View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar2-l.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar2.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar2-r.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/clear.gif)
178
10.66%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar3-l.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar3.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar3-r.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/clear.gif)
94
5.63%
I've always worn a helmet
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar4-l.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar4.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar4-r.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/clear.gif)
648
38.80%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar5-l.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar5.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar5-r.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/clear.gif)
408
24.43%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar6-l.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar6.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/polls/bar6-r.gif)
![](https://www.bikeforums.net/clear.gif)
342
20.48%
Voters: 1670. You may not vote on this poll
The helmet thread
#4201
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Liked 1,057 Times
in
636 Posts
Gee--------do I see a glimmer of common sense here among the anti helmet cult. They now tacitly seem to admit that new riders are more often killed or hurt if they dont wear helmets.
For a long time I have suggested that a new rider may come to this web site to learn more about cycling. And what does he or she find? The anti helmet cult blatering away against helmets. The new rider may believe them, and that could result in them getting hurt or killed, because they are the most in need of a helmet. This is a total disservice to the new members of the cycling community.
For a long time I have suggested that a new rider may come to this web site to learn more about cycling. And what does he or she find? The anti helmet cult blatering away against helmets. The new rider may believe them, and that could result in them getting hurt or killed, because they are the most in need of a helmet. This is a total disservice to the new members of the cycling community.
![rydabent is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4202
For a long time I have suggested that a new rider may come to this web site to learn more about cycling. And what does he or she find? The anti helmet cult blatering away against helmets. The new rider may believe them, and that could result in them getting hurt or killed, because they are the most in need of a helmet. This is a total disservice to the new members of the cycling community.
Also, as has been stated before, societal emphasis on cycling helmets as protection has negative safety effects, such as reducing the number of cyclists and taking attention away from education and infrastructure, the only things proven to reduce cycling risk.
So the peer-pressure you are creating on cyclists to wear helmets, especially new cyclists, has a net negative effect.
You want to kill cycling and cyclists? Just keep shoving helmets down everybody's throat.
![skye is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4203
Actually, the opposite is true. Wearing helmets, as has been stated so many, many times before, encourages greater risk-taking (the phenomenon called "risk compensation"). Encouraging risky riding is the exact opposite of what you want to do with a new rider. Instead, new cyclists should be encouraged to ride conservatively while they build their skills.
Also, as has been stated before, societal emphasis on cycling helmets as protection has negative safety effects, such as reducing the number of cyclists and taking attention away from education and infrastructure, the only things proven to reduce cycling risk.
So the peer-pressure you are creating on cyclists to wear helmets, especially new cyclists, has a net negative effect.
You want to kill cycling and cyclists? Just keep shoving helmets down everybody's throat.
Also, as has been stated before, societal emphasis on cycling helmets as protection has negative safety effects, such as reducing the number of cyclists and taking attention away from education and infrastructure, the only things proven to reduce cycling risk.
So the peer-pressure you are creating on cyclists to wear helmets, especially new cyclists, has a net negative effect.
You want to kill cycling and cyclists? Just keep shoving helmets down everybody's throat.
A study you cited, a helmet skeptic study posted on a helmet skeptic site, dismissed risk compensation as a measurable factor where cycling and helmets are concerned.
Also, there's no data available regarding effect on ridership rates for places and cultures where helmets are heavily encouraged but not mandatory. I'd also love to hear how encouraging helmet use takes attention away from education and infrastructure. Not to mention, there's plenty of other factors proven to reduce cycling risk beyond education and infrastructure, experience riding a bike being chief among them.
Sad, that you answer unfounded assertions with unfounded or blatantly incorrect assertions of your own. But typical...
![mconlonx is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4205
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 255
Bikes: Surly LHT (weekend ride & touring), GT Outpost (commuting), Brompton M6R (Weekend tours that involve flying), Co-Motion Periscope Torpedo (family weekend ride & touring)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm amazed at how much advocacy is around helmets but not lights. Now that it gets dark quite early I see a lot of cyclists with no lights or just a rear light. Funniest part is when they wear a helmet, as if that will protect them when they get hit.
I'd much rather focus on accident avoidance than to minify accident effects. There are a few other things that are more important than wearing a helmet to make bicycling safer but they involve education, behavior change and possibly some law enforcement. No buying stuff though.
I'd much rather focus on accident avoidance than to minify accident effects. There are a few other things that are more important than wearing a helmet to make bicycling safer but they involve education, behavior change and possibly some law enforcement. No buying stuff though.
![Frown](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/frown.gif)
![cbike is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4206
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Warwick, UK
Posts: 1,049
Bikes: 2000-something 3 speed commuter, 1990-something Raleigh Scorpion
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I'm amazed at how much advocacy is around helmets but not lights. Now that it gets dark quite early I see a lot of cyclists with no lights or just a rear light. Funniest part is when they wear a helmet, as if that will protect them when they get hit.
I'd much rather focus on accident avoidance than to minify accident effects. There are a few other things that are more important than wearing a helmet to make bicycling safer but they involve education, behavior change and possibly some law enforcement. No buying stuff though.![Frown](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/frown.gif)
I'd much rather focus on accident avoidance than to minify accident effects. There are a few other things that are more important than wearing a helmet to make bicycling safer but they involve education, behavior change and possibly some law enforcement. No buying stuff though.
![Frown](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/frown.gif)
However, people seem to get the idea that wearing a helmet is the first and last word in safe cycling, and so set forth into the night, with no lights, no reflectors, hugging the curb and more often than not (in the US) on the wrong side of the road, as if their magic hat will save them. After all, they've been told that it's vital and that riding without one is akin to jumping off a cliff.
Unfortunately, those who know how to ride properly are also more likely to wear a helmet, giving rise to statistics of bare-headed riders being injured more often. Helmeteers will then of course jump all over it and say how this 'proves' helmets save lives, disregarding the possibility of some other factor being the cause. How often do you read news stories along the lines of 'local cyclist run over by bus, was not wearing a helmet'. The assumption is that not wearing a helmet contributed to the accident.
![Monster Pete is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4207
Exactly. Prevention is always better than cure (of dubious effectiveness). If all the effort that was spent in promoting helmets was instead directed towards real safety measures, such as use of lights, riding correctly, and generally educating both motorists and cyclists, we might actually see cycling deaths fall.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![mconlonx is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4208
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 45,708
Bikes: everywhere
Liked 8,273 Times
in
4,405 Posts
I'm already anti-some-peoples'-lights-on-the-MUP.
Staying off the MUPs seems to help, though
Staying off the MUPs seems to help, though
![Wink](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![LesterOfPuppets is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4209
MUP World Champ
So... Light manufacturers start preying on consumers by using Fear Culture to sell their lights. Soon, a vocal minority anti-light contingent springs up, pointing out that while lights may help during some specific incidences, like while it's dark, the majority of riding is done when lights provide no benefit. Also, selling lights using fear will frighten more people away from cycling as a dangerous activity thus decreasing safety of any left engaging in the dangerous activity of cycling.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
![adamhenry is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4210
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Liked 1,057 Times
in
636 Posts
skye
Sorry but you make no sense at all. A new cyclist that is wearing a helmet because he wants to be safe is NOT going to take risks because he is wearing a helmet.
The argument that cyclist will take more risks because they are wearing a helmet is a total fail!!!!!
Sorry but you make no sense at all. A new cyclist that is wearing a helmet because he wants to be safe is NOT going to take risks because he is wearing a helmet.
The argument that cyclist will take more risks because they are wearing a helmet is a total fail!!!!!
![rydabent is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4211
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 45,708
Bikes: everywhere
Liked 8,273 Times
in
4,405 Posts
Headlamp while on ladder is a definite plus when it's dark out. Also wear when rooting around in the attic. It's always dark up there. Some of those attic ladders are pretty hairy, too, so a helmet, harness, ropes and a belayer couldn't hurt.
![LesterOfPuppets is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4212
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: south Georgia
Posts: 375
Bikes: 1972 Schwinn super sport, heavy no name each cruiser
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
wait, now there's something against lights? are some people forgetting how hard it is to see a bike in the dark, especially when someone has illogically removed all their reflectors?
![lostforawhile is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4215
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: south Georgia
Posts: 375
Bikes: 1972 Schwinn super sport, heavy no name each cruiser
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I dont hate cycling, I hate being run over, it will ruin your day, some things that people do dont make sense, it can be really hard to see that dark unlighted bike riding towards you on the WRONG side of the road, as often happens here, uncool or not I want my reflectors and lights working so cars can see me at night
![lostforawhile is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4216
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, it looks as if my opinion is sorely needed here.
Do you all realize that lights are positively DANGEROUS to use on a bike, especially at night? Bike lights DRAW motorists like magnets. When a car sees a little bike light, they can't help but run into it. They're drawn inexorably towards it.
"Ninja style" invisibility is the safest way to ride at night.
This is discussed exhaustively in "The Art of Cycling" by Robert Hurst.
Do you all realize that lights are positively DANGEROUS to use on a bike, especially at night? Bike lights DRAW motorists like magnets. When a car sees a little bike light, they can't help but run into it. They're drawn inexorably towards it.
"Ninja style" invisibility is the safest way to ride at night.
This is discussed exhaustively in "The Art of Cycling" by Robert Hurst.
Last edited by commodorefork; 11-16-12 at 11:51 PM.
![commodorefork is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4217
I dont hate cycling, I hate being run over, it will ruin your day, some things that people do dont make sense, it can be really hard to see that dark unlighted bike riding towards you on the WRONG side of the road, as often happens here, uncool or not I want my reflectors and lights working so cars can see me at night
![mconlonx is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4218
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wearing helmet - good
Enforcing helmets - bad
Enforcing helmets - bad
![Skinner is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4220
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: south Georgia
Posts: 375
Bikes: 1972 Schwinn super sport, heavy no name each cruiser
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
![lostforawhile is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4221
Totally having fun with the anti-light thing; more making light (ha!) of the bare-head brigade and their arguments against helmet use in this thread than getting down on lights at all -- At night I usually run two out back, one or two up front. Whenever I run two, the least powerful one is set to blink, brightest one on steady.
Lights are indeed better safety equipment at night than any helmet.
![mconlonx is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4222
Banned.
No, it almost certainly is not. Risk compensation is a well-observed phenomenon in a number of contexts, and there seems no reason to suppose that cyclists are immune. The safer people feel, the more they tend to indulge in risk-taking behaviour. So if you feel safer wearing a helmet, it is perfectly plausible that you may ride less cautiously as a result.
![chasm54 is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4223
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: south Georgia
Posts: 375
Bikes: 1972 Schwinn super sport, heavy no name each cruiser
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That's not a given in this thread...
Totally having fun with the anti-light thing; more making light (ha!) of the bare-head brigade and their arguments against helmet use in this thread than getting down on lights at all -- At night I usually run two out back, one or two up front. Whenever I run two, the least powerful one is set to blink, brightest one on steady.
Lights are indeed better safety equipment at night than any helmet.
Totally having fun with the anti-light thing; more making light (ha!) of the bare-head brigade and their arguments against helmet use in this thread than getting down on lights at all -- At night I usually run two out back, one or two up front. Whenever I run two, the least powerful one is set to blink, brightest one on steady.
Lights are indeed better safety equipment at night than any helmet.
![lostforawhile is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4224
Banned.
You're probably wrong. The Snell Foundation, which tests helmets, says that because bicycle helmets have to be so light, it is impossible to make one that offers real protection against being hit by a vehicle. And the helmet manufacturers themselves do not claim that their products will protect you in this sort of accident. The forces involved simply overwhelm the helmet by such a margin that whether you're wearing one or not is pretty much irrelevant.
![chasm54 is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
#4225
Senior Member
You're probably wrong. The Snell Foundation, which tests helmets, says that because bicycle helmets have to be so light, it is impossible to make one that offers real protection against being hit by a vehicle. And the helmet manufacturers themselves do not claim that their products will protect you in this sort of accident. The forces involved simply overwhelm the helmet by such a margin that whether you're wearing one or not is pretty much irrelevant.
![350htrr is offline](https://www.bikeforums.net/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)