Hated them always screaching and grabby. Now we have caliper brakes and find them to be fine, no desire to have a disc.
#31
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
Actually Di2 shifters are more than just a switch. There is a chip that converts the switch input to a protocol. From what I read it is based on CAN bus which is used in cars and is like a network.
I am an electrical engineer and when i first got Di2 I tried to reverse engineer it thinking I would make my own Di2 shifter using Campy shifter bodies. I got to a certain point but then decided it was going to be very hard or impossible to decode the protocol. Its even possible Shimano used encryption. That is why they can sell a brake lever with a switch and chip that cost then a few bucks for several hundred dollars, the profit margin must be huge. I also thought if I did spend the time to try and figure it out I couldn't do much with it without Shimano suing me.
As far as brakes go, our previous tandem had V-brakes. Hated them always screaching and grabby. Now we have caliper brakes and find them to be fine, no desire to have a disc.
I am an electrical engineer and when i first got Di2 I tried to reverse engineer it thinking I would make my own Di2 shifter using Campy shifter bodies. I got to a certain point but then decided it was going to be very hard or impossible to decode the protocol. Its even possible Shimano used encryption. That is why they can sell a brake lever with a switch and chip that cost then a few bucks for several hundred dollars, the profit margin must be huge. I also thought if I did spend the time to try and figure it out I couldn't do much with it without Shimano suing me.
As far as brakes go, our previous tandem had V-brakes. Hated them always screaching and grabby. Now we have caliper brakes and find them to be fine, no desire to have a disc.
#32
Senior Member
Hacking the Heck Out of My Di2 9070 ? Dino Sarti
AFAIK nobody has reverse engineered the Di2 chip.
I think it is possible but would take a lot of time and I have better things to do with my time.
#33
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 110
Bikes: Santana Team AL Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here is a photo of our almost complete build. We are going down to Calfee tomorrow to take it on its first ride.
#34
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 420
Bikes: 2022 Calfee Tetra, 2023 Giant TCR
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Brad: You’ll love your new ride. We have a 2014 Tetra with similar specs to yours. Why did you go with TRP Cross Fork? At some point, we will convert from Reynolds Ouzo Pro to a thru axle fork.
Bryan: Nice to meet you at NWTR Bellingham. Hope you have a speedy recovery. Would like to see you latest build when you’re done.
Oldacura: I think you get the biggest payoff with Di2 on a tandem. The shifting is so fast and precise that it’s much easier to coordinate pedaling with my stoker. There’s also no rubbing (due to automatic alignment of front cage) or grinding from mis-shifts. I use SRAM Red mechanical on my road bike, and don’t feel the need to switch to electronic shifting-it would only be a luxury.
We use Ultegra 11sp Di2 with 50-34 chainrings and 32x11 cassette. At the low end, our 30x32 ratio is the same as a triple with 30x 28. For loaded touring, it’s possible to go with a 34T or 40T cassette. We don’t worry about the high-end because it’s a pleasant problem to spin out at 121 gear inches.
Paul
Bryan: Nice to meet you at NWTR Bellingham. Hope you have a speedy recovery. Would like to see you latest build when you’re done.
Oldacura: I think you get the biggest payoff with Di2 on a tandem. The shifting is so fast and precise that it’s much easier to coordinate pedaling with my stoker. There’s also no rubbing (due to automatic alignment of front cage) or grinding from mis-shifts. I use SRAM Red mechanical on my road bike, and don’t feel the need to switch to electronic shifting-it would only be a luxury.
We use Ultegra 11sp Di2 with 50-34 chainrings and 32x11 cassette. At the low end, our 30x32 ratio is the same as a triple with 30x 28. For loaded touring, it’s possible to go with a 34T or 40T cassette. We don’t worry about the high-end because it’s a pleasant problem to spin out at 121 gear inches.
Paul
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 156
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
7 Posts
[QUOTE=mtseymour;17962597
We use Ultegra 11sp Di2 with 50-34 chainrings and 32x11 cassette. At the low end, our 30x32 ratio is the same as a triple with 30x 28. For loaded touring, it’s possible to go with a 34T or 40T cassette. We don’t worry about the high-end because it’s a pleasant problem to spin out at 121 gear inches.
Paul[/QUOTE]
Does this work okay?
Our 2012 Tetra is off to Calfee for the Di2 retrofit. Our local mechanic will rebuild it after Calfee makes the need changes to the frame. We want to run 50/34 chainrings with a 11/32 cassette with the ability to go to a 36 or 40 cassette. Shimano told my mechanic that we need to use XTR front and rear to do the. I prefer Ultegra.
We use Ultegra 11sp Di2 with 50-34 chainrings and 32x11 cassette. At the low end, our 30x32 ratio is the same as a triple with 30x 28. For loaded touring, it’s possible to go with a 34T or 40T cassette. We don’t worry about the high-end because it’s a pleasant problem to spin out at 121 gear inches.
Paul[/QUOTE]
Does this work okay?
Our 2012 Tetra is off to Calfee for the Di2 retrofit. Our local mechanic will rebuild it after Calfee makes the need changes to the frame. We want to run 50/34 chainrings with a 11/32 cassette with the ability to go to a 36 or 40 cassette. Shimano told my mechanic that we need to use XTR front and rear to do the. I prefer Ultegra.
#36
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 420
Bikes: 2022 Calfee Tetra, 2023 Giant TCR
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Does this work okay?
Our 2012 Tetra is off to Calfee for the Di2 retrofit. Our local mechanic will rebuild it after Calfee makes the need changes to the frame. We want to run 50/34 chainrings with a 11/32 cassette with the ability to go to a 36 or 40 cassette. Shimano told my mechanic that we need to use XTR front and rear to do the. I prefer Ultegra.
Our 2012 Tetra is off to Calfee for the Di2 retrofit. Our local mechanic will rebuild it after Calfee makes the need changes to the frame. We want to run 50/34 chainrings with a 11/32 cassette with the ability to go to a 36 or 40 cassette. Shimano told my mechanic that we need to use XTR front and rear to do the. I prefer Ultegra.
If you prefer Ultegra, one option is the K-Edge long cage mod to allow the 11sp rear derailleur to handle 36T cassette. Alexpress had gone this route. According to Lennard Zinn, it's possible to mix the XTR Di2 with a road shifter (presumably Ultegra). Here's the link to the article:
Technical FAQ: Di2 XTR opens up gear options for road bikes - VeloNews.com
You may want to check with Shimano before you spring for a XTR R derailleur. We decided on the 50/34 and 11/32 combo by climbing a nearby 12% hill on our Co-Motion (with triple crank). We figured that our Calfee with Di2 and double rings should climb virtually any hill in the Pacific Northwest, and like the 50/34 & 11/32 combo. The 36 or 40T might be necessary if you do loaded touring or climb Alpine passes.
Paul
#37
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
We went with the K Edge option which gives you capacity for a 36, or 40. So far it works great, but we haven't put a large cassette on yet.
I'm not so sure about using the XTR FD with an Ultegra rear. I believe there are some people on the forum that have had trouble with that setup, even though Zinn's early report was that it would work.
Also the XTR FD is designed to run with MTB rings, where 44 teeth would be a large MTB ring.
I'm not so sure about using the XTR FD with an Ultegra rear. I believe there are some people on the forum that have had trouble with that setup, even though Zinn's early report was that it would work.
Also the XTR FD is designed to run with MTB rings, where 44 teeth would be a large MTB ring.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 620
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Does this work okay?
Our 2012 Tetra is off to Calfee for the Di2 retrofit. Our local mechanic will rebuild it after Calfee makes the need changes to the frame. We want to run 50/34 chainrings with a 11/32 cassette with the ability to go to a 36 or 40 cassette. Shimano told my mechanic that we need to use XTR front and rear to do the. I prefer Ultegra.
Our 2012 Tetra is off to Calfee for the Di2 retrofit. Our local mechanic will rebuild it after Calfee makes the need changes to the frame. We want to run 50/34 chainrings with a 11/32 cassette with the ability to go to a 36 or 40 cassette. Shimano told my mechanic that we need to use XTR front and rear to do the. I prefer Ultegra.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 620
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
It is a new long cage with a repositioned upper jockey wheel that replaces the cage on an Ultegra or Dura-Ace DI2 rear derailleur. If your frame is at Calfee you can get it direct from them or you can send your derailleur to Ace co (K-edge)in Boise Idaho. Get the latest version of the Ultegra Di2 GS cage version to modify as it is proven to work with 11-40 cassettes but the SS version might not work. The derailleurs are on sale for under 200 all over the place.
#41
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 22
Bikes: Landshark 2016, Comotion CoPilot 2000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For those using the 11 speed Ultregra Di2 with K-edge modification, a few questions:
1. Which crankset are you using? I ask because it seems there aren't many double tandem cranksets available. Especially if you want 110 bcd for the drive side, and 130 bcd for the timing side for a gates belt.
2. Also, which 11-36 cassette have you found to offer the smoothest shifting?
1. Which crankset are you using? I ask because it seems there aren't many double tandem cranksets available. Especially if you want 110 bcd for the drive side, and 130 bcd for the timing side for a gates belt.
2. Also, which 11-36 cassette have you found to offer the smoothest shifting?
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 620
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
For those using the 11 speed Ultregra Di2 with K-edge modification, a few questions:
1. Which crankset are you using? I ask because it seems there aren't many double tandem cranksets available. Especially if you want 110 bcd for the drive side, and 130 bcd for the timing side for a gates belt.
2. Also, which 11-36 cassette have you found to offer the smoothest shifting?
1. Which crankset are you using? I ask because it seems there aren't many double tandem cranksets available. Especially if you want 110 bcd for the drive side, and 130 bcd for the timing side for a gates belt.
2. Also, which 11-36 cassette have you found to offer the smoothest shifting?
#43
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
Another option is to use a regular road triple, and run the timing belt on the driveside replacing the outer chainring on the triple.
Paketa is big on this one side setup.
Mike at Calfee said they can do it, but aren't high on it. While it saves weight, it's a bit of a cobbled together approach.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#44
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 420
Bikes: 2022 Calfee Tetra, 2023 Giant TCR
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
We also use the Lightning cranks and really like them. The low Q factor is another plus. One minor glitch is that the over-sized external bearings are not compatible with the Calfee eccentric. The cups partially cover the two Allen bolts for adjusting the eccentric. Rather than removing the right side cup to adjust the eccentric, we switched to the Bushnell. We didn't have this problem with the Hollowtech bottom bracket.
The da Vinci may be another option for double crankset because it offer interchangeable spiders in 110 BCD.
The da Vinci may be another option for double crankset because it offer interchangeable spiders in 110 BCD.
#45
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
My understanding is that the Bushnell eccentric is an upgrade over the Calfee anyway.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#46
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Anchorage, Ak
Posts: 620
Bikes: 2015 Calfee Tetra tandem,2016 Calfee Tetra Adventure Tandem, Ventana ECDM 26 mtn tandem, Ventana ECDM 29r full suspension Mtn tandem ,Ventana Fat tire tandem, Calfee Dragon Fly, Santa Cruz Carbon 5010, 907 Whiteout fat tire
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
+1
#47
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 22
Bikes: Landshark 2016, Comotion CoPilot 2000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We also use the Lightning cranks and really like them. The low Q factor is another plus. One minor glitch is that the over-sized external bearings are not compatible with the Calfee eccentric. The cups partially cover the two Allen bolts for adjusting the eccentric. Rather than removing the right side cup to adjust the eccentric, we switched to the Bushnell. We didn't have this problem with the Hollowtech bottom bracket.
The da Vinci may be another option for double crankset because it offer interchangeable spiders in 110 BCD.
The da Vinci may be another option for double crankset because it offer interchangeable spiders in 110 BCD.
#48
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 420
Bikes: 2022 Calfee Tetra, 2023 Giant TCR
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Di2 does not require any modification to the eccentric. Since our Calfee frame was configured for Di2, the BB shells are slotted. This makes it possible to fish the Di2 cable through the frame. Once the Di2 is properly connected, the wire can be tucked into the slot and out of the way. I believe that Calfee puts a dab of silicon on the slot to prevent the wire from dropping into the eccentric or the stoker BB.
#49
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 110
Bikes: Santana Team AL Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think it was the only thru axle fork option that would work with the calfee geometry. Some have also used the whisky fork, but that was out of stock and unavailable when we were having our tandem built up.