Search
Notices
"The 33"-Road Bike Racing We set this forum up for our members to discuss their experiences in either pro or amateur racing, whether they are the big races, or even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

Racer Tech Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-15 | 10:27 AM
  #1751  
ips0803's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Check the box or ship it to your destination
ips0803 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 11:10 AM
  #1752  
shovelhd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 15,669
Likes: 0
From: Western MA

Bikes: Yes

One shot or recurring? Wheel box for one shot stuff. Hardshell bike travel case or wheel case for recurring use.
shovelhd is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 07:05 PM
  #1753  
Ninny
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 1
From: The Gunks
Originally Posted by globecanvas
Let the handwringing commence. Traveling next week for a 3-crit weekend and I can only bring one set of wheels. It's too far out for the forecast to be reliable of course, but the extended forecast is currently for rain all weekend.

If not raining I'd absolutely bring 60mm carbon tubulars. If the forecast holds, I'm not sure what to bring. My training wheels are your standard velocity A23 24/28 on decent hubs, neither light nor aero (not heavy wheels, but not light). I've never actually ridden the carbon tubulars in the rain but I assume braking would be horrible to nonexistent.

I've pretty much decided to bring one only set of wheels, the 60mm carbon tubulars. I don't want to deal with schlepping the bike plus a wheel box. If it rains a lot, I'll avoid braking situations . I flat before the last race of the weekend, I'll bum a wheel off of somebody. The wheels are maybe not totally ideal for Sunday's race but that's going to be a death march anyway.
globecanvas is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 09:09 PM
  #1754  
Hermes's Avatar
Version 7.0
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,844
Likes: 3,859
From: SoCa

Bikes: Road, Track, TT and Gravel

Originally Posted by shovelhd
One shot or recurring? Wheel box for one shot stuff. Hardshell bike travel case or wheel case for recurring use.
I get multiple uses out of wheel boxes plus the local shops always have boxes available. In fact, I am sitting in a hotel room in SoCal and when I left NorCal, I took an empty wheel box and put a double wheel bag in it so the box had very little supporting infrastructure. I checked it is part of my luggage with Southwest. The box arrived in perfect condition and I am putting a front and rear disc in in the wheelbag and then put the bag in the box and check it in as luggage on my return trip. That is the way the wheel manufacturer shipped the wheels to me. One time, Southwest did not my wheels on the plane and they were delivered to my house the next day. However, a hard case is a great solution.
Hermes is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 09:50 PM
  #1755  
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,546
Likes: 5
From: Boulder, CO
Thanks for the info. One round trip. Wheel box on southwest sounds manageable.
valygrl is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 10:45 PM
  #1756  
Doge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Originally Posted by Ygduf
says the guy who puts his kid in an altitude tent.
I don't know a competitor of my son that is not doing some Hypoxia training.
Things change. Just like I don't know anyone (personally) that does not use weights. You raced a kid (actual 16 year old) teammate at San Dimas. You should know.
Doge is offline  
Reply
Old 06-08-15 | 11:05 PM
  #1757  
Doge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Originally Posted by globecanvas
I have to step in to defend shovelhd, who is not the kind of guy who "makes up rules to enforce."

You know the rules. 1G6b: official's responsibility to ensure that "numbers are in good condition and properly placed." 1J7b: "Numbers may not be folded, trimmed, or otherwise defaced."

The rules do not address crinkling numbers or pins, but requires them to be properly placed and not defaced. If an official chooses to interpret an unpinned number as improperly placed, or interpret a crinkled number as defaced, that is the official's prerogative. As shovelhd has said in the past, the reason every possible permutation of behavior is not explicitly allowed or forbidden is specifically to give officials the ability to exercise judgement. A number that is attached as a crinkled wad is defaced and unreadable, so it would be absurd for the racer to protest that crinkling is not specifically disallowed. A number that is attached with one paper clip would not be properly placed, so it would be absurd for the racer to protest that paper clips are not specifically disallowed.

Gray-area behavior, like a number that is somewhat crinkled but mostly readable, will be interpreted different ways by different officials. So it goes. Most racers choose to avoid gray-area behavior for that reason.
I do know the rules. But speaking of the posts on this forum @shovelhd said if my kid showed up without pins and a crinkled number - he would not race (paraphrased). That is a made up rule. He also quoted contact about pushing and used a track rule, not a road rule. So, the facts are, what he posted and what are rules of road racing are different. He seems like a real nice guy and a fan of cycling, but while I am not a cycling official I read these rules - USAC, UCI over and over because I have to...and I have a passion for officiating. His posts were not according to the rules - and he knows that, and if you read the posts and the rules - you would know that too.

Part II.
Unreadable numbers are the responsibility of the promoter and it is the promoter that is to be fined (cash money). So if junior, crinkles a number that is poorly printed and that number is unreadable - fine the promoter.
Doge is offline  
Reply
Old 06-09-15 | 06:52 AM
  #1758  
shovelhd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 15,669
Likes: 0
From: Western MA

Bikes: Yes

If you are a fan of officiating, as you say, then you'd understand the position of the officials. But you don't. You continue to quote rules verbatim without acknowledging how they are interpreted. That's your perogative. It puts perspective on your complaints about officials.

At last week's state championships, a rider was DQ'd for folding his number. Not crinkling, folding. He was warned not to fold the week before by one of the officials who had worked both races, but he stubbornly refused and showed up next week with a folded number, so it was dealt with.
shovelhd is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 08:03 AM
  #1759  
Harlan's Avatar
Tyrannosaurus Rexitis
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, MA

Bikes: Scott Addict 6870

I went to my Lbs to check out some aero shaped drops and absolutely hated how they felt on my hands. The 7% of time I would be on the tops wouldn't be worth it to me, plus since I don't want a carbon bar there would be a big weight penalty. No sale.

Also got 2 for 1 stages on closeout today.
Harlan is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 08:56 AM
  #1760  
grolby's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,878
Likes: 160
From: BOSTON BABY
Originally Posted by Doge
...while I am not a cycling official I read these rules - USAC, UCI over and over because I have to...and I have a passion for officiating.
I read this as "I have a passion for rules-lawyering with officials." Not exactly a well-regarded practice.
grolby is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 09:49 AM
  #1761  
Doge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Originally Posted by grolby
I read this as "I have a passion for rules-lawyering with officials." Not exactly a well-regarded practice.
We'll its not. At race venues I don't talk to the officials that are working a race I have interest in. I let them do their job - right or wrong. That rules and application vary, finding where they vary affects the little changes. Some incorrect officiating has ruined kids trips. Last year at nationals a juniors TT bike in the shoot (already checked) is seen by an official that says the seat has to be level and changes the kids seat 5 min before start. Kid's race is ruined. Out current team (before we were on it) had the officials reject the nose cones on the SHIVs and have them cut off. So they were - and used. Next year disallowed because they were modified. Lots of other small examples in a sport where making it to the next opportunity is determined by small amounts of time.
Doge is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 11:00 AM
  #1762  
grolby's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 9,878
Likes: 160
From: BOSTON BABY
Originally Posted by Doge
We'll its not. At race venues I don't talk to the officials that are working a race I have interest in. I let them do their job - right or wrong. That rules and application vary, finding where they vary affects the little changes. Some incorrect officiating has ruined kids trips. Last year at nationals a juniors TT bike in the shoot (already checked) is seen by an official that says the seat has to be level and changes the kids seat 5 min before start. Kid's race is ruined. Out current team (before we were on it) had the officials reject the nose cones on the SHIVs and have them cut off. So they were - and used. Next year disallowed because they were modified. Lots of other small examples in a sport where making it to the next opportunity is determined by small amounts of time.
Oh FFS. Imperfect officiating is part of any sport, and even if the officiating IS perfect (which is not possible), hyper-anxious parents like you are always going to complain. Any kid who is The Real Deal isn't going to miss their One Big Chance because some random official made them change their saddle.
grolby is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 12:53 PM
  #1763  
shovelhd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 15,669
Likes: 0
From: Western MA

Bikes: Yes

If officiating was perfect, then there would be no opportunity for optimization.

One of the most important things I can teach my children is how to deal with adversity. This is how growth happens.
shovelhd is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 01:49 PM
  #1764  
Doge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Originally Posted by shovelhd
...
At last week's state championships, a rider was DQ'd for folding his number. Not crinkling, folding. He was warned not to fold the week before by one of the officials who had worked both races, but he stubbornly refused and showed up next week with a folded number, so it was dealt with.
As it should have been. That is spelled out. The officials were nice to warn him.

If the rules do not mention pins and some UCI races, like Paris Roubaix juniors, have numbers that are issued with adhesive backs and no pins are needed - how would you rule if a rider showed up without pinned numbers?

Would you not allow them to race?
If not on what grounds?

Last edited by Doge; 06-10-15 at 01:55 PM.
Doge is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 03:27 PM
  #1765  
shovelhd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 15,669
Likes: 0
From: Western MA

Bikes: Yes

I would do whatever the Chief Referee wanted me to do. I am not a UCI official. Not even close.

Once again you totally miss the point for the sake of argument.
shovelhd is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 03:40 PM
  #1766  
Doge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Originally Posted by shovelhd
I would do whatever the Chief Referee wanted me to do. I am not a UCI official. Not even close.

Once again you totally miss the point for the sake of argument.
I was posting once how we put numbers on using a legal method done in many races and never penalized. Your response was if my son did that and your were the official you would not allow him to race. What was your point and what point am I missing?
Doge is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 04:03 PM
  #1767  
mattm's Avatar
**** that
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,402
Likes: 106
From: CALI
Holy **** it's like we need a whole forum about race numbers.

Hasn't this dead and beaten horse been re-beaten enough?
__________________
cat 1.

my race videos
mattm is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 04:07 PM
  #1768  
Ninny
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,295
Likes: 1
From: The Gunks
On February 26 2015, in a different thread, shovelhd did knowingly type the following statement:

Originally Posted by shovelhd
Puppy Doge shows up at the line without pins at the corners and I pull him. Period. End of story.
On February 27 2015, in that same thread, Grumpy McTrumpy did with knowledge aforethought clarify as follows:

Originally Posted by Grumpy McTrumpy
I remember when our local rep relayed the info that USAC was going to require pins on four corners (a few years ago).

That thread then went pear-shaped, or more accurately it started pear-shaped and ended up extra pear-shaped.


In this thread, on June 10 2015, shovelhd did typograph thusly:

Originally Posted by shovelhd
Once again you totally miss the point for the sake of argument.
Whereupon Doge, who is truly a Forum Thread Perseverance Machine, did request politely:

Originally Posted by Doge
What was your point and what point am I missing?
Referring to the four-month-old post of February 26.


To continue to follow along as events develop, please consult your Internet Squabble Guide and Companion, which can be found under your seat.
globecanvas is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 04:35 PM
  #1769  
Killing Rabbits
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,696
Likes: 217
Originally Posted by shovelhd
At last week's state championships, a rider was DQ'd for folding his number. Not crinkling, folding.
Do you guys give our many fines? I only ask because at the last stage race things that normally would have only earned a warning or DQ are now also getting you a fine.

$35 + relegation or DQ for yellow line, $25 for missed sign-in, $100 for unseemingly behavior.
Enthalpic is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 04:40 PM
  #1770  
shovelhd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 15,669
Likes: 0
From: Western MA

Bikes: Yes

I said that tongue in cheek. If the CR had warned riders to use pins and some did not, then I would have to let him/her know about it. But if I wasn't the CR I would have no authority to take action like that. Only the CR can. And if I was the CR and arbitrarily pulled riders for something that they could not reasonably be expected to know about would not be good conduct as an official. What this thread did was bring out how people think. How some people interpret what they want the way they want and then criticize others in authority that do the same thing. I'm done with this thread. Point made.
shovelhd is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 05:54 PM
  #1771  
TheKillerPenguin's Avatar
Nonsense
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,918
Likes: 542
From: Vagabond

Bikes: Affirmative

Originally Posted by shovelhd
If you are a fan of officiating, as you say, then you'd understand the position of the officials. But you don't. You continue to quote rules verbatim without acknowledging how they are interpreted. That's your perogative. It puts perspective on your complaints about officials.

At last week's state championships, a rider was DQ'd for folding his number. Not crinkling, folding. He was warned not to fold the week before by one of the officials who had worked both races, but he stubbornly refused and showed up next week with a folded number, so it was dealt with.
Lol, in the pre race email it was repeated like 3x to not fold the numbers. He deserved what he got.
TheKillerPenguin is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 05:58 PM
  #1772  
mike868y's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 9,284
Likes: 1
On the folding numbers bit - is there any usac regulations on number size. As a small guy some race numbers are so damn big they cover just about my entire back.

I used to fold my collegiate numbers but then again collegiate = no rules.
mike868y is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 06:44 PM
  #1773  
Doge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

A separate rules thread may be appropriate. As a tech thread, I see rules as technical (as they are in the technical guide).
Doge is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 06:49 PM
  #1774  
Doge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Originally Posted by mike868y
On the folding numbers bit - is there any usac regulations on number size. As a small guy some race numbers are so damn big they cover just about my entire back.

I used to fold my collegiate numbers but then again collegiate = no rules.
Yes there is a min, no max. My 60# rider had a real issue with double numbers.
Doge is offline  
Reply
Old 06-10-15 | 08:06 PM
  #1775  
shovelhd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 15,669
Likes: 0
From: Western MA

Bikes: Yes

Originally Posted by Enthalpic
Do you guys give our many fines? I only ask because at the last stage race things that normally would have only earned a warning or DQ are now also getting you a fine.

$35 + relegation or DQ for yellow line, $25 for missed sign-in, $100 for unseemingly behavior.
Yes. The rider we were discussing was fined as well.
shovelhd is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.